Mike Peinovich / Mike Enoch & The Right Stuff (therightstuff.biz) - Lazy Podcasting Clique, Pepe the Frog Fetishists, Doxed by /pol/, Fed Honeypot for Gullible Neo-Nazi Conspiracy Theorists.

Striker (and trs in the whole) should really, really, REALLY shut his mouth on anything about Ukraine.
They know absolutely nothing about anything outside of the US, yet they will still comment on every single event in the world. It only makes them look bad, but I don't think they'll ever understand.
 
I've wanted to write an effortpost about Jazzhands and Balogh's misinformed and historically illiterate takes on the Iron Guard and fascist Romania in FTN 515: All Hail the Iron Guard, but the site went down and my enthusiasm went away.
What I don't get, why so many lies? We get it, it's OK to push a narrative, and mostly everything is propaganda, but why the hell lie if you don't have to, knowing that it's likely people will look into it and lose trust in you?
BTW, for the unaware...
Corneliu Zelea Codreanu's father's name was fucking Zelensky. He changed it to Zelea, in an attempt to integrate better. There are stories around the real ethnic provenience of his paternal line, one that is speculating he comes from a family of Moldavian free peasants, and that the Zelea name was changed to Zelinsky after Bukovina's fall to Polish occupation/influence, but none can be truly proven or removed from legend.
I find it comical that the hero of the podcast has had the same name as their most hated target.
 
I've wanted to write an effortpost about Jazzhands and Balogh's misinformed and historically illiterate takes on the Iron Guard and fascist Romania in FTN 515: All Hail the Iron Guard, but the site went down and my enthusiasm went away.
giphy.gif


I genuinely care because few perspectives on figures like Codreanu will be reliable especially from either liberal/leftist academics or third positionists. I'd like to know what he was all about. What did they miss? What did they get wrong?

If posts like yours get unsaid, then nobody knows where to start when setting the record straight.

Tell me more.
 
View attachment 3700175

I genuinely care because few perspectives on figures like Codreanu will be reliable especially from either liberal/leftist academics or third positionists. I'd like to know what he was all about. What did they miss? What did they get wrong?

If posts like yours get unsaid, then nobody knows where to start when setting the record straight.

