- Joined
- Jan 8, 2022
I love the magically high number of trans "women" who just happen to be "lesbians."
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You mean Blanchard might be right and trannies are just men with a fetish?I love the magically high number of trans "women" who just happen to be "lesbians."
wow so you're saying autogynophilia is real and banning everyone who even mentions it from Twitter is 1984 thought police bullshit?You mean Blanchard might be right and trannies are just men with a fetish?
No. I'm told by Very Serious People on Twitter that AGP has been completely debunked and was a stupid idea anyway. Surely blue check trannies wouldn't lie about their ~lived experiences~
Right?
So much hysteria. No one is going around killing trannies. Terfs don't care if you "exist" - we just don't want you in our spaces, taking away our places in sports and other areas, like job quotas and awards that are meant to go to real women.
You're not going to be killed for ~being yourself~
Oh wait, words are violence now. Someone telling him HWNBAW is literally the same as murder. Man, it's rough being a tranny always on the lookout for unkind words.
So much hysteria. No one is going around killing trannies. Terfs don't care if you "exist" - we just don't want you in our spaces, taking away our places in sports and other areas, like job quotas and awards that are meant to go to real women.
You're not going to be killed for ~being yourself~
Oh wait, words are violence now. Someone telling him HWNBAW is literally the same as murder. Man, it's rough being a tranny always on the lookout for unkind words.
What happens when a high school biological female speaks up and says she’s not comfortable with a biological male changing with her in a locker room? In the case of a Vermont high school, the local school officials reportedly decided they’d settle the issue by banning the use of the locker room.
According to WCAX in Burlington, Vermont, drama erupted this season as biological females from the Randolph High School volleyball team when a biological male made inappropriate comments while changing with the biological females.
The station reports parents and athletes raised concerns with the school and that’s when the wheels of the transgender freight train were put in motion.
The biological females were the problem.
An email was sent out to families explaining Vermont law. The email stated there is “plenty of space where students who feel uncomfortable with the laws may change in privacy.”
That’s right, if you’re a biological female who doesn’t feel comfortable changing in a locker room with a biological male, that’s a YOU problem and it’s on YOU to find a new place to change. It’s a very similar response to issues raised by University of Pennsylvania biological females who were told to share locker room space with swimmer Lia Thomas.
Deal with it, ladies. It’s a new era. Either get with the times or find a new place to change.
Biological female Blake Allen, a member of the volleyball team, says she was encouraged by her mother to speak out about the situation to “make a change” while noting she doesn’t “want a biological man” changing with her.
What are Blake’s rights here?
Vermont’s State Board of Education policy states Blake is pretty much out of luck. Again, deal with it is the stance of the state.
WCAX
“The use of restrooms and locker rooms by transgender students requires schools to considernumerous factors, including, but not limited to: the transgender student’s preference; protectingstudent privacy; maximizing social integration of the transgender student; minimizing stigmatization of the student; ensuring equal opportunity to participate; the student’s age; and protecting the safety of the students involved,” the board’s policy states.
“A transgender student should not be required to use a locker room or restroom that conflicts with the student’s gender identity.”
Translation: Simply put, if a biological male IDENTIFIES as a female, he can change in the women’s locker room.
Where is this transgender vs. biological female athletics — and even the use of locker rooms — debate headed?
In January, Roger Brooks, who serves as senior counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom, told OutKick it appears a showdown at the Supreme Court is inevitable.
“I think the answer to that is ‘yes,’” he said while noting court cases are mounting and it’s likely there will be more cases to come. “The law is not fast but within the next couple of years we’ll see a case about this issue in front of the Supreme Court.”
The locker room debate isn’t just playing out in central Vermont with a girls’ volleyball team. In Texas, a parent filed a complaint against the Round Rock school district over a case that centers on a female student being told to go home to change during the school day “to avoid a male student whom district officials had authorized to undress with her in her locker room.”
In Randolph, Vermont where the volleyball team has been banned from using for changing purposes, it’s unclear where the biological male athlete is changing.
