Racemixing Debate - Do you support it? Are you again it?

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Only hated by /pol/. The rest of wider normie society does not give a shit
Disagree, I think you don't know what the rest of normie society believes.

People might not be goosestepping and saying that if you date a black person you should be thrown in a camp, but no, average people who otherwise aren't that politically affiliated absolutely do care about race mixing, irl if some girl is with a black guy word gets around, other guys tell you and it's looked at harshly.

It isn't impossible for those kinds of relationships to be respected, if the two can prove they're serious and it isn't some kind of race fetish then people will be more accepting over time; however people will tend to be very skeptical, mainly because they have good reason to be skeptical, because average people are able to observe from experience that mixed race couples tend to be very dysfunctional.

Also, ask yourself this: if society is such a big fan of race mixing, why is the media and journalists, who at every other turn do everything they can to undermine and brainwash average people, so intent on it?
So they'll aggressively support and promote all kinds of other social propaganda that isn't reflected by the average person, but this one single time their social attitude totally aligns with what the average middle class person believes, and the only people who look askance at race mixing is /pol/?
That's quite the coincidence.

Most of the time the attitude seems to be that families are totally fine coexisting or being friends with other races, but if someone comes home with a different race and tries to make them part of the unit your family and friends aren't going to look at it very kindly.
 
Dialectics aside, for those afflicted by talmudic brain rot: race mixing often results in physical and mental health difficulties, both ultimately being genetic, but behavioral issues result from having even less of a notion of belonging to any given place or people which is essential to human development beyond an atomized slave mentality. Additionally, different races have different behavioral proclivities which can conflict in mixed peoples. If you need an appeal to emotion, it's essentially child abuse.

Race mixing could only be considered good for those of races who find themselves otherwise outmatched. The liberal excuse of humanity doesn't hold up as those willing to get over their programming will admit, if the goal is human survival and success, or even progress and happiness, the best strategy would be to select against the procreation of most africans, aboriginals, and talmudic populations, let alone race mix with them.

Not to mention there is plenty of diversity among broader groups which produce much better general results. Is it race mixing for an English to marry a French? Maybe, but certainly not the affront of involving an aboriginal. Again, it depends who decides what is ok and what their motives are. If you are ruled by people who wish to breed a slave population to international finance and their debased, anti-human proclivities, which manifests a colloquially named "clown world", you'd be stupid to be open or even indifferent to their ideas just because you'd be ok with a japanese waifu. You may think people will choose what they want, but at mass and scale it should be obvious that things can be and are being nudged, or more like shoved these days, against the general interests of freedom loving peoples.
 
Last edited:
Cute petite brown skinned wavy black-haired Aryan women

Endogamy is for conflict-averse sissy cucks. Real champions have a conquistador mentality, seizing the women of rival tribes to breed out their genes and create vigorous new strains of humanity.

The truth? Its not as common as you think. The media just massively over represents it to push the narrative.

The vast majority of people are still more attracted to people of their own skin color than other skin colors. Its built into our evolutionary biology to prefer people from our own "tribe" and to have a dislike of those outside of it. The easiest way to identify our tribe is through physical traits such as skin color and other shared features. Even walking down a urban park or street in a major metropolitan city, the place with the most "multiculturalism", you will see the vast majority of couples are people of the same skin color.

People dismiss the genetic argument because of the Nazi's obsession with genes in WW2, but there is without a doubt genetic differences between different races of people. Its more than skin color to be sure, otherwise Basketball and (American) Football wouldn't be dominated by blacks and the Japanese wouldn't crush at Baseball as hard as they do (not even mentioning the IQ differences across races).

Being as impartial as I can be, I look at children, racemixed or not, the same way I look at dog breeds. Different mixes confer different pros and cons. Some are just bad ideas, others confer greater benefits from the mix than if they remained "purebred".

In terms of people attracted to other races, yeah its a fetish thing. Then again, since when do people choose a partner that doesn't meet a fetish they have? Being sexually attracted to your partner is a pretty big part of the relationship after all.

People are free to do whatever the hell they want in my eyes, but there is a reason social stigmas exist against certain racemixed couples and its more than just "Bigotry".
This is how I see it to. When I am talking to someone (who I can talk safely about it with), my brief pitch is:
1) We know personality is partially genetic
2) Ethnic groups are groups of people with similar genes/shared heredity
3) There is no reason then to assume that ethnic groups CANNOT influence behavior through genetics.

And then you prove the principle by pointing to dog breeds, which are the direct equivalent of our ethnic groups. One of the most illustrative things I've seen with it is how dogs will instinctively do things they were bred for. Shetland Sheepdogs will just naturally play with people by chasing them around, trying to herd them, and nipping at their feet. It's not learned behavior, it's not trained, the Sheltie could be a little puppy that's raised in a house and it will still do that. Likewise, Retrievers will naturally take to fetch more readily than other dogs.

As for how much of it behavior actually is attributable to race, I don't know. As I understand there is supposed to be way more genetic variability between individuals than there is between races, though clearly we are still able to see regularities in physical appearance. Often I hear it as 40% heredity with personality, so what percent of your genes could be considered "racial" as opposed to "individual," to the extent that question even makes sense. But just to make up a number, say it's only 25%. Then already your personality is only 10% racial. That's not insignificant, but it's not like a stereotype either.