Tell me more.
I'll have to listen to the first part of the podcast again and write down, cause it's been like 2 weeks now.
Screw you for making me type this autism. I take no responsibility for typing and spelling mistakes, I'm not proof reading this.
From what I remember, it's untrue Antonescu was that much of a respected ally of Hitler, and the Romanian army on the Russian front was not one of the best, but the weakest link, as expected, as it was badly trained and equipped, and probably 2 decades behind the Reich. Romania DID switch sides and "betrayed" the Axis, and it was not just the king that wanted it, but most of the people wanted it too, for very obvious reasons - Axis was losing, and the country's national survival always comes above ideology. In East Europe, ethnonationalism comes naturally, it's not an ideology that needs Aryans and enemies, the ethnicity is the vehicle for survival in front of nearby empires, it's not that important which ideology rules as long as the nation is preserved, and remaining as an Axis ally was incompatible with success in 1944, so the king did what he had to do to preserve as much sovereignty as possible.
Romanians were friendly towards Germans, but also towards the Allies, minus Russia, yet with the Reich collapsing there was no other way other than accept the occupation.
It's not "mostly Hungarians" that live in the area around Timisoara (a zone called Banat, that's a really diverse, mixed land that's split between Serbia, Romania and Hungary). It was not majority Hungarian or German even in the 30s, and now Romanians make up like 80%+ of the area. The influence of Austria-Hungary and Germanic migrants is indeed visible, but it was not always considered positive, as Romanians never desired to live under an empire, they always preferred war, struggle and potential loss instead of subjugation.
The Romanians will not tell you largely anything about "controlled by Jews" and the royal Hungarian family, in fact, the ethnic resentment against Hungarians is incredibly strong and worryingly so, because these days Hungarians tend to like Orban and his policies, while Romanians, even though they are just as socially conservative, are simple minded and reactionary enough to reflexively side against Hungarians to this day, which means leaning into US liberalism. So it's not resentment towards Jews, of which there are like 6-7K left in the whole country, nor towards monarchies, but actual ethnic resentment. Sadly - because Romania and Hungary need to get over this narcissism of the small differences fast.
Now, Ceausescu
Jazzhands - "I've never spoke to a Romanian that doesn't like Ceausescu" - that's a huge lie, lmao. There's a tiny group of Romanians that would say that. Most right wingers in the country despise him, because they got persecuted to an insane degree, i.e. labor camps and detention for just being a dissident. Normie citizens were regularly picked on by the secret police, tortured, interrogated. It was a terror regime, yes a somewhat nationalistic one, but that is of little benefit when you have no milk to feed your children, the hospitals don't have gauze and basic meds, and there's no heating in the winter. The revolution against Ceausescu was arguably one of the few genuine uprisings that had (at the start) no gayops that one can bring proof of, as it started in an isolated city, it had a Hungarian nationalist priest at its center, defended by Romanians against the Securitate, which was unprecedented.
There is incredibly much to say about this period, which would require an effortpost in itself. Because it was such a long period spanning decades, you cannot simply paint it with the same brush. Ceausescu was not always the old decrepit commie leader, he used to be more open and permissive in the 70s, it was his trips to North Korea that changed him towards being more and more paranoid, afraid and totalitarian, and vengeful and distrustful of his own people. It was his desire to pay all the external debt that brough the country to a standstill, and even after it got paid, he still did not choose to make life easier for the population, which simply tore him down in a bloodlust.
Big derp - the Dacians and Germans never coexisted in Transylvania, the Dacians and Romans mixed in the first centuries AD, after Trajan conquered Dacia for good and settled it with Romans. After the conquest, as the Roman Empire started to die out and let go of the border provinces, history becomes muddy. What's certain is that Dacians and Romanians mixed up and multiple "barbarian" invasions added dozens of more tribes to the mix, including Slavic ones, Magyars, Huns, Pechenegs, Cumans, Vlachs and hell knows what else, resulting in the genesis of the Romanian ethnicity over 1500 years. Germans were a recent addition to the mix, largely from two tribes, Swabians and Saxons. But yes, the Romanian tribes were less advanced than the Germans, as they often lived a pastoral rural life with their cattle, in villages and tiny cities, and were not industrialized yet. Germans were never a dominating force though, and never built a "country inside Transylvania", they were often merchants, but always minority.
Klaus Iohannis, a shitlib politician, is the president, not the prime minister, proof of the tolerance of the Romanians for other (European...) ethnic groups, and also proof of the lack of Romanian politicians to vote for. He is ethnically German, visibly so. He's no longer well liked, I'd say, because his Liberal party had to enter an alliance with the Social Dems to govern, which are perceived as corrupt gruggs.
Codreanu was a Romanian nationalist, he would have never sided with the German minorities, and he would never had allowed "lebensraum" for the Reich in Romania. He was deeply religious, charismatic and dedicated, alliances in East Europe are pragmatic and temporary.
Romania in present is safe-ish, I wouldn't say it's "better than the West", as there's a war nearby, the economics are getting worse and worse, the population has become polarized, social conservatism has been linked to Russia for most normies, which is a tragedy, and there are even more and more migrants on the streets, both legal and illegal.
"The best thing for Romania and East European countries is to ally with Russia" - bwahahahhahaaa, so out of touch, lmao
Poland is not "gayer and browner" because of the West, Poland is 99% Polish and has the army and a fence at the BELARUS border, wonder why. Statistics>lived experience>google doodle NGO shenanigans.
East Europe will rather go to war than ally with Russia. The resentment that already existed has gone through the roof since the war started. 99% of East Europeans would consider the NJP "solution" the ramblings of madmen. Their choice is simple - become more liberal over time, over decades, as an outpost of the American Empire. Or become a subject of the neo-feudal Russian totalitarian state, where you cannot dissent, where you're served paper to enroll in wars as cannon fodder, and where you're an enemy to everyone but China and Africa. Contrary to expectations, the far away potential threat of Drag Queen Story Hour in Bucharest and Middle Eastern and African hordes taking over Sibiu and Timisoara is incredibly low compared to the very close, very military threat that Russia is posing.
You tell me what choice will be made.
 
