Debate Brooklyn Red Leg on how loli is not CP and how you should take meds and you're hiding something if you don't jerk off to loliporn - Also "pedo" is a slur, get it right you pedophiliaphobes

[draggs]

I don't do that, actually. I'm just here to point out how performative all this outrage is. You're not doing anything about the pedophilia problem, and you're never going to. You're going to continue bitching at people from behind the safety of your screen because you don't actually have the balls to risk your own comfort and safety for anything. You won't even seek institutional power and try to solve the problem through legal means. You don't genuinely care as much as you pretend to. Niggers like you and Jack are just faggots dancing around for internet street cred.

Ostracism is effective at communicating social standards and singling out deviants so everyone knows who the subhuman filth is

Also deriding pedo scum is just plain fun

 

[Brooklyn Red Leg]

Honestly this is pretty tame...no sexual content. There's plenty to rag on on that platform, this personally is nothing. Unlike our friend Brooklyn Red Leg who likes reposting hentai of infants getting fucked by giant cocks.

Yep. Here ya go, a loli getting fucked....

 

[Delicious Diversity]

No its not you fucking moron. Jesus Christ you people are goddamn dumb.

Who cares if it's legal, you like drawings of children being raped. You are a pedophile.

 

[Stabmaster Arson]

Yep. Here ya go, a loli getting fucked....

Why are you even still defending this shit here lol? I'm in conversation with the mods and have your entire life archived. You better pray they take mercy on you.

 

[Procrastinhater]

Lmfao well done faggot. You sperged out so hard defending your japanese jpegs of little kids getting fucked and shit the thread up so badly you got your own debate thread.
Remember what you said about "it's all being recorded" well nigger your shit is proving to be very enlightening, and about as sick as I would have guessed.
Maybe next time make sure your Internet footprint doesnt look like the Palace of Slaanesh before you provoke people into looking into your shit.
Don't worry it's all been archived.

 

[Brooklyn Red Leg]

Do it. Go ahead, faggot

 

[Stabmaster Arson]

Do it. Go ahead, faggot

It was never up to you. I'm waiting for the staff decision, not yours.

 

[DiggieSmalls]

Dude seems pretty eager to be outed as a pedo into raping kids. almost enthusiastically so. i think this is a no brainer to me.

 

[nym]

forget to wipe out that it's from an "Anti" folder, a phrase only pedophiles use

[sorry I'm late]
Hmmm, I noticed that "anti" right off the bat; surprised I'd never heard that term before.

Yeah, it does seem that way, doesn't it.

 

[Starved Artist]

As a gurofag, I find the loli debate interesting because after people are done with loli, Guro is next. if they can charge you with endangering a real child with a drawing of a being that doesn't exist, they can charge you with murder for a drawing of a murder that didn't happen.
It's a stretch but stupid shit has happened.

Anyway. After browsing Twitter and reading threads filled with people who have MAP on their profile calling Japanese artists pedophiles for young (not loli ) characters, I came up with a simple stance.

Is it based off of a real, living, breathing person?
Was it sketched off of a real child?
Do you call yourself a MAP?

Yes at any point : You should be in jail.

No - Carry on being a degenerate in your own private part of the internet.

Why do I have such a simple stance? Because if you break it down into smaller, stupid parts you end up with circular logic that enables severe authoritarian bullshit with enough loopholes for everything. You give faggots an inch and they'll take a mile.

Essentially.

You kill people in Grand Theft Auto, Postal , Saints Row. Should you be held responsible for the crimes you committed virtually?
You willingly choose to play those videogames, where you can run people down and slaughter them with no remorse. You can desecrate graves, rob banks, steal cars, all, if you did these things in real life, would carry a hefty fine and severe jail time.

Should you be held responsible for the crime of the theft of pixels in the shape of a car?

versus

You fire up Skyrim , Fallout Honey Select , Sims , any game that lets you have sex with then brutalize a virtual doll woman until it's red and broken, then you hit the slider to turn her into a loli, then do it again and then you hit the slider to turn her into a furry animal and finally Thomas the tank engine?

Should you be held responsible for the crime of the rape of pixels in the shape of a woman, an animal, a little girl and thomas the tank engine?

Both examples are digital crime simulators, but only one of the examples is backed by a multi-million dollar industry.

