- Joined
- Nov 22, 2020
I meant more is that how he is presented still, I should have better wrote my questionThere is the often quoted "Everything is canon, but canon doesn't mean it's the exact truth."
Sadly a lot of people find this to be a genius concept or fundamental to the warhammer lore experience but they're wrong because practically this has no narrative of story telling value. By that I mean it's a concept that does not impact any of the stories or the way in which those stories are told.
The context of this quote is simple, when one of the authors was confronted about why his novel broke canon he quickly though up this retort... basically what this quote actually means is that he didn't much care about the details or making sure that his work fit into the existing body of work (the supposed canon). The idea took root and it became a shield used by 40k fans whenever someone points out inconsistencies, as a simple thought terminating cliché. Sadly it makes it hard to care too much about the lore and canon when the people working on it don't particularly care much either... but that's a me thing though since plenty of other people seem to still love the lore.
But the popularity of this idea among the fans and among some of the writers themselves (obviously) really tells us that nothing is canon. I believe ADB said it best: ""There is no canon. There are several hundred creators all adding to the melting pot of the IP."
Everything can change at any moment if some new author decides he can get away with it.
This is sadly the downside of properties like this where there is no central author or controlling body and the only real driving force is money. Comics has this in the most extreme form where you can literally see entire backstories just scrapped and rewritten not just reinterpreted or subtly changed as we more often see in 40k.
But if you want to some semblance of canon then the answer would be yes this is now canon until someone else decides to change it in which case it will not be canon.
We already had flawed Emperor before, just happened that Graham McNeill and other pre-MoM had him still well meaning despite said flaws. Now it feels more Grimderp than GrimdarkThe Laer Blade initially possessed him but then he regained control of his body in the short story Reflection Crack’d.
Fulgrim has fully gone down the path of damnation.
There is no canon to how the Emperor acts, but I will say that I do like this depiction because it demonstrates that the Emperor is fallible. He is the most powerful human being but he is not omnipotent. He is convinced by his superiority that He knows what is best for humanity.
Any fuck up can’t be His fault. He doesn’t need to change, the galaxy must bend to His will.
The current state of the Imperium is therefore not a master plan of a God-Emperor or a final option to stave off the encroaching darkness. It is the result of a tyrant shaping humanity how is believes it should be and failing modify his vision for the future. 10,000 years of unending war brought about by the foibles of one man, trapped in a near deathless state as the civilization he built became the antithesis of everything he worked for.
Fucking grimdark, ain’t it?
Last edited: