𝕏 / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

[Balldo's Gate]

Considering twitter yeeted a dozen accounts that operated in the same manner as elonjet today, that's clearly not true.

All of those dozen accounts that were banned were run by the same person who runs the ElonJet account.

 

[1Tonka_Truck]

All of those dozen accounts that were banned were run by the same person who runs the ElonJet account.

https://archive.vn/03bCF

Try again.
Sweeny only claims the Elon and SpaceX jet accounts on twitter. He helped one other guy setup a bot and that's all I'm aware of.

 

[Mothra1988]

All of those dozen accounts that were banned were run by the same person who runs the ElonJet account.

Surely he will go down as the Rosa Parks of our time.

 

[quaawaa]

Elon banned him because he got heckled leaving the airport:

Source (Archive)
Also because of this:

Source (Archive)
"lil X" isn't a rapper; "X AE A-Xii" is one of his kids.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

View attachment 4074189

https://archive.vn/03bCF

Try again.
Sweeny only claims the Elon and SpaceX jet accounts on twitter. He helped one other guy setup a bot and that's all I'm aware of.
View attachment 4074228

Not sure why this is a big deal, but I'm confused why you cropped out the Tweet of him asking for his other accounts back.

https://archive.ph/LCG7k
An archive of his list of accounts reveals that they all explicitly stated they were run by the same person:

https://archive.ph/mLHJt

 

[AnOminous]

Those two groups are not open to changing their minds and it would be very welcome if they leave twitter which they mostly won't.

Ever notice the people who screech loudest about how they're leaving any minute now (yet never do) are exactly the people you wish would fuck the hell off already?

I'm glad the Boring guy blew it up, but he's being such a whiny, unfunny bitch about it.

Like with most lolcows their humorlessness is part of the fun for everyone else.

 

[Kel1 shi1]

Ever notice the people who screech loudest about how they're leaving any minute now (yet never do) are exactly the people you wish would fuck the hell off already?

You've seen the same behavior on forums for years when someone threatens to flounce off. They are just looking for validation of people begging them not to go and how unfairly that "Popular" poster was treated by the mods. They'll only go when they get banned.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

You've seen the same behavior on forums for years when someone threatens to flounce off. They are just looking for validation of people begging them not to go and how unfairly that "Popular" poster was treated by the mods. They'll only go when they get banned.

The best KF rule isn’t don’t pozload my neghole. It’s “just leave” - don’t flounce.

 

[SBG]

Hate being wrong, but I guess the reason for the Elon's Jet account being suspended was Elon genuinely treating it as a threat.

Still feel my theory made sense at the time though!

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1603190155107794944

 

[AnOminous]

Hate being wrong, but I guess the reason for the Elon's Jet account being suspended was Elon genuinely treating it as a threat.

I'm not sure there's really a great distinction there. I mean "he's at X location every Thursday at 9:00" is just as bad, right? Not that I'd expect him to put up with being doxed on his own site anyway.

 

[ZMOT]

They're defending lolicon as "free speech." Holy shit, how is it free speech?! Free speech is for ideas not for whatever depraved shit you whack to, sickos. Where was your defense of "free speech" when we were getting attacked by an insane cabal of troons?

since I've seen that discussion before, I can shed some light on that.
the basic idea is, when a site is compromising on lolicon, what else are they compromising on?

the first issue is that most people can't even define what lolicon even is. the drawing of a child? the drawing of a child in a bathing suit? the drawing of a child in a pg13, 60's style pinup? the drawing of a child getting a train run on them? or, if you're a dipshit like jason schreier, this is also lolicon:



and for the record, we're not talking about real CP here, because anyone who is a literal pedo obviously doesn't want to see that shit and agrees anyone involve need to take a gasoline shower with a smoke afterwards.

so right from the start we got a lot of different people meaning a lot of different things - and that's before even going in to the east vs. west definition or context.

for most people the difference is pretty clear, they simply don't want to see cartoon pornography unless they specifically look of it; doesn't matter if it's a child, a granny, or tails on a park bench; but here comes the problem: coomers. even if people can separate fiction from reality, normies on normie platforms don't want to see it, that's why anyone with common sense keeps that shit where it belongs, so normies don't get riled up, advertisers don't make a fuzz, and everyone is happy. except coomers can't do that and constantly have to drag their shit everywhere. hence why most platforms have a blanket ban on anything involving even remotely sexual (and other stuff like religion - and if they're smart politics) to protect their business and be legally safe. this also includes a lot of troons and other "folx" trying to able to talk about literal gay shit and cub porn under the shield of their "marginalized status" (look up why tabletop simulator disabled it's global chat if you want an example).

which means on top a murky definition, there are a lot of different factions with different goals, from the one with the "I don't like what you have to say, but I defend your right to say it" principle all they way to groomers who openly want to flaunt their degeneracy.

