US Waukesha massacre suspect Darrell Brooks pleads not guilty to all charges - It was the SUV

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
1644609013968.png

The Milwaukee man accused of killing six people and running over dozens with an SUV at a Christmas parade in Waukesha, Wisc. pleaded not guilty to every charge laid against him.

According to the local Fox affiliate, Darrell Brooks, 39, pleaded not guilty to all 77 charges against him.

Brooks remains in jail on $5 million bail. GoFundMe confirmed to FOX Business in November that they removed the fundraiser for violating the crowdsourcing platform's Terms of Service. Additionally, the person who launched the fundraiser, reportedly a man named James Norton, will no longer be permitted to use the platform for any future fundraisers.

The courts have said that there is ample evidence against Brooks, as well as testimony from police detective Thomas Casey, who described how Brooks plowed into citizens even after some yelled at him to stop. Brooks allegedly "zigzagged" across the street "for blocks" at the family event.

Victims include an 8-year-old boy, along with members of the Dancing Grannies troupe, that was performing in the parade.

Public defender Anna Kees said that her defendant could not turn off the route, and that he did not intend to hit pedestrians. She also said that Brooks couldn't bring himself to look at photos of the crimes he allegedly committed.


 
This trial is comedy gold. I love it wen a sub 80 IQ moon cricket thinks he's a galaxy brain 9d underwater go master. This dude is going to stretch a 3-4 week trial into a 3-4 month trial with his monkeyshines. I know WI doesn't have a death penalty but I am sure the jury will be sending a note to the judge asking about if they can make an exception for him after it finally, FINALLY goes do deliberation.
Now I wanna hear him object to the verdict.
 
Still refers to himself as the plantiff, trying to get some gotchas in on a detective but every time it's obvious he didn't read the entire police report.

Or he might be saying because the state, aka the plantiff, isn't a person that the trial is void or something. I'm really looking forward to his opening statement to see how he ties all this together cause so far it just looks like he has no strategy beyond attempting to say the court is invalid.


Ok he just asked if a witness ever has had a conversation with the state of Wisconsin. He's definitely going to argue that cause the state isn't a person that it can't convict him.
That's the sovereign citizen playbook. Did he bring up 'maritime law' yet?
What is up with the white balance on this video holy shit
Can't have a black man that killed people look black.
 
I love how they're desperate to keep anyone from knowing this guy is black to the point where the video is blown the fuck out.
If dems were honest, they would use this case as a shining example of mental illness and how we need to bring back institutions for the safety of not only the community but people like this dingle. But they can't do that, doing so would get rid of half their voting base.
 
I love how they're desperate to keep anyone from knowing this guy is black to the point where the video is blown the fuck out.
As if it wasn't' obvious that's what they're doing from the fact they've adjusted the contrast slider so far to the right his stack of papers are glowing a bright blue.....
 
If dems were honest, they would use this case as a shining example of mental illness and how we need to bring back institutions for the safety of not only the community but people like this dingle. But they can't do that, doing so would get rid of half their voting base.
Plus the chorus of people who would claim they were going to start committing political dissidents to asylum to be cuckoo nested, which would probably become i likely outcome.
 
Plus the chorus of people who would claim they were going to start committing political dissidents to asylum to be cuckoo nested, which would probably become i likely outcome.
I can't imagine why you would think something like that. It's not like the democratic establishment has been ruining the lives of anyone who would speak out against retarded covid procedures or the awesome vaccines we've gotten or anything like that. I trust my government, they care about me.
 
So this might be a stupid question. But if he's representing himself and he elects to testify in his own defense, does that mean he has to question himself? And how much fun would that be to watch given his antics so far?
 
So this might be a stupid question. But if he's representing himself and he elects to testify in his own defense, does that mean he has to question himself? And how much fun would that be to watch given his antics so far?
IME you can more-or-less give a narrative, subject to objections or judge intervention when it comes to things like hearsay or lack of established foundation for exhibits.
 
“Objection, I do not consent to being called ‘he.’” Is Darrell Brooks a troon now? Are we seeing the troon and sov citizens joining together now? This cop is just waiting for Darrell Brooks to step out of line again. He already bruised him last week.
Sounds like more sov-shit "corporate/incorporated entity" shit. An ENTITY can not have a gender, I suspect, is his retarded hang-up.

What I'm curious about: do we have anything to show he was a sov-shit before all this? Or is it something he picked up from some galaxy-brained professional detainees?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back