Pennsylvania School District fieldtrip to see "Alice in Wonderland" ends with twerking drag queens

Status
Not open for further replies.
Article/Archive

If Lewis Carroll were alive today, “curious” might be the word he would use to describe the People’s Light Theater performance of his world-renowned novel, Alice in Wonderland.

The theater, located in Chester County is currently running a holiday, pantomime rendition of the classic. The website says the show is appropriate for ages five to 105 and includes a drag queen performer in the cast. Eric Jaffe, according to the theater’s casting page, “is a genderfull [sic] glamour monster and the recipient of the 2018 Philly Drag Awards, Best Host, Best Alternative Drag Queen, And Drag Queen of the Year as well as 2020’s Performer of the Year.”

Just as curious is the fact that multiple school districts in Chester County are sponsoring field trips for students to attend the performance, including West Chester Area, Tredyffrin/Easttown, and Downingtown. Students as young as second grade and up to sixth grade attended the performance.

The theater website makes a point to highlight Eric Jaffe’s role on the main page. “This year, People’s Light is thrilled to welcome award-winning drag performer Eric Jaffe as the audience’s new guide through the magical mayhem in the role of Dinah/Cheshire Cat.” None of the other performers are mentioned in the overview.



Controversy erupted after some children attended the show with their school and informed parents that they were required to wear masks at the performance. As parents started looking further into the show, they realized that a drag queen was appearing as one of the main characters and that the theater was promoting this performer above the rest.

A public Facebook group posted about the issues with parents weighing in on both sides.

While the majority of comments were very concerned about the field trip, Meghan Reikob disagreed about the content of the show.

“WCASD did list the show name on permissions slips. I do agree that there should have been advance notice provided by the school about People’s Light mask policy.  But I genuinely don’t understand the rest of your argument,” Reikob said. “Has no one complaining ever heard of a panto before? Nothing about this is new or woke.” ”

Her comments, however, did not address others’ concerns of a drag queen performing for children or the fact that the theater advertised the show as such.

No one is questioning or concerned about pantomimes as a theatrical modality or the fact that someone of one gender can play a different role in a performance. Theater has a long tradition of men playing women’s roles, dating back to the Greeks and Romans. In more recent history, the theater term “transvesti” is used to describe the portrayal of a character of the opposite sex. Therefore, the idea that someone of a different gender can play the role in a theatrical performance is not surprising or uncommon, nor is it troubling to parents.

What concerns many parents is the lack of transparency and communication with the school districts.

Downingtown Area School District’s permission slip (see below) for the field trip did not even include the name of the performance. While some districts did include the name of the show, they did not state that their children would see a drag queen performer. Nor did they state that every child would require a mask. This is despite the fact that the districts are not currently requiring masks for children at school, and some children have mask exemptions that may or may not have been accommodated. Parents were not given enough information to make informed decisions about whether their child should attend.

One of the Facebook commenters suggested that parents should have researched the show before completing the permission slip. And while that is a reasonable solution, parents should be able to rely on our publicly funded schools and administrators to make good decisions and to provide parents with enough information to also make decisions in the best interest of their child.

Alice in Wonderland was written in 1865 by Lewis Carroll, a deeply conservative and spiritual man and a deacon in the Church of England. I am fairly certain that Carroll did not intend his book to be used as a social commentary on gender fluidity, nor do most parents. Most parents are familiar with the whimsical nature of the book and likely thought it would be an entertaining and educational field trip for their child.

Several parents of children who attended the show shared anonymously, for fear of retaliation from their district, that they would not have allowed their child to attend if they knew that they were required to wear a mask. Others stated concerns over the performance and promotion of the drag queen performer. Parents also questioned whether there was any discussion following the performance at school.

Both the West Chester Area and Tredyffrin/Easttown School Districts were asked to comment on the field trip. Molly Schwemler, manager of district communications for West Chester Area School District, responded with the following:

“Sixth grade students from the West Chester Area School District did attend the performance of Alice in Wonderland: A Musical Panto at People’s Light and Theater. As part of People’s Light and Theater’s current health and safety guidelines, masks are required for all those attending indoor performances regardless of vaccination status. Students and staff attending the performance were provided masks and did follow this policy.

