Spic Fuentes Hates White People - Nick's hatred of whites, his & AF's negrophilia, race related hypocrisy, non-white hangers on, and Kanye obsession

Tard Whisperer said:
its true they did bomb the comments but some of the blacks saying they liked him have a long comment history in the no jumper channel. which is funnier to me than a groyop

example is this dummy Sneako who is fully convinced Nick is a brilliant leader lol
View attachment 3895686
Click to expand...
Im honestly shocked Sneako doesn't already have a thread on here, he's admitted to watching his girlfriend have sex with other men, and just generally has a long history of being a sex pest.
He's also seemingly a pedophile, openly admitting to enjoying softcore child pornography.
 
  • Horrifying
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Geddy Lee's Fee and See, AgendaPoster, Skarlatvoros and 13 others
Tard Whisperer said:
last night on stream Sneako gets a text from Nick and starts celebrating but won’t say what the text said
View attachment 3901179

Today a video comes out of Ye giving a reporter a tour of his studio. he says he is running for president and that Milo, also in the video, is his campaign manager

now groypers on tg are saying Nick is also in the video
View attachment 3901173
here’s the small clip where the guy they’re saying is Nick walks past
View attachment 3901152

Nick seems to confirm on his tg, but deletes the post within an hour…
View attachment 3901155
Click to expand...
remember when snekko took that gay test and it pinged him for being bi no wonder folks like him if AF LMAO
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Troon Destroyer, Nein Inch Nales, ffo kcuF and 2 others
soulgains said:
Im honestly shocked Sneako doesn't already have a thread on here, he's admitted to watching his girlfriend have sex with other men, and just generally has a long history of being a sex pest.
He's also seemingly a pedophile, openly admitting to enjoying softcore child pornography.
Click to expand...
A cucked paedophile is a member of AF, least of my surprises.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Spicolás José Fuentes, TwinPeaksEnjoyer, Nein Inch Nales and 1 other person
Never forget that Nick presents himself explicitly as an 'ethnic' (=white catholic, non-WASP) papist who is convinced that the USA should be ruled by papists ethnics like him. The KKK was founded in part to suppress and persecute ethnic papists just as much as it was created to go after Jews and Blacks. In the final analysis Ben Shaprio and Nick Fuentes, as power hungry, uppity sons of Ellis Islanders aren't so different.
 
  • Like
Reactions: REGENDarySumanai, Nointey, pharaohwewuz and 1 other person
BoxerShorts47 said:
What you're noticing is that Nick is a brainlet. Nick can memorize talking points, just like the typical college student is able to memorize ideas for a test, but he can't think outside the box, just like the typical college student isn't able to make quality research. So when Nick does his monologue, he seems smart, but, when he's in situations without /pol/ talking points, he fails. He doesn't know how to deal with black psychology and black grievances and he says the exact same thing that every other white person in his shoes has said, "Yes, Mista Nigga. You be right. Life is hard for a Nigga. Wez White people gotta be more compassionate and inclusive." This is the proof that Nick isn't smarter than other people.
Click to expand...
You’re not wrong about him just memorizing talking points and thinking he’s smarter than he actually actually is. Even so being book smart doesn’t always translate into being able to make smart decisions. Narcissism and personality flaws can blind otherwise bright individuals.
BoxerShorts47 said:
Even if his narcissism was cured and he stopped hating women and he accepted his homosexuality, he would still be a typical IQ 130, above avg intelligance, brainlet.
Click to expand...
I highly doubt he has an IQ of 130.
 
  • Like
Reactions: REGENDarySumanai and AgendaPoster
IAmNotAlpharius said:
You’re not wrong about him just memorizing talking points and thinking he’s smarter than he actually actually is. Even so being book smart doesn’t always translate into being able to make smart decisions. Narcissism and personality flaws can blind otherwise bright individuals.

I highly doubt he has an IQ of 130.
Click to expand...

