Liz Fong-Jones / Elliot William Fong / @lizthegrey - 'Consent accident' enjoyer, ex-Google employee, nepotistic sex pest, Robert Z'Dar look-alike who wants authority over the Internet

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
@0 1 Your OP is missing some important context that "Liz", unfortunately, has literally changed the world. While at Google, Liz coauthored the "Real Names Considered Harmful" letter, which was part (archive) of a back-and-forth (archive) that has actually shaped policy at Google and etc.

There's a lot to be said for anonymity and pseudononymity - I'm taking advantage of that now. It's necessary for certain classes of crimes to be uncovered and distributed, for certain kinds of debates to happen. It's not wrong to ask people to call you by your preferred name, lots of people go by nicknames, a smaller few change their names for good reason. Elliot Fong changed his name to suit his sexual fetishes and to derive a sense of power over people by making them deny reality for his sake. Every good argument will have criminals that take advantage of it. This is a perfect example of how the righteous and the vile are arguing for the same thing, but the direction that it's pointed matters a lot.
 
Here is the entire tumblr in a PDF and converted to PNG (also .zip) for local archive.
Elly-01.pngElly-02.pngElly-03.pngElly-04.pngElly-05.pngElly-06.pngElly-07.pngElly-08.pngElly-09.pngElly-10.pngElly-11.pngElly-12.pngElly-13.pngElly-14.pngElly-15.pngElly-16.pngElly-17.pngElly-18.pngElly-19.pngElly-20.pngElly-21.pngElly-22.pngElly-23.pngElly-24.pngElly-25.pngElly-26.pngElly-27.pngElly-28.pngElly-29.pngElly-30.pngElly-31.pngElly-32.pngElly-33.pngElly-34.pngElly-35.pngElly-36.pngElly-37.pngElly-38.pngElly-39.pngElly-40.pngElly-41.pngElly-42.pngElly-43.pngElly-44.pngElly-45.pngElly-46.pngElly-47.pngElly-48.pngElly-49.pngElly-50.pngElly-51.pngElly-52.pngElly-53.pngElly-54.pngElly-55.pngElly-56.pngElly-57.pngElly-58.pngElly-59.pngElly-60.pngElly-61.pngElly-62.pngElly-63.pngElly-64.pngElly-65.pngElly-66.pngElly-67.pngElly-68.pngElly-69.pngElly-70.pngElly-71.pngElly-72.pngElly-73.pngElly-74.pngElly-75.pngElly-76.pngElly-77.pngElly-78.pngElly-79.pngElly-80.pngElly-81.pngElly-82.pngElly-83.pngElly-84.pngElly-85.pngElly-86.pngElly-87.pngElly-88.pngElly-89.pngElly-90.pngElly-91.pngElly-92.png
 

Attachments

:story: This is the most retarded thing I've heard him say, and he's supposed to be a tech guy who knows how computers work. It's not like people are downloading the Christchurch video every day.

Looks like the "he's just doing a whataboutism!!" excuse didn't work so they're deploying the "he's just lying and smearing him!!" excuse.
 
As I've stated before, Liz Fong-Jones is a pedophile, or at the very least actively engages in his partner, Ely's, pedophilic fantasies and CSAM collection. They discussed them openly on their Eve Online Teamspeak server ten years ago, and there's no chance that there's anything changed since then given the consistent doubling down on "I should be allowed to contact minors" and "Kiwifarms should not be able to collect evidence directly against me"
I can't understand how they don't understand that their entitlement towards *other people's kids* is really fucking creepy.

A couple months ago when the "Ok, Groomer" thing took off and the Florida bill to prevent teachers from talking about sex / relationship issues with kids 3rd grade and under was the hot button issue I saw a tweet from a troon arguing that troons should basically be given 50/50 access to people's kids (shared with the parents) so they can teach the kids about LGBT dogma to "balance out" any values systems or religious systems taught by the parents.

Like if we're not going to let this stuff being taught in school then a law needs to be passed to require kids to spend a certain amount of time with troon tutors to learn about rainbow mafia shit.

This tweet had like 76,000 retweets, too. Wasn't just bots either, the tweet had all kinds of positive interactions going on in the thread beneath it - thousands of shitlibs saw this tweet and thought to themselves "yes, that seems reasonable."

I wish I could find the tweet because I didn't believe it at the time, still don't. But it happened - clown world is fuckin wild.
 
:story: This is the most retarded thing I've heard him say, and he's supposed to be a tech guy who knows how computers work. It's not like people are downloading the Christchurch video every day.
:smug:

Oh yeah? Well I'll have you know I've downloaded the christchurch video 137 times so far today to own the libs. Thanks CloudFlare!
 
@0 1 Your OP is missing some important context that "Liz", unfortunately, has literally changed the world. While at Google, Liz coauthored the "Real Names Considered Harmful" letter, which was part (archive) of a back-and-forth (archive) that has actually shaped policy at Google and etc.

There's a lot to be said for anonymity and pseudononymity - I'm taking advantage of that now. It's necessary for certain classes of crimes to be uncovered and distributed, for certain kinds of debates to happen. It's not wrong to ask people to call you by your preferred name, lots of people go by nicknames, a smaller few change their names for good reason. Elliot Fong changed his name to suit his sexual fetishes and to derive a sense of power over people by making them deny reality for his sake. Every good argument will have criminals that take advantage of it. This is a perfect example of how the righteous and the vile are arguing for the same thing, but the direction that it's pointed matters a lot.
I'll add that in now, thank you.
 
More seething, more favors from journoscum friends.
1661990422601.png
T/N/A
Cloudflare tries to explain its free-speech stance • The Register-1.pngCloudflare tries to explain its free-speech stance • The Register-2.pngCloudflare tries to explain its free-speech stance • The Register-3.pngCloudflare tries to explain its free-speech stance • The Register-4.pngCloudflare tries to explain its free-speech stance • The Register-5.pngCloudflare tries to explain its free-speech stance • The Register-6.pngCloudflare tries to explain its free-speech stance • The Register-7.png
1661990509463.png
T/N/A
Cloudflare Hints It Won’t Cut Ties to Kiwi Farms Site Linked to Harassment - Bloomberg-1.pngCloudflare Hints It Won’t Cut Ties to Kiwi Farms Site Linked to Harassment - Bloomberg-2.pngCloudflare Hints It Won’t Cut Ties to Kiwi Farms Site Linked to Harassment - Bloomberg-3.pngCloudflare Hints It Won’t Cut Ties to Kiwi Farms Site Linked to Harassment - Bloomberg-4.pngCloudflare Hints It Won’t Cut Ties to Kiwi Farms Site Linked to Harassment - Bloomberg-5.png
1661990615263.png
T/N/A
Cloudflare protests over Kiwi Farms customer - Protocol-1.pngCloudflare protests over Kiwi Farms customer - Protocol-2.pngCloudflare protests over Kiwi Farms customer - Protocol-3.pngCloudflare protests over Kiwi Farms customer - Protocol-4.pngCloudflare protests over Kiwi Farms customer - Protocol-5.pngCloudflare protests over Kiwi Farms customer - Protocol-6.pngCloudflare protests over Kiwi Farms customer - Protocol-7.png
Takeaway, all of the articles are bullshit small blurbs obviously put out as favor, it's embarrassing really.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Back