You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.
He also hates his deadbeat Muggle dad and obsesses over his mom, who was herself a rapist (conceiving him with a love potion). Getting so mad jealous of a normal magic couple having a normal magic baby that he killed them and started grooming their kid with Parseltongue mind whispers. At one point his snake wore a woman like a skinsuit. Lots to unpack.
Funnily enough, Tom Riddle originally thought he was a wizard on his father's side, because he assumed no witch would be weak enough to let themselves die in childbirth. Which somehow also feels apt. And then he wandered into the ladies' room and killed a girl with his giant snake.
I've always said trannies are the kings of historical revisionism and you can't believe a single thing they say about their past.
If this guy was suddenly a teenager again, he wouldn't go get on hormones. He'd proceed to go back to acting like a standard garden variety incel, until he hit his 30s again at which point he'd get desperate, troon out, and claim he wishes he could've been on hormones when he was young and it's the world's fault he wasn't.
Even if these people (and I use that term tentatively) were capable of being honest with themselves, they absolutely aren't able or willing to be honest with other people.
He also hates his deadbeat Muggle dad and obsesses over his mom, who was herself a rapist (conceiving him with a love potion). Getting so mad jealous of a normal magic couple having a normal magic baby that he killed them and started grooming their kid with Parseltongue mind whispers. At one point his snake wore a woman like a skinsuit. Lots to unpack.
To be fair every single horror movie monster/villain has parallels to trannies, because predatory mutants that have transformed into twisted, animalistic mockeries of humanity which hide in the shadows waiting to target women and children are pretty classically scary and unlikeable.
Well, she did try. Unfortunately the judge's rationale for awarding Tony custody is not included in the publicly available divorce documents that Marvin so kindly retrieved for us.
Tony's current position is that he "knew" he was "trans" when he was roleplaying as Eri-chan online in D&D games as a young teenager, but was "forced into the closet" by his hyper-religious parents and wider society. Naturally, there is no evidence of any of this beyond his old web page where he uses his character's name of "Erin/Eri-chan" (which is tenuous to say the least). But Step No. 1 in the AGP handbook is to reinterpret and reinvent your entire life to support whatever claims you make about yourself now.
Very little, as far as we can tell -- but then he was actively deleting his posts while we were trying to archive them. There was one post, in reply to someone asking "is this person a tranny?", which we caught because someone else on the Shroomery had quoted it:
I think this may have appeared in this thread before but I couldn't turn it up with a few searches. Just as a reminder, you can see all the Shroomery pages I archived by going to this list -- look for the pages archived in mid-May.
But yeah mostly it was Tony fantasising about "banging a 10":
Anyway, some Tony moob lols I stumbled across when writing this post -- from two years ago but I believe it's not appeared in this thread before. (old.reddit.com, archive.ph) View attachment 3719431
Do they know that boobs shaking doesn't hurt them? Especially when you have like AA cups like Tony? Do they think natal women have to wear bras all the time else hold onto their boobs so they dont jiggle right off?
Who am I kidding this is all just their weird fetish role playing again..
Well yes exactly. Tony's mega baps for anyone who needed reminding:
Now, obviously Tony is having to hold his 36DDD whoppers while he walks down stairs, lest he knock himself out with a self-inflicted norks-based uppercut. Which is why we can totes believe him when he talks about oral on his amhole "driving [him] up a wall in the most wonderful of ways".
I’d like to see a double blind study on this topic. You can’t tell a difference for most of these wack jobs anyway. Besides, they do double blind studies on people with conditions that will actually kill them. I do think there could be a placebo affect when it comes to the suicidal ideation. Ofc I’m not a scientist, but it’s not like Tony ‘Have a Xan’ Reed is much better.
(A)
Well yes exactly. Tony's mega baps for anyone who needed reminding: View attachment 3720022
Now, obviously Tony is having to hold his 36DDD whoppers while he walks down stairs, lest he knock himself out with a self-inflicted norks-based uppercut. Which is why we can totes believe him when he talks about oral on his amhole "driving [him] up a wall in the most wonderful of ways".
I don't know what would be worse, Tony being awarded custody for bullshit tranny pandering reasons, or him being legit a more fit parent than the boy's mother. Also, good to see you again Geranium.
The mom seems like a nice lady. She works as a theater somethin or another so her hours are weird which probably facotred into it. It's hard to say what went down, but she had to file a court order to keep Tony from wearing her dresses- the only issue I can imagine is thay she almost cheated? Or something. It's fucking ridiculous
I will never stop being frustrated by this fucking double-talk? You know why we don't commonly consider being gay to be an illness these days? Because a gay kid doesn't need elaborate, invasive medical intervention just to live. You can't talk about the importance of forced femming little boys "trans-healthcare" without acknowledging it's a medical issue!
