Page 12 of the study.
"Zoophilia, Furryism, and Paraphilias
With 146,627 members, 43,060 threads, and 1,077,680 messages for Zooville alone, the online zoophilia community appears to be a large and well supported international community of persons who share a sexual attraction to animals. Our research also demonstrated that the presence of self-reported zoophilia coincides with the endorsement of other paraphilic behaviors, with the largest associations being with furryism (which had a high frequency) and necrophilia (which had a very low frequency). Sexology research has found that paraphilias tend to be intercorrelated, as do spe-cifc fetishes (Seto et al., 2014). Some fndings may reflect the nature of zoophilia—for instance, higher rates of public masturbation may reflect that zoophilic persons consider the areas where their animals of interest reside (e.g., barn, feld, etc.) to be public areas. By contrast, the low rates of telephone scatalogia could be that phone calls as a medium have been replaced with more private systems (e.g., discord, telegram, whatsapp), which do not reveal one’s phone number, allow media sharing, and are often encrypted.
The conceptual overlap with furryism, however, bears fur-ther mention. Zoophilia was correlated with furryism; how-ever, more than half (55.8%) of persons with zoophilia were not furries, and while supplemental analyses (not reported due to space considerations) demonstrated that furryism was correlated with indicators of zoophilia, these associations were decreased to nonsignifcance after controlling for self-identifed zoophilia. Thus, the link between furryism and these zoophilic indicators would appear to be only by virtue of shared variance with zoophilia. That is, we would argue that zoophilia indicates a higher likelihood of furryism, how-ever, furryism does not necessarily entail a greater likelihood of zoophilia."
Hmmmmmmmmmm. Attached is the study, it goes through the numerical stats first and then summarizes them.
