Culture ‘This guy grifted me hard’: My date chose an exclusive L.A. restaurant. After dinner, he accepted my credit card — and we split a $600 bill. - "Shouldn't he have paid? " - Skank gets a dose of reality

Article (Faggy Paywall)
Archive


‘I could not believe my eyes. I work in PR, I’m 26, and I don’t even earn six figures’​


Dear Quentin,



Long story short: I met a man for dinner last week. I usually try FaceTime, or even a daytime coffee at Starbucks SBUX, -1.88% or Verve Coffee Roasters in West Hollywood when there are a lot of people around, for safety reasons. But this time, I took one look at his joyful pictures and his jet-set lifestyle (if I’m being honest) and I thought, “What the hell? What could go wrong?”

Famous last words. This guy grifted me hard.

He chose the restaurant. It’s a fancy place on Melrose, which is great for people-watching. It’s one of those places that attracts movie-industry types and celebrities. The online menu does not list prices. If you have to ask, you can’t afford it. Well, I could not afford it. The bill came to $600. I fully expected him to pay. He drives a Tesla TSLA, +3.23% Model S Plaid Tri Motor ($127,590 a pop) and wore what appeared to be a custom suit. He probably eats at these places five times a week.

He was — is — a successful, smartly dressed guy with bundles of confidence and smiles, but oh boy, could he eat and drink. He ordered two glasses of champagne to start, and then we each had a cocktail, followed by the chef’s tasting menu, and a bottle of wine that we shared. He’s a TV producer, and probably earns more money in a month than I earn in a year. The bill came to over $600. I put down my credit card, fully expecting him to throw it back at me, but he didn’t.

We had a pretty good time, especially given the food (which was excellent) and the copious amounts of alcohol we drank. I am just out of a long-term engagement, which lasted three years, and he seemed both interested and, frankly, taken aback by that. My ex was a narcissist, and I’m better off without him.

We ended up splitting the bill. I could not believe my eyes. I work in PR, I’m 26, and I don’t even earn six figures. I’m still reeling from this.

As he chose such an expensive restaurant, shouldn’t he have paid? He texted to make sure I got home OK. What should I do if he wants to meet again?

-Sticker Shock

Dear Sticker Shock,

Well, we now know at least one reason why he can afford his jet-set lifestyle.

I redacted the name of the restaurant, but I looked it up, and it does look like a nice place. You’re right: The restaurant does not list prices on its menu online. In fact, I had to go to Yelp to get an idea of the prices. If a restaurant does not have prices online, that’s probably because it’s not cheap. Never assume that someone else is paying, even if you believe he should have paid. So you proffered your card, and he accepted it. He’s either a schmuck and/or someone who believes in culinary equality. The only way he’s the former: If, after several drinks, he drove that Tesla home.

You must have known this would cost a pretty penny. The chef’s tasting menu will also be far more expensive than any other item. It’s nine courses. This is where ordinary mortals — people who do actually have to be at work at 9 a.m. and stick to a monthly budget — go for a big celebration, like a milestone “zero” birthday. You drank cocktails and champagne, and you ate like this was your last meal before a meteor hit planet Earth. But you can’t say yes to every expensive item on the menu just because you assume someone else will pay.

Should he have paid? I’m torn. One part of me says, “If he chooses a very expensive restaurant, and there is clearly an economic gap, then — yes — he should pay.” But another part of me says, “If it were a gay couple, should the person who chose the place split the bill?” Not necessarily. Here’s what people don’t admit: “I’ll pay for it because we had a good time, and if you accept my gesture it’s your way of saying we are going to meet again.” It would be churlish to watch someone fork out $600 knowing you will never see them again.

OPS Note (Here comes some angry skanks to chime in)

Here are a few takes from some female members of the Moneyist Facebook Group. Angela wrote: “Listen, if you’re going to pay, then by all means pull out your card. But don’t play a game to seem agreeable. It always backfires.” Gail added: “Lesson to be learned: First date is always, always, always coffee.” And Jeanie added: “He let you pay half because that’s most likely what he does with all the women he goes out with. You can’t afford to pamper him.” Suzy was a bit harsher: “Call the $300 an education, and block his number.”

