Yeah the "for money" part is something I don't remember him specifying until this incident. Seems like justification from him that he's suddenly drawing that fine line distinction. "Well we didn't do it for money so it's ok" also seems counter to his whole "king grifter" schtick.
you make a good point.
I mainly remember him from continually getting name-dropped in The Young Ones (which was also named after one of his movies).
Oh good, now we're arguing the definition of pornography. This ought to be very enlightening, worthwhile debate.
Honestly, it's a useless debate because I have a feeling unless there's a penis entering a vagina, it won't be considered porn because degenerates don't believe softcore porn exists or something stupid like that.
Didn't all of this start after that one chick posted her tits in his locals chat?
That started the current shit storm, but a lot of the issues have been ongoing for years.
And that was a teaser review. He hasn't filmed his full review yet.
are 2d drawings of alien, demon, shemale robots cat people really pornography?
Kind of irrelevant since she posts it for free, no?
Shwing!
Why buy the (lol)cow when the milk is free?
Nick yiff stream when?
