Gamergate III: Rise of the Machines

Status
Not open for further replies.
SJWs hate anything sexual unless they're playing the victim; that's their fetish.

Yea but it would be different if we were talking about bare crotches and asses. They're literally demanding censorship of bare thighs and midriffs. That's like Victorian England levels of prudishness.
 
Is Allison Rapp a lolcow?

At best, lolcalf. Potential for chimp-out is high but not worth anyone's time unless she does.

So long as Patreon gets their cut, they don't give a shit if stupid people get conned out of their money.

Anyone who backs one of those retards probably never should have had financial independence in the first place.

Considering her stance on GG she must be a lolcow and an SJW. Since she's an SJW she must sympathize with pedos or be one herself if you do the math.

Social Justice advocation and hilariously hostile, knee-jerk response to Gamergate don't necessarily demarcate lolcowery.

Rather, like being a fan of Sonic the Hedgehog or My Little Pony, it's considered a warning sign; a possible tipoff to further lolcowery beyond.

Same seems to be true of the reverse, given that we have that Matthew Hopkins fucker proudly showing us that even though one side of that discussion has historically had considerably more lolcows, it doesn't have a monopoly on the crazy by any stretch.

Moving on to actual content, here we have this post, which revealed many of the usual suspects acting like petulant children. In addition to being liked by Katherine Cross, Rami Ismail, and Megaphone herself, we have the likes of Jenn Frank and Rowan Kaiser electing to try to turn it into their own little rage-fest over TB:


And for those who want the image:

NA7C9QE.jpg


Looks like he Brendon Keogh (owner of this account) baleeted the post on Facebook, and since Archiving doesn't work there, take with all due hesitation.
 
The Alison Rapp stuff is spilling into mainstream media now.

http://archive.is/GePkS
Nintendo is facing calls to sack a feminist employee who penned a highly controversial academic essay questioning whether it was morally correct to censor child pornography.

feminist employee

I love needless information in news stories.
 
Like at least Anita has a product she releases once every 7 months, but Quinn has literally not worked on a game for 3 years (and I'm using the word "game" in the most liberal usage of the word).

I'd say people supporting Sarkeesian / Brianna Wu / Quinn / Randwhale on Patreon get their money's worth. It's not like they care about them producing anything, they just donate to:
1) Alleviate their white-straight-male guilt
2) Pretend they are progressives supporting strong womyn against the patriarchy to their friends
3) Promote their SJW / Feminist ideology

All of the above are achieved much easier if Sarkeesian / Brianna Wu / Quinn / Randwhale gives lectures at university on oppresshiun / cries on twitter all day / gives botched U.N. speeches about muhsoggyknee / harass and doxxes ideological opponents, instead of actually making videos / creating games / doing... whatever it is Quinn pretends to do / making "anti-cyberbullying" software.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Bluebird
The Alison Rapp stuff is spilling into mainstream media now.

http://archive.is/GePkS

"Like, if my opinions on sex, gender and sexual media were secret, don't you think I'd maybe not have my thesis on my LinkedIn?"

Dunno if that tweet is real (is The Mirror) but... lol . I actually don't care if she keeps her job or not, but is usually expected that people that are vocal about their political views try to be congruent about that, specially important to take in account when your job is PR. In any case, to me is vile to shield yourself with being vague about whatever you consider fictional despictions being at the same level as real stuff, as IT IS a big difference and obfuscating this is what makes a very real problem (lax laws of child pornography in Japan) being derailed in stuff like "ban this manga I don't like".

Side note but is kind of shitty that the first result in google of "Alison Rapp" outside her twitter handles is: the Daily Stormer. A reminder in how toxic this topic can be when the involved act like desingenious assholes at both sides.
 
Last edited:
Side note but is kind of shitty that the first result in google of "Alison Rapp" outside her twitter handles is: the Daily Stormer. A reminder in how toxic this topic can be when the involved act like desingenious assholes at both sides.

It simply doesn't occur to this type of person that having a PR job for a company that sells things to children and openly advocating on behalf of child pornography might be incongruent. If she had, she wouldn't have proudly put it in her online resume.
 
So it seems that Tom from Xseed is unbanned in Neogaf but doesn't want to come back: http://archive.is/wH2S9

Neogaf mods has been so fucking squizophrenic about how they feel about Xseed and localization in general. They want and celebrate stuff like Legend of The Heroes but hate Tom guts because his views about free speech, censorship and localization. Like always, deleting posts just because and making neutral regular users walk in eggshells.
 
So it seems that Bravely Second is also butchered (to the point of eliminating fully voiced side quests outcomes where characters died). Dunno who to blame, if Nintendo or Square Enix but: LOL , THIS SHIT KILLS GOODWILL FROM JRPGS FANS.

Also, some users in Neogaf said that kids are buying Bravely Default games: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHOHWOW
 
I think NoA problems are a syntom of Nintendo as a whole but... man if now doesn't feel that NoA itself hates its fandom and gamers in general
They're still trying to figure out this video game thing. Is it a video or a game? Both? So confusing.
 
They're still trying to figure out this video game thing. Is it a video or a game? Both? So confusing.

"A horror game with a japense girl as a protagonist? Ugh, why anyone would play that? In any case, lets cut some costumes as we don't want moms complaining to us about their children getting to puberty. Why the hell Iwata-sama (rest in piece) would have wanted any sort of variety in the WiiU? I mean, we know that heavy hitters as Animal Crossing Amiibo Festival is going to sell pancakes as it did in Japan, after all is our speciality: TOYS. "
 
More info on the 8-4 thing and similar ongoing censorship:

* Virtually every female character in Bravely Second who has a remotely revealing outfit has had it censored in some way or another. More clothes are added, cleavage covered up, garters hidden, despite Bravely being a title designed to appeal to weebs.

* An entire questline centered around you being put into a no-win scenario and having to make a choice has been changed so that it's an "everyone wins" ending regardless of what you do:

so if its not even enough that is worse than the first one we also get cut and manipulated content to make it more "child" friendly

fuck off with this shit franchise

>I've finished the Japanese version and something felt off about the outcomes of the side quests in the english version, I just finished the side quest with Ominas and Artemia and they made a pretty big change with how the outcome works. Hard to explain in more detail without going into major spoilers but i'll try to keep it major spoiler free, read on at your own risk.

So i chose to side with Artemia which resulted in fighting Ominas and Bahamut, at the end of it instead of Bahamut dying they switched over to the side quest ending that comes after a major event further down the story in which it's a good ending for both sides no matter which choice you pick.

Went to look for a video that shows the other option being picked and my suspicions were correct [Embed] picking to side with Ominas also gives the good ending version

So basically instead of picking a side and seeing the consequences of your decision being played out you're given a "good" ending regardless, i just went back and checked the events again and this applied to all the ones i've done so far. Can't say i'm a fan of this change as part of the appeal of picking a side was actually seeing the consequences of your choice and then further down the line without going into spoilers "stuff" happens.

Edea also no longer questions herself on her decision which was something that was supposed to happen much much later on.[/Embed]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back