Skitzocow MikeeUSA / Michael McAllister / Mikhail Kvaratskhelia - Anti-Feminist Chan Troll, Open Source Code Developer, Pedo Advocate

chimpburgers

Big league
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Feb 15, 2015
I am really surprised that there was no thread for this guy. His thread over at /cow/ was one of the threads over there with the most responses as can be seen in the following screenshot and he's been doing this shit for many years now, so he's definitely an old school lolcow. He was brought up a couple of months ago in the Loveshy Therapy Center but no one ever put the thread together, so I want to get this out of the way because he seems like he'd be a lot fun to fuck with if he ever found Kiwi Farms and made an account here.

cfbd48a96a.png


The Geek Feminism Wikia page has a lot of information about him readily available and so does his ED page. Their timeline of events dates all the way back to 2005 and I think I found a link dating all the way back to 2001 of this guy having some kind of online presence.

So going through the Geek Feminism Wikia page first, they talk a lot about how back in 2009, MikeeUSA wrote an open source code and tried to use that as a means to justify why he feels that he's superior to the female open source contributors that were on the site that he spammed this code. He's infamous for his threats and harassment that he has also made towards the users of the websites that he goes around spamming this shit and getting his dumb ass either suspended or banned. I will leave a link to the Wordpress page which goes into this much better than I can.

http://www.whatwillweuse.com/2009/10/13/not-in-my-neighborhood-mikeeusa-removed-from-sourceforge/

This sperg was such a nuisance on SourceForge that the blog writer here issued a warning to anyone who encountered MikeeUSA on these types of websites and telling them to report him.

Since mikeeUSA thinks his code was of substantial quality, I downloaded a few packages and took a look for myself. There was one full program which was a text based slot machine game which displayed messages encouraging the denial of women’s rights. He also developed game add-ons, levels, and maps for already existing GPL-ed games. At best, these game components would include comments that would promote his agenda. At worst, the components would engage the player with his hateful themes. Sometimes variable names and function calls included evidence of hate-speech. Even if one were to ignore the politics of mikeeUSA, the product is not very good: low quality, dysfunctional, and not fun. The Nexuiz gaming community has repeatedly rejected his submissions. The reality is, just because you include a copy of GPLv2, it does not make you an open source rockstar. mikeeUSA’s claims of being a renowned open source contributor are unfounded. Now that the mikeeusa’s account has been disabled, it is unlikely that mikeeusa will be able to release anything with opportunity of claiming major open source contribution under a world-wide distribution ever again.

No one has the right to harass or threaten another human being. I don’t care who you think you are. If you have encountered mikeeUSA, do not be ashamed. As a community we will stand together to ensure safety in the open source neighborhood for all.

The Geek Feminism page also links to a great example of what you'll typically see from MikeeUSA when you see any of his spergy posts. Look at this shit and see if it makes any sense. The rambling here is so incoherent but he's so adamant about pissing people off. He truly exemplifies the meaning of the term misogynist and doesn't seem to be interested in learning or changing his ways. @Marjan Šiklić or @Autphag might have a field day with him.

10/11/09
Response to J: If you drive men away, free software ends.
If you turn your back on men, if you make men feel unwelcomed, if you
drive men away, you close the book on free/opensource software.

Free software will not exist without men. You may think you can "move
on" and pass the torch to women and try to exclude "mysoginist" or
"sexist" minded men, but you will only cause the triumph Richard M.
Stallman and of the programmers of the world who have created the free
software movement, who are almost all men, to be no more.

As for ages of marraige: the age of majority was never the age of
marraige untill the middle 1990s. Before then, in the southern states,
a man could marry a 12, or 13, or 14 year old young woman. Previously
in the north this was true aswell. By the middle of the 1990s the old
beliefs of the south, that which was decendant from the Scottish
settlers of the region (and some Irish), that once a female was able
to have children that she could be married to a man, was defeated.

I remeber when the laws were changed. I remeber the recent triumphs of
feminism.
I remeber when men of that region started to be persecuted for "child
rape" when they had relations with their brides. This is now the norm
since then; the south finally fell.

