Debate a total fucking retarded FAGGOT who derailed the Nick Rekieta thread for 5 fucking pages into a one on one conversation about if he's a fag

I can’t wait to see this spun as some massive loss for the planet and “freedom of speech” as a whole and how we absolutely must care about this one man’s means of making tons of money getting drunk every night.
yeah when trannies can arbitrarily revoke someone's income and platform it's kind of a bad thing homie
 
I can’t wait to see this spun as some massive loss for the planet and “freedom of speech” as a whole and how we absolutely must care about this one man’s means of making tons of money getting drunk every night.
So individuals losing their ability to speak doesn't matter for free speech? Do only multinational corporations and government agencies matter in your opinion?
 
I’m not saying it a good thing, I’m saying it’s not a bad thing for pretty much anyone else except rekeita. It sucks it happened to him, but it’s not some death of the west occasion
How does a group retarded trannies having the ability to convince the largest corporations in the world, who control most of the internet's infastructure, to do whatever they want based on lies not affect anyone but Nick?

Show me where I said anything even remotely close to that and I’ll respond to it
I bolded it.
 
There's a reason the 'First they came for' poem is so spot on.

It’s never been spot on though, like literally never. Stop caring about his wallet, he doesn’t care about yours.

How does a group retarded trannies having the ability to convince the largest corporations in the world, who control most of the internet's infastructure, to do whatever they want based on lies not affect anyone but Nick?

Because basics of any similar complaint from anyone would have the same effect. This isn’t exclusively a tranny issue. Someone with a bad mood complaining to someone’s boss will usually result in them being fired, and because they’re not as popular as Nick, it won’t be treated as sow crazy injustice.
Nick isn’t a martyr

Edit to respond to your bold:

Nowhere in saying I don’t care about this one person getting removed from YouTube does it imply I think only corporations and the like are valid. I’d be just as apathetic if a corporation got removed.
 
This isn’t exclusively a tranny issue. Someone with a bad mood complaining to someone’s boss will usually result in them being fired, and because they’re not as popular as Nick, it won’t be treated as sow crazy injustice.
Nick isn’t a martyr
I'm pretty sure that despite being 1% of the population, trannies are responsible for at least 50% of instances of CloudFlare dropping websites.
 
I'm pretty sure that despite being 1% of the population, trannies are responsible for at least 50% of instances of CloudFlare dropping websites.
It’s beyond stupid to compare this situation to the situation the site went under.
Unlike YouTube, cloudflare did not have a long history of removing people for several walks of life after reports and complains from various groups.
You know as well I do that trannies are not the only people who get people removed from YouTube and that Nick is far from the only person to be removed from YouTube for bullshit complaints

The farms actually had an unprecedented removal. That was a significant event. An alcoholic youtuber losing his channel is just another Wednesday on YouTube


Dude just stop caring. lmao just not care about anything. I'm very smart.

That thing you like? Just not like it when it goes away. lol. lmao even.

That’s actually not what I said. I care about things, everyone does. I’m saying this particular person, and any one particular person is not something you should care about when the only connection is you watching videos they put out. Nick losing his channel really only effects Nick personally, and you can care and feel bad for it without pretending that it’s a key event in the destruction of free speech.
 
It was literally caused by the exact same group of people, with the same tactics, for the same supposed reason.
Except one unprecedented and set a standard the other is status quo. They couldn’t be more different.
You could start complaining right now for any arbitrary reason and get some other equally sized youtuber removed, that’s how YouTube operates. Until recently it was not how cloudflare operated. That’s not very hard to see

Everyone is well aware of how ban happy YouTube is and has been for nearly a decade now. Even Nick had commented many times on stream that he expected his channel would go down. That’s just one of the many risks people have to take on when dealing with Susan’s company. I don’t like it, but I won’t fool myself into think there was any significance to this or any other banning
 
Except one unprecedented and set a standard the other is status quo. They couldn’t be more different.
You could start complaining right now for any arbitrary reason and get some other equally sized youtuber removed, that’s how YouTube operates. Until recently it was not how cloudflare operated. That’s not very hard to see
Except Nick had his youtube channel for about 6 years, the majority of that time with hordes of idiots screeching at YouTube to ban him and it only happened now, the moment some retarded trannys got involved.
 
Except one unprecedented and set a standard the other is status quo. They couldn’t be more different.
You could start complaining right now for any arbitrary reason and get some other equally sized youtuber removed, that’s how YouTube operates. Until recently it was not how cloudflare operated. That’s not very hard to see

Everyone is well aware of how ban happy YouTube is and has been for nearly a decade now. Even Nick had commented many times on stream that he expected his channel would go down. That’s just one of the many risks people have to take on when dealing with Susan’s company. I don’t like it, but I won’t fool myself into think there was any significance to this or any other banning
This is your brain on hypernormalization.
 
Honestly Null should've just yeeted the Keffals thread when it became an existential threat to the site. There's trannies the world over looking to manipulate any platform they can to drop us. I don't think you'd have appreciated us going around doomsaying like you are for Rackets now. I trust Rackets knows enough to have known this was a likely outcome. Like I trusted the farms would return stronger than ever, I'll trust Rackets to land on his feet. I'd also be very careful to separate Nick and Nick's YT channel. He doesn't seem like the type not to survive what life throws his way.

No, Null handled it correctly, removing the thread would have meant he can and will cave to terrorism, which would have just made every other cow do the same thing.
 
No, Null handled it correctly, removing the thread would have meant he can and will cave to terrorism, which would have just made every other cow do the same thing.
Exactly that.
Give a screeching manchild what they want in response to their screeching, and it empowers them to screech louder, more frequently, and at more people.
 
View attachment 3719644

So Legal Mindset has been saying we'll know who is ride or die now that Nick has been banned. Well here's ol Legal Byte with the mildest of support for her "dear old friend". Fucking snake.

I don’t think this is throwing anyone under the bus, they expressed dislike for the situation but wants to wait for more info, which is reasonable when someone just woke up.
Legal Mindset was always more of a loud personally than Legalbyte but I don’t think one is saying they’re less of a friend than the other
 
No, Null handled it correctly, removing the thread would have meant he can and will cave to terrorism, which would have just made every other cow do the same thing.
That's my entire point. Couching this as Racket's failure just because it's not the easiest path forward for him seems irrational to me, especially given the source. I was trying to contrast the response while Rackets backed Null up from the jump.
 
Back