“In advance of the performance, families were informed that students had the opportunity to attend a contemporary, pantomime version of Alice in Wonderland and given permission slips to return. The actors’ biographies and acting credentials were not included with this information but were accessible on the People’s Light and Theater website.”

Tredyffrin/Easttown School District did not respond to the request for comment.

1670804253772.png

Facebook group post.

I know our britbong members sometimes claim that "panto" is a child-friendly alternative form of men dressing as women, but it doesn't sound like that from the post:

1670804384638.png


1670804405900.png 1670804425931.png 1670804450017.png

Finding more to archive, bbl.
 
It's a win-win for them in either case. The only option seems to be to retreat to redder areas and fortify them.

Sucks to be the groomed kids I guess, but you can't save everyone, just like Titanic with those few lifeboats.
See the thing is though those groomed kids will contact your kids, whether over online, or in person when hanging with friends. Homeschooling will never be the solution many hope it is. If that were the case socialist would never have gained as much ground as they have or pedophiles.
 
The people with genitalia on the brain all day and all night have become quite emboldened in recent years haven't they
I not an expert but my understanding of these faggot types is that engaging in "perverted behavior" is a primary aspect of their sex drive and as the subversion of our culture deepens and becomes more "accepting" it drives them to seek increasingly bizarre and deviant sex acts to get the same "high".

It's not enough to just suck a strangers dick in an alley anymore... now you need to sodomize a guy with AIDS in a little red riding outfit behind an elementary school to get the same effect
 
Absolutely it's a coordinated effort. It's just been a long boil of the frog the last 20 years. It'll end with encouraging children to enter the sex trade and make it legal, just like Weimar.

View attachment 4051221

It's such a shame all that tranny medical literature was burned by the Hitler youth. They deprived the West to having men in dresses twerking for babies in the 1950s.
IDK, if I were these people, I would really not want to draw attention to how the Nazis cracked down on Jewish sexual predators.
 
It's a win-win for them in either case. The only option seems to be to retreat to redder areas and fortify them.

Sucks to be the groomed kids I guess, but you can't save everyone, just like Titanic with those few lifeboats.
Problem is, the women in those "redder areas" eat this shit up and that's why a good number of the schools featured in my drag groomer omnibus thread are in BF Iowa, often in a district that "votes red" or is rural or has lots of evangelicals or Mexican farm workers or whatever calculus copers think is gonna work.

As long as the people running this shit know so well how to appeal to the vanity of wine aunts and soccer moms, it's going to keep infiltrating and taking over in your "redder areas."

See the thing is though those groomed kids will contact your kids, whether over online, or in person when hanging with friends. Homeschooling will never be the solution many hope it is. If that were the case socialist would never have gained as much ground as they have or pedophiles.
Exactly. The idea that this rot can be kept within "bugman containment hives" is and always has been a dangerous fantasy. Especially as long as those in power favor this ideology, it will continue to spread.
 
IDK, if I were these people, I would really not want to draw attention to how the Nazis cracked down on Jewish sexual predators.
This is the core flaw with jews. It's their neurosis. Look at the flier campaign the GDL has been doing the past couple years, specifically this year. They drop fliers filled with J pill info on them, and these dumb jew producers show the fliers with all the information on them and even post them to their website.

They've lulled themselves into this false sense of security for decades now that as long as you say they're Nazis, people will just move in lockstep behind them. But those days are over. That's a Boomer and Gen X thing.
 
Problem is, the women in those "redder areas" eat this shit up and that's why a good number of the schools featured in my drag groomer omnibus thread are in BF Iowa, often in a district that "votes red" or is rural or has lots of evangelicals or Mexican farm workers or whatever calculus copers think is gonna work.

As long as the people running this shit know so well how to appeal to the vanity of wine aunts and soccer moms, it's going to keep infiltrating and taking over in your "redder areas."


Exactly. The idea that this rot can be kept within "bugman containment hives" is and always has been a dangerous fantasy. Especially as long as those in power favor this ideology, it will continue to spread.
It's exactly why I've become black pilled on the situation. Parents are still believing a utopian solution or thinking that it will stop. They don't get how easy it is for Daisy who is being groomed down the street to invite their daughters for threesome with the old balding weirdo down the street, how easy it is to have the girls getting frisky with adult men, or the boys being groomed by older women (some of which I've seen first hand) They are so emboldened they don't hide it online or in person anymoer, and republicans still carry the "If we just pull them out they're safe belief."