>Jazzhands - "I've never spoke to a Romanian that doesn't like Ceausescu"
Can't quote the post, but please don't tell me these fucktards are shilling for Ceausescu of all people.
Also, "The best thing for Romania and East European countries is to ally with Russia"
So that Hungary can annex Translyvania and Bulgaria can annex Dobruja? Because that is what will happen if Romania allies with Russia. I guess Warren's Magyarness is shining through.
 
Last edited:
>Jazzhands - "I've never spoke to a Romanian that doesn't like Ceausescu"
Can't quote the post, but please don't tell me these fucktards are shilling for Ceausescu of all people.
Also, "The best thing for Romania and East European countries is to ally with Russia"
So that Hungary can annex Translyvania and Bulgaria can annex Dobruja? Because that is what will happen if Romania allies with Russia. I guess Warren's Magyarness is shining thorugh.
Yes I think Jazzhands and Striker have shilled a bit for Ceausescu.
You have to understand they really, really suck at nuance, and are very propaganda focused. The thinking behind the Ceausescu thing goes like this:
- he was nationalistic (he was essentially a National Communist, he was a commie activist, got imprisoned during the WW2 era etc.), after the war he entered the Party in full and ascended its ranks. I know this is hard to believe these days, but back then everyone was deeply conservative, basically. The commies were more progressive in as they wanted equality between the sexes, but that was not the type of equality that we have today, it was more like "you is strong motherly woman engineer chemist athlete you belong to the Motherland you go now make children with tovarich Igor".
- he sold Jews to Israel (that part is accurate and funny yeah). You see, the commie regime was a 3rd worldist type of regime. Ceausescu cultivated close relationships with socialist countries in Africa and the Middle East, he would send them our engineers and workforce to build them various stuff and prop up the industry, and Israel was always sus for the commies, as it was kinda, somewhat, deeply ethnonat and absolutely oppressed the often socialist leaning Arabs with the help of Big Satan Capitalist Murica. So it was not muh super mega nazi anti-Semitism that lead to this behaviors, but geopolitics, socialism "Workers of the world unite", and also wanting to nationalize the wealth the Jews had, which was largely returned after the 89 revolution. Also returned, land that belonged to richer peasants that got collectivized, various historical buildings etc.
Anti-Semitism exists in East Europe, it was always here, hence the pogroms. But it's more of a dormant thing within the population itself, elites were generally Jew-friendly or neutral at best, and the commie regime here was full of Jews, and even after the destalinization happened and the break with the USSR, the commie regime was still OK with Jews and Israel, on average.
- there is an old article that it's always used by people that are Ceausescu-nostalgic:
This is very questionable, but it might be possible, depending on how the questions were asked and how leading they were. Everyone familiar with East Europe knows the place is not famous for its super high IQ people, as it has endured so much deprivation and war. People are indeed nostalgic, but they don't truly understand why. What people would want is a decrease in economic inequality and instability, a state that doesn't liberalize important business for cents because it's corrupt, a country where you don't have people with a bike and people with 5 BMWs, a country where you can find a wife without being rich, with fewer foreigners etc. But they also want to shop at Lidl and Profi for cheap, they want Nikes and Apple phones, they want the Internet, and most want Americans to protect them, and West Europe to allow them to come work. They want freedom of expression and assembly, they want a less powerful state that cannot imprison them at will. So people are, well, naive and confused.
It all depends on how, to whom, and when you ask the questions.
- Hungary won't annex anything, neither will Bulgaria. As much as the grugg brains in all these 3 countries are seething against each other, 99.9% of them want peace, and war would be catastrophic. Most Romanians would rather run than fight Hungarians (unless they invade). Bulgarians are even more neutral.
Again, it's of paramount importance for East Europe that all these past grievances are set aside. Cannot fight each other.
I could give Ukraine as an example, which hold lands that were once Hungarian and Romanian, because of the USSR. Remember, Moldova was once Romanian, and while it is true that it was more diverse than the rest of the country, it would still usually lean towards Romania, instead of Kiev, Moscow or Poland.
Ukraine held referendums in the former Romanian territories it holds in the 90s, and Romania was rather furious, sounds familiar? It definitely should.
Later, we disputed the ownership of the Snake Island (of "Russian ship fuck off" recent fame), and I think not to this day it is fully solved.
And we should not forget the Moldovan War, where we ended up with Transnistria, a war that came rather close to a Romania-Russia+Ukraine conflict.
BUT!
We in the area are so much against war that we went through all the diplomatic channels and international courts to fix all these territorial issues.
All changed when Russia took Crimea. Now, we might not particularly like Ukraine, and they did try to Russify the Hungarian and Romanian minorities (also a thing in Moldova), but we also know how much of a danger the empire that has nukes and doesn't give a fuck about international courts and diplomacy is.
This is why you see so much anti-Russian sentiment and such a belligerent Poland and East Europe. We basically fought for so long to be left the fuck alone, so we can economically develop in peace. Now all is under threat, from the East militarily, and from the West there's the endless social corrosion and cultural rot that we despise passionately.
And we know time is limited, as we have our own new generation of zoomers grown with the Internet, with blue hair and rings in nose and lips, that is only kept in check by the bullying that would happen if they step out of line too much, but they're still winning, slowly - unless we can somehow get the West to change and no longer promote so much deviancy. That's basically our best hope, as remote as it sounds.
East Europe is a zone that's complicated, fascinating at times, sometimes incredibly brutal, sometimes grugg-brained, and really undomesticated, which makes it unpredictable and a constant powder keg that threatens to start world wars.
Let's hope it won't happen this time.
 