As for men and useful weaponry: men cannot easily aquire automatic
weapons, rocket propelled munitions, or any anti-vehicle arms. Nor can
they aquire armored vehicles that can hold land. Men who try to aquire
modern, effective, arms end up in prison for decades. Men have NO
power against the forces of their women-representative government.

As for historic female figures: that has nothing to do with what is
most advantagious to men.

As for rape within marraige: men were exempt from prosecution before
the 1970s in most parts of the USA.

The ONLY thing that will push this back is an armed rebellion that can
NEVER happen.

Men going to jail for hitting their wives is bad for men.

Men going to jail for raping their wives is bad for men.

Men losing their jobs because they said or did a "sexist" thing is bad
for men.

Men being pushed out of opensource projects at the behest of WORTHLESS
feminist women is bad for men and that which men create.

(Also, Men being jailed for raping young unbetrothed unmarried females
of childbearing age is also bad for men. The Bible has a solution: the
man marries the girl he raped (Dueteronomy 22), This should be law as
it is to the benifit of men.)

It is NOT good for _men_ if people OTHER THAN _men_ are represented:
it dilutes the power of men. Today women can override the wishes of
men in everything. Men do not have final say, and what little say they
do have is worthless.

As for a women being "politically divided": virtually all women
support women's rights and liberty. Virtually all women support
women's privledge to vote. Virtually all women support men being
jailed for marital rape. Virtually all women support their privledge
to divorce their husband if they so need to. That is NOT disunity.
That is COHESION; something that men do not have except in war. Men
NEVER have cohesion in peace.

You, sir, are a fool, you are also talking PAST me, and you are an
enemy of the interests of Men.

Death To women's Rights.
Viva Men's Liberty... somehow
--MikeeUSA--

There's another link to his open source code if you're interested in seeing what the fuck that was. The Geek Feminist people did a good job archiving a lot of this material. There's another link in there to one of his old profile pages which has his powerword right in there.

https://geekfeminism.org/2009/10/19/mikeeusas-code-now-available-on-geekfeminism-org
https://geekfeminism.org/mikeeusa/

sJ5AGxk.png

With a good example of his kind of anti-woman sperging and hate, there's more shit that I was able to find. He has gone around from chan board to chan board trying to shit those places up with this nonsense and has been mentioned not only on 8ch, but places like Endchan (their /pol/ board) and Masterchan, the latter link is where they try to purposefully summon him over to their site. It seems to be really easy to grab his attention and to get him to sperg and chimp out here.

YII5TP1.png


Some great sperging from his /cow/ thread
where people called him out on how he's been thrown out of so many other communities. They really go into how he was also thrown out of the /tech/ board for the shit he'd pull. He doubles down on his autism and doesn't ever stop, so he's still active and around.

395f0720c9.png


That's not even the half of it. They also post his shitty obsession with maps and guessing by the very last post in the /cow/ thread, he fucked off over to /v/, /news/, and /mu to keep doing the same shit once he stopped posting. This was so much to go through but I laughed my ass off so much learning about how pathetic and desperate this guy to take his sperging everywhere that he goes. He's a lot like Mikemikev, but instead of spamming neo-Nazi rhetoric everywhere, you just take that same mentality and add a whole lot of hatred against women in there.

Further reading:

https://encyclopediadramatica.se/MikeeUSA
http://mikeeusa.newgrounds.com/ (where you can find his songs)
 
lol he had a pressword.
http://archive.is/e84g6

Mikeeusa and rape

Rape, the most heinous of heinous crimes, more serious then death, more traumatizing then the most grevious bodily injury.

Rape; The crime elevated above all others.
Why?
Because men do it to women. More specifically, men have sex with women without paying for it: the man takes from the woman her product for free and thus takes away her barganing chip, her power . In the society of a woman’s country to take away a woman’s power is to degrade that which is most precious to that society: woman’s place over and above man, woman’s power.

