View attachment 3813712
Every line reads like a random.txt.
"Ace in dogfighting":
1. Catches and fucks dogs (I honestly hope its not this).
2. Every time a dog barks at him he raises his fists in cartoonish fashion and screams "come at me bro".
3. Literally lives like a dog (trans-canine bitch) and is being used as a pit dog by american brown people for illegal blood sport matches. This will be very impressive, I wonder what his score is.
Saw wikipedia mentioned a while ago and I’m glad I stopped using it. At one point they called Kiwifarms a far right website despite there being two large subforums dedicated to clowning on far right figures
Wikipedia and media in english segment of lower case i iNTERNET follow this procedure:
1. Some journo scumbag piblishes an article which fits the current twitter trend. No regards for facts and alternative opinions, just all gas and no breaks. "That god dang batstard Joshua Moon raped me while I was sleeping. His spirit traveled here and ghost-fucked me."
Honestly I cant put 100% of blame on journos- they are giving the readers what they want. And who actually reads yellow press like Bloomberg, New Yorker, Washington Post etc.? Twitter users. Both blue checkmark soulless manipulators and insane people who have a safe space there. No one else reads these papers nowdays. I bet even the US old people stopped.
2. Literal tanny-lannies of wikipedia edit this into the wikipedia. I have a theory that the more "serious" and "normal" editors of wikipedia just let them do that because they dont care what happens on the pages about "controversial" topics. We all know trannie-jannies are masters of scrreching on the internet and no one probably wants to deal with that over something general public doesnt care about much.
3. Jannie-trannies link articles in Bloomberg, New Yorker, Washington Post etc. as "proof" and "verification" of a "fact".
4. Same yellow press publishes articles wich quotes wikipedia as "source".
5. We get into the perfect recursion situation- wiki qoutes press, press quotes wiki.
6. Shit sites like Snoops DEBUNK something by quoting the same passages on wiki as a "fact" because its on wikipedia.
7. You've created a false consensuns about reality.