Same stupidity as when some of them think balkanization would be great if only it were peaceful. They are just as brainwashed and submissive as the left, the only difference is they haven't fully been taken over yet. It's even better due to the people who act like they don't just see it. "Yeah it's getting bad but I don't think it's that bad yet." You show them and to avoid the bare bones stress they pretend it's not happening.

Shit is fucked, and the problem is the "good men." are just as worthless on solving the situation. How long until those of us who are messengers trying to stop this shit are silenced forever, probably most of us already have a target on our back and it's only a matter of time before that boot is firmly placed on the back of our necks permanently.
 
Problem is, the women in those "redder areas" eat this shit up and that's why a good number of the schools featured in my drag groomer omnibus thread are in BF Iowa, often in a district that "votes red" or is rural or has lots of evangelicals or Mexican farm workers or whatever calculus copers think is gonna work.

As long as the people running this shit know so well how to appeal to the vanity of wine aunts and soccer moms, it's going to keep infiltrating and taking over in your "redder areas."
We'd basically need to undo all the damage of feminism in that case, which I don't even know is possible. We've made some progress on abortion--it's the weakest link in feminism imo--but it sure seems like a real uphill struggle, to say the least.
 
Even the deepest dyed in the wool red areas are getting this shit, since it's Californian transplants moving to places like northern Idaho. I think it's a matter of time that it gets bloody, and unfortunately it's what's gonna have to happen to move the needle. Both sides are bringing rifles now.

1670819279533.png
 
I don't understand - how does exposing their children to a man in drag twerking appeal to their vanity?
Simple. You tell wine aunts and more that being tolerant is a higher IQ behavior and they will behave in that manner to be considered more intelligent. Tell them it's bigoted and low IQ and intolerant to not take your kids to a drag show and to not allow the weirdo man to twerk in front of the children and boom they fall right in line. Similar process to when women became left leaning on mass by the old study claiming right wing people had lower IQS. "I'm not low IQ, so I can't be right wing. Obviously I'm left wing, right wingers are tards, DUH SCIENCE SAID SO!"
 
I don't understand - how does exposing their children to a man in drag twerking appeal to their vanity?
Let's take this tiktok "star" from Oklahoma as our visual sample so you can get the right image in your head:

1670819708949.png

Her moniker is "mommacusses" and this is one of her tamer get-ups. Her shtick is modern-day-folksy-relaxed parenting advice. She's not terribly edgy or controversial. I found out about her because a fairly tame and conservative female friend of mine- a Christian school teacher from Alabama- follows her.

There are dozens of her in every small "red" town in the USA. They don't want to be seen as stodgy old ladies. They don't want to be seen as matronly. This leaves the matron class dwindling-to-empty. Between the cool moms and the cat ladies, who is left to be that dreaded stodgy old lady archetype? But the truth is, conservatives hate the old ladies as much as leftists do. No one wants to "clutch pearls" and "think of the children."

So our parenting experts become tatted up bison with pastel tufts of bleach-fried hair.

And the common wisdom of the "stodgy matron" class is replaced with that of the wine aunt's sister-who-had-kids, which is who these desperate women are. They have an inferiority complex compared to the sister who went to Grinnell and became a journo in the city, after all. They have something to prove.

So that's the vanity. Never going to grow old. Never going to be "stuck in the past." Always going to be tolerant, adventurous, "cool." Accepting of any damned nonsense no matter how harmful. Saying no is for pearl-clutchers, after all. Thinking of the children is for hateful old fashioned frigid prudes.

So there we are.
 
So that's the vanity. Never going to grow old. Never going to be "stuck in the past." Always going to be tolerant, adventurous, "cool." Accepting of any damned nonsense no matter how harmful. Saying no is for pearl-clutchers, after all. Thinking of the children is for hateful old fashioned frigid prudes.
Jesus Christ. Women were a mistake.
 
I still think women can be "fixed", size all media and pump your cultural norm on full blast and they'll sing your tone. Women merely sing the tone of the dominated cultural in their lives but their behavior doesn't actually change, covid masks and "Karen's" are an example, those "Karen's" are the exact same women who would have smacked me across the head if they heard me say "jesus fucking Christ" for blaspheming.