Last edited:
Very informative posts, @AgendaPoster. All this stuff was unknown to me, so it's important people set the record straight on these matters.

Anyway, how accurate was their assessment of Codreanu? How is he perceived in Romania today?
First things first.
It is illegal in Romania (and most East Europe) to glorify fascist, nazist or communist regimes and leaders. It's a set of laws that gets rarely, and badly applied. More recently, a pretty low quality local party named AUR has attempted to flirt with the legionnaire legacy, and it resulted in its honorary president getting indicted (info is very scarce, feel free to use Google Translate).
However, the Romanian web is full of positive views of Codreanu and the Guard's legacy:

Screenshot 2022-09-30 162846.png
It's important to understand that as it's the case with every issue at the fringe of acceptability and legality, the waters are often muddy, and people will largely avoid telling you the truth unless in private. However, my personal experience is that the vast majority of Romanians know far less about Codreanu than the US far right, and he only appears in the news if some drunken dude yells some anti-Semitic stuff at some rally or a party like AUR appears (this is the second one like this, we had another ultranationalist party in the 2000s).
Romania is a rather poor country and people tend to be focused on making enough money to live their lives. They are largely apolitical and most don't vote at all, as they are used with corrupt politicians that only lie and never do anything for them.
Iron Guard and Codreanu are presented in a very negative light in most mainstream media, as dangerous, genocidal madmen. This is because there were assassination campaigns and some pogroms. What is not mentioned is that the regimes of that era were just as savage and used similar methods.
A TL;DR would be that almost nobody really cares in Romania, minus some niche communities, either NGOs and J-adjacent academics/historians that know what to look for, or the very, very few people that would pass as far right. I suspect more than 70% of the country has no idea who he was. Antonescu is a more known figure, and also forbidden to "rehabilitate".
The culprits for these laws were - the commie regime, which hunted down, killed and imprisoned legionnaires and "fascists" (it used fascist the same way Russians today do...), the neoliberal regimes after the 90s that sought a EU and NATO membership, which came with specific conditions (ethnic minorities respect, signing of various human rights charters, you know how it goes), and lastly and more recently NGOs and J-adjacent politicians and power structures. One prominent example would be this dude:
Alexandru Muraru (use Google Translate)
Who is:
- anti-fascist
- anti-communist
- anti-Russia, Orban/Hungary
- pro NATO/EU
- wants a "patriotism" without xenophobia, chauvinism, anti-Semitism and the sort
I think I'll end up with this, no additional words needed?
Screenshot 2022-09-30 164938.png
 


