Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.2%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 94 25.7%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 62 16.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 143 39.1%

  • Total voters
    366
These people have used these very same tactics to ruin regular people, so why shouldn't we adopt them and let them have a taste of their own medicine? Then, and only then will this fucking stop.
I've seen this opinion and the opposing moral high ground sentiment of "we can't sink to their level" echoed around every time something like this happens. I'm starting to think the nuclear option is the only way.

The only difference is it's far, far more effective when they do it because - to use their own phraseology - they're protected by the system. Youtube, Twitter, Faceberg, and all mainstream social media sites will always protect their useful idiots and won't hesitate to offer up a sacrifice to the screeching horde of gash wounds when the situation calls for it. No one is safe, not even the otherwise obedient mutts like Destiny. That's just the way it is.
 
Youtube doesn't care about the money Nick makes. Even thinking the money Nick makes Youtube per ad revenue has the slightest affect on the bottom line is folly. What started out as a website for fun videos has now become a site where public opinion is created, concentrated, and sold to the masses.
Google literally bought Youtube and subsidized it to the tune of billions if not trillions over the years specifically FOR the ability to control public opinion. They do not care if YT is profitable or not. The ability to manipulate "the new Hollywood" and "the new TV" forever is far, far more important to them.
 
Just noticed this on the tab I had opened to find out why my youtube stream stopped.
Untitled.png
It's over boys. I hate the anti-Christ.
 
Another hot take:

While Nick wasn't threatening to murder Lucas, saying "he needs to go against the wall" is 100% referring to execution via a firing squad, and anyone saying different is disingenuous.

Nick was getting too smug, cocky, and sloppy from his success. He thought that he was invincible, but when you're hunted by the troon squad you can never afford to give them an inch.
While there is truth in that there's no actual threat in what he said, no matter how much dick snipping, child groomers cry about it. Maybe he was riding a little high off his own fumes but there wasn't a single thing actionable in what he said. This is made worse by Luke purposefully misquoting what Nick said in the first attempt to get him de-platformed and his law license revoked, giving Nick a justifiable reason to double down. Nick and us have the right to say what he says and also say that Luke and his groomers should be shot, but we don't live in a world of laws anymore.
 
This is fucking ridiculous. A high majority of these disgusting troons and their "allies" need to completely fuck off. A good bit of Nick's income comes from Youtube, I assume. Most of these faggots will never know what it is like to support an actual family.
I like nick, a great deal, but he was fucking dumb for putting his income in jeopardy like this. I expect he was wanting to push the issue a bit so he could have a lawsuit against youtube, and set some precedence for the texas law, but it could really backfire on him.
 
GIVE UP THE ADDRESSES RACKETS!!!
WE ALREADY HAVE SEVERAL OF THEM, I HAVE 40 THREADS TO MAKE
And I have 40 credit cards to create


I like nick, a great deal, but he was fucking dumb for putting his income in jeopardy like this. I expect he was wanting to push the issue a bit so he could have a lawsuit against youtube, and set some precedence for the texas law, but it could really backfire on him.
Damn, guess he is going to have to go back to being a lawyer again. Too bad those careers don't make a bunch of money. Maybe he can sell bathtub HRT to minors like all these groomers. Then he could be back on the gravy train
 
View attachment 3718255
Nick's channel has been terminated
You know what’s insane? All we ever do is talk about what they are doing. And their unhinged reaction is to go scorched earth life ruination.

One day they’ll target the wrong person and it will be like their prophecy of always being in danger will be fulfilled.

It goes to show that for all of their hype about being in danger, they don’t really ever fear backlash. They continue to ramp up because they know they are protected.
 
While Nick wasn't threatening to murder Lucas, saying "he needs to go against the wall" is 100% referring to execution via a firing squad, and anyone saying different is disingenuous.
This got very interesting to me in his discussion with the Highlander guy. On one hand, I entirely agree: he'd long said "MAPs go on the wall, that's where they belong" and a hundred variations of that, and everyone gets the very simple double entendre.

Sticking with his "I wasn't saying that, you're saying that" argument against Duncan: he's doing his lawspeak flawlessly. We can start to say "he's disingenuous", which seems obvious, but then consider: what exactly are we claiming he's saying when we say that? Are we claiming he's advocating for someone murdering them? No. So what are we claiming? Are we claiming he's trying to be edgy with regards to pedos etc? Yeah. What we're really doing when we say "he's being disingenuous" is that he's using his brand of edgy humor.

But carrying that on, legally speaking, no one can ever claim he's advocating violence. "On the wall" was never a variation of "against the wall = execution". It just brings that immediately to mind. If he sticks with "I'm not saying that, you're saying that", he's simply always correct.

Of course when it comes to these companies and their stupid protections while censoring speech, the legal argument means nothing other than that Nick was refusing to cede any ground whatsoever to the troonsquad. It means jack fucking shit to the staff of YT who would love to destroy him for wrongthink.

Ofc this really will just be edging another group of people further away from giving YT money.

I don't think his YT channel is coming back, because they don't care who's right, they're just certain Rekieta is evil that must be defeated. It's how this always works.

edit: he used the phrase last night "borrowed time", "I knew it was always on borrowed time". yup.
 
Last edited:
Anyone arguing about the "on the wall,"the obvious lawyer context is that of a police lineup for fingering suspects, where the wall has height lines and the accused has similar buds lined up with them to make sure the accuser can make a positive ID or the police let them go. Firing squads haven't been relevant in the US since we were still fighting over border lines with stinky 1800's mexicans.
 
When did he say, specifically "he needs to go against the wall"?

Because all I've ever heard has been "on the wall".
Or he meant what he said he meant.
Yes, because he clearly meant all the pedophiles and groomers should just stand against a wall for a few seconds and leave without being harmed in any way.

Same way people who say they want to give pedos helicopter rides really just mean they want to give them a lovely tour of the country side.

"Against the wall" has been an internet colloquialism for executions for years. I haven't ever heard against the wall used in the context of legally processing someone.

I agree, pedos and groomers should be locked up and/or killed, but when you're on a pro-pedo platform like YouTube don't say that unless you want to be banned.
 
Last edited:
Back