Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 14.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 115 24.8%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 84 18.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 193 41.7%

  • Total voters
    463
I don't see anyone moralfagging or pearl clutching. I see a lot of people pointing out the obvious hypocrisy at play here (how many times did we see Nick scrunch up his nose at people fostering parasocial relationships with their audience, talking about their sex lives, thirstposting, etc.), as well as how humiliating this will be for Nick's children in the future.

Unfortunate, Nick always seemed to have a good head on his shoulders. Hard to say which got to his head faster, the anime or the e-fame.
 
I see we're past the event phase and now at the damage control phase.

Again, I'm not disappointed at the nudes themselves. They're whatever.

I'm disappointed that Nick had the opinion of "don't overshare your sex life" up until mid 2022 and suddenly he jumped off the cliff into degeneracy. One of Nick's biggest selling points was consistency. He is (was?) generally well received on the Farms because no matter what people said about him he just shrugged and said "you people have the right to say what you want, even if I don't like it."

Thankfully I haven't seen him reverse on that sentiment yet. It's just, well, disappointing that he forgot about other positions he's held.
 
Primarily what I think isn't even about hipocrisy or morality, it's more that it's just unfortunate that these two have kids and yet will be getting divorced within the next few years.

When couples start doing this stuff, that's a sign that things aren't going well even if the couple hasn't acknowledged it.
The wife needs validation that she's still attractive, and the husband needs validation that he has a bangable wife and other guys are jealous, they're clearly feeling insecure about their relationship, once a couple starts looking outside the marriage for approval it's a wrap, especially once the seal's been broken and you've given other guys some form of sexual access to your wife in exchange for reassurance.

Mark it, within 3 years divorce announcement (edit: and if he doesn't I'll tell myself it's because he read this post and decided to be stubborn just to spite me specifically, and therefore that I saved his marriage. So it's really a win either way).
 
I feel a little bad that he's trying to have his big 5 year anniversary right in the middle of all this, but something something sow, something something reap. It really doesn't seem that hard to me to never ever take a picture of your ass as a heterosexual man in a monogamous relationship, never mind putting it somewhere it can and will be seen by the whole sektur. The wife shit is gross in that there was absolutely no reason for anyone outside of their allegedly monogamous relationship to see intimate photos of either of them. The pictures aren't that bad in a vacuum, but a married woman posing like that in publicly distributed material is just awful, impressive as they are for a mother of five.
 
"Guys are proud of their cars and guns, I'm proud of the body I take care of."

I'm gonna get hats, but my hatred for libertarians keeps growing. This argument that you and your body parts are just property and hold no inherent value other than the fact that you 'own' them is so fucking stupid.
Perhaps she did not watch enough Sesame Street? I find that to be a common problem in today's society. Much to our collective determent. Sesame Street adroitly addressed this very issue 40+ years ago.


Similarly, if you took a picture of Lady Rackets and posted it next pictures of a Glock 17 and a Dodge Charger, you'd have a round of "One of these things is not like the others" that the most autistic of Farmers should be able to pass.

Joking aside, I agree.
 
Some people say a picture is worth a thousand words.
2v11v1v.PNG
 
More cope with the thot herself.
Only took 2 minutes for the first "BBC" joke. Large black man visits the stream within the first 10 minutes to gibsmedat the wife. More swinger jokes, including "prepping". So, nothing unusual for Nick but not sure why she felt the need to release a statement denying she and Nick are swingers.
 
Last edited:
Rumble and youtube numbers seem to be equal. If that continues Nick has one less less thing to bargain with rumble about.
I wonder if Rumble inflates their viewers or they aren't counting unique. It kinda doesn't make a lot of sense the numbers Nick was getting for his latest court streams when he's not on Twitter to shill them, and was pretty random with little notice if he was actually going to do the stream or not. Yet he was getting tens of thousands of viewers.

With how shitty the site seems to function, it wouldn't surprise me if their viewer counts are bullshit.
 
I wonder if Rumble inflates their viewers or they aren't counting unique. It kinda doesn't make a lot of sense the numbers Nick was getting for his latest court streams when he's not on Twitter to shill them, and was pretty random with little notice if he was actually going to do the stream or not. Yet he was getting tens of thousands of viewers.

With how shitty the site seems to function, it wouldn't surprise me if their viewer counts are bullshit.
How do we know youtube numbers are real? Odysee tried to claim Rumble numbers were bullshit and they were told to knock it off or get ass pounded by lawyers.
 
Back