TLDR: complicated issue that's not easily fixed (if ever), some people are right, some people are wrong, same thing as usual where a loud minority ruins things for the rest.

I know it's just fiction and I know censorship is inherently bad, but fiction or not, it's still fantasizing about having sex with children. If nothing else it leaves a very bad sense in my sensory organs.

"I know it's just fiction and I know censorship is inherently bad, but fiction or not, it's still fantasizing about killing someone".
same energy.

and if you think that's some 20 year old strawman - the prosecutor in the rittenhouse trial tried to pull that exactly that just last year. fiction will never be reality, thinking otherwise gets you men in dresses believing they're women.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

ElonJet got unbanned and banned again.

 

[Markass the Worst]

since I've seen that discussion before, I can shed some light on that.
the basic idea is, when a site is compromising on lolicon, what else are they compromising on?

Well I still consider lolicon separate. It's entirely possible to have free speech and ban loli, and it's also possible to have loli but ban free speech (many left of center tranny pedo coomer places already do this). Loli as a litmus test for free speech is retarded. Saying "nigger" or even mild things like "trans women are men" is more reliable.

the first issue is that most people can't even define what lolicon even is. the drawing of a child? the drawing of a child in a bathing suit? the drawing of a child in a pg13, 60's style pinup? the drawing of a child getting a train run on them? or, if you're a dipshit like jason schreier, this is also lolicon:
View attachment 4074660
View attachment 4074687

Just to be clear lolicon is the sexualized depiction of a child, often NSFW, not just any drawing of a child. Getting run over by a train is disturbing but it's less of a problem than pedophilia. I don't know who that woman in the image is but it's not lolicon despite it being coomer bait.

 

[Big Al's Famous Pork]

If you are splitting hairs over whether or not loli appeals to pedos, you are part of the problem.
Its pedo shit.
Also Twitter is useless.

 

[George Lucas]

since I've seen that discussion before, I can shed some light on that.
the basic idea is, when a site is compromising on lolicon, what else are they compromising on?

the first issue is that most people can't even define what lolicon even is. the drawing of a child? the drawing of a child in a bathing suit? the drawing of a child in a pg13, 60's style pinup? the drawing of a child getting a train run on them? or, if you're a dipshit like jason schreier, this is also lolicon:
View attachment 4074660
View attachment 4074687

and for the record, we're not talking about real CP here, because anyone who is a literal pedo obviously doesn't want to see that shit and agrees anyone involve need to take a gasoline shower with a smoke afterwards.

so right from the start we got a lot of different people meaning a lot of different things - and that's before even going in to the east vs. west definition or context.

for most people the difference is pretty clear, they simply don't want to see cartoon pornography unless they specifically look of it; doesn't matter if it's a child, a granny, or tails on a park bench; but here comes the problem: coomers. even if people can separate fiction from reality, normies on normie platforms don't want to see it, that's why anyone with common sense keeps that shit where it belongs, so normies don't get riled up, advertisers don't make a fuzz, and everyone is happy. except coomers can't do that and constantly have to drag their shit everywhere. hence why most platforms have a blanket ban on anything involving even remotely sexual (and other stuff like religion - and if they're smart politics) to protect their business and be legally safe. this also includes a lot of troons and other "folx" trying to able to talk about literal gay shit and cub porn under the shield of their "marginalized status" (look up why tabletop simulator disabled it's global chat if you want an example).

which means on top a murky definition, there are a lot of different factions with different goals, from the one with the "I don't like what you have to say, but I defend your right to say it" principle all they way to groomers who openly want to flaunt their degeneracy.

TLDR: complicated issue that's not easily fixed (if ever), some people are right, some people are wrong, same thing as usual where a loud minority ruins things for the rest.


"I know it's just fiction and I know censorship is inherently bad, but fiction or not, it's still fantasizing about killing someone".
same energy.

and if you think that's some 20 year old strawman - the prosecutor in the rittenhouse trial tried to pull that exactly that just last year. fiction will never be reality, thinking otherwise gets you men in dresses believing they're women.

Stop fucking kids.

