Terrorist Ex-Councillor Samuel Collingwood Smith / Vordrak / Sam Smith / BenvolaStar / Matthew Hopkins News - Convicted defamer, vexatious litigant, actual terrorist, GamerGator, stalker, extortionist (Prosperous Software Consulting Limited)

I saw this posted on the fediverse.
View attachment 3720106
poasted pic
View attachment 3720108

EDIT:
There was a follow up shortly after I posted this.
View attachment 3720126
For what it's worth, this is from Rob's twitter
View attachment 3720132
I could see them going after him and his family but I've seen nothing on his timeline to suggest that this is real.
Fake and gay. Employers never say they fired someone, only that they are no longer employed.
 
Let me ask something, this seems to be in Europe and we certainly have employment laws that differ slightly from country to country, but you can't, even in UK, fire somebody without reasonable cause and absolutely not if it's only about something related to a relative of yours. My wife could literally be Hitler, if I don't stand on the spotlight myself next to her my employer wouldn't care. And my employer doesn't care at all about kiwi farms or internet drama niche.
So I don't believe some story about somebody being fired because her husband has a work relation with KF. It sounds absurd.
 
Let me ask something, this seems to be in Europe and we certainly have employment laws that differ slightly from country to country, but you can't, even in UK, fire somebody without reasonable cause and absolutely not if it's only about something related to a relative of yours. My wife could literally be Hitler, if I don't stand on the spotlight myself next to her my employer wouldn't care. And my employer doesn't care at all about kiwi farms or internet drama niche.
So I don't believe some story about somebody being fired because her husband has a work relation with KF. It sounds absurd.
Century 21 Real Estate is an American company. That said, the only source is Vordrak who has fabricated stuff in the past. Rob Tyree hasn't made a comment on twitter about this and you'd bet he would be the first one to complain about it if it happened.
 
Rob Tyree hasn't made a comment on twitter about this and you'd bet he would be the first one to complain about it if it happened.
Not if he's discussing a possible tortious interference suit with an attorney. Vordrak himself likely isn't easily pursued for that from the US, but the national franchise organization of Century 21 relaying what amounts to unsubstantiated gossip to a local franchisee -- leading to an employee severance -- very well could be actionable.

That and there's something to be said for not confirming something publicly that your enemies will take a victory lap over.
 
Fake and gay. Employers never say they fired someone, only that they are no longer employed.

Not to mention he completely removed any information from it that would allow for any kind of verification. If this was real he would have left the name of the person who sent the e-mail on there, but he didn't. I've never seen anyone do that with any legitimate e-mail because it is literally the only way to prove anything is potentially legitimate. Removing all verifiable information guarantees something is a fake.
 
How the fuck do you even act this smug over some C# scripts?

samuelsmug.PNG
 
Vordrak himself likely isn't easily pursued for that from the US, but the national franchise organization of Century 21 relaying what amounts to unsubstantiated gossip to a local franchisee -- leading to an employee severance -- very well could be actionable.
The UK is the best place in the world to sue someone for defamation so you'd be best off going there to do it.
 
The UK is the best place in the world to sue someone for defamation so you'd be best off going there to do it.
Don't they balk pretty hard at entertaining Americans suing for that in their courts? Especially considering the US passed a federal law explicitly protecting American citizens from any attempts by the UK courts to collect on judgments against them for libel, slander, defamation, etc.?
 
Don't they balk pretty hard at entertaining Americans suing for that in their courts? Especially considering the US passed a federal law explicitly protecting American citizens from any attempts by the UK courts to collect on judgments against them for libel, slander, defamation, etc.?
If the defendant is in the jurisdiction, there's jurisdiction. I'm not sure if they've reacted to the SPEECH Act by prohibiting Americans from suing other Americans there, but they can hardly claim they don't have jurisdiction over a UK defendant violating UK law.
 
If the defendant is in the jurisdiction, there's jurisdiction. I'm not sure if they've reacted to the SPEECH Act by prohibiting Americans from suing other Americans there, but they can hardly claim they don't have jurisdiction over a UK defendant violating UK law.