A grifter is a swindler. That is, he goes to the restroom to powder his nose, and he never comes back. The bitter truth: You walked into the restaurant with your eyes wide open. You could have said, “I prefer to go Dutch. Let’s go somewhere a little cheaper.” He might have said, “It’s on me.” Then you could decide whether or not to go. But that too comes with complications. What if you hated each other? What if he was an abortion-rights supporter and you were anti-abortion, or vice-versa? What if he was a Republican and you were a Democrat, or vice-versa?

There are so many reasons it’s safer and healthier to go Dutch. Some men (and women) see how the evening progresses before deciding whether to stump up for the entire bill. What if you did not want to see him again? Would you still allow him to pay? Would he pay under those circumstances? It’s safer to stick to a place within your budget. You called his bluff, and he saw the bill too, and may have thought, “Oh, ****!” — and, in the moment, decided to take you up on your generous offer to split it, given that you both lived high on the hog all evening.

It’s not a dealbreaker. Personally, I like that you paid half. It’s 2022. Good for you!
 
First off, if she volunteered to pay, then she volunteered to pay. Don't play coy then act like you think he should pay the bill. And if you're already in a sweet gig at 26 years old there's no reason to bitch about it.

Second off, it stands to reason that a first date at the finest restaurant in town should be a red flag. Maybe not necessarily "my disembodied torso will be found by hikers a few days from now" red flag, but a "hey something's up with this guy and I don't like it" red flag. If there any lady Kiwis out there, please tell me if that's a reasonable assumption or not.
 
I don't normally do this but you PL'd.. If you knew she was "a bitchy feminist non-profit lawyer who loved communism"
That describes like, a full third of female lawyers who aren't actual public defenders or family lawyers so I think I'm safe here. The lefty thing surprised me a bit, since even tard-lawyers tend to be right leaning (becoming a lawyer is hard work and criminals make you realize that welfare is dumb). Every guy has a story about why they no longer date lawyers.

I actually knew none of this before we went out; it was a Tinder thing. I saw "lawyer", she was cute, it didn't work out, I had the veal. Sometimes when I like the look of someone, I skip right to dinner. A hundred bucks for dinner isn't gonna break the bank. Clearly, I was wrong in this case.
You never ever have sit down dinner date with women off dating apps as your first date. Thats date 2 or ideally 3+. 1 should always be some grab a cup of coffee or something similar.
I actually can't imagine going on a first date without some kind of alcohol involved. Couple glasses of wine does wonders for loosening you both up.

Do you get coffee and then shake hands at the end or something? Do you go in jeans and a t-shirt or do you wear a dress to Starbucks? Call me old fashioned, but I feel like a date should be at least a partial event, where you put your best foot forward.

If the economics are an issue, I'd say be more selective, but do yourself a favor and get a proper drink after work instead.
 
EXACTLY

You never ever have sit down dinner date with women off dating apps as your first date. Thats date 2 or ideally 3+. 1 should always be some grab a cup of coffee or something similar.

That's what works for me. First dates, especially from apps should be low investment, low commitment. Firstly because it's a filter for women that are just looking for a free dinner and validation and secondly you'll quite often be rejected because "They didn't feel a spark" and they think they are Disney princesses in their own movie.

First dates from apps are purely to check out that you're not a mental fucker catfisher on both sides and then you move to stage 2.
 
My first date filter is a mid tier steakhouse with a decent bar. I think I've told this story before where I went out with a woman and with appetizers she orders an enormous margherita and a bottle of wine that she made abundantly clear she was not going to share. I excused myself to the restroom and didn't come back. You can learn a lot about a woman just by taking her to a place where alcohol is abundant, but not the main draw.
 
Second off, it stands to reason that a first date at the finest restaurant in town should be a red flag. Maybe not necessarily "my disembodied torso will be found by hikers a few days from now" red flag, but a "hey something's up with this guy and I don't like it" red flag. If there any lady Kiwis out there, please tell me if that's a reasonable assumption or not.
I'm a guy, but I think wanting to go out to a nice restaurant for a date isn't that weird. Feels a bit traditional for a date idea even if coffee at Starbucks would probably make more logical sense.

The main problem this woman ran into is she didn't think to ask how much the meal cost and didn't think pretending she was fine paying would backfire. She also doesn't say she's against going out with the guy again, so it wasn't necessarily a bad date for her even.

I think it mostly comes down to her being a bit stupid and trying to think of how to avoid paying for half of an expensive date night again.
 
