- Joined
- Sep 7, 2016
The petard of not sucking the new tranny overlord cock? That one? Oh, how awful of him.Hoisted on his own petard. Nice grift while it lasted.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The petard of not sucking the new tranny overlord cock? That one? Oh, how awful of him.Hoisted on his own petard. Nice grift while it lasted.
But remember they are an oppressed minority.Except Nick had his youtube channel for about 6 years, the majority of that time with hordes of idiots screeching at YouTube to ban him and it only happened now, the moment some retarded trannys got involved.
The image doesn't work well for name-searching, for example, if hypothetically one of these vexatious complainants wanted to name-search themselves or their friends or family on our forum for any record of them being mentioned. LET ME REMEDY THAT:
In the Matter of the Complaints against NICHOLAS R. REKIETA, a Minnesota Attorney
Registration No. 0397061
COMPLAINANTS
Julian Applebaum
I didn't say this was okay cause it's not, I just said this is not going to financially ruin him.Cutting off funding isn't the point. The point is to limit the chance that normies will stumble into your content and "become radicalized"
These people are fucking scum. They're sending complaints using their full names trying to destroy this man's life and expect what, pats on the back? Fuck I'm seething.View attachment 3718303
View attachment 3718306
![]()
KaptainCnucklz on Twitter: "@GayestFesh @TeamYouTube Hi @TeamYouTube!…
archived 5 Oct 2022 23:57:28 UTCarchive.ph
Both of those twatwaffles have been doxed here... those 2 never seem to STFU eitherView attachment 3718303
View attachment 3718306
![]()
KaptainCnucklz on Twitter: "@GayestFesh @TeamYouTube Hi @TeamYouTube!…
archived 5 Oct 2022 23:57:28 UTCarchive.ph
I get where you're coming from, but it's not like they would say, "Well, you deleted the thread, so we no longer have a problem with you." They'd say, "Okay, now delete THIS thread. Now THIS thread. Now ban all anti-trans speech. Now hand over all your users' info." It'd be like every time someone is publicly accused of racism and they respond with a groveling apology, then end up getting reamed into oblivion anyway. There's no incentive to compromise or to make small concessions.Honestly Null should've just yeeted the Keffals thread when it became an existential threat to the site.
Pretty much, yeah. He knew what platform he was on. Like so many before him and so many afterwards, he knew the line, (unfair and odious as that line may be), was there and yet couldn’t help but keep sticking a toe across it just to see if for him things would be different.The petard of not sucking the new tranny overlord cock? That one? Oh, how awful of him.
my honest guess is the man has enough money that he can take the L, so he wanted to be the last cool kid on YouTube now that Jim is sickly and only does a stream a month.Pretty much, yeah. He knew what platform he was on. Like so many before him and so many afterwards, he knew the line, (unfair and odious as that line may be), was there and yet couldn’t help but keep sticking a toe across it just to see if for him things would be different.
Well, guess what? Things weren’t different for him.
That was kind of my point, hence the follow-up:I get where you're coming from, but it's not like they would say, "Well, you deleted the thread, so we no longer have a problem with you." They'd say, "Okay, now delete THIS thread. Now THIS thread. Now ban all anti-trans speech. Now hand over all your users' info." It'd be like every time someone is publicly accused of racism and they respond with a groveling apology, then end up getting reamed into oblivion anyway. There's no incentive to compromise or to make small concessions.
Sure his channel is down now but should he just suck the tranny cock to keep it up or stand for his principles? And if he should stand for those principles why shouldn't he likewise offer no quarter?That's my entire point. Couching this as Racket's failure just because it's not the easiest path forward for him seems irrational to me, especially given the source. I was trying to contrast the response while Rackets backed Null up from the jump.
He's acknowledged he was on borrowed time on YT for months now. He just wasn't going to not say what he wanted to say.Pretty much, yeah. He knew what platform he was on. Like so many before him and so many afterwards, he knew the line, (unfair and odious as that line may be), was there and yet couldn’t help but keep sticking a toe across it just to see if for him things would be different.
Well, guess what? Things weren’t different for him.