I hate the Internet and the people who own it

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Troons want to force the entire world including the Internet into being a safe space where they can gaslight each other into believing that they're women. It's a fetish and we're all an unconsenting partner. Kiwifarms is a redpill, while the troon wants to take the bluepill and have everything be a fantasy.

Troon is a perverted man who was given the luxury to develop his fetishes instead of being too occupied with survival to become a paraphiliac. Troon is the alpha slave of capitalism as it will channel its entire lives worth into keeping the fetish alive, instead of perpetuating the species. There is a feedback loop between medical industry and trannyism, which expresses itself as a massive amount of cash. Getting a cut of this stack is good enough reason for your friendly neighborhood sociopaths to support this sickness.
 
Simple, basic and predominantly text based and a concise overview of the depths these scummy autogynephiles have stooped to in the pursuit of narrative control. I’m a tech smoothbrain so I only know basic CSS, but once I’ve got something up I’d gladly hand the account over to somebody more competent.
I can host something on MangoRanch.net if you can cook up the CSS and HTML. I've been wanting to put up some sort of "What's going on?" and "Where in the world is Kiwi Farms right now?" explanatory text for people unable or unwilling to use Telegram to keep up to date, but I'm lazy.
 
I'm seeing the same thing. I admittedly don't know much about how TOR works, but I imagine there are some extra KF side shenanigans in place for handling TOR connections, maybe some extra security measures. Accessing clearnet through TOR likely doesn't have any of the extra KF side processing.
I've been doing the same thing. I noticed though if it's an American based exit node the clearnet URL won't load. I either have to change the exit node or use the .onion link.
 
I can host something on MangoRanch.net if you can cook up the CSS and HTML. I've been wanting to put up some sort of "What's going on?" and "Where in the world is Kiwi Farms right now?" explanatory text for people unable or unwilling to use Telegram to keep up to date, but I'm lazy.

I’ll be going out for a coffee tomorrow morning UK time. Right now, our perspective is restricted to this site alone, for years we’ve abided by a policy of not directly engaging with people or taking this stuff elsewhere. I think that has passed at least somewhat. We absolutely shouldn’t interact with these freaks, but creating advocacy for the site in other places might be worthwhile.

My primary concerns would be a take down of the neo nazi dox swatting site narrative that could be shared somewhere as readily as copypasta every time DKF spews it. From there an analysis of the total absence of corporate accountability and just how easily a small minority can silence others by knowing the right people.
 
Net neutrality isn't a law, it's a principle that has been treated as inviolable since the inception of the Internet.
Explain the nuance / What was the whole support net neutrality episode about? I thought people were trying to get enforcement powers so if someone violated it, they could be smacked with a figurative stick. Are there ways to get those powers that aren't enshrining it law? It's not like corporations can be trusted to keep to anything that's just at the level of gentlemen's rules.
 
WE SALUTE YOU, OUR HALF-INFLATED DARK LORD maxresdefault (1).jpg
 
I'm going to make a fairly bold proposal here.

We should consider writing our Congressmen.

Okay, yes, it's a long shot. The government is not your friend. But Republicans have a well justified hateboner for Big Tech lately, and their interests may coincidentally align with ours. ISPs should have been designated as common carriers long ago, and may we should start agitating for that. In particular, I think Hawley might be sympathetic, if any Kiwis happen to live in Missouri.

I would certainly appreciate any thoughts on writing a letter in a way that it's likely to actually get looked at. I'm well familiar with the technical issues, but I don't know much about letter writing campaigns. Should Kiwifarms be mentioned directly, or should it be kept vague? Should it be deliberately spun as a culture war thing? Is it better to take a neutral-ish pro free speech stance?

We may be too late to save the Farms, but maybe we can still save the internet.

*rates self optimistic*
 
Every day for the past few months, I wake up hating troons more and more.

I’ve been listening to archived Coast to Coast episodes, in the background while doing other things. Art was having a discussion with someone about the state of the internet, and how much they disliked it, in an episode from 2007. I’ve been listening to it today, and the foreshadowing of it is a little depressing. I pine for 2007 internet culture now.
 
I think the way forward is creating content elsewhere, maintaining contact with other farmers elsewhere and trusting by the time the trannies have effectively entirely undermined freedom of communication on the Internet we’ll already be set up on another platform. The collective that makes kiwifarms what it is, with the right preparations, need not cease to exist.

It’s not on Josh to create these backup places, but I don’t think it’s a stretch to say we’re all hands in at this point. I’ll be starting work on my little neocities site tomorrow. We should be ensuring whatever victory these censorious corporate scumbags enjoy is as hollow as possible.

Every day for the past few months, I wake up hating troons more and more.

