Restaurant refuses service to Christian group, citing staff ‘dignity’

A restaurant in Richmond last week canceled a reservation for a private event being held by a conservative Christian organization, citing the group’s opposition to same-sex marriage and abortion rights.

“We have always refused service to anyone for making our staff uncomfortable or unsafe and this was the driving force behind our decision,” read an Instagram post from Metzger Bar and Butchery, a German-influenced restaurant in the Union Hill neighborhood whose kitchen is helmed by co-owner Brittanny Anderson, a veteran of TV cooking shows including “Top Chef” and “Chopped.” “Many of our staff are women and/or members of the LGBTQ+ community. All of our staff are people with rights who deserve dignity and a safe work environment. We respect our staff’s established rights as humans and strive to create a work environment where they can do their jobs with dignity, comfort and safety.”

The group, the Family Foundation, was set to host a dessert reception for supporters on Nov. 30, the group’s president, Victoria Cobb, wrote in a blog post describing the incident. About an hour and a half before it was slated to start, one of the restaurant’s owners called to cancel it, she wrote. “As our VP of Operations explained that guests were arriving at their restaurant shortly, she asked for an explanation,” Cobb wrote. “Sure enough, an employee looked up our organization, and their wait staff refused to serve us.”

The Family Foundation is based in Richmond and advocates for “policies based on biblical principles.” It has lobbied against same-sex marriage and abortion rights.

In an interview, Cobb said that since she posted about it, she has heard from people alarmed by the story and from other dining establishments making it clear they would be welcome. “A lot of people are outraged that a restaurant wants to make a litmus test at the door,” she said. “Everyone should be concerned that people are being denied service based on their politics.”

In her blog post, Cobb likened the restaurant’s move to establishments that refused to serve Black customers in the 1950s and ’60s, and she decried what she called a “double standard” by liberals who think a Colorado baker should not be allowed to refuse to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.

Legal experts say neither of those are apt analogies. While it’s illegal to discriminate against someone because of their race or religion, the restaurant’s refusal had to do with the group’s actions, said Elizabeth Sepper, a professor at the University of Texas. “It’s about the overall positions and policies the group has taken — it’s not about Christian vs. non-Christian,” she said. According to the American Civil Liberties Union, D.C., Seattle and the Virgin Islands specifically protect people from being refused service because of their political affiliation or ideology.

Reached by phone, Metzger co-owner Kjell Anderson said the owners had no comment beyond the Instagram post.

Restaurants have made news for taking issue with their patrons’ politics. Sarah Sanders, then the White House press secretary and now the governor-elect of Arkansas, was asked to leave the Red Hen in Lexington, Va., in 2018. The owner of the restaurant, Stephanie Wilkinson, wrote that she thought Sanders was “a person whose actions in the service of our country we felt violated basic standards of humanity.” And a judge in 2018 sided with a New York bar that ejected a customer for wearing a “Make America Great Again” hat in support of President Donald Trump.

If past is prologue, Metzger’s move — which was first reported by Virginia Business — is likely to bring it both criticism and support. Wilkinson described the aftermath of the incident with Sanders — which made headlines around the world — as intense. Her phone lines were hacked, she and her staff had private information about them posted online, and many of them received death threats. People took to Yelp, leaving fake negative reviews, and made reservations they had no intention of keeping. But Wilkinson said people also showed their support by driving in from miles away and by donating to local charities.

As of Tuesday, Metzger’s Yelp page was frozen and an “Unusual Activity Alert” was added. “This business recently received increased public attention, which often means people come to this page to post their views on the news,” the notice reads. “While we don’t take a stand one way or the other when it comes to this incident, we’ve temporarily disabled the posting of content to this page as we work to investigate whether the content you see here reflects actual consumer experiences rather than the recent events.”

The restaurant and the foundation used interest in the event to fundraise. Metzger on Saturday posted an image of a bourbon-based cocktail dubbed “Cracks in the Foundation” and said it would donate the profits from its sale to Equality Virginia, a group that advocates for LGBTQ rights. “We are so grateful to our many guests and neighbors for their support the past few days!” read the Instagram post. “To say thank you we are donating all proceeds from this cocktail to @equalityva tonight!”

And in its blog post describing the incident, the Family Foundation sought donations, too. “Will you consider a donation today to support our efforts to ensure that no Virginian will ever have to worry about being refused a simple meal because of his or her religious beliefs?” the post read.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Faggots: "BAKE THE CAKE, BIGOT"
Also faggots: "WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO REFUSE YOU SERVICE BASED ON YOUR RELIGION!"
I'm not even religious and even I can see this as a push towards the invalidation of religion as a reason/excuse to do or not do certain behaviors.
It used to be that if something was against someone's religion, you would back off, no matter how retarded their beliefs might be, it was a line you didn't fuck with.
Now I could say "I don't want to do that because it goes against my LGBTQUIAA+ identity" and that would be ok, but if I say "I don't want to do that because my god isn't ok with it." that's not ok.
 
C-658VsXoAo3ovC.jpg
 
Legal experts say neither of those are apt analogies. While it’s illegal to discriminate against someone because of their race or religion, the restaurant’s refusal had to do with the group’s actions, said Elizabeth Sepper, a professor at the University of Texas. “It’s about the overall positions and policies the group has taken — it’s not about Christian vs. non-Christian,” she said. According to the American Civil Liberties Union, D.C., Seattle and the Virgin Islands specifically protect people from being refused service because of their political affiliation or ideology.
I don't discriminate against the blacks, just people who play basketball a lot.
 
