Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[stalkerchild]

I wonder if they think they could get a certain Texas lawyer to completely drop the ball again.

I assume he is just always dropping the ball, so wouldn't be hard.

The law let's either the user or the Texas AG sue on the users behalf, and Nick has connections in Texas. So it's not out of the realm of possibility that Texas will sue for him. Nick even mentioned bringing it to Ken Paxton's attention during the post-ban stream.

And Google wants no part of the state and their truly unlimited funds coming after them. They would prefer some 30k subscriber channel with no pull and no money so it never ends up at the SC. This might have actually had enough evidence for the AG to have gotten involved and that probably scared Google.

 

[White Pride Worldwide]

even if we imagine infinite funding I haven't the faintest idea how you assume "would" and really what that would even fucking mean if they did

I was about to ask what power you really think such an organization has and if you think it would actually mean anything
and then I realize your name lul

The fact of the matter is these companies really don't have any accountability to anyone and can and will boot you from their platform if they don't like you, twitch has been shit anyway since it become thothub.

 

[moocow]

The circus of this shit should be utterly humiliating for companies like Cloudflare and YouTube. Imagine being a serious shareholder of either and hearing extremely conflicting statements + seeing extremely conflicting actions. "Oh a lawyer with half a million subs got banned? Must be a good reason for it. Wait, they're already unbanned?" "Oh, they're not banning this controversial site? Must have a good reason for it. Wait, they're already banned?" lol, just the necksnap.

My employer is an enterprise customer w/Cloudflare and we spend 7 figures a year on their services. After I grilled them about KF's banning during our last annual account review (and they gave thoroughly unacceptable answers), we're spreading out our infrastructure now and reducing (and ultimately will eliminate) our dependence on their service. We've told them as much and told them why. The call began as a routine "oh boy we get to upsell more services now!" kind of meeting but ended with them scrambling to figure out how to save the account at all. I guarantee our meeting was the topic of heated discussion at a higher-level meeting within CF after it was finished.

Also, they openly discussed Null's account information with us and lied that he was a "free" user (he wasn't). The only assurance they would give us that we wouldn't just get unilaterally shut off if some prima donna whined about us was that we were an enterprise customer. I literally asked "so we only get free speech because we're paying for it?" and got a dumbfounded look but no response. That seriously worried the C-levels on my end. And they talk to other C-levels at other companies.

I can't give details on what my company does for obvious reasons but suffice to say we do not allow or publish any user-generated content but we do provide aggregated (public) data to paying customers. Nothing even remotely controversial, but given how fucking stupid our current batch of politicians are, you never know.

This has not been a casual nothingburger for Cloudflare. High-value customers are fucking pissed and (justifiably) very worried that they could be next now that it's been shown that an angry tranny can knock down the whole house of cards. There are a great many conversations happening in private at a lot of big companies right now concerning whether to continue using Cloudflare. Their actual services are fantastic but they've just proven they're vulnerable in a different (and infinitely more exploitable and unpredictable) fashion that renders it all worthless. It doesn't matter one bit how theoretically tough and fast your security services may be if you can be scared into just turning it off.

It's because of that new Texas law. Personally, I don't think it'll hold up in appeals and they probably think the same, but the cost of being the one to take it to the SC will be extraordinary. Why rush to do that when you can hold back and let twitter or facebook or tiktok take the hit instead?

I got that vibe from this too. They know current Twitter management is retarded enough to drag this to SCOTUS (though Musk's purchase might change that) and of course Facebook/Meta has no problem lying to congress so they might "lead the charge" too.

 

[yydszmiteg2]

Their actual services are fantastic but they've just proven they're vulnerable in a different (and infinitely more exploitable and unpredictable) fashion that renders it all worthless. It doesn't matter one bit how theoretically tough and fast your security services may be if you can be scared into just turning it off.

I honestly don't see how cloudflare can turn that around either. They claimed to support the freedom of speech of KF and then took it down and posted Prince's unhinged rant when anyone went to kiwifarms. Imagine going to a professional site and being met with some midwit's tard rage wall of text. Nothing could harm a sites reputation more.

There is nothing they can say to get the good will back because their word is worth 0 after they went back on it with KF.

 

[JoeBidenSniffMe]

Duncan is taking credit for getting his Twitch channel taken down. I posted a clip on his thread.

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/duncan-macleod-duncancantdie-duncankneesdeep.130024/post-13010125

 

[Pill Cosby]

I hope Lucas is really really angry right now.

He will be having that retarded Lost Dick Syndrome rage out. He will have to find something else to take credit for.

Lucas I know you’re reading this. You will never be a women. You will never become a man again. Your only existence is attacking people and eventually it will catch up to you.

 

[Spatula]

LMAO Lucas eat shit

 

[get_ur_gamon]

I hope Lucas is really really angry right now.

He will be having that retarded Lost Dick Syndrome rage out. He will have to find something else to take credit for.

Lucas I know you’re reading this. You will never be a women. You will never become a man again. Your only existence is attacking people and eventually it will catch up to you.

Lucas starts planning his revenge before his alarm goes off and he realised he has to pause everything and dilate in agony.

Twice a day.

Every day

Until he ropes.

All the Gofundme bucks in the world won't bring it back.

There is nothing you can take from this man.

 

[SpellforceFan]

View attachment 3722692
And the snakes are?

He is supposed to be smart, how could he not see that a bunch of two-faced, four-tongued kikes would behave like two-faced, four-tongued kikes?

 

[Felis Meanis]

Tranny-frens, I'm not feeling so good...

Edit: How is such an extraordinarily disgusting fuckface like Legal Eagle so popular on YouTube, with each video getting over at least a million views? He's one of few "content creators" that truly rustles my jimmies. It's like his entire existence screams out "inauthentic cocksucker".