IQ 115 is the avg college graduated person's IQ, IIRC. Nick could easily graduate with a degree so 115 is the floor. He isn't a true genius (IQ 145+) because he's too dumb to understand high level thoughts and his owns ideas are very bad. Examples include: simping for Trump in 2018 when everyone else was ready to move on, dredging up Christian Conservationism despite it being a failed tactic, jumping on the Stop the Steel grift. So If I'm being generous then I would say 130 is his ceiling. I reasonably estimate his IQ to be in the 120s or maybe low 130s if we're really generous. He has about the same IQ as other brainlets like Vaush or Destiny or Hunter Avallone or Jordan Peterson. This range is where all the grifters and psuedo-intellectuals live because they're smart enough to convince the majority of society to listen to them and the people dumber than them can't tell that these grifters are psedo-intellectuals and should not be trusted.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Lunacy
  • Dumb
Reactions: Ged!, IAmNotAlpharius, AgendaPoster and 3 others
BoxerShorts47 said:
IQ 115 is the avg college graduated person's IQ, IIRC. Nick could easily graduate with a degree so 115 is the floor. He isn't a true genius (IQ 145+) because he's too dumb to understand high level thoughts and his owns ideas are very bad. Examples include: simping for Trump in 2018 when everyone else was ready to move on, dredging up Christian Conservationism despite it being a failed tactic, jumping on the Stop the Steel grift. So If I'm being generous then I would say 130 is his ceiling. I reasonably estimate his IQ to be in the 120s or maybe low 130s if we're really generous. He has about the same IQ as other brainlets like Vaush or Destiny or Hunter Avallone or Jordan Peterson. This range is where all the grifters and psuedo-intellectuals live because they're smart enough to convince the majority of society to listen to them and the people dumber than them can't tell that these grifters are psedo-intellectuals and should not be trusted.
Click to expand...
You are highly overestimating IQ of Vaush or Hunter Avallone. These two retards are sitting at MAYBE 110 tops. The cum detective is maybe pushing 120 since he found a somewhat stable grift and managed to make enough money out of it to live, supposedly. But you also have to realise that he willingly associates with Ethan fucking Ralph.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius and AgendaPoster
Kotoid said:
You are highly overestimating IQ of Vaush or Hunter Avallone. These two retards are sitting at MAYBE 110 tops. The cum detective is maybe pushing 120 since he found a somewhat stable grift and managed to make enough money out of it to live, supposedly. But you also have to realise that he willingly associates with Ethan fucking Ralph.
Click to expand...
No. I think you're overestimating the IQ of most people. Most people are really dumb. Vaush and Hunter Avallone would be considered smart by most people. They're skilled at memorizing talking points and even using debate tactics effectively. They're min 120. Ethan Ralph is probably a better example of 100-115.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Dumb
  • Disagree
Reactions: felted, IAmNotAlpharius, AgendaPoster and 2 others
Black AF hanger-on Bryson Gray gets kicked off of BBC Radio Scotland mid-interview for saying Jews own the big 3 record labels

https://twitter.com/RealBrysonGray

his music video from this summer featuring Nick:
Screenshot 2022-11-25 at 3.54.32 PM.pngScreenshot 2022-11-25 at 3.52.41 PM.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Retribution
slickerthanyouraverage said:
Never forget that Nick presents himself explicitly as an 'ethnic' (=white catholic, non-WASP) papist who is convinced that the USA should be ruled by papists ethnics like him. The KKK was founded in part to suppress and persecute ethnic papists just as much as it was created to go after Jews and Blacks. In the final analysis Ben Shaprio and Nick Fuentes, as power hungry, uppity sons of Ellis Islanders aren't so different.
Click to expand...
Maybe the Know-Nothings knew something after all.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius, REGENDarySumanai and pharaohwewuz
HeyU said:
I think he likes white people in theory, like he thinks we are the best at producing and that we’re generally well-behaved and among the smarter races. He thinks this country is only what it is thanks to white people, he thinks white people have an overall good impact on society. He likes white people on paper, basically.
But in real life, day to day, he doesn’t particularly care for white people, he doesn’t feel like he relates to or fits in with our culture and he doesn’t have good experiences with white people and white culture and doesn’t enjoy it.
So, there’s a split, a conflict in his head. That’s my take, anyway.
Click to expand...
This is a fairly common sentiment amongst WNs-they very much love the "White race" as an abstract, but do not like, in fact they despise the bulk of the White population-you see this as far back as the Turner Diaries-where Pierce gleefully describes the slaughter of Whites who won't go along with his program.

