Liz Fong-Jones / Elliot William Fong / @lizthegrey - 'Consent accident' enjoyer, ex-Google employee, nepotistic sex pest, Robert Z'Dar look-alike who wants authority over the Internet

This sounds like the premise behind that "restorative justice" movement where problems are supposed to be resolved by simply talking out the differences or doing some other menial task that doesn't involve any sort of disciplinary action or accountability.
Restorative Justice isn't about just talking or whatever. The people that promote it in that way are hack frauds, or ideologues who don't understand the structure behind it (or do understand and want to subvert it for their own ends). It's not just "criminal and victim talk, victim becomes enlightened by the criminal's lived experience, they hug and the criminal is forgiven", which is so blatantly stupid that I can't even begin to describe the depths of it.

Restorative justice is deep, broad topic that covers everything from community mediation, to criminal rehabilitation, to workplace disputes, right up to national and international conflicts. The general form of the process is to seek restitution between conflicting parties, in a way that is mutually beneficial and conducive to better, or at least more tolerable co-existence. It's called restorative justice because it seeks to restore some element of life or stability that was lost by the involved parties.

In the criminal setting in particular, the idea is to help the victim move past the moment of the crime and perhaps understand where the criminal is coming from; but moreso to have the crim come face to face with the people they've victimised, so that they can see an understand the impact their actions have on the lives of others. The goal is that they will realise that there's a better path to take. Now I'll grant you, it doesn't work often in that setting, because repeat criminals are either retards or sociopaths, wh won't understand what's being asked of them. However, there are enough first-timers or low-level criminals who, when faced with the realisation that their victims are real people, will find it within themselves to try and make a better life. At the same time, the former target of their crime will hopefully find completion and resolution in helping the other person improve their life. That's why it's called restorative. It restores a sense of wholeness in the former victim and, ideally, restores a sense of purpose and social duty in the crim.

The problem is, a bunch of trendies and fuckwits have flipped the process on its head, making "restorative justice" be about brow-beating victims into forgiving the crim, who was obviously justified by his circumstances and shouldn't be persecuted in any way. Like so many things, it's a good idea that has been destroyed by the people seeking power.
 
Restorative Justice isn't about just talking or whatever. The people that promote it in that way are hack frauds, or ideologues who don't understand the structure behind it (or do understand and want to subvert it for their own ends). It's not just "criminal and victim talk, victim becomes enlightened by the criminal's lived experience, they hug and the criminal is forgiven", which is so blatantly stupid that I can't even begin to describe the depths of it.

Restorative justice is deep, broad topic that covers everything from community mediation, to criminal rehabilitation, to workplace disputes, right up to national and international conflicts. The general form of the process is to seek restitution between conflicting parties, in a way that is mutually beneficial and conducive to better, or at least more tolerable co-existence. It's called restorative justice because it seeks to restore some element of life or stability that was lost by the involved parties.

In the criminal setting in particular, the idea is to help the victim move past the moment of the crime and perhaps understand where the criminal is coming from; but moreso to have the crim come face to face with the people they've victimised, so that they can see an understand the impact their actions have on the lives of others. The goal is that they will realise that there's a better path to take. Now I'll grant you, it doesn't work often in that setting, because repeat criminals are either retards or sociopaths, wh won't understand what's being asked of them. However, there are enough first-timers or low-level criminals who, when faced with the realisation that their victims are real people, will find it within themselves to try and make a better life. At the same time, the former target of their crime will hopefully find completion and resolution in helping the other person improve their life. That's why it's called restorative. It restores a sense of wholeness in the former victim and, ideally, restores a sense of purpose and social duty in the crim.

The problem is, a bunch of trendies and fuckwits have flipped the process on its head, making "restorative justice" be about brow-beating victims into forgiving the crim, who was obviously justified by his circumstances and shouldn't be persecuted in any way. Like so many things, it's a good idea that has been destroyed by the people seeking power.
I don't think restorative justice, even in the proper sense of the term, works for something like rape though.
Which means Liz Fong Jones, Field CTO for Honeycomb.io, who is a rapist, wouldn't be an appropriate candidate.
 