The current penalty for rape is insane and not in good standing with what we wish to achieve: a Men’s culture.
How to handle rape then? It is my opinion that the Bible has a good answer, an answer that I totally agree with:
If a man rapes an unmarried virgin girl he merely has to marry her (the Bible also states that he is to pay her father some money (about 1.5 pounds of silver, $150 about)) and keep her forever. Forever as an obedient and subordinate wife of his (one of many perhaps).
If he rapes someone’s mother or wife etc, caps are busted as he just disrespected his fellow man.

Mikeeusa and singer Tiffany

Remeber the old pop hit from the 80s “I Think We’re Alone Now” which was sung by Tiffany, a 16 year old girl in the year 1987.

Ever wonder what happened to her?
Well she got married in 1992 at the age of 21, had a child, posed nude in playboy at the age of 30, divorced her husband in the year 2004 (at the age of 33), and then married another man.
Basically what happened is that she has lived the normal whorish life that most of our women live today.
What once was a promising young girl of value has become a debauchered hussie.
Why?
Because of two things:
Her mother.
Herself.
Tiffany was allowed to start her musical career at age 13 (or encouraged to by a parent with dollar signs in her eyes). She gained fame, fortune, and ultimately emancipation that comes from fortune and a society and country that supports women having and holding power.

...

A girl ‘on her own’ is a theft committed against all Men of this world.
It is both against God’s law of the Bible and against all that is benificial for Men.
Unfortunatly we can yet do nothing to stop the further use of girls for the enjoyment of the mother rather then for bestowing Happiness upon a Man as God intended.
If you listen to her popular song it’s about love. It’s a pitty that while she was singing of it was kept from it. It is even more of a crime that countless numbers of Men have been denyed the true love that stems from marrying young females of childbearing age because our Feminist System denys Men all that is good, and brainwashes girls to believe in all that is Bad.

“I think we’re alone now”
Yes Tiffany, we are alone. Those who would be our compainions have been robbed from us from a young age by the schools and the media: both who support women’s rights and deny Men’s Liberty.

Mikeeusa and underage marriage

If ever the ever coming revolution comes Judge Daniel Bryan and the prosecutor in this case must be payed back for their assault on this Man, Matthew Koso, with usurious interest. All who take action against Men must be destroyed. Matthew Koso did nothing wrong. Females were made by God for Men. Men were not made for females.
There is nothing wrong with marrying young girls who are able to have children. ALL people who have taken action against Men who have done so must eventually be murdered (assuming the ever coming revolution does come within their lifetime).

Mikeeusa and women in politics

Benazir Bhutto Killed
The two-time woman leader of Pakistan, Benazir Bhutto, was killed by an assasin’s bullet today. She was trying to become the leader of Pakistan again but some of the Men of Pakistan disagree with a woman ruling over Men. It is good that Men do not want a woman to rule over them and have taken action to stop that from happening again. It is not so good that they also lobbed a bomb (which exploded killing some people in the crowd). I guess this was the third strike (she was the leader of pakistan twice allready), God finally lifted his hand and allowed what her opposition was trying to do happen. Women should never have power over Men in my opinion: it is not good for the Men that are ruled over (as the female leader will raise women’s rights and remove Men’s liberties as her alliegence is to other power hungry “sisters”).

From: Robin
Date: Nov 13, 2007 2:19 PM
MikeeUSA:

Your last email implied that you are just playing around with a created persona… Using the hate, etc. just to get a rise out of people… or at least exaggerating your views. In case that’s true, Let’s take a timeout from the game. I’m going to give you some very important advice and I hope you’ll take it seriously. If you choose instead to disregard it or share it with the brain dead Bob, MM and other dregs, I at least warned you and my conscience is clear.

There is no anonymity on the Internet. I am only a moderately powerful attorney with moderately powerful connections, and I could have you located, arrested and charged with making terroristic threats with a single phone call. I’m not saying this as a threat and have no intention of doing so. My point is that there are many more who could - and would - do much worse if it benefitted them.

I’ve seen people sent to prison because politicians want to look like they’re responding to threats. Look at the HS kid from PA who was emailing the shooter in Finland. That kid faces a possible 6 years in prison. The headlines read that law enforcement foiled the next Columbine. This was a week before voters decided whether the district attorney should be a judge. Do you think they give a rat’s ass if fat boy has to go to prison instead of college so they can get their judgeship? Fat boy made himself an easy target.
The real world has real consequences.

