Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread - Episode III - Revenge of the Ruski (now unlocked with new skins and gameplay modes!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's amazing if ever got anywhere in life, how does anyone look at him and think "think yeah he looks trustworthy, I'll give him a job."
I think at some point the unemployability of looking like a creep bends back around into looking like a guy who's easy to blackmail.
 
Agreed. We shouldn't escalate unnecessarily and I think some actions and statements by Western politicians/pundits have been highly irresponsible in that regard, but 'we must tolerate any landgrab by a nuclear power or they'll nuke us' is clearly not a sustainable approach.
Supplying weapons to a nation defending itself isn't escalation, the only nation that is actively and consistently escalating the situation is Russia. This is because they are losing, and the only way they could possibly win is through escalating.

However, short of actually using nuclear weapons - which would draw a huge kinetic response from NATO - they are not going to win.

Their mobilisation won't work, because even if they could train these guys adequately they cannot equip them. Poorly trained infantry, with no enthusiasm and drive will not be of any use.

Russia cannot produce enough of their high end weaponry, and that which they can is easily dealt with by the Ukrainians.

So where does that leave us? Poorly trained, poorly equipped. Russia is fucked and will be defeated in the field.
 
Supplying weapons to a nation defending itself isn't escalation, the only nation that is actively and consistently escalating the situation is Russia. This is because they are losing, and the only way they could possibly win is through escalating.

Supplying an enemy nation with arms, intelligence, advisers, and plans was considered an act of war prior to the world's two great powers acquiring nuclear weapons, after which point we had a gentleman's agreement that it didn't count because, well, we needed some way to fight wars against each other without saying we were fighting them. It's why the Germans sank the Lusitania and Lend-Lease was extremely controversial.

The gentleman's agreement is off because we used Cold War tactics to go directly after Russian military assets instead of constraining our proxy wars to puppet states.
 
Supplying an enemy nation with arms, intelligence, advisers, and plans was considered an act of war prior to the world's two great powers acquiring nuclear weapons, after which point we had a gentleman's agreement that it didn't count because, well, we needed some way to fight wars against each other without saying we were fighting them.
That's debatable; for example during the US Civil War the British supplied the Confederacy with a lot of rifles, cannons and even full warships. But the US did not declare war, and even backed down when an opportunity arose with the diplomatic clusterfuck that was the Trent Affair, where the Americans boarded a British ship carrying confederate diplomats and arrested them.

One might say they only didn't declare war because Britain was too powerful, but the US had already declared war on Britain before when it was far weaker, back in 1812. In the end when the civil war was over they just asked the British to pay reparations for the cost to US shipping inflicted by Confederate warships built in British dockyards and otherwise didn't make a big fuss of it.

I would agree the presence of nuclear weapons has in some ways made it easier for third parties to support countries engaged in war, as it greatly shifts the equation in favour of turning a blind eye for the side being undermined by that support. And of course that's why the Cold War stayed cold. It's also why this current geopolitical struggle will probably stay cold...ish.
 
Holy shit, the right flank really did just collapse near Kherson...they just fled and nobody on the Russian side did anything. Putin's "greatest military operation since WWII" is looking more and more like Idi Amin's invasion of Tanzania.
Oh come on, Uganda is not nearly as much a nigger nation as Russia so this comparison is unfounded and unfair
 
so if this images are correct, (taken from /k/ which was also taken from a telegram, so could be fake and gay) Ukraine is making big gains.
kherson1.jpg
the front 4 hours ago.
kherson2.jpg
front now.
 
so if this images are correct, (taken from /k/ which was also taken from a telegram, so could be fake and gay) Ukraine is making big gains.
View attachment 3714515
the front 4 hours ago.
View attachment 3714517
front now.
Orthodox God saw that video of the conscripts suckin eachothers sputniks and abruptly withdrew his blessing on muh third rome
 
Just like BLM, Russia is a terrorist organization.
BLM doesnt have nearly as high a percentage of niggers and faggots in it tho

Seriously tho, the basic answer of "why support globohomo instead of russia?" is because russia is literally just a shitter, more psychotic, less competent, and more suicidally retarded globohomo in denial.

Same reason why most people would rather be roommates with Al Capone over Jeffrey Dahmer if those were the only two real options. Aside from the obvious perks of not sharing a house (or a fridge) with Dahmer, atleast Al Capone likes to throw his money around and will probably give you a few spare tommy guns if you asked nicely, even if he does occasionally coerce you into helping him hide barrels of hooch from elliot ness.
 
Last edited:
I found a very funny article by the "conservative" writer Richard Hanania, for those uninformed Hanania is a creepy jew who looks like he rapes and eats kids in his basement.
View attachment 3713799
But he makes some laughably bad points about Russia such as that they are destined to remain a poor, backwater country because Europe is looking elsewhere for their energy and this absurdly retarded quote.
"Even in the Russian-speaking regions of Ukraine, support for the occupation has been lukewarm at best, as pro-war Russian writers and analysts have had to admit. Following their social media accounts, I see practically no signs of mass enthusiasm among almost anyone in Eastern Ukraine for the idea of being absorbed into Russia."

"I don't see enthusiasm from people in Eastern Ukraine on English social media, thusly it must not exist!!!"

Jewish intelligence is highly overstated.

Do you have any proof that he's Jewish?
The Hanania name seems to be common with the Christian Palestinians.
I don't get why anyone would support Ukraine while bitching about the blm nigs burning down their cities and trannies grooming their kids. Nigga this is what the US stands for, this what their embassies looked like last year. Trannies and nigs are their protected classes and when this what Ukraine wants more of.
View attachment 3714118
So even tho I'm a Polack, given the choice between living under the fag American empire or being annexed by the Russians I know one thing. I'd rather die a Slav than a Faggot Westerner. Maybe we should revive the idea of panslavism?
Do you understand the concept of priorities?
How immediate is the threat of drag queen story hour and BLM for you in Poland?
Don't lie.
 
so if this images are correct, (taken from /k/ which was also taken from a telegram, so could be fake and gay) Ukraine is making big gains.
View attachment 3714515
the front 4 hours ago.
View attachment 3714517
front now.


Yeah, there were reports that they had to retreat as to not get encircled when Ukraine ran along the river

Problem is, the Ukies cant seem to effectively neutralize these retreating units. They seem to be capable of spearheads and offensives, but lack the power to completely rush down these units
 
Yeah, there were reports that they had to retreat as to not get encircled when Ukraine ran along the river

Problem is, the Ukies cant seem to effectively neutralize these retreating units. They seem to be capable of spearheads and offensives, but lack the power to completely rush down these units
That would be lack of air superemcy I would assume.
If they had air supremecy, they could rain down hell on russians.
 
Problem is, the Ukies cant seem to effectively neutralize these retreating units. They seem to be capable of spearheads and offensives, but lack the power to completely rush down these units
could be intentional

if you half-encircle the enemy and apply pressure while leaving them a way out, they will retreat, so you get to take the territory immediately, fast and smooth.
but if you fully encircle them, they have no way out, so they will fight to the death, so taking the territory will take more time and effort and resources from you.
 
Yeah, there were reports that they had to retreat as to not get encircled when Ukraine ran along the river

Problem is, the Ukies cant seem to effectively neutralize these retreating units. They seem to be capable of spearheads and offensives, but lack the power to completely rush down these units
If they cant effectively neutralize retreating units why cant these units re-form in effective defensive positions

These retreating russian units are effectively neutralized, they have lost their ability to perform in combat. They just keep running to the next village down the road then retreat again from there in a few hours or the next day. what youre saying isnt connected to reality
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back