 

[Tsukasa Kadoya]

How long until Keffels starts creating fake DMS to try and trick Susan Wojewki to nuke him again? Wouldn't put it past him.

 

[JoeBidenSniffMe]

Izzi on Twitter

“@DuncanCantDie @nonetosee @WayaAsgitsa @RekietaLawNews @Twitch @TwitchSupport @keffals "We should get his Twitch banned." --@DuncanCantDie Seems like targeting and encouraging mass flagging against @RekietaLaw. @TwitchSupport @twittersecurity @TeamYouTube”

web.archive.org

https://twitter.com/Izzi12/status/1578638293180493824

Someone private message me to post the twitter link of the clip of who flag Rekieta twitch channel and got his twitch channel taken down. Here the link if you cannot go the tread link.

 

[LemonParty]

The circus of this shit should be utterly humiliating for companies like Cloudflare and YouTube. Imagine being a serious shareholder of either and hearing extremely conflicting statements + seeing extremely conflicting actions. "Oh a lawyer with half a million subs got banned? Must be a good reason for it. Wait, they're already unbanned?" "Oh, they're not banning this controversial site? Must have a good reason for it. Wait, they're already banned?" lol, just the necksnap.

Bold of you to assume it wasn't a shareholder that wanted the Kiwi Farms axed in the first place.

For those of you who are unfamiliar with BlackRock here are some "diversity is our strength and buisness model" snippets from a pdf. linked on their about-us page.

Everyday we stray further from God.....

(edit: more info from BlackRock)

 

[King Possum]

Izzi on Twitter

“@DuncanCantDie @nonetosee @WayaAsgitsa @RekietaLawNews @Twitch @TwitchSupport @keffals "We should get his Twitch banned." --@DuncanCantDie Seems like targeting and encouraging mass flagging against @RekietaLaw. @TwitchSupport @twittersecurity @TeamYouTube”

web.archive.org

https://twitter.com/Izzi12/status/1578638293180493824

Someone private message me to post the twitter link of the clip of who flag Rekieta twitch channel and got his twitch channel taken down. Here the link if you cannot go the tread link.

Local archive

 

[northstar747]

This has not been a casual nothingburger for Cloudflare. High-value customers are fucking pissed and (justifiably) very worried that they could be next now that it's been shown that an angry tranny can knock down the whole house of cards. There are a great many conversations happening in private at a lot of big companies right now concerning whether to continue using Cloudflare. Their actual services are fantastic but they've just proven they're vulnerable in a different (and infinitely more exploitable and unpredictable) fashion that renders it all worthless. It doesn't matter one bit how theoretically tough and fast your security services may be if you can be scared into just turning it off.

did they understand that last part? like how arbitrary their actions were and how schizoid CF was with their response?

 

[The Bovinian Derivative]

So did anyone learn anything from this, or will everything just go back the way it was?

 

[Random Internet Person]

So did anyone learn anything from this, or will everything just go back the way it was?

Learn? I believe the only lesson was there’s nothing greater in streams than the almighty superchat.

Hopefully comeback stream incoming to gloat and make them dilate further.


View attachment 3722632

That laugh. Ted DiBiase would be proud.

Why does Lucas feel the need to prematurely celebrate? Like, he does it every time, with Destiny, Kiwifarms and now Nick all he ever manages to do is give people minor annoyances and he treats it like he's won some kind of war.

Because when you feel like you’re fighting a noble cause, everything makes you think that you’ll go in the history books. And sound like an anime character. Must be tiring.

The circus of this shit should be utterly humiliating for companies like Cloudflare and YouTube. Imagine being a serious shareholder of either and hearing extremely conflicting statements + seeing extremely conflicting actions. "Oh a lawyer with half a million subs got banned? Must be a good reason for it. Wait, they're already unbanned?" "Oh, they're not banning this controversial site? Must have a good reason for it. Wait, they're already banned?" lol, just the necksnap.

There’s bank to be made, Null. Nobody likes to see potential cash flows be out of their grasp.

Tranny-frens, I'm not feeling so good...

Edit: How is such an extraordinarily disgusting fuckface like Legal Eagle so popular on YouTube, with each video getting over at least a million views? He's one of few "content creators" that truly rustles my jimmies. It's like his entire existence screams out "inauthentic cocksucker".

Well, Nick started off as “a lawyer using his channel to talk about the law and legal proceedings in layman’s terms”, and so did Legal Eagle. If memory serves, Eagle also analyses legal scenes from movies. And once Nick went full Internet shock jock , there was a void for Eagle to fill.

 

[Randall Flagg]

Tranny-frens, I'm not feeling so good...

Edit: How is such an extraordinarily disgusting fuckface like Legal Eagle so popular on YouTube, with each video getting over at least a million views? He's one of few "content creators" that truly rustles my jimmies. It's like his entire existence screams out "inauthentic cocksucker".

Because he is a shitlib.

But what’s worse is that Legal Eagle’s legal analysis is generally terrible. He has a nice presentation and it’s enough to impress a lot of non lawyers and law students (which he tries to sell shitty study programs to btw) but actual lawyers think he’s a joke.

 

[Puff]

I disagree. Nick's Youtube business is registered in Texas and the new HB20 prevents social platforms from banning users due to their political beliefs. When the new law gets its first test in court Youtube probably does not want it to be against a lawyer with such large damage claims. They would prefer a less sympathetic plaintiff whose damages are not close to a million bucks. They will have to fight that battle eventually but this particular plaintiff could do serious damage.

It's been upheld by the fifth circuit twice already.

 

[teriyakiburns]

How long does rumble take to process a VOD? trying to decide if I should wait unti I'm back home before trying to watch last night's stream.