 

[draggs]

since I've seen that discussion before, I can shed some light on that.
the basic idea is, when a site is compromising on lolicon, what else are they compromising on?

the first issue is that most people can't even define what lolicon even is. the drawing of a child? the drawing of a child in a bathing suit? the drawing of a child in a pg13, 60's style pinup? the drawing of a child getting a train run on them? or, if you're a dipshit like jason schreier, this is also lolicon:
View attachment 4074660
View attachment 4074687

and for the record, we're not talking about real CP here, because anyone who is a literal pedo obviously doesn't want to see that shit and agrees anyone involve need to take a gasoline shower with a smoke afterwards.

so right from the start we got a lot of different people meaning a lot of different things - and that's before even going in to the east vs. west definition or context.

for most people the difference is pretty clear, they simply don't want to see cartoon pornography unless they specifically look of it; doesn't matter if it's a child, a granny, or tails on a park bench; but here comes the problem: coomers. even if people can separate fiction from reality, normies on normie platforms don't want to see it, that's why anyone with common sense keeps that shit where it belongs, so normies don't get riled up, advertisers don't make a fuzz, and everyone is happy. except coomers can't do that and constantly have to drag their shit everywhere. hence why most platforms have a blanket ban on anything involving even remotely sexual (and other stuff like religion - and if they're smart politics) to protect their business and be legally safe. this also includes a lot of troons and other "folx" trying to able to talk about literal gay shit and cub porn under the shield of their "marginalized status" (look up why tabletop simulator disabled it's global chat if you want an example).

which means on top a murky definition, there are a lot of different factions with different goals, from the one with the "I don't like what you have to say, but I defend your right to say it" principle all they way to groomers who openly want to flaunt their degeneracy.

TLDR: complicated issue that's not easily fixed (if ever), some people are right, some people are wrong, same thing as usual where a loud minority ruins things for the rest.


"I know it's just fiction and I know censorship is inherently bad, but fiction or not, it's still fantasizing about killing someone".
same energy.

and if you think that's some 20 year old strawman - the prosecutor in the rittenhouse trial tried to pull that exactly that just last year. fiction will never be reality, thinking otherwise gets you men in dresses believing they're women.

there is not even a weak correlation between partaking in fictional depictions of killing and actually killing someone

fictional cheese pizza does not share that characteristic

up against the wall please

 

[WelperHelper99]

since I've seen that discussion before, I can shed some light on that.
the basic idea is, when a site is compromising on lolicon, what else are they compromising on?

the first issue is that most people can't even define what lolicon even is. the drawing of a child? the drawing of a child in a bathing suit? the drawing of a child in a pg13, 60's style pinup? the drawing of a child getting a train run on them? or, if you're a dipshit like jason schreier, this is also lolicon:
View attachment 4074660
View attachment 4074687

and for the record, we're not talking about real CP here, because anyone who is a literal pedo obviously doesn't want to see that shit and agrees anyone involve need to take a gasoline shower with a smoke afterwards.

so right from the start we got a lot of different people meaning a lot of different things - and that's before even going in to the east vs. west definition or context.

for most people the difference is pretty clear, they simply don't want to see cartoon pornography unless they specifically look of it; doesn't matter if it's a child, a granny, or tails on a park bench; but here comes the problem: coomers. even if people can separate fiction from reality, normies on normie platforms don't want to see it, that's why anyone with common sense keeps that shit where it belongs, so normies don't get riled up, advertisers don't make a fuzz, and everyone is happy. except coomers can't do that and constantly have to drag their shit everywhere. hence why most platforms have a blanket ban on anything involving even remotely sexual (and other stuff like religion - and if they're smart politics) to protect their business and be legally safe. this also includes a lot of troons and other "folx" trying to able to talk about literal gay shit and cub porn under the shield of their "marginalized status" (look up why tabletop simulator disabled it's global chat if you want an example).

which means on top a murky definition, there are a lot of different factions with different goals, from the one with the "I don't like what you have to say, but I defend your right to say it" principle all they way to groomers who openly want to flaunt their degeneracy.

TLDR: complicated issue that's not easily fixed (if ever), some people are right, some people are wrong, same thing as usual where a loud minority ruins things for the rest.


"I know it's just fiction and I know censorship is inherently bad, but fiction or not, it's still fantasizing about killing someone".
same energy.

and if you think that's some 20 year old strawman - the prosecutor in the rittenhouse trial tried to pull that exactly that just last year. fiction will never be reality, thinking otherwise gets you men in dresses believing they're women.

If you have to write me a book on why the loli is actually a 900 year old immortal vampire queen and totally not fap bait you've lost me chief. I do like anime, yes. It has issues, I'm not ashamed to admit that, and loli is the cardinal sin. Defending loli is heinous.

 

[Kel1 shi1]

If you are splitting hairs over whether or not loli appeals to pedos, you are part of the problem.
Its pedo shit.
Also Twitter is useless.

"I jerk off to cartoons of legal age men fucking each other but I'm not gay" Bullshit, you're just not actually fucking guys but want to and "I'm not gay if I'm not actually giving or taking dick" defense.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

Elon should just ban porn and such outright.

Only people bitching would be cooomers, whores, and pedos. And fuck ‘em. It’s never been about speech it’s about power and lols.

LOLs not LOLIs.

 

[AnOminous]

Elon should just ban porn and such outright.

Facebook did that and if you really want a normie platform and not just a site for terminally online weirdos you probably have to do that.