“They want all the girls who feel uncomfortable — so pretty much 10 girls — to get changed in a single stall bathroom, which would take over 30 minutes. Where if one person got changed separately, it would take a minute, like no extra time,” Blake Allen told WCAX.
That’s true, Blake. Stop making sense. It’s 2022. Common sense isn’t allowed.
Round Rock ISD (RRISD) is ignoring parents . . . on a “case-by-case basis.” Last week, the RRISD Board of Trustees met to discuss a Level III grievance complaint filed by a parent to express concern about a shadow policy allowing male high school students to undress in the female locker room without the knowledge of parents in the district.
A parent in the district initiated a formal complaint with RRISD last year after a female student was required to go home to change during the school day to avoid a male student whom district school officials had authorized to undress with her in her locker room. Through Levels I and II of the complaint process, the student’s parents requested that the district develop clear district policies that protect females from male intrusion in their sex-specific spaces, and to communicate those rules to parents, guardians, and students.
Texas Values’ President and Attorney Jonathan Saenz represented the parent for Level III of the grievance complaint, which involves a hearing before the Board of Trustees. On behalf of the parents, Attorney Saenz requested a public hearing for transparency, instead of the closed session planned by the board.
During the meeting, Board President Amber Feller announced that the board would not allow comments related to the grievance from members of the public during the public portion of the meeting. Board members Danielle Weston and Mary Bone pointed out that the board had, three times in the past year allowed public testimony on a Level III grievance similar the current complaint. The request to have an open meeting was not granted. As a result, Attorney Saenz and the parent did not participate in the closed meeting.
A De Facto Shadow Policy
Round Rock school district officials have claimed all along that they have no policy on usage of sex-specific spaces such as bathrooms and locker rooms on campus. Since at least 2016, however, Round Rock ISD employees appears to have adhered to an internal, secret policy that explicitly ignores and misinterprets the current state of the law and embraces radical LGBT guidance from the Texas Association of School Boards.
The existence of this shadow policy is corroborated by statements of various Round Rock ISD employees that point to a de facto policy almost identical to one mentioned by the district in 2016 in an Austin American-Statesmen article. In the article, the school district is quoted as saying it accommodates transgender students on a case-by-case basis. “Our school leaders…[work] with students and parents on a case-by-case to assess any concerns regarding safety, including making special accommodations when appropriate.”
In correspondence available to Texas Values, several mentions were made by district employees of an unofficial policy currently in use by the district, all while school officials simultaneously claim that no policy exists:
How is this “case-by-case” policy implemented? Sal Espinosa offered some insight in his Level II response to the parent: “Key considerations [for bathroom and locker room usage] would include student preference, student safety, accessibility, privacy, and the minimization of disruptions. [emphasis added]…As an initial step, the school district should communicate with the transgender student and the student’s parents to determine the student’s preference as to gender-specific facilities.”
- Round Rock ISD Hearing Officer, Dr. Carla Amacher said: “Through your attempt at informal resolution, district administration informed you that when questions arise regarding facility usage as it pertains to gender they are handled on a case-by-case basis with the campus staff.” (Letter on 12/17/21)
- Round Rock ISD Hearing Officer Sal Espinosa: – “…[D]istrict administration informed you that when questions arise regarding facility usage as it pertains to gender, they are handled on a case-by-case basis with campus staff.” (Letter on 12/17/2021)
- Round Rock ISD Chief of Schools and Innovation Dr. Daniel Presley: “There is no district policy that restricts who uses which restroom, but…[w]hen questions arise on campus regarding facility usage, as it pertains to gender, these matters are handled by the campus on a case-by-case basis with considerations given to students and the campus.”(10/29/2021)
This certainly sounds like a policy – a policy where the key consideration is student preference, and parents of other students who can be impacted are not notified. This troubling behavior also suggests that some Round Rock ISD board members don’t want to face the backlash of a public hearing on this issue. How do you do that? You refuse to call it a policy (which would require the school board to take an official, public vote) and instead call it a practice or approach.
