Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Wooper]

How many hours of streams was just yeeted? Tens of thousands? My favorite streams & the ones I always made sure to watch were Nick's streams with Drex.

 

[Potatoherder]

I've been watching him on Rumble since February.

What else should he have been doing?

Including the rumble viewers in the conversation. I get it's hard to manage multiple chats and even more so when rumble/odysee have poor UIs. This is all compounded by the lack of cross pollination of the chats. Rumble and youtube chats are completely different at this point. Salty and Viva are doing the start on youtube and move to rumble for the spicy. This causes people to move over and unify the chats and fanbases. Not demanding he does that but it does work.

I think Nick fully expected youtube to treat in special because of all the money he makes them. They simply do not care and same goes with all the other normie platforms. Expect his twitch to get banned when he streams on there again. Off site activity is fair game and they will use his youtube ban to justify it.

 

[None More Black]

Who says we have to ask rackets?

I think lawyer complaints are a matter of public record. Lawyers in good standing are officers of the court. As good.citizens, we have a duty to request a copy in full of the complaint against the Court Officer Nicholas Rekieta.

You know, so we can do our duty as citizens to verify the claims made against someone with authority to administer the law.

 

[Matt Damon]

At the very least I want him to take away from this the fact that he's not the social media genius he thinks he is.

It has nothing to do with being a "social media genius".

They were eventually going to ban him for the capital crime of wrongthink-while-popular and there was nothing he could've done to prevent it short of completely bending the knee.

 

[Retink Retunk]

and he was starting to get pretty smug about it.

That's the thing though, he should be allowed to be smug about making fun of people who tried to fuck with him. I do feel bad for the guy, he took the risk and had he succeeded maybe things would improve for everyone, but as it stands stuff is still shit. You're free to shit on him too, but I just don't really agree with the take on that aspect.

 

[Devious Dave]

Metakour is definitely next on the chopping block I never would've imagined nick would go before metakour would at the very least maybe this will finally get people to use alternative platforms

 

[buying gf]

That's the thing though, he should be allowed to be smug about making fun of people who tried to fuck with him. I do feel bad for the guy, he took the risk and had he succeeded maybe things would improve for everyone, but as it stands stuff is still shit. You're free to shit on him too, but I just don't really agree with the take on that aspect.

The only thing Nick did wrong was that he forgot Null's rule: Never be smug.

 

[Beavis]

Nick's a big boy, he'll always figure out a way to land on his feet. What a shit platform YouLube is right now though.

Nick was well off before he started streaming and he’s made over a million off YouTube. He’ll be just fine.

 

[MuuMuu Bunnylips]

It seems Duncan's (Duncan MacLeod pussy is still sore from that stream. What at an absolute twat..

What an absolute twat.




https://mobile.twitter.com/DuncanCantDie/status/1577809684655915009

https://mobile.twitter.com/DuncanCantDie/status/1577810861741195265

View attachment 3718570View attachment 3718566

Has anyone explained to him that the streams are nothing more than bonus income?

 

[Judex Meus]

Alright, my complete layman's theory:

1. Complaints get filed. Not by Keffals or LawyerTroon, but clearly answering their call to action.
2. These future-starters file false complaints in Minnesota.
3. New sponsors/management deals, stream within TOS, but agitates troons.
4. False-flagging deletes the channel.

Unlike the fruitless complaints to the bar, this has very quantifiable damages for Rackets. There's dox here of the ring leaders and all of the participants. Their reaching into the state of Minnesota to file these complaints means Rackets can pretty much assume they've submitted to jurisdiction. Bare minimum they pay for a MN attorney to try and say they didn't. You cannot just come out and say you're giving them enough rope to hang themselves, plaintiff's have a duty to mitigate damages. That said, reading between the lines and seeing what's happening I wouldn't be shocked if that was the plan. And I don't worry about disclosing it because it's already to late to stop if that's the case.

I want to believe, but it just seems too (as a non-lawfag myself understands it). I can't imagine he'd risk his livelihood to try and play 4D chess with a bunch of trannies and Jewtube. Although, given that it was essentially a foregone conclusion that he'd eventually be banned, maybe it was just his way of going out with a bang. Still, seems too risky.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

Has anyone explained to him that the streams are nothing more than bonus income?

You think Duncan is capable of learning from others? He is the one who teaches you about how the world works, despite knowing nothing

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

Confirmed for Crowder

 

[Absurdity]

Nick was well off before he started streaming and he’s made over a million off YouTube. He’ll be just fine.

I'm referring more to his online visibility than his income, but he will need to save up for all the cancer treatment he's destined to splurge on behalf of his estranged liver.

 

[Vexillology]

Anyone arguing about the "on the wall,"the obvious lawyer context is that of a police lineup for fingering suspects, where the wall has height lines and the accused has similar buds lined up with them to make sure the accuser can make a positive ID or the police let them go. Firing squads haven't been relevant in the US since we were still fighting over border lines with stinky 1800's mexicans.