I don't think race is the main determinant of people's behaviors, I think in most theories of history based around race you can easily disprove them by finding times when that culture was ahead or behind others, and you can usually find valid sociological theories that explain why some groups behave differently. I just don't think it's honest to dogmatically refuse the idea that it could have some effect.
 

Attachments

  • main-qimg-a41fc3276850ab71ba382cc15956429f-pjlq.jpg
    main-qimg-a41fc3276850ab71ba382cc15956429f-pjlq.jpg
    41.2 KB · Views: 93
Racemixing with niggers is basically throwing your heritage away and letting a primitive race take over. It's a step back evolutionarily and takes ages to overcome even if every subsequent generation avoids mixing with niggers. I'd say the same also about mixing with South Indian and Australian australoids.
 
Last edited:
It doesn't take it away. It just means you are not worthy of it.
Says who? If my ancestors don't like it, they can wake their dead asses up and tell me. Right before I put them down with a shotgun or get a priest to exorcise them, cuz while I'm fine on race mixing I will NOT have undead on my property.
 
This is pretty fucking gay. There is no debate, it's beyond obvious that it is bad.

If there wasn't "race mixing," the white race literally wouldn't exist because it came into existence through race mixing between human and pre-human species. This is what you people are forced to believe anyways since you abandoned religion due it to being connected to ancient jews. lol Either way, your stand point is childish and tends to come from people too autistic to have a relationship.

Dialectics aside, for those afflicted by talmudic brain rot: race mixing often results in physical and mental health difficulties, both ultimately being genetic, but behavioral issues result from having even less of a notion of belonging to any given place or people which is essential to human development beyond an atomized slave mentality. Additionally, different races have different behavioral proclivities which can conflict in mixed peoples. If you need an appeal to emotion, it's essentially child abuse.

Race mixing could only be considered good for those of races who find themselves otherwise outmatched. The liberal excuse of humanity doesn't hold up as those willing to get over their programming will admit, if the goal is human survival and success, or even progress and happiness, the best strategy would be to select against the procreation of most africans, aboriginals, and talmudic populations, let alone race mix with them.

Not to mention there is plenty of diversity among broader groups which produce much better general results. Is it race mixing for an English to marry a French? Maybe, but certainly not the affront of involving an aboriginal. Again, it depends who decides what is ok and what their motives are. If you are ruled by people who wish to breed a slave population to international finance and their debased, anti-human proclivities, which manifests a colloquially named "clown world", you'd be stupid to be open or even indifferent to their ideas just because you'd be ok with a japanese waifu. You may think people will choose what they want, but at mass and scale it should be obvious that things can be and are being nudged, or more like shoved these days, against the general interests of freedom loving peoples.

A bunch of larping stormfag pseudo-intellectual hogwash. One give away of course is you throw in Jews with Africans, which makes no sense outside of the framework of meme natsoc idiocy that's up there with flat earth for logical consistency or truth.
 
I disagree with race-mixing out of aesthetic value. Most race-mixing has been the result of violent conquest or subjugation (i.e. Latin America). There are some distinct subraces of Native Americans and Aboriginals that are completely extinct now because they've been so thoroughly race-mixed with whites (or in some cases blacks) which is a complete loss for the human race. They only survive in pictures taken 100+ years ago by anthropologists, usually of very old men and women. Like that's a big part of why there are no full-blooded Australian Aboriginal models, because the full-blooded community is so small due to 200+ years of race-mixing with whites.

However, I think there is some value when it comes to building nations. Nations built of multiple races are inherently more fragile than nations of a single race. That's why President Gaspar Rodriguez de Francia of Paraguay banned all non-interracial marriages to preserve his nation's identity. If the US were race-mixed into a mestizo type nation (based on youth demographics, I think genetically it would be like 79% white, 10% Native American, 10% black, 1% Asian), it would do wonders for social stability since we'd be one people, not divided by race. This is why globohomo wants to race-mix the entire world (which would be the worst genocide imaginable) so they can make a global identity of consoomer-serfs in a stable reich of their own creation.

Now the media's race-mixing obsession is just disgusting. It shouldn't matter what race you are, it's propaganda demeaning to both blacks and whites (which is part of their agenda to destroy both the black and white race). I don't think race-mixing should be banned, but I think some sort of reverse DEI should exist where companies are financially punished for putting out too much race-mixing content.
 
I got nothing against race mixing if it only would be biology. But my wife is from a different European country and we are spending time discussing cultural differences. How the heck do I explain to a Mexican lady that mashed potatoes sauerkraut and schnitzel is the way to go? Or a jewess that the foreskin fuckin stays? Only problems...
 
Buncha redditors ITT getting offended because they think people who don't like racemixing are trying to destroy their white savior complex of snatching up a poor brown girl from the third world
REEEEEEEE, strangers are hurting my fee fee's by fucking a brown girl!

And you call other people Redditors?
 
I got nothing against race mixing if it only would be biology. But my wife is from a different European country and we are spending time discussing cultural differences. How the heck do I explain to a Mexican lady that mashed potatoes sauerkraut and schnitzel is the way to go? Or a jewess that the foreskin fuckin stays? Only problems...
with a firm, but fair back-hand. Works in every language.
 
Back