The only interesting thing about this dude is how spectacularly ugly he is
0B39BA1C-D167-457F-97C6-07DD4AD4ABE8.png
 
I guess he can’t call a friend to make Elon Musk disappear, so they’re back to screaming about Nazis and the ongoing current thing. With the exception of cloudflare bending the knee, which can perhaps be attributed to Keffals fleeting prominence and media connections, everything else seemed to rest on no dong knowing some bugman who’d follow orders.

Keffals got paid, No Dong run out of connections, John is screaming into the void. I know it isn’t over, but I’m agreeing with the people who said their next move is likely to involve full blown mask off criminality.
If it's not over, where does it go from here? Even admitting we're still online on the Clearnet is admitting that their slacktavism failed, and the site is now nigh impossible to kill. I don't see where it goes from here.
 
I don't see where it goes from here.
Fong-Jones is committed. He views this and other threads implicating him in shady shit as an existential threat, especially those bits bringing up his little consent accidents with unwilling sex partners. Being exposed as a rapey sociopath is no small thing. He'll keep going to the end, whatever form that end takes. Same with Sinseer, a pornsick neurotic whose whole adult life has been lived online. If he's autistic enough to spend 16K hours playing the same dumb videogame, he'll spend at least that much time on revenge against the Farms.

Notice they've been doing all this criminal shit consequence-free. Based on what other Kiwis have been posting recently, that appears to be changing. Whether the risk discourages them is anyone's guess.
 
Last edited:
If it's not over, where does it go from here? Even admitting we're still online on the Clearnet is admitting that their slacktavism failed, and the site is now nigh impossible to kill. I don't see where it goes from here.
if its really true that people are finally getting tired of his endless obsessive complaining my guess would be he would need to go full mask off and we might see some attempts at hacking the site again or maybe he will just try to find the server that hosts the site and run at it with one of those explosive vests.

the more likely option however is that he will do nothing but complain about us forever much like vordrak he will screech forever into the void until his body falls apart from the endless extremely painful sessions of dilation and all the various chemicals he must be filling his body with daily to even function and attempt to ignore the pain. not just from the dilation but from the fact that regardless of all his connections he cant control things the way he wants just like he cant make himself a woman no matter how hard he tries.
 
r8 me l8 but I’ve read through and still can’t understand the whole dog hair = rape = “consent accident” thing. But the fact that Liz himself calls it a “consent accident” makes me so sure it wasn’t just fucking dog hair.

At least now we know why he’s trying to burn down the Internet, though.
 
Dong-Gone has been quiet on cohost, the last thing he did was repost some dumb joke by someone named Irenes (many).

View attachment 3846540

This is Irenes (many), the pretty guardian who fights for love and justice.

View attachment 3846543

Part of Liz's "plural gang", I guess. He's written some kind of batshit insane plural guide with a foreword by "Liz Fong-Jones (who are also a collection of Lizzes)": https://www.pluralpride.com/playbook (archive).
View attachment 3846588
These are the heroes trying to break the Internet because people are making fun of them. Man I dunno, how does anyone look at this and think "oh yeah we'll take them seriously"?
Why are they like this? If someone I worked with told me they couldn't remember a conversation we had earlier because a different person in their head was in charge at that point then I would, firstly, hide all the sharp objects, then phone an ambulance and ask them to bring a thunderous dose of anti-psychotics. Why would you admit to being fucking insane even if it is made up?
 
Why are they like this? If someone I worked with told me they couldn't remember a conversation we had earlier because a different person in their head was in charge at that point then I would, firstly, hide all the sharp objects, then phone an ambulance and ask them to bring a thunderous dose of anti-psychotics. Why would you admit to being fucking insane even if it is made up?
Hell, I might even clonk them on the head for safety's sake if the ambulance was running a little slow.
 
Whatever instance he and his colleagues creat I am blocking that domain lol

I think him and his army of troons are much more toxic than those they claim are Nazis or whatever.
The fediverse was never meant for troons and the troon-adjacent. The whole point of decentralization was to empower free speech and freedom of association.

Twitter worked for troons because it forced them on a captive audience who couldn't talk back. Look at what's happening to Taylor Lorenz on mastodon.social, I mean hahahahahahaha
 
Back