Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[ShinyStar]

I just noticed he lost 3k subs since early November. He peaked at 480k and is down to 477k. It started before his retreat to youtube but the loss has continued. It'll be interesting to see if this trend continues or corrects.

Did he even confirm he was starting a trial this week? All i heard is Branca was going on Nick's channel if he was streaming. It's not looking good as Monday is his homosexual retreat and if he voice goes out the rest of the week is shot. He should know that you can't tank thru lost of a voice.

Now I really want to see him mime his way through trial commentary. The show must go on!

 

[TexOffender]

https://rumble.com/v208glm-aaron-dean-trial-day-4-defense-case-in-chief.html

We got a trial stream going.

 

[Potatoherder]

Another datapoint in rumble's viewer numbers. Currently it has 4.5k and youtube has 4.7k. If they were doing a scrap and multiply you'd not expect to see that. Though this is the first time i have seen rumble numbers lower than youtubes in a while. Their live viewers seems as accurate as the youtube numbers.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

He should know that you can't tank thru lost of a voice.

We got a trial stream going.

I jumped to the beginning of the stream and it sounds like he managed to successfully exorcise Lemoiny's spirit from his voice box. I can't watch yet so let me know if his whisky gargle holds up or if his voice evaporates throughout the day.

 

[MugolEx]

Just found out who Aaron Dean is. Appreantly he shot and killed someone throw a window while screaming put you hands up. So whats the non-pozzed version of events?

 

[Confetti Meringue]

Just found out who Aaron Dean is. Appreantly he shot and killed someone throw a window while screaming put you hands up. So whats the non-pozzed version of events?

Cops investigating a possible burglary. They're crawling around the property without announcing to avoid alerting criminals. The house is such a mess that it looks like it has been rummaged through. Dean spots a person with a gun in the window (he describes her as pointing the gun at him) and shoots one shot while mid "Put your hands up!" command. The shot hit her directly in the heart, no chance of saving her life. They did not know if the person was an intruder or the homeowner at the time.

The debate is due to the homeowner being justified to shoot at Dean, since he was not an identified officer and was intruding on her property. He looked suspicious as hell.
But, Dean was possibly also justified in shooting because a gun being pointed at you in a criminal investigation would be a life threatening situation. Not identifying yourself during a burglary investigation is also standard procedure.

 

[Mikoyan]

Kurt being a whiny bitch. "I can't get a word in edgewise!"

 

[FILTH Tourist]

Cops investigating a possible burglary. They're crawling around the property without announcing to avoid alerting criminals. The house is such a mess that it looks like it has been rummaged through. Dean spots a person with a gun in the window (he describes her as pointing the gun at him) and shoots one shot while mid "Put your hands up!" command. The shot hit her directly in the heart, no chance of saving her life. They did not know if the person was an intruder or the homeowner at the time.

The debate is due to the homeowner being justified to shoot at Dean, since he was not an identified officer and was intruding on her property. He looked suspicious as hell.
But, Dean was possibly also justified in shooting because a gun being pointed at you in a criminal investigation would be a life threatening situation. Not identifying yourself during a burglary investigation is also standard procedure.

Not a fan of the prosecution, but I am leaning towards reckless homicide. He approached the situation half-cocked without a clear idea what's going on and shot the homeowner by mistake. I think the prosecution did a good job pointing that out along with highlighting that he didn't call in the gun and should have drilled him further on that. But instead he went way too long on bullshit, and those poignant facts got buried under empty sound and fury.

Kurt being a whiny bitch. "I can't get a word in edgewise!"

You would think that lawyers would be good talking over people.

 

[Confetti Meringue]

Not a fan of the prosecution, but I am leaning towards reckless homicide. He approached the situation half-cocked without a clear idea what's going on and shot the homeowner by mistake. I think the prosecution did a good job pointing that out along with highlighting that he didn't call in the gun and should have drilled him further on that. But instead he went way too long on bullshit, and those poignant facts got buried under empty sound and fury.


You would think that lawyers would be good talking over people.

Disagree. The defendant made a lot of mistakes surrounding the shooting, but the fact is if he saw a gun pointed at him, it doesn't matter how much of a dimwit he is. Your life is at risk, you have the right to eliminate that threat.