>UKRAINIANS DIDN'T WASTE MEN AND RESOURCES ON TRYING TO DISTURB FAKE ELECTIONS BY KILLING A BUNCH OF CIVILIANS THAT MEANS THEY'RE LOSING
 
Last edited:
View attachment 3708818

>UKRAINIANS DIDN'T WASTE MEN AND RESOURCES ON TRYING TO DISTURB FAKE ELECTIONS BY KILLING A BUNCH OF CIVILIANS THAT MEANS THEY'RE LOSING
The fat nerd has edited his former, far more neutral "no more brother wars/no more dead whites/no more escalation" February NJP statement to reflect the Current Thing mood changes for October and embrace Striker's radicalization.
I still remember Jazzhands being skeptical of both sides, it's been just half a year, but it was enough to go from an attempt to be reasonable and against senseless violence to shilling for Russia.
lol
 
OK I fucked up again.
I keep on making this mistake where I go on a run and don't find any podcasts or content to listen to, and eventually end up with some FTN.
Today it was FTN 517: The Parasitic Gay Satan Did This, and JFC, it was not pleasant.
After a short intro, Jazzhands rants for hours about how and why he "changed" from being a "Russian-skeptic" (i.e. pointing out that there were Jews around Putin, that's the political analysis of everything NJP) to being a Russian propagandist, EVEN when the Russian president specifically mentions in a very negative light anything related to Nazis, Germans, the "West"/US, Bandera, and more. There are dozens of lies (again) and idiotic justifications for empire building and land grabs, often very rudimentary and put together for guaranteed success at a sub 70IQ grugg-brained bloodlust-perverted population, which considering the NJP is an allegedly pro-white group, it's rather suspicious.
Jazzhands and Warren (?) go over Putin's speech and "victory", although as they were speaking the Russians were getting evicted from some cities of relevance and running away from others (inside the new "Mother Russia" territories that are to be under the alleged nuclear umbrella protection). It's such a lack of self-awareness that it's simply painful to listen.
The parts about the Nazis contain an unimaginable amount of cope and "you have to understand why Russia would hate Nazis, and yes we're super hardcore, avowed Nazis and Hitler enjoyers ourselves, but you see *insert 5 minutes rant that changes nothing*"
Absolutely amazing stuff, also sad.
Definitely recommend listening if you hate yourself and are interested in bad propaganda.
Also, Mike, Strike, Jazz and the rest, I know you read this or your have your paypigs sending you "takes".
You had a few months of Russia shilling with moderate success, cause it seemed to "win". Far fewer gruggs will accept to be on the losing side. Are you guys prepared for the moment when what you lied to be as "ZOG" wins, which yes is uncertain, but still a possibility. Are you prepared in the case of an actual war to be judged as traitors to the US?
How can you be SO COWARDLY to think that YOUR country is ZOG and dying, and yet you won't do shit to fix it, instead expecting a foreign power to come deal the deathblow for your homeland?
 
Last edited:
The fat nerd has edited his former, far more neutral "no more brother wars/no more dead whites/no more escalation" February NJP statement to reflect the Current Thing mood changes for October and embrace Striker's radicalization.
I still remember Jazzhands being skeptical of both sides, it's been just half a year, but it was enough to go from an attempt to be reasonable and against senseless violence to shilling for Russia.
lol
That was great Jazzhands doing the Moscow is browner than Paris nnnngguyy. Than the next episode Warren had to do a show with Striker and Jazzhands with Enoch to get the correct programming from Strike & Mike.
 