"The wall" is, to the Twitter people, a reference to The Handmaid's Tale, a story by (((Margaret Atwood))). In that story, "the wall" is where the bodies of criminals are hanged.

This is exactly the fucking point. To Nick, allegedly, "the wall" sometimes refers to a Rogue's Gallery of people (like Lucas) who we should be wary of. Words don't mean the same thing to anyone, not even to you and me.

 

[BelUwUga]

I want to believe, but it just seems too (as a non-lawfag myself understands it). I can't imagine he'd risk his livelihood to try and play 4D chess with a bunch of trannies and Jewtube. Although, given that it was essentially a foregone conclusion that he'd eventually be banned, maybe it was just his way of going out with a bang. Still, seems too risky.

I mean, there is risk, but is it really more than the alternative when even you phrase it as the ban being an inevitability? "Your channel's gone but you cannot quantify damages, you cannot identify the bad actors, womp womp" has been the case with internet giants for forever. Either by intent or coincidence this is turning into a situation that's "ripe" for a meaningful case to happen. I agree it might be tilting at windmills but I'll be pulling for Don Quixote if that's the case. I'm sick of seeing the groomers win and not even have to fight.

 

[Cherenkovblue]

It has nothing to do with being a "social media genius".

People have been telling him to diversify his presence for the better part of three years and he's been dragging his feet and openly mocking anyone who tells him otherwise because ME YAM BIG YOUTUBE MAN, EARN MUCH SHEKELBERRIES. Don't act like he wasn't being retarded.

They were eventually going to ban him for the capital crime of wrongthink-while-popular and there was nothing he could've done to prevent it short of completely bending the knee.

They didn't ban him for wrongthink. He read off the names of complainants to his local bar for ethics violations. He chose to do that. They were going to get him for something eventually, but HE CHOSE TO BROADCAST THAT. I'm not saying that doesn't make it wrong, but I am trying to impress upon everyone here that you're all getting dangerously close to acting like the sort of people we all routinely laugh at because they absolutely cannot recognize when they've fucked up. HE FUCKED UP. People need to admit that before they become cows themselves.

 

[TheClappening]

Has anyone explained to him that the streams are nothing more than bonus income?

I wouldn't say that. Nick's streams are his main source of income. He hasn't actually lawyered in a while, and when he was lawyering (while also doing his nightly shows) he was charging very little or going full pro bono.

So this ban is substantially hitting his ability to feed/house/clothe himself and his family.

 

[Hey Fatrick FUCK YOU]

View attachment 3715655
Anyone know what happened this morning around 4:45AM EST?
I got an email about the subscription being paused.
Less than an hour later I got an email that it started up again.

@Null announcement-worthy? Youtube axes its biggest and most beloved lawyer channel because he said something mean about trannies once.

Not sure if it's been posted but here it is happening in real time:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBYYV52Et64

And they called us "crazy" when we talked about a slippery slope once they started axing David Duke and "fringe" people...

 

[HTTP Error 404]

Alright, my complete layman's theory:

1. Complaints get filed. Not by Keffals or LawyerTroon, but clearly answering their call to action.
2. These future-starters file false complaints in Minnesota.
3. New sponsors/management deals, stream within TOS, but agitates troons.
4. False-flagging deletes the channel.

Unlike the fruitless complaints to the bar, this has very quantifiable damages for Rackets. There's dox here of the ring leaders and all of the participants. Their reaching into the state of Minnesota to file these complaints means Rackets can pretty much assume they've submitted to jurisdiction. Bare minimum they pay for a MN attorney to try and say they didn't. You cannot just come out and say you're giving them enough rope to hang themselves, plaintiff's have a duty to mitigate damages. That said, reading between the lines and seeing what's happening I wouldn't be shocked if that was the plan. And I don't worry about disclosing it because it's already to late to stop if that's the case.

They clearly wanted to destroy his law career, and when that didn't happen and it turns out they didn't read the fine print saying they would give their complaints directly to Nick, they want on to plan B to try and ruin his youtube career over covering their attempt to ruin his law career.

Of course, since this is youtube and we're in 2022 where the rule is "A tranny? Do whatever you want, all the time", Youtube capitulated. It doesn't hurt that Youtube's trust and safety team is literally staffed by brain dead, barely literate, couldn't-pass-a-US-GED-Program indians.

 

[Cherenkovblue]

That's the thing though, he should be allowed to be smug about making fun of people who tried to fuck with him. I do feel bad for the guy, he took the risk and had he succeeded maybe things would improve for everyone, but as it stands stuff is still shit. You're free to shit on him too, but I just don't really agree with the take on that aspect.

Make fun of them all you want, sure... but reading their full names on stream? That was pants-on-head retarded. There's a reason you shouldn't be smug. Avoiding the urge to be a smug fuck will keep you from being blinded by schadenfreude and thus keep you from doing stupid shit like this.