My first date filter is a mid tier steakhouse with a decent bar. I think I've told this story before where I went out with a woman and with appetizers she orders an enormous margherita and a bottle of wine that she made abundantly clear she was not going to share. I excused myself to the restroom and didn't come back. You can learn a lot about a woman just by taking her to a place where alcohol is abundant, but not the main draw.
I'm writing that one down. Mostly because if she can't enjoy meat as much as I do it means there won't be room for the sausage later.
 
Women want to have all the cake and eat it in situations like this. They want the guy to take them out and pay, but also want to pretend like they were going to pay their own way, but gosh darn in! That pesky patriarchal man just DEMANDED to pay!
This some peddit-tier rationalism.

Women pay their share for a restaurant date when they slut it up for the occasion. A man probably doesn't want his date to show up in a faded tie-dye t-shirt and yoga pants, with a ponytail, and some chain grease still under the nails, and even if he doesn't mind, she has no way to know this, so she'll have to slut up as a show of respect.

Heterosexual women can offer to pay their half, and heterosexual men are supposed to override that. This is why it's up to the man to suggest the venue. (A woman is also supposed to play hard to get, even though she might want to jump on the man's dick that instant -- otherwise he'll think she's a slut and would jump on any man's dick.) Fags, dykes and troons pay for themselves.

That said, women shouldn't be going to places if they can't afford to pay for themselves (not to split the total, but to pay for what she actually ate). The proper thing to do is to reject the offer when she's invited, thus prompting the man to commit to paying for her food. (She'll still have to pay for slutting up.)
 
a first date at the finest restaurant in town should be a red flag. Maybe not necessarily "my disembodied torso will be found by hikers a few days from now" red flag, but a "hey something's up with this guy and I don't like it" red flag.
I'm not too sure about this. If I took this girl to one of my usual places god only knows what she would think. It's a run down mom & pop place that serves 2 menus each day that they rotate through the week. It's at an intersection in the middle of nowhere catty-corner to an old gas station. Even if she didn't think I was hauling her out to the middle of nowhere to kill her, she'd be horrified to see the place. But it's great food and just part of my normal life.

This seems like a woman that ended up in part of this dude's normal life, then is surprised that he isn't a mind reader. He didn't act according to her understanding of some unwritten rules that she thinks men and women should act by.

The only red flag I see here is that they both live/work around Hollywood.

eta: I think this comes down to modern feminism's interpretation of a "strong independent woman". She'll throw down the card to give the appearance of strong and independent, but still expects a man to take care of her.
 
I get that the online menu doesn't say much:
View attachment 4038495

But you can also just google to find out what the prices are for those tasting menus, which seem to be the main way they do meals at this restaurant.



Looks like they do those obnoxious tiny dishes that they overcharge a huge deal for. It would just take the guy suggesting choosing the Chef's menu versus the regular Providence menu (which the guy did) for the woman to suddenly end up paying an extra $100 for the meal.

With these kinds of prices the story seems more about her regretting trying to act like she was comfortable paying due to how fucked up the restaurant's prices are.

View attachment 4038579
View attachment 4038717
View attachment 4038720
I'm shocked by the lack of foam.
 
$600 on dinner, shit. I'm over here debating whether I should spend $60 on a dinner or not.

Dinner is a bad first date idea, just sitting there watching someone eat. Going to the movies is also bad, you sit in the dark and don't talk to someone you don't know for 2 hours. So basically I agree with skank 1/Gail, skank 1/Gail is correct go for coffee or something low pressure/low commitment see if you can even stand being around her.
Zoo or Aquarium are what my dad told me to do if they give you nothing to work with. Art gallery or minor league sports events if she gives you a fucking idea.

You only go out to eat if it goes well.
 
Do you not talk about this when he says ‘let’s go to..’ or am I just old and too direct? I was taken to a restaurant I couldn’t afford (nothing fancy I was just very poor) when I was skint and I just said something like, ‘it looks great, but it’s out of my price range so if we go there, you’d need to pay. I’d prefer to go halves so how about this place instead?’ We went to the nice steak place and he paid.
If you offer your card then you’re paying half. Dating nowadays seems like a bit of a hassle
 
See my goto is always a movie then lunch afterwards and arrive a bit early beforehand. You spend some time chatting before the movie to see if they make you want to die. You get to see a decent movie (back in the day lmao) then have lunch with her if you like her enough otherwise you can just say goodbye and ditch.

Most fun girls suggested we smuggle in food so we dont pay ridiculous candybar prices, though I believe some people are probably worried looking bad doing this on a first day ecks dee
 
Back