The prosecutor has gone so far into the weeds, I can't believe anyone would take this guy seriously outside of confirmation bias.

> You didn't check thoroughly enough!
Ok, does that affect him shooting because he saw a gun pointed at him?

> You didn't yell gun afterwards!
Ok, does that affect him shooting because he saw a gun pointed at him?

And the defendant needs to grow a backbone. Stop bending over every time the prosecutor says "That's not good police work, is it?" He shouldn't have been a police officer with this low of a constitution.

 

[FILTH Tourist]

The defendant made a lot of mistakes surrounding the shooting, but the fact is if he saw a gun pointed at him, it doesn't matter how much of a dimwit he is. Your life is at risk, you have the right to eliminate that threat.

But he didn't see the gun. He did not call out the suspect had a gun, he did not notify his partner that the suspect had a gun, didn't seem cautious in clearing the house even though the suspect is still alive (and allegedly armed) and only mentioned the weapon when he arrived in the room. The guy saw a figure, got spooked, and killed an innocent and is now trying to lie his way out about seeing the gun.

 

[Yellow Jacket Blue]

I don't know enough about this particular case to have an opinion atm, but I will point out how funny I find Nick and his chat. Under most circumstances they are all "Don't tread on me" and fuck the government and ATF, but when it comes to police misconduct trials they turn into the biggest boot lickers.

 

[Confetti Meringue]

But he didn't see the gun. He did not call out the suspect had a gun, he did not notify his partner that the suspect had a gun, didn't seem cautious in clearing the house even though the suspect is still alive (and allegedly armed) and only mentioned the weapon when he arrived in the room. The guy saw a figure, got spooked, and killed an innocent and is now trying to lie his way out about seeing the gun.

The little nephew of the dead woman said she pointed a gun at Dean in his interview 2 hours after the incident. There was a gun right next to her body. There's no reason to believe she did not have a gun besides him being a dumbass afterwards, which can also be explained by adrenaline making his brain not work good, so he wasn't thinking his actions through. I'd believe the nephew's immediate interview over behavioral analysis.

Again, he's an idiot and should not be in police work, security, etc with his pushover scaredy attitude. That does not mean he's guilty in this case.

 

[Bitcoin Henchman]

I don't know how much of the officer's bullshit I believe but at the start of this case I came into it thinking he was super guilty, mostly because it was told to me as "a cop shot someone in their own home while sneaking through their backyard." But as the prosecution went on I wasn't really convinced of his guilt, especially not for first degree, and as he testified under cross the prosecution started okay but frankly I'm tired of hearing inane questions and have fallen squarely to the officer's side. Either way when the state fights the (former)state it can be considered a small victory no matter the outcome.

 

[Joggin Noggin]

I don't know enough about this particular case to have an opinion atm, but I will point out how funny I find Nick and his chat. Under most circumstances they are all "Don't tread on me" and fuck the government and ATF, but when it comes to police misconduct trials they turn into the biggest boot lickers.

It's because of Branca. Dude almost always sucks the cock of every cop charged, more fervently defending them than he seems to do for other cases. Dude probably has We love our cops blaring at home. Pretty fucking annoying

 

[Yellow Jacket Blue]

Lady Rackets must really want to go get Blacked again since it seems Nick is so desperate for money he's already scraping the bottom of the barrel in advertising to push onto his viewers. With Established Titles being btfo'ed before Rackets could cash in he had to go to the next best shady company he could find.

He is pushing that Tacright mini saw, which he admits he hasn't even used yet and the site looks like every shady internet sales scam circa 2010. It has the usual fake 50% off claim which is illegal in many jurisdictions, 5 minute timer to the fake sale expires and unsourced claims it was featured in every major media outlet. When you click the About Us link it takes you to another website that looks like a retard made it https://www.mytacticalpromos.com/ A quick google of reviews show BBB complaints of scams with no response by the business, trustpilot rating of 2.1 with a mix of obviously fake reviews and those claiming unauthorized charges, repeated charges etc. Yelp reviews of 1 star average and the list just goes on and on.

Glad to see Nick wasn't satisfied with telling his viewers to cash out their IRAs for Jew Gold and has now gone on to getting them to buy shit products from shit companies that he hasn't even used.

