𝕏 / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

[Tactical Wizard]

There's "known" and then there's actually documented.

We got the documentation from Berrnson’s case. He successfully sued to get his account back and during discovery, they uncovered the emails asking for him to be banned.

I hope this shit launches a thousand lawsuits.

 

[Celebrate Nite]

 

[Next Task]

My man we saw the guns being fired, we saw who fired them, and we saw who they hit.

Personally, I'm on the Farms because I love receipts. I knew all this, but it's great to see undeniable evidence, with names not redacted, showing how it happened.

Also, the interesting part to me is that this was apparently all Twitter's decision. I would have been thought the Democrats were involved. Seems like they didn't even need to give the order or make the request, as Twitter employees were ready to do what they thought was best politically anyway. Which, again, I knew they were, but I didn't know whether this was purely their decision or not.

 

[Celebrate Nite]

 

[mindlessobserver]

View attachment 3986088
View attachment 3986091

I am Mad At the Internet now. I always KNEW they thought this way, but seeing it there in print just....

 

[Maldavius Figtree]

Matt go faster you absolute nigger, is he typing this while he is posting?!

 

[Celebrate Nite]

 

[Tanuki Mixed Nuts]

View attachment 3986037
View attachment 3986040

I appreciate the fact that Khanna at least tried to steer the conversation to 1A, but at the same time, the email reads almost like "I-I know the conservitards like 1A, b-but maybe.. uhh pwease maybe think about it. btw i love biden h-haha and hillary is epic haha"
It comes off weirdly pathetic and like half hearted groveling, but at the same time I don't doubt they genuinely believe that shit.

 

[Polarity]

I appreciate the fact that Khanna at least tried to steer the conversation to 1A, but at the same time, the email reads almost like "I-I know the conservitards like 1A, b-but maybe.. uhh pwease maybe think about it. btw i love biden h-haha and hillary is epic haha"
It comes off weirdly pathetic and like half hearted groveling, but at the same time I don't doubt they genuinely believe that shit.

He's another indian. Probably hoping for bobs and vagene.

 

[TheSaltySpitoon]

What is the fucking point of this shit
View attachment 3985905

This is Twitter, where reposting other people’s tweets with a minor alterations is the pinnacle of comedy.

It’s the logical conclusion when dogpiling = engagement

 

[Your Starter for 10]

So the Democrats barely needed to puppeteer Twitter, everyone found out about it, the Republicans gnashed their teeth and made some limp-dicked threats, and absolutely nothing happened (until Elon bought it, I guess).

Guess what's going to happen the next 25 billion times: the same exact thing.

 

[Alabaster Disaster]

Matt go faster you absolute nigger, is he typing this while he is posting?!

Unironically yes. People are literally trying to coach him how to multi Tweet in the comments.

 

[mindlessobserver]

Wait....Jack Dorsey's email address is Jack@0.pizza?

Oh no.

 

[Celebrate Nite]

 

[McSneaks]

So they have a wide range of tools used for "extraordinary circumstances only" (only ever used for severe child pornography, Musk says), can easily use it to completely suppress a random news story about crack laptops that is being actively aggressively pushed by also powerful people, but were unable to remove or suppress that massive amount of child pornography and grooming that has been openly shared on the site for years.

"Celebrities and unknowns alike could be removed or reviewed at the behest of a political party" and they comply, but two people who BEG THEM for years to remove CHILD PORNOGRAPHY OF THEMSELVES get directly refused (because "we don't have to") and told it's impossible. Said political party never said "when you remove Rice Gum, could you maybe remove some of those child fuckers posting the naked kids?"

https://www.teslarati.com/twitter-taking-child-exploitation-seriously/ wasn't that hard for Musk, within days, to use said tools AND MAKE NEW ONES.

Makes you wonder about priorities huh?

The amount of disgusting pedophiles on Twitter in that thread talking about "is just bullshit attacking a mans son for his hard past so what? you guys are evil" or "tldr; one employee did something wrong".

Completely ignoring the fact it's literally the entire team designed to keep the platform safe and FOLLOW THE LAW, wielding this power to play politic games while clapping and cheering pedophiles opening grooming and mutilating children. I'd be interested into an investigation on how much of that content was ever actually moderated, I guarantee you'll find all of it that was "removed" on the staffs computers. Fucking sick freaks

Mark me MATI if you want because I definitely am. We are watching literal child fucking pedophiles be protected by every single position of power in the country, more openly and blatantly everyday, smugly revel in how they're mutilating, grooming, and fucking children while saying YOU are evil for wanting to do anything, not like you can. And it's not solved by "oh you don't like trump? leave the country" these are children getting their lives ruined by sick fucking freaks, not being upset over local taxes.

 

[Polish Businessman]

View attachment 3986022
View attachment 3986028

This one is the worst. These people have fundamentally unamerican, non-western mindset. What the fuck is this shit? They don't even understand that they should at least pretend to play by the rules. Reading this feels like you transplanted some tsarist bureaucrat or CCP apparatchick into America. Not even our communists were this tone-deaf.

 

[Involuntary Celebrity]

Also, the interesting part to me is that this was apparently all Twitter's decision. I would have been thought the Democrats were involved. Seems like they didn't even need to give the order or make the request, as Twitter employees were ready to do what they thought was best politically anyway. Which, again, I knew they were, but I didn't know whether this was purely their decision or not.

Somebody can have two jobs. The CIA once made a proud tweet, which I can't find now, about all the many other jobs an operative might have.
Back when the State Department built a whole fake social media platform in Cuba, modelled after Twitter btw, the AP eventually exposed it and the fact that local executives working for the platform didn't know who their real employer actually was. That platform was coincidentally shut down the same year the Smith-Mundt act was changed (Obama administration) making it legal for the State Dept to simply operate in an unrestricted way on Twitter instead.

So, y'know. There won't be an email when someone simply walks through the front door and applies for a job.

 

[Celebrate Nite]

 

[Baroque]

Elon's certainly got me back on Twitter today!

And that is a suspicious email address

 

[McSneaks]

View attachment 3986088
View attachment 3986091

They're terrified of "making truth relative" but if Mark tweets today that he's now known as Stephanie and is she/frogself, and you call him Mark, they will ban you.

MAKES YUH WONDER