In concert with the SPEECH Act, the Parliament in the UK passed the Defamation Act of 2013 that closed the loophole of anyone suing in the UK if the lawsuit in question doesn't involve at least one party over which the court would have jurisdiction:


DAct2013.png

Obviously, this wouldn't apply to Vordrak since he is in the UK.
 
Last edited:
In concert with the SPEECH Act, the Parliament in the UK passed a law that closed the loophole of anyone suing in the UK if the lawsuit in question doesn't involve at least one party over which the court would have jurisdiction. Obviously, this wouldn't apply to Vordrak since he is in the UK.
I wasn't aware of that but it definitely answers the question of the case that inspired the SPEECH Act, where a Saudi Arabian funder of terrorist named Khalid bin Mahfouz sued an American in the UK, Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld, over her book Funding Evil, which analyzed the funding of terrorism by terrorists like this Saudi Arabian fuck, who basically said fuck you limeys and refused to answer and got a default judgment against her.
 
Let me ask something, this seems to be in Europe and we certainly have employment laws that differ slightly from country to country, but you can't, even in UK, fire somebody without reasonable cause and absolutely not if it's only about something related to a relative of yours. My wife could literally be Hitler, if I don't stand on the spotlight myself next to her my employer wouldn't care. And my employer doesn't care at all about kiwi farms or internet drama niche.
So I don't believe some story about somebody being fired because her husband has a work relation with KF. It sounds absurd.
In the US, anyone who isn't under some sort of contract (like a union contract) can be fired from anything for any reason, as long as it isn't for being a member of a protected class. This is where you get retardation like this one woman getting fired from her office job for the crime of being the mother of the cop who shot and killed a violent drunk black guy who tried to steal his weapon (said cop had been arrested and charged with murder but IIRC was cleared). Shit like that is what makes Vordrak's tall tale sadly believable.
 
  • Agree
  • Horrifying
Reactions: SIMIΔN and Marvin
I wasn't aware of that but it definitely answers the question of the case that inspired the SPEECH Act, where a Saudi Arabian funder of terrorist named Khalid bin Mahfouz sued an American in the UK, Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld, over her book Funding Evil, which analyzed the funding of terrorism by terrorists like this Saudi Arabian fuck, who basically said fuck you limeys and refused to answer and got a default judgment against her.
I remember when that happened, not so much the case but various US states and finally the federal government essentially making it impossible to enforce a UK libel judgement in the US.

The UK legal profession did not appreciate that ruling, for a while believe it or not, they fancied London was going to become the hub for some sort of international circuit of courts, where people would travel from around the world to have their cases adjudicated. This was in particular going to attract wealthy people from countries with underdeveloped 'legal systems' usually Arabs and Russian oligarchs. Essentially certain London legal firms were going to make a shed load of money.

Even the Judiciary itself, seemed to be annoyed with former judges in the house of lords criticising it, and expecting the government to do something. Stories started popping up in the press (most likely written by PR firms) which tried to turn the whole thing into a case of the Yanks throwing their weight around, some managing to omit mentioning the book at all. Also believe it or not Khalid bin Mahfouz is an Irish Citizen. I'm still hoping to find a story, about an American libelling a poor honest Irish Man.

Then it just stopped, I suspect because the same groups that pushed for the law to be passed so quickly in the US, started to apply more pressure. I mean why the fuck would wealthy US citizens want to put themselves in the situation where they could be dragged in front of a UK court. Only to find that the guy suing you has already hired one of the Judges mates to represent them, and you're basically fucked.
Incidentally the solicitors Mahfouz used are actually a US owned firm, kendall freeman... I thought that was interesting. for some reason.
 
One more kinda update with the alleged firing
Rob has not mentioned his wife at all since Vordy's email dropped. There has been only one person since then that has asked about the alleged firing and it has had no interactions.
1665234174589.png
What there is is a lot of eunuchs and cucks hounding him before the email
1665234342390.png
and after.
1665234287483.png
There are more but you get the idea.

It seems that if Vordy isn't lying and got either Rob's wife or some completely unrelated person fired, nobody but us seems to care. Good job dipshit. Your hard work paid off big time.
 
Back