It should be noted that it was women who where the ones who voted more for Republicans when the cultural was more Christian. Ffs they're the one who pushed the heaviest for prohibition back in the day.
 
The concept of exposing children to drag queens is so specific yet so many instances across the country are coming to light that it's hard to imagine there's not some kind of large-scale conspiracy at work.

I really can't explain it any other way.
They saw that basic bitch soccer moms are total fag hags for Ru Paul and drag race and decided it was the best avenue to push for what they really want.

All you need to do to defeat soccer moms is make your degeneracy fashionable.
 
I still think women can be "fixed", size all media and pump your cultural norm on full blast and they'll sing your tone. Women merely sing the tone of the dominated cultural in their lives but their behavior doesn't actually change, covid masks and "Karen's" are an example, those "Karen's" are the exact same women who would have smacked me across the head if they heard me say "jesus fucking Christ" for blaspheming.

It should be noted that it was women who where the ones who voted more for Republicans when the cultural was more Christian. Ffs they're the one who pushed the heaviest for prohibition back in the day.
Problem is most right wingers or "people on the right side of culture" don't push or enforce their culture on others and try to behave as tolerant as possible. Even then if you just reverse it, that doesn't really fix the problem more than leave it as a potential crutch fix.

Let's take this tiktok "star" from Oklahoma as our visual sample so you can get the right image in your head:

View attachment 4052940

Her moniker is "mommacusses" and this is one of her tamer get-ups. Her shtick is modern-day-folksy-relaxed parenting advice. She's not terribly edgy or controversial. I found out about her because a fairly tame and conservative female friend of mine- a Christian school teacher from Alabama- follows her.

There are dozens of her in every small "red" town in the USA. They don't want to be seen as stodgy old ladies. They don't want to be seen as matronly. This leaves the matron class dwindling-to-empty. Between the cool moms and the cat ladies, who is left to be that dreaded stodgy old lady archetype? But the truth is, conservatives hate the old ladies as much as leftists do. No one wants to "clutch pearls" and "think of the children."

So our parenting experts become tatted up bison with pastel tufts of bleach-fried hair.

And the common wisdom of the "stodgy matron" class is replaced with that of the wine aunt's sister-who-had-kids, which is who these desperate women are. They have an inferiority complex compared to the sister who went to Grinnell and became a journo in the city, after all. They have something to prove.

So that's the vanity. Never going to grow old. Never going to be "stuck in the past." Always going to be tolerant, adventurous, "cool." Accepting of any damned nonsense no matter how harmful. Saying no is for pearl-clutchers, after all. Thinking of the children is for hateful old fashioned frigid prudes.

So there we are.
This horrified me in so many ways, I remember back when I was frequenting facebook I'd get in fights with younger ladies over their behavior these days, and each time women would defend my stances of the issues, it was always the ladies in their 50s/60s/70s and a few 40 year old ladies. 18+-30 year old ladies were on board with the new obscene behaviors and saying I was a creep for criticizing their issues. "I don't dress in skimpy clothes for creeps like you." type of nonsense. Just the whole depiction is so accurate and on the nose... The only ladies against degeneration were the "old pearl clutchers" and "out of dating field" women. Oof.
 
Lol wut.

No average American knows what "panto" is or it's "rich theatre tradition" besides Bongaboos and theater fags.
Every once in a while some lezzoid mumsnet refugee will try to distinguish between drag queens being pushed at kids and "harmless, traditional British panto" and it's just like:

1670823517523.png

That's from the wikipedia page and granted, they're not wearing thongs and pasties, but why would you brag about this or want it around your kid? Why do we need ANY men with fake breasts and gaudy makeup getting in ANY kids' faces, ever?


edit oh hey hey hey get this:

The form has a number of conventions, some of which have changed or weakened a little over the years, and by no means all of which are obligatory. Some of these conventions were once common to other genres of popular theatre such as melodrama.[52]

The leading male juvenile character (the principal boy) is traditionally played by a young woman in male garments (such as breeches). Her romantic partner is usually the principal girl, a female ingénue.

Pantomime dames
An older woman (the pantomime dame – often the hero's mother) is usually played by a man in drag.[53]
Risqué double entendre, often wringing innuendo out of perfectly innocent phrases. This is, in theory, over the heads of the children in the audience and is for the entertainment of the adults.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back