Part of it is rage/frustration that Whites reject their claims and ideas, and part of it is class/region based-Richard Spencer is a good modern example of class divides within WN and adjacent circles.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: EpicGamerMoment, IAmNotAlpharius and AgendaPoster
Ishtar said:
This is a fairly common sentiment amongst WNs-they very much love the "White race" as an abstract, but do not like, in fact they despise the bulk of the White population-you see this as far back as the Turner Diaries-where Pierce gleefully describes the slaughter of Whites who won't go along with his program.

Part of it is rage/frustration that Whites reject their claims and ideas, and part of it is class/region based-Richard Spencer is a good modern example of class divides within WN and adjacent circles.
Click to expand...
Most WNs are low IQ and unable to be consistent in their ideas.
That paradox in your post can be solved by not purity spiraling on race and introducing complexity and nuance.
For example, you should always acknowledge the "x race" as a construct that's mentioned for convenience. It's the same with dogs, cats, trees, seas, lakes and suns. Some stars are small, some huge, some go supernova when they die, others die slowly. They are still categorized as stars.
For whites (or other groups), the idea is that you will be recognized as part of that racial group by most external people. You might have 10% Korean and 20% Native American blood, but you might pass as white for all blacks and asians. That forces a reality upon you.
It's even more complex in areas like East Europe, where similar looking warring tribes can usually be only categorized on language, accent etc. Yet it's still enough to get you genocided if you're unlucky to be part of these conflicts.
So your heritage, your belonging, are typically, but not always, external realities imposed upon you by society. You will learn to find safety in groups that match who you are.
It's not hard, it's just survival and should never be condemned.
This sort of racial purity spiraling is idiotic, because you want the group you belong to to be "good" and cozy. There is no advantage in belonging into a group of drug using degenerates with high criminality and vodka enjoying. You obviously want to fix them and shape them into acting less grug, more smart. That's gonna be hard as hell.
But the groups still have to be acknowledged, even if it's inconvenient, because they exist and are rather obvious. Observing objective reality is basically always good.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
AgendaPoster said:
Most WNs are low IQ and unable to be consistent in their ideas.
That paradox in your post can be solved by not purity spiraling on race and introducing complexity and nuance.
For example, you should always acknowledge the "x race" as a construct that's mentioned for convenience. It's the same with dogs, cats, trees, seas, lakes and suns. Some stars are small, some huge, some go supernova when they die, others die slowly. They are still categorized as stars.
For whites (or other groups), the idea is that you will be recognized as part of that racial group by most external people. You might have 10% Korean and 20% Native American blood, but you might pass as white for all blacks and asians. That forces a reality upon you.
It's even more complex in areas like East Europe, where similar looking warring tribes can usually be only categorized on language, accent etc. Yet it's still enough to get you genocided if you're unlucky to be part of these conflicts.
So your heritage, your belonging, are typically, but not always, external realities imposed upon you by society. You will learn to find safety in groups that match who you are.
It's not hard, it's just survival and should never be condemned.
This sort of racial purity spiraling is idiotic, because you want the group you belong to to be "good" and cozy. There is no advantage in belonging into a group of drug using degenerates with high criminality and vodka enjoying. You obviously want to fix them and shape them into acting less grug, more smart. That's gonna be hard as hell.
But the groups still have to be acknowledged, even if it's inconvenient, because they exist and are rather obvious. Observing objective reality is basically always good.
Click to expand...
Part of the issue is yes these differences matter, but at the same time there will be 2 billion more Africans end of century, include Asians and other non Whites-then the imperative for racial unity becomes much stronger.

I think a good rule of thumb is anyone of European descent in the russian federation from the Pacific to Lisbon, the Anglo settler colonies of America, Canada, Australia and NZ. And residual White populations in Africa-south Africa obviously, but there are a few in Namibia and elsewhere. Upper caste Latin Americans-I’d argue are too ambiguous, many may have 90%+ Spanish or Portuguese ancestry but it’s not a straight guarantee.

There are a mountain of problems-different ethnic identities, religious identity or lack thereof, liberal resistance, and many many more besides for a “successful” WN movement. And even within it-you run into the fact people often have very different backgrounds and beliefs-far right Twitter for example has several factions of atheist/Nietzcheans, and you have your catholic/orthodox reactionaries.

These world views are incompatible.

So the “far right” will continue to exist on the margins, never able to break into normie consciousness, always in a state or self cannibalization.

How you break this endless cycle of false hope and factional infighting on the cul de sac to nowhere, I have no idea.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back