I’ve been listening to archived Coast to Coast episodes, in the background while doing other things. Art was having a discussion with someone about the state of the internet, and how much they disliked it, in an episode from 2007. I’ve been listening to it today, and the foreshadowing of it is a little depressing. I pine for 2007 internet culture now.

What episode? I used to listen to C2C on night shifts all the time.
 
Should Kiwifarms be mentioned directly, or should it be kept vague? Should it be deliberately spun as a culture war thing? Is it better to take a neutral-ish pro free speech stance?
No mention of the Kiwi Farms. The name is too toxic and no one really gives a fuck about this small site. Frame everything as dismantling big tech.
 
Also the EU countries where most of the rest of the action will happen are probably completely on-board with this.
Ohh yeah the EU is Fine with blocking the Farms, BUT there is no section 230 protection in Europe, so they are open to all kind of lolsuits that come from breaking the basic rules of the internet.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: AnOminous
Should Kiwifarms be mentioned directly, or should it be kept vague? Should it be deliberately spun as a culture war thing? Is it better to take a neutral-ish pro free speech stance?
Don't write about why you care (KiwiFarms). Write about why they should care, what organizations do they claim to support but have a herd of rabid detractors who would be willing to engage in this tactic once they learn it works?

It’s not on Josh to create these backup places, but I don’t think it’s a stretch to say we’re all hands in at this point. I’ll be starting work on my little neocities site tomorrow. We should be ensuring whatever victory these censorious corporate scumbags enjoy is as hollow as possible.
Don't forget to backup the backups. Don't trust automatic backups, assume you will lose provider level access. Keep backups at different providers.

And if you expect to jump around a lot, learn to sign things cryptographically to prove your identity after sudden relocations in order to avoid impersonators. We don't have jannies to give us blue check marks where we're going.
 
I know I should not be surprised, but it is absolutely wild to me how users will suddenly pop out of the woodwork and seethe at Null.
"Private companies don't have to host your dox suicide terrorism website sweaty /smug" or some variation of that every 5-7 posts. They really don't seem to get where this line of thinking lands a lot of them 10-20 years down the road.
That's why they're called NPCs.
Ohh yeah the EU is Fine with blocking the Farms, BUT there is no section 230 protection in Europe, so they are open to all kind of lolsuits that come from breaking the basic rules of the internet.
Also these troons are obsessed with keeping enormous databases of enemies. The Farms does dox as a joke, these creepy perverts do it as an obsession. Look at what Tardfinn does with redditors.

That kind of shit seriously runs afoul of EU directives like GDPR.

Even a Nawtsee can invoke the ludicrous, but extant "right to be forgotten" doctrine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt
I think the way forward is creating content elsewhere, maintaining contact with other farmers elsewhere and trusting by the time the trannies have effectively entirely undermined freedom of communication on the Internet we’ll already be set up on another platform. The collective that makes kiwifarms what it is, with the right preparations, need not cease to exist.

It’s not on Josh to create these backup places, but I don’t think it’s a stretch to say we’re all hands in at this point. I’ll be starting work on my little neocities site tomorrow. We should be ensuring whatever victory these censorious corporate scumbags enjoy is as hollow as possible.



What episode? I used to listen to C2C on night shifts all the time.
The March 3rd, 2007 episode, with Whitley Strieber and Nick Pope. He talks briefly with Nick about it. It mostly pertains to UFO talk on the internet. But it’s still relevant to today.

There is an “art bell tape vault” account on Spotify, that seems to post one or two episodes on a daily basis. That’s where I’ve been listening.
 
Also these troons are obsessed with keeping enormous databases of enemies. The Farms does dox as a joke, these creepy perverts do it as an obsession. Look at what Tardfinn does with redditors.

DDoSecrets is basically a big dox database of targets hated by the woke left (cops, conservative groups, free speech supporters, etc.), and is an almost entirely troon-run operation. Unlike the Farms, however, they get fawning media coverage as noble activists, and they have suffered no deplatforming.
 
Explain the nuance / What was the whole support net neutrality episode about? I thought people were trying to get enforcement powers so if someone violated it, they could be smacked with a figurative stick. Are there ways to get those powers that aren't enshrining it law? It's not like corporations can be trusted to keep to anything that's just at the level of gentlemen's rules.
Nut Neutrality was astroturfed up the ass by Netflix because they didn't want to pay for peering and moved to a shit provider (Level 3). Peering works because big providers produce about the same amount of traffic as they consume, but Netflix was producing infinite amounts of data (movies) and Level 3 didn't have fast enough interconnects for it. So the big providers were "rate limiting" Level 3 by not upgrading the links for free. It really had to do with rate limiting and not blocking,.

Then Netflix realized they could just be a CDN and shove cache servers in every datacenter in the world and so they gave up the astroturfing and nut neutrality died.
 
Back