The last time I listened to these guys they were making fun of haters, ironically pretending to be "dooginists" and saying that nobody could define what that means.
It's sad to see they have fully embraced the Russia shilling and left the irony behind. Apparently Western Multirracial Jewish Empire = bad, but Eastern Multirracial Jewish Empire = good now.
 
The last time I listened to these guys they were making fun of haters, ironically pretending to be "dooginists" and saying that nobody could define what that means.
It's sad to see they have fully embraced the Russia shilling and left the irony behind. Apparently Western Multirracial Jewish Empire = bad, but Eastern Multirracial Jewish Empire = good now.
The thing with NJP and TRS is that they abandoned the "we're just fucking around lol CALM DOWN sperg" argument when they made a political party and decided to attempt to enter traditional politics. So they can longer do the "we were just pretending to be retarded" dance, now their statements are essentially those of the party and its leadership.
I'm not saying having a party is bad, but IF you decide to have a party, and you change your foreign policy from year to year, and you coming to power would spell disaster for your strategic allies in East Europe and Asia, well, I guess you're fucked, and you'll never get enough votes.
It is one thing to be mega isolationist for Middle Eastern wars, and proclaim how evil the American Empire is, because in that area it is Russia that does diplomacy and covert ops.
And another thing to be isolationist when it comes to East Europe, largely more white than the US nowadays, which joined all the political alliances it did with ONE purpose, deterring Russia from doing what it is doing now.
Doing the latter is exposing you as not actually being a pan-Europeanist, but something else. Laughing at Ukrainian deaths and territorial losses while crying for Russian ones is making you a Russian nationalist, not a white advocate.
There are ways to stay in better shape as a WN during this war, for example Devon Stack/Blackpilled has barely touched on it, yet he still pointed out NATO expansionism, J power and that Russia was "provoked" (I would say more like masterfully jebaited). But Devon doesn't shill for Russia, doesn't shill for Ukraine, he just observes, and then goes on doing his thing.
Too hard for TRS, way too much of a challenge to not pick a (losing) side and shill it to the ground.

Striker literally cannot help himself, from both lying and sucking up Russia whatever it does.
First, it's not about East EU governments. THE POPULATION literally fears and often hates Russians. Striker is such a burger that he completely lacks any East EU and Balkan understanding capacity. Let's take my own personal experience, which is one in many, many similar ones.
As a child, grand-granddad stories of war and horrors, and about how our poor country looked to the West for salvation from the savagery and cruelty of the East. Stories of dealing with Nazi occupation rather well and get used to German influence, only to have the war tides turning and the Soviet biomass sweeping over the lands, taking EVERYTHING they owned, raping the women, eating the fucking horses and dogs, torturing people in odious ways while drunk. Had to run over borders with nothing start from zero. Later, communist regime enabled by Russia uprooted them AGAIN and put them in a different part of the country as "fascist dissidents", forced them to build mudhuts and start agriculture from nothing.
Worthless continuing with the stories (of which I have proof, pictures, wartime letters and more). You get the idea. Getting fucked by Germans was bad, but they acted like humans. Getting fucked by the Soviets, on the other hand...
About the discriminating of whites in the West, dude, FIX IT?!? What the fuck are you guys waiting for?
You expect Poland to care about it while 99% Polish? Hungary, 96% Hungarian? Romania, 89% Romanian (and like 7% Hungarian so still fucking white).
You expect East EU to care first about trannies and drag queens in NYC and LA? There are like 100 troons in the whole country and they get bullied all the time. A Pride parade barely consists of 100-200 people and they need THOUSANDS of cops to protect them or they'd get lynched lmao.
We see Western deviancy as deplorable, sad, tragic but avoidable. We always looked towards the West as explorers and inventors. The American image for East Europe was the manly man that went into the Wild West and charted unknown lands while fighting savages, the manly man that built skyscrapers while we were living in ruins after 2 WWs.
What can we do other than cheer you guys in the West up so you can do what you have to do for your own homelands? It's YOUR responsibility to fix things.
As for Soros and Nuland, lol, dying fossils, who the fuck cares.
We have an entire army fucking up things nearby. YOU in the West deal with the things you care about, K?

