Liz Fong-Jones / Elliot William Fong / @lizthegrey - 'Consent accident' enjoyer, ex-Google employee, nepotistic sex pest, Robert Z'Dar look-alike who wants authority over the Internet

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
8BE450B6-4D49-48E6-9A24-E27FED77FC21.jpeg

Big ol anvil jaw thinking he sounds like some cool, edgy internet supervillain. He’s back to citing AUP and TOS, really emphasising the whole ‘harassment’ aspect. A lot of what they’re doing now is flinging shit and seeing what sticks. Somebody should tell him that all the coomer sites he rots his brain with are notorious for hosting content that amounts to harassment, revenge porn and such.
 
Liz's claim that her dad disowned her for being transexual doesn't make sense. By all accounts her dad is a big Rainbow Flag supporter. I think there's more to that story.
His dad didn't disown him because he's a troon he disowned because his son is somebody that commits alot of "consent accidents" and probably was retarded enough to brag to dear father about it.
 
He doesn't sound like a merit hire to me if he's specifically been told not to write code. Sounds like a hastily made up excuse for that not to hurt the troon's feelings because he'll chimp out otherwise.
I wonder if hes been committing TI on company time or company computers
No they won't.
This is why people hate that derranged bitch Umbridge more than Voldemort himself. One is a nasty bitch that's far more relatable, the other is a literal genocidal freak, in perspective. So why do people hate a literal who stupid cat lady more than a genocidal freak?

These people are privileged upper class autogynephiles with enough money to waste on their womanising pornographic fantasies. They simply cannot understand the horrors of child trafficking and terrorism. It's not relatable. Their dilemmas involve either spending $1000 on a botnet versus $1000 in a gacha game, not between getting beheaded or raped by 5 men first, and then getting shot.
He might be talking about Twitter and Facebook
View attachment 3776348

Miserable, wretched perverts, compelled to spread their own misery to others. Even after all this, I couldn’t care less about this square jawed freaks income or Internet projects. He’s literally emotionally invested in people he doesn’t like losing money.
This is literally proof of damages
 
I wonder if hes been committing TI on company time or company computers
Oh my, now this is a FASCINATING question. It never really occurred too me, but now that you brought it up.

Let's talk about Agent-Principle relationships, and how liability can attach to the principle as a result of the actions of an agent.

Under US law, we have established precedent dating back to middle ages England involving the master-servant relationship. See, back in ye Olden Tymes, it was accepted as a matter of course a Servant acted on the will of their Master. If a Servant were to say, engage in contract with a merchant to supply his master with a case of wine, the Master could not, when the merchant had bought the wine and brought it to the manor, claim he had ordered no such thing.

Common law precedents held that because the Servant of the Master said the wine would be bought, the Master had to buy the wine. Even if he didn't want too.

The US courts have extended this concept to civil torts. Basically, if an employee, through their official duties or through company means, holds themselves out as representing the company in the furtherance of a civil tort, the employee is not the only person made liable. The company itself is too.

Who is Elliot a senior manager of again? Is he using his position in that company to commit textbook tort Interference? Elliot may not have a couple million dollars to justify a lawsuit. But his employer might.
 
Last edited:
Big ol anvil jaw thinking he sounds like some cool, edgy internet supervillain. He’s back to citing AUP and TOS, really emphasising the whole ‘harassment’ aspect. A lot of what they’re doing now is flinging shit and seeing what sticks.
If I could go back in time just a month or two, one of the things I'd encourage everyone to do is reach out to the same Tier 1 service providers, fiber owners and hosts and whatnot and complain. Complain loudly and thoroughly and in depth about all manner of porn site, terror cell recruitment page and furry hub. Really "gamergate" the shit out of their response nodes, because I suspect these companies and the people who work in them are absolutely not used to taking feedback or special requests. I don't think the Farms' deplatforming would be getting any traction and probably would be lost in the noise of a vigorous email campaign of "here are 10 things I don't like and you should take off the Internet" from 30,000 gamers because the natural corporate response would be "retention, file away for 7 years in case anyone comes looking, and ignore all this bullshit because we're not paying someone to actually consider and do this nonsense." In the glut off all that nothing would be removed, and special requests like Fong's would be even more heavily scrutinized if KF is taken down but an ISIS homepage isn't.

Alas, it's too late now to lay the groundwork and it would be discouraged as a gay op anyways, but I'm sure murmurs in the DMs of Kotaku In Action spergs would've produced great results chaff.

This is absolutely trash advice. You never test on Prod, and if you do, you are fucking amateurs LARPing as a company. There are three stages of environments.
you would not believe(or maybe you would?) just how many Fortune 500 companies allow their IT to violate this principle on the daily.
 
Last edited:
I see the bad dental care and hygiene as part and parcel of furrydom. Then I look just a little lower at the tags and Golly. I see "furry" as one of them.
"Wolves and foxes don't brush their teeth, and they are still beautiful killing implements granted by nature; why should I?"
 
Back