The mom seems like a nice lady. She works as a theater somethin or another so her hours are weird which probably facotred into it. It's hard to say what went down, but she had to file a court order to keep Tony from wearing her dresses- the only issue I can imagine is thay she almost cheated? Or something. It's fucking ridiculous
I kind of want a remake of Time Bandits, but instead of banal surburban parents, it's Tony. Still explodes at the end from foolishly touching Evil, though.
View attachment 3720239View attachment 3720238
I’d like to see a double blind study on this topic. You can’t tell a difference for most of these wack jobs anyway. Besides, they do double blind studies on people with conditions that will actually kill them. I do think there could be a placebo affect when it comes to the suicidal ideation. Ofc I’m not a scientist, but it’s not like Tony ‘Have a Xan’ Reed is much better.
(A)
If they can do double-blind studies with people who have clinical depression and give them placebos that often improve their condition, then someone taking HRT can wait a year or however long to get their real tiddy skittles. I'm sure they'd all immediately start talking about getting periods and such, so there'd be no difference between other obvious psychosomatic symptoms!
View attachment 3720239View attachment 3720238
I’d like to see a double blind study on this topic. You can’t tell a difference for most of these wack jobs anyway. Besides, they do double blind studies on people with conditions that will actually kill them. I do think there could be a placebo affect when it comes to the suicidal ideation. Ofc I’m not a scientist, but it’s not like Tony ‘Have a Xan’ Reed is much better.
(A)
I wondered how long it would be until Tony started playing this track again. For someone who was working towards a PhD I would expect more curiosity about the available (and not available!) evidence, but obviously he has taken a position on this matter and it is now just an argument to be won.
When your opponent's goal is just to convince other people, countering with facts means fighting with one arm tied behind your back -- or rather means spending hours just to debunk a thread of tweets that have the substance and consistency of whipped cream from a spray can. So for my own sanity I'll try to keep this relatively brief and just hit the main points.
Regarding Tony's assertions about what the phrase "low quality evidence" means, let's just dig into one of the studies that I've mentioned previously to see what stands behind the phrase (actually it would be more appropriate to say "very low certainty evidence"). All of the quotes below are taken from the NICE review of the evidence for GnRH agonists (puberty blockers).
Before digging in, I just want to note that when Tony claims that a randomised controlled trial would be unethical, this is something that has already been explicitly considered, so we can put that particular red herring in the bin:
NICE puberty blockers review said:
There may also be ethical issues with a ‘no treatment arm’ in comparative trials of GnRH analogues, where there may be poor mental health outcomes if treatment is withheld. However, the use of an active comparator such as close psychological support may reduce ethical concerns in future trials.
It's important to note also that RCTs are the best type of study but they're not the only way to get good-quality evidence. (Though as @A1 Steak Sauce and @Trianon pointed out, there have been successful RCTs for other risky conditions.) The problem is that the studies we do have are all right down the bottom end of the quality scale.
From the Discussion section (S6, p40 onwards), any emphasis is mine:
NICE puberty blockers review said:
A key limitation … is the lack of reliable comparative studies. The lack of clear, expected outcomes … also makes interpreting the evidence difficult. …
In plain English: aside from the lack of well-designed comparative studies (where one treatment is compared against another), the studies that do exist don't set out what they expect to see, so it is difficult to judge what they report.
NICE puberty blockers review said:
The studies … are all small, uncontrolled observational studies, which are subject to bias and confounding …
All the included studies reported physical and mental health comorbidities and concomitant treatments very poorly. For example, very little data are reported on how many children and adolescents needed additional mental health support, and for what reasons, or whether additional interventions, and what form and duration (for example drug treatment or counselling) that took. This is a possible confounder for the treatment outcomes in the studies because changes in critical and important outcomes may be attributable to external care rather than the psychological support or GnRH analogues used in the studies.
The argument for puberty blockers is that they allow children to avoid the distress of going through puberty (the """wrong""" puberty). If you're studying a treatment intended to relieve mental suffering, maybe it would be important to note the mental illnesses your study participants have and what other treatment they are receiving for it! But these studies don't and chalk up the changes to the puberty blockers.
And finally from the conclusion:
NICE puberty blockers review said:
The results of the studies that reported impact on the critical outcomes of gender dysphoria and mental health (depression, anger and anxiety), and the important outcomes of body image and psychosocial impact (global and psychosocial functioning) in children and adolescents with gender dysphoria are of very low certainty using modified GRADE. They suggest little change with GnRH analogues from baseline to follow-up.
The "critical" outcomes here are the ones that are judged to affect suicide risk (reduce those = fewer dead patients). But we can't tell from the studies we have whether puberty blockers improve things.
So this is for puberty blockers but the NICE review on cross-sex hormones says basically the same things about those studies. I would just emphasise as well that these are reviews, which take all the existing individual studies and try to draw conclusions across the whole set. Tony's counter is typically (as in the linked thread) to point out some new study with an eye-catching figure. “One swallow does not a summer make”, and all that (particularly if you were looking through dirty binoculars and it wasn't a swallow at all).