Based on Inaccurate Law
Documents available to Texas Values show that the school district refused to address the complaint based on the hearing officer’s determination that (1) the U.S. Department of Education would be releasing amendments to their Title IX guidance in April 2022 (this guidance, to date of writing, still has not been finalized), and (2) that separating bathrooms for males and females according to their genitalia would violate Title IX.
The legal issue that everything turns on is whether, under Title IX, “sex,” an objective standard based on human biology, includes “sexual orientation and gender identity” – a concept that allows sex to become wholly self-verified by each individual person and subject to change at any given moment.
The school district relies on the U.S. Department of Education’s “Interpretation” of Title IX, published in the Federal Register on June 22, 2021. This document explained that “the Department interprets Title IX’s prohibition on sex discrimination to encompass discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity” in light of Bostock v. Clayton County, a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision.
However, the statute implicated in the Bostock decision was Title VII, not Title IX. The Supreme Court explicitly excluded other laws, such as Title IX, from consideration, as Justice Gorsuch stated in his majority opinion:
The employers worry that our decision will sweep beyond Title VII to other federal or state laws that prohibit sex discrimination. And under Title VII itself, they say sex segregated bathrooms, locker rooms, and dress codes will prove unsustainable after our decision today. But none of these other laws are before us; we have not had the benefit of adversarial testing about the meaning of their terms, and we do not prejudge any such question today. Under Title VII, too, we do not purport to address bathrooms, locker rooms, or anything else of the kind. [emphasis added]
Further, the Department of Education’s interpretation of Bostock was enjoined across 20 states in July 2022 when a federal judge ruled that the Department’s guidance documents improperly expanded the reach of Bostock and was effectively unauthorized legislative rulemaking by an executive agency. Judge Charles Atchley wrote:
Therefore, as explained above, Plaintiffs can show that the Department of Education’s guidance creates rights for students and obligations for regulated entities not to discriminate based on sexual orientation or gender identity that appear nowhere in Bostock, Title IX, or its implementing regulations.
This injunction is still in effect and includes plaintiff states under the jurisdiction of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals – the appellate jurisdiction of the State of Texas.
Ongoing Misconduct
As early as 2016 there is record (queue Austin American-Statesman article noted earlier) of Round Rock ISD ignoring the current state of law in favor of radical LGBT ideology and favoritism. For example, at the time of the article, the school district supported their decision to address transgender bathroom and locker room issues on case-by-case basis with decisions from the U.S. Department of Education and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. These decisions were summarized in a communication from then-President Obama, written to school districts across the country called “Dear Colleague Letter on Transgender Students.”
However, less than three months after the Obama “Dear Colleague” letter was sent, Texas federal Judge Reed O’Connor granted a nationwide preliminary injunction to stop enforcement of the agency guidance. Despite this, Round Rock ISD has continued to follow the rules set up by rogue federal agencies in 2016 and place students’ safety in jeopardy.
The school district denied the request of Texas Values and the parent for a Level III hearing open to the public last week. If this shadow policy continues, parents in the district will continue to be left in the dark about what goes in their students’ most intimate spaces. It’s generally accepted that school districts often communicate important notices to parents. In fact, in 2018 Round Rock ISD sent a food alert notice to parents about contaminated Romaine lettuce that the district was not even serving!
Unfortunately, a lack of transparency often indicates larger problems beneath the surface. The fight continues – and so does the irreparable damage to students in Round Rock ISD by the very entity charged with the responsibility to protect them.
Alright, I don't have a penis, but not washing your dick with soap sounds unhinged and atrocious. This is some tranny bullshit right? There is an argument to not washing your vulva with soap as upsetting the natural pH of your vagina can lead to infections, but every woman I know at least makes sure to wipe/rinse it clean.
