I want to know for real, not a meme. Why it's okay when they threaten our lives, but someone makes an obvious glowpost and we're suddenly the villians and a threat to human life? I'm mad, I never threatened anyone just laughed at them now I'm an internet terrorist.
Because the left is good at deceptive wording, it's always been their thing, one of the most common ways its seen is by defining the same action differently when it's for or opposing them (the right is very amateur at doing this by comparison).
An typical example would be the "peaceful protest" of setting occupied police stations on fire for BLM, vs the "hateful violence" of standing around portland with some Christian-themed sign.
Kind of a side note, but an example of a carefully crafted pseudonym is anti-racism, a rework of the term reverse-racism, meant to deceptively appear as "against racism" to the casual observer, when it's actually about encouraging more "correct" racism.
If the left cant meme like the right, then the right cant deceive like the left.
And as usual, the main perpetrators of that are journalists, they get to twist the wording, leave things out to change the context, and are treated as the history writers.
Also to technically stay on topic, it was, once again, the journalists that ultimately got Cloudflare to do it, Lucas is just the twitterite they picked up for the moment.
If the .net donain stays down for awhile, and the journalists move on, Lucas will lose steam and get cancelled by the many black activists currently nipping at them for their past racism.
Unless of course they find a new target to keep the donation grift going.