Of course there are extremists who say YES. Fuck those retards. People who believe imaginary shit is real is the same reason our country is overrun by troons and faggots playing pretend anarchist and pretend nazis who couldn't call someone a nigger to their face.

And then come the "Butttttt the pedophiles" argument

Real Pedophiles are actually out there looking for children to get their hands on. They don't need anything beyond their lust and tools like discord that give them unprotected access to children. The same way real criminals, real rapists and real serial killers don't need Saints Row, Postal or Grand Theft Auto to be menaces to society.

Of course, there's always the gross and horrible exceptions that ruin any argument you try to make. I don't pretend they don't exist. I make it my business to know these freaks exist and use them as examples to why I worry about the direction censorship is going.

If you want to save the world, sign up for the pedo hunter teams and hunt down actual pedos.

Remember. do your due diligence if your going vigilante, not everyone on the sex offender registry is a sex offender. Beating up a dude who's on the list for public urination isn't cool - depending on your state..

 

[BULLY HUNTER_77]

The ones that scream the loudest often have skeletons to hide in their closet. Take your meds, you fucking schizo fucktard.

It never ceases to amaze me that the users that post loli always have real CP ready-to-go whenever they want to throw a bitch-fit because "muh freeze peach" wherever loli is banned. Quite the amazing coincidence. It's almost as if pedophiles are attracted to depictions of sexualized kids, whether they're real or fake.

 

[nym]

Yet Loli is illegal in the USA, if rarely prosecuted

That's really not clear, not on a federal level where it would matter. I'm essentially certain if it ends up in front of the Supreme Court (which it won't / why the law you mention isn't pressed) it'll be determined to be a 1st Amendment violation.

It's fair for us to assume anyone posting lolicon is doing so because they jack off to similar stuff [and might be inclined to violate kids]; it isn't fair for a judge to assume that. It's not going to be seen as inherently obscene [ie. "prurient & lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value"] because one can simply argue "nah I just like drawing these, it's just my art style" and then anything like that PROTECT Act is gonna fall flat.

It's one of those things like... in California the law clearly states it's illegal to tell someone to kill themselves, but if they ever try pushing that law on an actual case there's no fucking way in hell it's gonna be upheld as it's a clear 1st Amendment right TO TELL PEDOS TO KILL THEMSELVES [even in California].

 

[The Ugly One]

Serious question:

Why do pedophiles think, "I don't like to look at photos of children getting raped; I like to look at drawings of children getting raped!" will convince anyone they're not pedophiles?

I mean, why do you think I would find this convincing?

 

[BULLY HUNTER_77]

[sorry I'm late]
Hmmm, I noticed that "anti" right off the bat; surprised I'd never heard that term before.
View attachment 3693805
Yeah, it does seem that way, doesn't it.

I've noticed this a lot with the pedo sphere. They seem to have a whole vocabulary of dog-whistle words such as "anti" and "cunny." IMO, these words are kinda the "Christian Fish" of pedophiles, used to establish a handshake with a potential fellow child rape enjoyer. Normal people will either not know what they're talking about or immediately block them because raping children is vile. After trust is built between the two, they invite each other to their private discord servers, where they can share actual CP.

 

[Procrastinhater]

Serious question:

Why do pedophiles think, "I don't like to look at photos of children getting raped; I like to look at drawings of children getting raped!" will convince anyone they're not pedophiles?

I mean, why do you think I would find this convincing?

These aren't exactly the brightest, most well adjusted people we are dealing with here.

 

[SenutiSolidus]

One thing i'm genuinely curious about for the paladins against pictures here is:
Do you genuinely think that every single 18 year old is suddenly okay to fuck? I graduated with a bunch of complete retards that you'd totally be taking advantage of if you had sex with them, and some lowerclassmen were much more "adult" then they were.

it's almost like there's nuance to this shit.

 

[Stabmaster Arson]

Do you genuinely think that every single 18 year old is suddenly okay to fuck?

Yes.

 

[SenutiSolidus]

Yes.

I'm twenty-one, but I really wouldn't think I should be dating eighteen year olds when I'm thirty.

 

[Stabmaster Arson]

I'm twenty-one, but I really wouldn't think I should be dating eighteens year olds when I'm thirty.

Ok, and this is relevant how?

 

[SenutiSolidus]

Ok, and this is relevant how?

because most loli isn't a five year old child getting finger blasted it's usually highschool age kids. Is that just as bad?