Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 101 25.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 72 17.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 162 40.2%

  • Total voters
    403
The image doesn't work well for name-searching, for example, if hypothetically one of these vexatious complainants wanted to name-search themselves or their friends or family on our forum for any record of them being mentioned. LET ME REMEDY THAT:

In the Matter of the Complaints against NICHOLAS R. REKIETA, a Minnesota Attorney
Registration No. 0397061

COMPLAINANTS

Julian Applebaum

Applebaum follows both Lucas and Tony Reed : https://twitter.com/ju_applebaum
This is a female that thinks she is Male

School:
A: https://archive.ph/gxNUv
 
Cutting off funding isn't the point. The point is to limit the chance that normies will stumble into your content and "become radicalized"
I didn't say this was okay cause it's not, I just said this is not going to financially ruin him.
Tbh, most people that have bad shit happen to them on youtube are faggots but I can be against what happened to them while simultaneously calling them faggots.
 
Honestly Null should've just yeeted the Keffals thread when it became an existential threat to the site.
I get where you're coming from, but it's not like they would say, "Well, you deleted the thread, so we no longer have a problem with you." They'd say, "Okay, now delete THIS thread. Now THIS thread. Now ban all anti-trans speech. Now hand over all your users' info." It'd be like every time someone is publicly accused of racism and they respond with a groveling apology, then end up getting reamed into oblivion anyway. There's no incentive to compromise or to make small concessions.
 
The petard of not sucking the new tranny overlord cock? That one? Oh, how awful of him.
Pretty much, yeah. He knew what platform he was on. Like so many before him and so many afterwards, he knew the line, (unfair and odious as that line may be), was there and yet couldn’t help but keep sticking a toe across it just to see if for him things would be different.

Well, guess what? Things weren’t different for him.
 
Pretty much, yeah. He knew what platform he was on. Like so many before him and so many afterwards, he knew the line, (unfair and odious as that line may be), was there and yet couldn’t help but keep sticking a toe across it just to see if for him things would be different.

Well, guess what? Things weren’t different for him.
my honest guess is the man has enough money that he can take the L, so he wanted to be the last cool kid on YouTube now that Jim is sickly and only does a stream a month.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Lorne Armstrong
I get where you're coming from, but it's not like they would say, "Well, you deleted the thread, so we no longer have a problem with you." They'd say, "Okay, now delete THIS thread. Now THIS thread. Now ban all anti-trans speech. Now hand over all your users' info." It'd be like every time someone is publicly accused of racism and they respond with a groveling apology, then end up getting reamed into oblivion anyway. There's no incentive to compromise or to make small concessions.
That was kind of my point, hence the follow-up:
That's my entire point. Couching this as Racket's failure just because it's not the easiest path forward for him seems irrational to me, especially given the source. I was trying to contrast the response while Rackets backed Null up from the jump.
Sure his channel is down now but should he just suck the tranny cock to keep it up or stand for his principles? And if he should stand for those principles why shouldn't he likewise offer no quarter?
 
Pretty much, yeah. He knew what platform he was on. Like so many before him and so many afterwards, he knew the line, (unfair and odious as that line may be), was there and yet couldn’t help but keep sticking a toe across it just to see if for him things would be different.

Well, guess what? Things weren’t different for him.
He's acknowledged he was on borrowed time on YT for months now. He just wasn't going to not say what he wanted to say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moocow
Back