Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 14.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 109 25.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 79 18.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 178 40.8%

  • Total voters
    436
I dislike that they're getting lost in the weeds. Nick is capable of nailing down a specific argument with this Duncan on any particular topic but they're meandering all other the place. Nick Rekieta I will no longer fuck your wife for you, this displeases me! 45 minutes in, and it went from Hot to Cold, Carrot to Stick.
 
Nick, don't make friends with this piece of shit:

1661921265310.png
(I know you've seen it; just don't forget it.)
 
I dislike that they're getting lost in the weeds. Nick is capable of nailing down a specific argument with this Duncan on any particular topic but they're meandering all other the place. Nick Rekieta I will no longer fuck your wife for you, this displeases me!
Yeah like literally nail him on Keffals sending collars to minors.
 
I dislike that they're getting lost in the weeds. Nick is capable of nailing down a specific argument with this Duncan on any particular topic but they're meandering all other the place. Nick Rekieta I will no longer fuck your wife for you, this displeases me! 45 minutes in, and it went from Hot to Cold, Carrot to Stick.
Nick's probably toying with Duncan for the grift. If he blows his load too early there's a risk that Dunc could rage quit.
Duncan has to keep interrupting and 'so your saying' rhetoric because he has no control over his emotions or skills in debate. I'm laughing my ass off.
You can just hear the straw being hastily thrown together into a vaguely human shape whenever someone drops "so you're saying..." into a discussion.
 
Don't puberty blockers have negative effects if they're used into adulthood?

"The relevant information therefore that a child would have to understand, retain and weigh up in order to have the requisite competence in relation to PBs, would be as follows: (i) the immediate consequences of the treatment in physical and psychological terms; (ii) the fact that the vast majority of patients taking PBs go on to CSH and therefore that s/he is on a pathway to much greater medical interventions; (iii) the relationship between taking CSH and subsequent surgery, with the implications of such surgery; (iv) the fact that CSH may well lead to a loss of fertility; (v) the impact of CSH on sexual function; (vi) the impact that taking this step on this treatment pathway may have on future and life-long relationships; (vii) the unknown physical consequences of taking PBs; and (viii) the fact that the evidence base for this treatment is as yet highly uncertain.

In the setting of treating children with gender incongruence, puberty blockers are almost never reversed. The consequences are lifelong. The evidence base for this treatment is as yet highly uncertain. The Tavistock, a major worldwide centre of the treatment of children could not present any good evidence base to the judges."

 
Back