 

[FILTH Tourist]

I'd believe the nephew's immediate interview over behavioral analysis.

I am not trusting the testimony of a dazed 8-year-old right after a traumatic incident. Kids are eager to please authority figures, and he could have been nudged into giving the answers he thinks the detective wants to hear.

There was a gun right next to her body.

Again, I am not arguing she didn't have the gun. I am arguing that he didn't see it.

There's no reason to believe she did not have a gun besides him being a dumbass afterwards, which can also be explained by adrenaline making his brain not work good, so he wasn't thinking his actions through. I'd believe the nephew's immediate interview over behavioral analysis.

So you are willing to give the cop the benefit of the doubt over adrenalin impairing his thoughts, but trust the traumatized as fuck little kid at his word like his mind is crystal clear after what he saw? The cop shot someone, realized me might have fucked up and did not follow procedure when dealing with a wounded armed suspect, possibly putting himself and his partner in danger. While I do give him kudos for rushing to render someone aid, the fact that he rushes to her when adrenalin should force him to get to safety first shows that he did not think she was a threat. Again, the first time the cop mentions the gun was when he reaches the room. He fucked up, and I think reckless homicide or manslaughter is an appropriate verdict.

 

[AnOminous]

There was a gun right next to her body. There's no reason to believe she did not have a gun besides him being a dumbass afterwards, which can also be explained by adrenaline making his brain not work good, so he wasn't thinking his actions through.

The question isn't whether she had a gun, but whether he knew it and was acting reasonably under the circumstances.

So you are willing to give the cop the benefit of the doubt over adrenalin impairing his thoughts, but trust the traumatized as fuck little kid at his word like his mind is crystal clear after what he saw?

He'd have no reason to accuse his own mom who just got shot in front of him of doing something to cause it.

There's really a multi-step analysis here. I think we pretty much know she had a gun and pointed it at him. There's no reason to disbelieve that, even though she would have been justified to do that under the circumstances.

Then there's the question of whether he knew that and thought he was shooting an armed suspect under the circumstances. Then there's whether it was reasonable to think that.

Then there's whether it was merely negligent to do that, or whether it reached a criminal mens rea standard. I think he would lose a civil suit huge (an academic question because this is going to settle if it hasn't already).

I'm not sure what he did was criminal, though. Not every police mistake that results in a death is a crime and setting that as a standard would really eliminate anyone with any sense from ever taking a job as a cop.

If that were the case only the absolute bottom of the barrel would be dumb enough to take a job where the slightest mistake could get you sent to prison with the people who you spent a career putting there.

 

[TheClappening]

I don't know how much of the officer's bullshit I believe but at the start of this case I came into it thinking he was super guilty, mostly because it was told to me as "a cop shot someone in their own home while sneaking through their backyard." But as the prosecution went on I wasn't really convinced of his guilt, especially not for first degree, and as he testified under cross the prosecution started okay but frankly I'm tired of hearing inane questions and have fallen squarely to the officer's side. Either way when the state fights the (former)state it can be considered a small victory no matter the outcome.

That happens all the time.

Depp at start of the allegations? Super mega rapist. Now Heard him owes him millions.

Rittenhouse? Guilty as reported by the media. Now acquitted.

Popcorn shooter? Murderer. Eventually acquitted.

Etc.

This guy should never be a cop again or have a job where he carries a gun, but that doesn't mean he should spend years in a cage just because he shot a negro.

 

[FILTH Tourist]

I'm not sure what he did was criminal, though. Not every police mistake that results in a death is a crime and setting that as a standard would really eliminate anyone with any sense from ever taking a job as a cop.

I agree that some mistakes are acceptable. Like that teen getting shot in a dressing room due to over penetration or shooting a guy thinking he is armed even though he wasn't. But at the same time cops get away with too much and should be held closer to the standards civilians have. With this one I think he got jumpy, shot someone on impulse, then justified it after the fact. That kind of behavior should be criminal if it isnt already. Especially since the woman did nothing wrong preparing to defend her home and family from unknown intruders.

 

[Pelican Bones]

Your life is at risk, you have the right to eliminate that threat.

Homie, the cops don't have a right to sneak onto your property and shoot you if you're holding a gun.

And you don't want them having this as a right.