It would be based if the restaurant actually believed they had the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason.

This is how it should be but the left never fucking thinks out the implications of their idiotic policies. I hope someone refuses service to Muslims soon just to really drive it in.

Oh who am I kidding, they never learn.
 
"We are fine with Christians, just not Christians who actually believe their holy text." That is de facto religious discrimination, as the Constitution protects "the free exercise thereof." The goal is to ensure Christians are neutered into government-approved vassals for Current Thinking.

There has also been a great deal of legal ink spilled distinguishing contracts involving the business owner's speech from generic products available to all. Catering does not infringe on a business's free speech, and they might even have the ability to decline the job from the beginning. They were given a compromise and refused it. Last-minute cancellations based on employee feels is not going to cut it.
 
Personally, I wouldn't eat at a place that says they hate you. Heck, why would you want something made out of spite?

Anyways, the choices are interesting. Either keep to principles on private industry being able to discriminate on those it serves or make them live by their own standard by suing thereby making yourself a hypocrite.

"We are fine with Christians, just not Christians who actually believe their holy text." That is de facto religious discrimination, as the Constitution protects "the free exercise thereof." The goal is to ensure Christians are neutered into government-approved vassals for Current Thinking.

That only applies to the government.
 
Last edited:
The recent law passed by Congress that guarantees same-sex marriage ironically outlaws this.

Now, you can't discriminate based on religion unless you're a place of worship. It outlaws the guy not baking the gay cake, but it also outlaws restaurants like this taking a religious-based stance to ban their patrons.
 
Lmao what a bunch of retards.
To be clear, while shitty and while I think they should personally atone for their sins by seppuku, the restaurant faggots should be able to decline service just as a cake baking christian should be able to tell fags to fuck off.

But these retards went and explicitly made it a matter of religious discrimination. They could have just said "we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone" and left it at that and let the storm blow over. But by explicitly stating it was because the group was Christian and their servers dislike Christian doctrine, well oopsie woopsie fucky wucky they've opened themselves up to years of lawsuits if the people in question feel up to it.
 
Personally, I wouldn't eat at a place that says they hate you. Heck, why would you want something made out of spite?

Anyways, the choices are interesting. Either keep to principles on private industry being able to discriminate on those it serves or make them live by their own standard by suing thereby making yourself a hypocrite.



That only applies to the government.

Because none of this is about equal rights. This is about demanding DEFERENTIAL TREATMENT. The faggots and troons want to INVADE. SUBDUE. ENSLAVE. and DESTROY. That which was built by others who work hard.

Humiliation is the end game. And the rate faggots and troons are going, I will dead ass shit my pants with giddy laughter over the reckoning to come.
 
There are several observations to be made:

- First, Jack Phillips and others caught up in the LGTBQ YUCK reign of terror would never deny service categorically because someone is gay. They simply refuse to provide goods or services that are an endorsement of gay marriage. He will sell baked confectioneries and other items to gay, just not customized ones that expressly relate to so called gay marriage. This is true for all these cases as far as I know. These people on the other hand refused service full stop, because of a political disagreement that is pretty bound up in religious conviction.

- We are pretty close to civil war when one side cannot stomach to serve the other, and willingly give up a fair amount of money, and reputation damage from half the populace from the ensuing outrage. There is quite a bit of cognitive dissonace at best, outright hypocrisy at worst from the other side. See this tweet from occupy democrats, which combines such cognitive dissonance with open, naked contempt.

occupy democrats.png

-To the extent anyone thinks this fractured, balkanized Tower of Babel is worth sustaining, the obvious solution is to allow for freedom of association for individuals, recognizing small to midsize businesses as an extension of the individual (as opposed to large corporations or chain restaurants, stores). The baker has a right to refuse, not just a wedding cake but any service whatsoever, and these shitlibs have a right to refuse people they disagree with. If you listened to the oral arguments from yesterday, even socalled "right-wing" justices are clearly repulsed by the notion that somebody could refuse service to a mixed race couple. Of course, the Solicitor for the Department of Justice stated that people who disagree regarding gay marriage are honorable, as opposed to being despicable racists. One wonders how he feels about rabbis who refuse to ordain mixed marriages (there are many)
 
Last edited:
“Private business does what it wants with its own shit, more at 11”
Imagine being a business and not liking money
This is how it should be but the left never fucking thinks out the implications of their idiotic policies. I hope someone refuses service to Muslims soon just to really drive it in.

Yeah, but
The group, the Family Foundation, was set to host a dessert reception for supporters on Nov. 30, the group’s president, Victoria Cobb, wrote in a blog post describing the incident. About an hour and a half before it was slated to start, one of the restaurant’s owners called to cancel it, she wrote....“Sure enough, an employee looked up our organization, and their wait staff refused to serve us.”
This is out-and-out unprofessional behavior, regardless of the reasoning behind it. I hope they get slammed in the reviews.

Come to think of it, this is actually indicative of the larger "us vs them" mentality that's been permeating the culture over the past few decades - it's the reason why being forced to serve people who have viewpoints opposing your own is now considered an existential threat.
 
Last edited:
Back