- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fake and gay. Employers never say they fired someone, only that they are no longer employed.I saw this posted on the fediverse.
View attachment 3720106![]()
zyntrax (@zyntrax@poa.st)
Wife of FiberHub CEO allegedly fired for her husband hosting Kiwifarms Edit: The e-mail screencap is floating around Twitter but the original source is Vordrak (who has doctored screenshots in the...poa.st
poasted pic
View attachment 3720108
EDIT:
There was a follow up shortly after I posted this.
View attachment 3720126![]()
zyntrax (@zyntrax@poa.st)
I did not realize it was posted by originally by Vordrak so this is a very valid point since he has fabricated things in the past. Her profile is still listed on their website so worth keeping an e...poa.st
For what it's worth, this is from Rob's twitter
View attachment 3720132
I could see them going after him and his family but I've seen nothing on his timeline to suggest that this is real.
2014.When is his dementia supposed to kick in exactly?
Century 21 Real Estate is an American company. That said, the only source is Vordrak who has fabricated stuff in the past. Rob Tyree hasn't made a comment on twitter about this and you'd bet he would be the first one to complain about it if it happened.Let me ask something, this seems to be in Europe and we certainly have employment laws that differ slightly from country to country, but you can't, even in UK, fire somebody without reasonable cause and absolutely not if it's only about something related to a relative of yours. My wife could literally be Hitler, if I don't stand on the spotlight myself next to her my employer wouldn't care. And my employer doesn't care at all about kiwi farms or internet drama niche.
So I don't believe some story about somebody being fired because her husband has a work relation with KF. It sounds absurd.
Not if he's discussing a possible tortious interference suit with an attorney. Vordrak himself likely isn't easily pursued for that from the US, but the national franchise organization of Century 21 relaying what amounts to unsubstantiated gossip to a local franchisee -- leading to an employee severance -- very well could be actionable.Rob Tyree hasn't made a comment on twitter about this and you'd bet he would be the first one to complain about it if it happened.
Fake and gay. Employers never say they fired someone, only that they are no longer employed.
The UK is the best place in the world to sue someone for defamation so you'd be best off going there to do it.Vordrak himself likely isn't easily pursued for that from the US, but the national franchise organization of Century 21 relaying what amounts to unsubstantiated gossip to a local franchisee -- leading to an employee severance -- very well could be actionable.
Don't they balk pretty hard at entertaining Americans suing for that in their courts? Especially considering the US passed a federal law explicitly protecting American citizens from any attempts by the UK courts to collect on judgments against them for libel, slander, defamation, etc.?The UK is the best place in the world to sue someone for defamation so you'd be best off going there to do it.
If the defendant is in the jurisdiction, there's jurisdiction. I'm not sure if they've reacted to the SPEECH Act by prohibiting Americans from suing other Americans there, but they can hardly claim they don't have jurisdiction over a UK defendant violating UK law.Don't they balk pretty hard at entertaining Americans suing for that in their courts? Especially considering the US passed a federal law explicitly protecting American citizens from any attempts by the UK courts to collect on judgments against them for libel, slander, defamation, etc.?
If the defendant is in the jurisdiction, there's jurisdiction. I'm not sure if they've reacted to the SPEECH Act by prohibiting Americans from suing other Americans there, but they can hardly claim they don't have jurisdiction over a UK defendant violating UK law.
I wasn't aware of that but it definitely answers the question of the case that inspired the SPEECH Act, where a Saudi Arabian funder of terrorist named Khalid bin Mahfouz sued an American in the UK, Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld, over her book Funding Evil, which analyzed the funding of terrorism by terrorists like this Saudi Arabian fuck, who basically said fuck you limeys and refused to answer and got a default judgment against her.In concert with the SPEECH Act, the Parliament in the UK passed a law that closed the loophole of anyone suing in the UK if the lawsuit in question doesn't involve at least one party over which the court would have jurisdiction. Obviously, this wouldn't apply to Vordrak since he is in the UK.
In the US, anyone who isn't under some sort of contract (like a union contract) can be fired from anything for any reason, as long as it isn't for being a member of a protected class. This is where you get retardation like this one woman getting fired from her office job for the crime of being the mother of the cop who shot and killed a violent drunk black guy who tried to steal his weapon (said cop had been arrested and charged with murder but IIRC was cleared). Shit like that is what makes Vordrak's tall tale sadly believable.Let me ask something, this seems to be in Europe and we certainly have employment laws that differ slightly from country to country, but you can't, even in UK, fire somebody without reasonable cause and absolutely not if it's only about something related to a relative of yours. My wife could literally be Hitler, if I don't stand on the spotlight myself next to her my employer wouldn't care. And my employer doesn't care at all about kiwi farms or internet drama niche.
So I don't believe some story about somebody being fired because her husband has a work relation with KF. It sounds absurd.
I remember when that happened, not so much the case but various US states and finally the federal government essentially making it impossible to enforce a UK libel judgement in the US.I wasn't aware of that but it definitely answers the question of the case that inspired the SPEECH Act, where a Saudi Arabian funder of terrorist named Khalid bin Mahfouz sued an American in the UK, Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld, over her book Funding Evil, which analyzed the funding of terrorism by terrorists like this Saudi Arabian fuck, who basically said fuck you limeys and refused to answer and got a default judgment against her.
Does that make him our...Julian SausageHe looks like a fat, gay Julian Assange.