MikeeUSA, I know you think you’re smart, but I want you to think about this. You’ve made yourself the easiest target possible for anyone who needs some tough-on-crime PR. All anyone needs to do is seize your computer and lead you away in handcuffs to get themselves on the front page as the one who prevented the next Columbine.

If you think the truth matters more than appearance, you could be in for a serious education. Do you think the FBI screws around if they perceive even the possibility of a threat? They might. But they won’t if they perceive that they could get blamed for NOT responding if and when something happened. CYA is Rule #1.

If you’re getting scared, good. That means you have a clue. I don’t give a shit what you do. I just blew $450 in billable time writing this warning to you. But if I were you, I would not only tame or kill the psycho-hater persona, but I would have him neutralize the threat asap. Have MikeeUSA see the light. Say it was a joke. Find religion. Write an apology to the prosecutor you threatened (your most idiotic move). Whatever. But as long as your well-crafted “persona” is out there spreading hate and advocating violence, are a sacrificial lamb serving yourself and your future up on a silver platter.

If you are a psycho or just plain stupid, you’ll disregard and carry on. That’s better for me, as I won’t have to find a new psycho. But I share this with you for your own good. Good luck no matter what.

Now back to our regularly scheduled conflict.

Robin Steele, Esq.


I’m not exaggerating my views, I do enjoy the fighting on the internet and wished to share with you some information on how to make your blog seem more believable as many people think that it is a fabrication (I get accused of this aswell). I truly am opposed to women’s rights.

I have found religion in the Bible (long ago) and it is opposed to women’s rights and in favor of Men’s liberty. You will notice that much of my writing deals with the Bible and its spurned status today.

You don’t have to tell me that there’s no anonymity on the internet :). Do you prefer the little 1×1 gifs or aquiring the weblogs off the actual server? I’m a fan of the gifs but… you may well have a diffrent opinion.

As for computer, there is nothing on here that is not on the internet. All my work is opensource and all of it is released.

As for terroristic threats: that law is in violation of the first ammendment (not that it matters to anyone).

Do as you wish. I have said many times that I know that I will never get what I want and thus, in the end, I do not care what happens to myself. I wonder if the world the Bible envisions ever existed in reality or if it is the written work of dreamers…
 
Oh you try to claim threatening people is protected by the First Amendment, it's been tried, and slapped down.
 
As for terroristic threats: that law is in violation of the first ammendment (not that it matters to anyone).

Given that's this quote is basically a terroristic threat:

ALL people who have taken action against Men who have done so must eventually be murdered (assuming the ever coming revolution does come within their lifetime).

It's safe to say Mikey doesn't care about the First Amendment either.

As for the Bible quotes, I see him as what would happen if Theodore Beale was a) even more autistic, and b) wanted to have sex with children.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: chimpburgers
Given that's this quote is basically a terroristic threat:



It's safe to say Mikey doesn't care about the First Amendment either.

It has to be a threat against a specific person or people to be a true threat. However, to the extent terrorist threat laws only prohibit such so-called "true threats," they are not in violation of the First Amendment at all.
 
Is he just an edgelord? I'd worry he's gonna go out and rape a 14 year old. He's clearly a virgin with rage.
Honestly, I don't know, he does come off as one. But I really fear he'll probably go past that point at some point. Then again, he'd probably get his ass handed to him if he talked like that in public. So yeah, just a tryhard with a really stupid opinion and even stupider bitchfits.

Also:
View attachment 83254

Here he claims to have written his ED page

View attachment 83256
- 21, 42, does it matter? You're still advocating the rape of children regardless of age. Softens the blow a bit, but I get the feeling he's trying to cover his ass on that.
- Those who write their own ED page? They eventually find out. I await them adding that little tidbit onto your page.
 
Does anyone have a backup of the source code he had that got removed from SourceForce?

I want to judge his code.
 
Back