This appeared on my youtube feed last night. A personal message for Joshua Moon
Then he went back and edited it to include a personal message for his ex wife and
@Nekrosias
As pointed out earlier, he is trying to put himself and possibly others around him in danger by engaging in this behavior. Playing the victim as Sinseer/Fallout_76 clown, then being the active 25/8 aggressor as @DropKiwiFarms. I just think there should be a log should something bad were to ever happen, it would derails his, "They attacked me only because I am bipolar/trans" narrative.
I don't know this pictures of his family business as the only pictures posted are of him and his ex wife. It was also made clear to me some members of his family want nothing to do with him.
Unsure about all these aliases, but we know for fact that he is @DropKiwiFarms and previously pretended his current twitter account was ran by a "fan". So that is at least two accounts of him pretending to be other people that have been verified.
I also don't think it is true he tried to get anything deleted from the archive unless there is an alternative to waybackmachine we don't know about. He lost the domain which is why he can't delete anything, where as he was able to wipe sinseer.com 's history. If he got those nudes deleted, how are we able to find them years later? Makes no sense.
Nobody ever said being nude on the internet or running a porn website is illegal. That doesn't mean many of us would find it comical or ironic given his attitude towards anything questionable.
Also this claim of "revenge porn" is wrong. It's only revenge porn if Sinseer himself took and posted those photos without her consent. A performer can't sign off on something and then ten years later go, "I don't want that out there anymore".
Only in extremely rare circumstances can you do something like that and it's taken to civil court, not criminal.
The actor Cameron Diaz has been awarded damages in a civil lawsuit against a photographer who took pictures of her topless when she was 19 and later tried to sell them back to her for $3.5m (about £2m).
www.theguardian.com
Either way, he would be the one in trouble for publishing them.
Although we would be in store for some major lawls if he does contact the ex-wife, but hope for her sake she should know it's best to stay out of this one. Nothing good would come out of her having any contact with him again. It's best she not know about what he has been doing to begin with.