- Joined
- Aug 13, 2018
Ukraine had the choice to bomb the Donbass for nearly a decade straight.
Armed seperatists backed by Russia are not innocent civilians.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ukraine had the choice to bomb the Donbass for nearly a decade straight.
Oh no, Donbabwe again. Kremlin definitely wasn't conducting gay ops there following annexation of Crimea, fostering separatism, flooding the region with weapons and mercs when Putin realized that his control over Ukraine was slipping since his fuckboy Yanukovych was ousted. No, never, no siree!Ukraine had the choice to bomb the Donbass for nearly a decade straight. They also had the choice to allow the burgers to enter their asses in 2014 with their gay coup. Can you seriously think before you post? Anyone can play that game and I guarantee you the "who wronged who" game doesn't end in the Ukrainiens' favour.
Girkin did nothing wrong. All this kvetching about him sounds just like liberals talking about January 6th.I expect the cycle to include another piece of evidence that it was Ukrainian, then someone else points to something that suggests Russian origin, and in the end it is revealed it was actually Brazil.
Yeah Ukraine should have just let Girkin and his merry band on nutcases just seize government buildings.
Sorry, I don't believe that for a second.So it's pretty much confirmed that the missile was fired by drunk Ukrainians.
View attachment 3874716
LOL
Yeah but Russian rockets are shit and even if they were great, tech can always malfunction, and we need to preemptively tame down the hysteria for such potential events, last thing we want is politically important people seething and demanding vengeance online in front of millions of people.Zelensky jumped the gun, you're not wrong. Trying to double down until there's definitive proof is a bad look, should be prepared to own it if it ends up being theirs.
Russia isn't stupid enough to poke NATO like this, nor is Ukraine to risk losing one of their biggest supporters with such a gay op. Timing is also important, it happened as Ukraine was facing Russian missile barrage, so it was most likely a direct consequence of that, and both aforementioned options fit these conditions perfectly.
No need to overcomplicate it.
Again, Taras and Mykola who were manning the S-300 system most likely just got drunk and got startled by a flock of birds or by hearing a moped down the street, then started shooting off missiles indiscriminately. Who says there even was a Russian missile in the first place?Sorry, I don't believe that for a second.
If people still believe this after the Two Weeks to Flatten the Curve lies then there is no hope.
What were said Ukrainian Air Defense missiles targeting?
Where were said missiles statione
Looking at the position of the area hit to the position of Ukraine it seems unlikely that Ukraine had reason to fire interceptor missiles as their was very little time and geography for any sort of intercept.
Nigga what subject? This is the Russia-Ukraine war thread. That is the subject. Accusing me of changing the subject just because you don't like the reality of context. Pffft. It's called a discussion. Who the fuck let you out of the ward? Go back and ask the nurse for your child-size meds.Oh no, Donbabwe again. Kremlin definitely wasn't conducting gay ops there following annexation of Crimea, fostering separatism, flooding the region with weapons and mercs when Putin realized that his control over Ukraine was slipping since his fuckboy Yanukovych was ousted. No, never, no siree!
There's no two ways about it. Russia wronged Ukraine by violating their borders, it's rather simple. Maybe not for a gigabrain like you, but that's your problem.
You changed subject, by the way. Don't think I didn't notice.
What were they targeting?Again, Taras and Mykola who were manning the S-300 system most likely just got drunk and got startled by a flock of birds or by hearing a moped down the street, then started shooting off missiles indiscriminately. Who says there even was a Russian missile in the first place?
Who says they were targeting anything? Ukraine is on its 12th wave of conscription, all the able-bodied men ran off long ago, so most likely the conscripts were either too old, too drunk, or too blind for the job in the first place. Another possibility is that the S-300 system was manned by foreign mercenaries, which could lead to a language barrier. Maybe their commanding officer asked them for a smoke and they thought he said "fire the missiles." Anything can happen in Banderastan nowadays.What were they targeting?
If a Russian missile did exist then it could have been fired by a Bear bomber
The same subject we've been discussing for the last few pages, that being the recent Russian missile strike on Ukraine. What you did is called whataboutery, that's not a discussion, it's rhetoric.Nigga what subject? This is the Russia-Ukraine war thread. That is the subject. Accusing me of changing the subject just because you don't like the reality of context. Pffft. It's called a discussion. Who the fuck let you out of the ward? Go back and ask the nurse for your child-size meds.
I would say you are being deliberately obtuse, because part of me doesn't like to recognise that such severely retarded cases exist, but...here we are I guess!
Must be difficult trying to switch gears from "ARTICLE 5 NOW" to "Ukraine was the real victim here, we need to forgive and forget."Lots of cope from ukrainian side today
Doesn't change the fact that if it's indeed true, this unfortunate accident would be a result of Ukraine defending itself from the Russian attack. Russia had a choice in the matter, Ukraine didn't. Like how Rittenhouse had to shoot Pedobaum.
Of course it's not for no reason. Russia sees Ukraine as its toy to control as it wishes and is throwing a shitfit, because Ukraine dared to throw out its puppet ruler. Putin wants it to return to being a Russian vassal. It's no more complicated than that.Though even then I'm still of the opinion that the Russia-Ukraine war is more complex than "Mean Russia bullying Ukraine for no reason".
Well, the situation is similar, but the outcome is different. Rittenhouse had Smith & Wesson M&P15 and one Pedobaum, Ukraine had S-300 and at least 85 Pedobaums charging at them at the speed of anywhere between Mach 0.58 and Mach 0.78.I feel like that's a bit of a false equivalence. A closer comparison might have been if Rittenhouse had shot a bystander while being attacked by Pedobaum, which would concievably still be Rosenbaum et al's fault, but a little murkier.
Though even then I'm still of the opinion that the Russia-Ukraine war is more complex than "Mean Russia bullying Ukraine for no reason".
I mean it's not for no reason, they obviously want all the resources in Donbabwe since they don't want a competing banana economy near by, but that's like saying America was justified going into Iraq because America needed to maintain it's petrodollar.I feel like that's a bit of a false equivalence. A closer comparison might have been if Rittenhouse had shot a bystander while being attacked by Pedobaum, which would concievably still be Rosenbaum et al's fault, but a little murkier.
Though even then I'm still of the opinion that the Russia-Ukraine war is more complex than "Mean Russia bullying Ukraine for no reason".
America is wrong for that, but Russia good because America did bad, so bad is good now. Yes?I mean it's not for no reason, they obviously want all the resources in Donbabwe since they don't want a competing banana economy near by, but that's like saying America was justified going into Iraq because America needed to maintain it's petrodollar.