Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

No they don’t. Men do. Clean your damn room.
20A04EF1-111D-49E8-B7B7-DBB821423B17.jpeg

The absolute ENTITLEMENT of it. “To fully be in love with looking at myself in the mirror” you fucking tedious cretin. You self obsessed, self righteous societal leech.
FA8905AB-AE63-4AE7-B6FC-9D85E9FD5846.jpeg
> Beautiful women have stubbles too!
> I must get laser depilation on my face or I can't look into the mirror


Screenshot_20220830-233453_Chrome.jpg
He is a preschool teacher. Some preschool hires a coombrained male to "teach" their kids.

Surely, by this stage in the fad, some of these crowdfunders must be produced by little conmen working from stuffy offices in Pune or Abuja.
And I totally approve. It is simply unethical not to swindle people so dumb.
 
His first account was banned for uttering threats to a TERF, I think. (Was chronicled about 100 pages back)

When he came back with this one, many of the TERFS he pissed off and others noted he was ban evading. Probably reported him.

Hey Amy, Cope Seethe and Dilate, you fat hairy pedo.
More details here
 
Not sure why this guy is even bothering with amhole surgery. He's got a hole right there look.
Archive
Looking through the users comments, I found this.
View attachment 3658954
It looks like he commented but quickly deleted it. Wonder what he said 🤔
View attachment 3658972
Unddit archive
Reddit archive

Would be curious to know if this one had any puberty blockers involved or if they're really just that unfortunate. Isn't a penis that naturally small considered an intersex condition?
 
More details here

Thanks for that, I didn't know Solomon had his own thread. I need to spend more time on this site, haha.

So that makes Solomon, Petrelli and Katie Montgomerie who were all banned within a month. Make that 4 if you count Adrianna Adamson, although he threatened the British Prime Minister, so he probably got himself a visit from MI5.

Is Twitter cracking down on violent trannies?

We know that leftist scumbags run Twitter too, so they aren't banning them for simply rule breaking; they've shown they don't care if violence comes from their own side.

I wonder if something else is going on behind the scenes. Maybe something to do with Europes GDPR or whatever the law is called, or maybe they've pissed off enough American conservatives that they are generally scared of political or citizen retribution.

Or maybe even one of the big financial players like Visa, Paypal or so on is wondering why they have so many pedos on their site.


The truth is out there, Scully.
 
And now TheSphereHunter is getting involved with the woke G4TV revival. Retweeted by a certain lesbo turbo-dyke Karen that killed what used to make G4TV great.
Woah, i almost forgot The Sphere Hunter. It's been a very long time since i heard something about him and the last thing was in the Porncows thread. His story is pretty damn harrowing but fun nonetheless.

Long story short, Sue trooned out along with his "girlfriend" Natalie Mars and both did camming and got into the porn industry (mostly because Mars pressured him into doing it). All was a bit depressing until Sue had to fuck one of the most disgusting porn actors there can exist: ChristianXXX and apparently the experience was so horrifying to him that he quit porn and dumped Natalie so he wouldn't get pressured into going back to porn.

There might be more details about this.
I have no idea how someone can type out the words "A female Joan of Arc would have been too busy knitting, gossiping and shopping for shoes to fight the English" and not think that's genuinely misogynistic, or how belittling it is to say that strength, courage, and independence are not traits that humans who are comfortable in their own sex have.
Dunno what sort of stupid fixation they have with claiming that Joan of Arc is a man. This just makes me extremely MATI, specially because i know quite a bit about the subject. The fact that they go so far to say that "Because she's a woman she wouldn't have been able to fight the brits, and this means she's a man in drag" is really a mark about how much they hate women and also how strongly they enforce gender stereotypes on others.

Plus, how much you wanna bet these people don't know that Joan didn't "fought" the english and she played more of a support role to aid the morale of the troops who were devastated after many defeats? She was not a fighter and more of a moral support for many men that saw the unyielding will of a young girl to save her homeland as something uplifting. Specially one so devouted to god like her.

Or that she might had brain damage or be possibly retarded.
 
Pop Quiz! What gender is this Keffals RTer?

1661932866952.png

If you answered, "This is obviously a woman." No! You are wrong! This is a very masculine man! A masculine man who...only started T recently despite claiming to be a man for over a decade online.

Her ex husband also trooned out and, surprise, they divorced — because two trans people can never be together. They never want to be with each other!

Screen Shot 2022-08-31 at 5.00.26 PM.png

Screen Shot 2022-08-31 at 5.00.08 PM.png
 
Yes, this is a real article about CIS women having to smell their poo to make transwoman feel better. And wait until you read the comment section.

I have no idea how someone can type out the words "A female Joan of Arc would have been too busy knitting, gossiping and shopping for shoes to fight the English" and not think that's genuinely misogynistic, or how belittling it is to say that strength, courage, and independence are not traits that humans who are comfortable in their own sex have.
Jesus Christ, the amount of diagnosable autism spectrum disorder is the worst thing about this thread. The article is bait. The tweet is facetious. Get a grip, it is so fucking easy to find actual lunacy to post.

The article is a brilliant piece of trolling; it is coyly written so as to inform the general public about the horrors of armholes while maintaining plausible deniability.
 
Last edited:
Back