Washing your penis with soap is okay (especially if you got that smegma), but you better make sure it's a very mild one, as otherwise it can irritate the very sensitive skin.Alright, I don't have a penis, but not washing your dick with soap sounds unhinged and atrocious. This is some tranny bullshit right? There is an argument to not washing your vulva with soap as upsetting the natural pH of your vagina can lead to infections, but every woman I know at least makes sure to wipe/rinse it clean.
the fact that he went until 32 before thinking "hm, I'm totally a woman, why don't I shave my legs?" shows how much of their 'experience' is revisionist egg cracking bullshit where they just go "wow I totally *was* a girl the whole time!". Didn't experiment with it at all in his 20s? Was never grossed out by his own body hair until his egg was cracked? Totally led a hard life of gender dysphoria. Certainly not leaning into a fetish he developed by watching sissy cuck porn after letting his girlfriends cheat on him.Relationship disfunction and mental illness ends in paraphilia, an orgasm upon shaving the legs and eventual castration and mutliation.
View attachment 3715408
View attachment 3715419
These freaks are all so fucking gross and detestable, I wonder if this scum has always been in our society or if our current fucked up culture and environment (endocrine disruptors etc) is breeding this degenerate shit. These fucking people are pure cancer. No you fucking troon bastards, you're not women, you never will be, you're just weirdos and freaks who should shut the fuck up and just accept that you're a normal person and be happy with it.A troon presented this question to r/MtFView attachment 3715748
[x]
Here are some of the replies
View attachment 3715755
View attachment 3715758
View attachment 3715785
Wanted to share this post as well
View attachment 3715791
[x]
I really shouldn't laugh, I feel for the poor guy I do, but when Dr Phil asked him about that time his son dressed up in High School I snorted milk all over my keyboard lol "I thought it was Halloween" - lmfao it's Halloween everyday now bubA father faces the horror of losing his son to the transgender cult for the amusement of Dr Phil's brain dead audience, who clap but then recoil in horror:
View attachment 3715871
Can you imagine knowing your straight son has been MKUltra'ed into taking estrogen, wearing make-up and women's clothes, sucking dick, taking it up the ass and voluntarily having his balls cut off and his dick fileted? I can't imagine the horror.I really shouldn't laugh, I feel for the poor guy I do, but when Dr Phil asked him about that time his son dressed up in High School I snorted milk all over my keyboard lol "I thought it was Halloween" - lmfao it's Halloween everyday now bub
![]()
![]()
![]()
View attachment 3715880
I found this on r/mtf. Apologies if this has been posted already, I am trying to catch up on the thread.
Yeah I meant it when I said I feel for him. That's gotta be a fathers worst fucking nightmare, its about the worst thing that could happen to a parent, someone twisting your kids mind and literally brainwashing them into becoming a crazy person and mutilating themselves. Especially if you have knowledge of the full extent of what it means to be a troon, my heart seriously goes out to people in the "losing someone" thread, to know your loved one has fallen into the clutches of some twisted fuck... especially if its online and you couldn't get your hands on the people who did it.Can you imagine knowing your straight son has been MKUltra'ed into taking estrogen, wearing make-up and women's clothes, sucking dick, taking it up the ass and voluntarily having his balls cut off and his dick fileted? I can't imagine the horror.
You're welcome you jackassYeah I meant it when I said I feel for him. That's gotta be a fathers worst fucking nightmare, its about the worst thing that could happen to a parent, someone twisting your kids mind and literally brainwashing them into becoming a crazy person and mutilating themselves. Especially if you have knowledge of the full extent of what it means to be a troon, my heart seriously goes out to people in the "losing someone" thread, to know your loved one has fallen into the clutches of some twisted fuck... especially if its online and you couldn't get your hands on the people who did it.
In a very real way that poor bastard has watched his boy commit suicide, and in front of Dr Phil and his audience of fucking clapping seals.
I kinda feel like a prick for laughing now. Thanks.
A troon presented this question to r/MtFView attachment 3715748
[x]
Here are some of the replies
View attachment 3715755
View attachment 3715758
View attachment 3715785
Wanted to share this post as well
View attachment 3715791
[x]
Good fucking god. If I didn't know fistulas are a common occurrence with these things, I'd think this was a troll.View attachment 3715880
I found this on r/mtf. Apologies if this has been posted already, I am trying to catch up on the thread.