Anyway, the more general point I'd like to make is this: if we have effectively no evidence that these treatments work as promised, and we might expect that prescribing these treatments anyway would pose some amount of risk to patients, the burden of proof falls on those who want to press ahead regardless (that would be you Tony!), not those saying "Hold on a minute, this might be harmful".
Cass Interim Report - see Chapter 5 and Appendix 4 for information about why evidence matters in developing treatment programmes, the current situation in youth gender medicine, and comparisons to other illnesses.
SEGM overview of the two NICE reviews. Including links to archived PDFs are both; unfortunately due to an internal reorganisation at NICE, direct links to the NICE website don't work anymore.
More railing against detrans minors. The OP, who has now deleted her Twitter is a seventeen year old girl, and already had a double mastectomy. What I could find of the original tweets: View attachment 3711172 View attachment 3711175 View attachment 3711174 View attachment 3711173
Tony's reaction: BUT WHAT ABOUT MEEEEE?
(tweet | archive) View attachment 3711171 View attachment 3711177 View attachment 3711176
she's not a woman, Tony, she's a girl. Not yet a legal adult. Can't have a glass of wine at a bar, but predatory physicians gave her "affirming" cosmetic plastic surgery. People have a problem with girls, teenage girls, being offered mastectomies before they can grasp the consequences. Why are you so eager to blow this off? The only girl you can muster any sympathy for in your whole thread, is the one pretending to be a boy. Nice use of black trans women to deflect talking about you, though, very Redditor of you.
"developed as a man", lol Crimson Chin looking motherfucker
some more from this thread, Tony is confronted by another young detrans woman about how not having breasts because you're a man isn't the same as having a doctor cut off your healthy breasts as a minor
Tony insists that men having to go through male puberty is "irreversible damage". I truly can't fathom how anyone tolerates this ludicrous idea that the most natural body process is damaging or even oppressive.
Tony insists that men having to go through male puberty is "irreversible damage". I truly can't fathom how anyone tolerates this ludicrous idea that the most natural body process is damaging or even oppressive.
But remember, trans isn't a medical thing! You know that old Star Trek episode "Miri"? About a disease that kills you once you hit puberty? That's basically what Tony claims being trans is, but that it's also a great gift.
Cow crossover with fellow crybully @TaylorLorenz
Yes, journalism shouldn’t research all sides of any complex issue, only Tony’s horrifying woman-voice needs to be heard.
More Tony telling women to shut up this morning:
Tony I cannot goddamn believe you are making me defend the M4L group, but that’s how far we’ve come. I am going to cheer on a group of Karens over you every time, though, because they are actual women and mothers and you are a mutilated, failed man doing a LARP and stealing the “mother” title from your ex-wife (like you did with her clothes).
By the way, if a school policy was dropped that easily, I can only guess that there were other teachers willing to let it drop. There is usually one person who has to put their head above the parapet, and deal with screeching troons like you, but others who silently nod in relief when they don’t have to play language games anymore (or keep weird little secrets about children hidden from their parents, like you want- very creepy of you, dude).
Edit: the teacher doing a heckin misgendering is male:
but we all know that won’t stop Tony from engaging in his favorite past time- yelling at/smugly talking down to women
The mom seems like a nice lady. She works as a theater somethin or another so her hours are weird which probably facotred into it. It's hard to say what went down, but she had to file a court order to keep Tony from wearing her dresses- the only issue I can imagine is thay she almost cheated? Or something. It's fucking ridiculous
It might have been; it's not clear. Kate was working long hours in theatre, and then later quit and moved away. Tony used both (working too much, not working) against her. Here's my write-up of the divorce documents, do a Ctrl-F search for "disgusting" to find the portion about this.
Edit: Also my speculation on why she might have changed her mind on the custody arrangement.
What does he do exactly? Also, I've read this whole thread, and reread big portions, how did I miss the part where Tony claims to be the child of carnival folk? Is he also skinwalking Cher, but only when she sings "Gypsies, Tramps and Thieves"?
Tony insists that men having to go through male puberty is "irreversible damage". I truly can't fathom how anyone tolerates this ludicrous idea that the most natural body process is damaging or even oppressive.
Cow crossover with fellow crybully @TaylorLorenz
Yes, journalism shouldn’t research all sides of any complex issue, only Tony’s horrifying woman-voice needs to be heard.
That study was such a piece of shit. Its data actually did not show a reduction in suicidality in the troon kids, just that the kids who didn't go on blockers became more suicidal.
While this seems like splitting hairs, it's absolutely important to distinguish between a drug that cures symptoms, versus one that merely pauses symptoms. Pausing symptoms can be useful sometimes, like for example, keeping cancerous tumors from getting bigger. But that's not the same thing as a cure.