Screenshot 2022-10-05 010844.pngScreenshot 2022-10-05 011233.png
Bonus:
Congratulations for being on KiwiFarms, a site so unhinged and dangerous, that we even beat the Super Mega Based Anti Jewish Power TRS.biz, which is cozily protected by Cloudflare.
How come the Joos have not Shut You Down, Mike?
Screenshot 2022-10-05 014606.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Striker has no understanding of Eastern European history whatsoever
It's weird his views on Ukrainian identity which is legitimate identity is straight out of a weird Russian philosophers book
Let me explain to those who aren't familiar with the argument has never been whether or not you craniums and Russians are different ethnic groups
They are not the argument has always been is Ukraine more important to the overall Russian Identity or is Moscow more important to the overall Russian identity
This argument has to do with the birthplace of modern Russian statehood
It's a very complicated piece of Eastern European history which Striker has no understanding of because he's stupid is s*** and is paid to spout Russia Today propaganda the dumb American audience
Screenshot_14.pngScreenshot_15.pngScreenshot_16.png

Striker literally cannot help himself, from both lying and sucking up Russia whatever it does.
First, it's not about East EU governments. THE POPULATION literally fears and often hates Russians. Striker is such a burger that he completely lacks any East EU and Balkan understanding capacity. Let's take my own personal experience, which is one in many, many similar ones.
As a child, grand-granddad stories of war and horrors, and about how our poor country looked to the West for salvation from the savagery and cruelty of the East. Stories of dealing with Nazi occupation rather well and get used to German influence, only to have the war tides turning and the Soviet biomass sweeping over the lands, taking EVERYTHING they owned, raping the women, eating the fucking horses and dogs, torturing people in odious ways while drunk. Had to run over borders with nothing start from zero. Later, communist regime enabled by Russia uprooted them AGAIN and put them in a different part of the country as "fascist dissidents", forced them to build mudhuts and start agriculture from nothing.
Worthless continuing with the stories (of which I have proof, pictures, wartime letters and more). You get the idea. Getting fucked by Germans was bad, but they acted like humans. Getting fucked by the Soviets, on the other hand...
About the discriminating of whites in the West, dude, FIX IT?!? What the fuck are you guys waiting for?
You expect Poland to care about it while 99% Polish? Hungary, 96% Hungarian? Romania, 89% Romanian (and like 7% Hungarian so still fucking white).
You expect East EU to care first about trannies and drag queens in NYC and LA? There are like 100 troons in the whole country and they get bullied all the time. A Pride parade barely consists of 100-200 people and they need THOUSANDS of cops to protect them or they'd get lynched lmao.
We see Western deviancy as deplorable, sad, tragic but avoidable. We always looked towards the West as explorers and inventors. The American image for East Europe was the manly man that went into the Wild West and charted unknown lands while fighting savages, the manly man that built skyscrapers while we were living in ruins after 2 WWs.
What can we do other than cheer you guys in the West up so you can do what you have to do for your own homelands? It's YOUR responsibility to fix things.
As for Soros and Nuland, lol, dying fossils, who the fuck cares.
We have an entire army fucking up things nearby. YOU in the West deal with the things you care about, K?

View attachment 3715497View attachment 3715498
Bonus:
Congratulations for being on KiwiFarms, a site so unhinged and dangerous, that we even beat the Super Mega Based Anti Jewish Power TRS.biz, which is cozily protected by Cloudflare.
How come the Joos have not Shut You Down, Mike?
View attachment 3715559
Yep thank you for the kind words and I wish you the best in Romanian in Reviving The Spirit of the captain
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back