US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
You keep reciting outomded 70's feminazi rhetoric. The truth is you're the one who doesn't think women are people. You don't think a porn actress has free will to say no, you don't think she has the ability to determine whether she is a victim or not or whether or not she is a human being because she's doing things you don't like or approve of. You're basically Anita Sarkeesian.

If the internet scares you so much, old man, you can go spend time in the park or the library. No one is making you look at the evil vagina photos. And if you're a parent, you can stop being a lazy white nigger and watch your kid's phone internet access. Much better outcome then giving the feds the ability to put this site to death for offending someone else's precious sensibilities because you think expression you don't personally agree with isn't worth defending.
Excuse me, but what the hell is this tripe? They actually do put forward a reasonable argument regarding social cohesion; you are using the same tactics used against the fundies who have been increasingly proven correct.

You are attacking a strawman who as far as I can see has not directly advocated for a porn ban, and worse you're taking the same side as a user acting like saying nigger is an awful thing.
 
You keep reciting outomded 70's feminazi rhetoric. The truth is you're the one who doesn't think women are people. You don't think a porn actress has free will to say no, you don't think she has the ability to determine whether she is a victim or not or whether or not she is a human being because she's doing things you don't like or approve of. You're basically Anita Sarkeesian.

If the internet scares you so much, old man, you can go spend time in the park or the library. No one is making you look at the evil vagina photos. And if you're a parent, you can stop being a lazy white nigger and watch your kid's phone internet access. Much better outcome then giving the feds the ability to put this site to death for offending someone else's precious sensibilities because you think expression you don't personally agree with isn't worth defending.
Dry, desperate and shallow. What is wrong with you?
 
Now that the 2022 world cup has ended, the next one is going to be hosted in 2026 in America, Canada and Mexico.

How the fuck is FIFA and the Democrats and RINOs going to convince tourists to come to America given the high rates of Soros DAs just letting off niggers to keep on nigging in the urban shitholes of America.

And the police is going to be less than willing to enforce THE LAW if another chimpout happens during that event.

Though expect to be a lot of fear mongering over the 2A when they start the preparations for the event.
Mexico is the best bet, since they have stadiums that can be used for the event plus a population that treats soccer as a second religion.

I'm more offended at how much people pay for that OnlyFans shit. You can get parasocial relationships with your buttholes cheaper on most of the camsites. Less filters too. Seriously though, it is a problem and one of those "The Religious Right was right again" things. Before they shut themselves up into a cultural ghetto of their own making.
For the gay coomer perspective, the bulk of the gay porn out there is vanilla shit and the entire gay fetish porn subscription website ecosphere fell apart over the last decade. A lot of websites shut down or just recycle the same content and even fucking Kink/Bound Gods only does random updates and worse, has started to push interracial shit in what little stuff they do post, along with the fact that they lost all of their top stars to failed acting careers, going mental and getting busted for drugs, or vanishing into the ether.

Onlyfans/Just4Fans basically provides gay coomers the means to meet content makers making fetish porn be it leather, rubber, zentai, BDSM that you can't find these days; especially on cam sites where wearing a hood can get you banned if you get reported and where the rules about tying people up are kafka-esque (last time I checked, you have to have at least one hand free from bondage if you stream on Chaturbate).

Of course, Onlyfans isn't perfect: it doesn't have a search engine to search people by (even Clips4Sales offers that) and worse, you basically have to subscribe literally blind to what's available on a person's Onlyfans and jerry-rig a way to download it, since unlike Just4Fans, Onlyfans doesn't offer a direct method to download their stuff. God knows I've been burnt on a couple of occasions, subscribing for a month only to find out the content is crappy 2-3 minute videos and not long form stuff.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dry, desperate and shallow. What is wrong with you?

Really great argument. At least I'm not pretending telling other women what to do is feminism in 2022. Bunch of grandparents in here. lol

Excuse me, but what the hell is this tripe? They actually do put forward a reasonable argument regarding social cohesion; you are using the same tactics used against the fundies who have been increasingly proven correct.

You are attacking a strawman who as far as I can see has not directly advocated for a porn ban, and worse you're taking the same side as a user acting like saying nigger is an awful thing.

Yes, alinging with 1990's fundies is a really smart thing to do on Kiwi Farms, a site that has been repeatedly deplatformed for wrong think. Gotta throw out personal responsiblitiy in favor of "social cohesion" like North Korea. That will definteily improve things I'm sure.
 
You act like there's any reason for a man to even be with a woman right now. I've watched too many of my friends getting screwed over by family court in terms of possessions, children, and divorce. You want men to get invested and to stop jerking it so much? How about we work on fixing the busted ass system that will give a child to a clearly drug addicted mother over the sober father because it's 'better' for the child to be with the Mom.

if you have multiple friends who have impregnated and married multiple junkie whores....
 
if there are real ones they are working with the cartels

one of the most annoying things about this thread is how you guys act like the cartels are just going to fold up and stop existing at some point

that's the next government
nobody outright says it, there's just a weird lack of awareness

a related issue is how people think that it's labor trafficking that is the primary reason the borders aren't being controlled

If it weren’t for illegal immigration being profitable with underpaid labor, we would shoot every coyote that even thought about sneaking across the border. This includes the cartels. Sure, they bribed their way into their current position, but any State gov’t supported by a POTUS that has a pair can tear them out of where they are.

Cartels are foreign criminal actors, they are instantly shootable by the feds. The reason we don’t is because media optics and this whole “We’re civilized, so let the murderers and rapists falsely claim to be victims to get in, then deport them for a week when they commit an atrocity instead of just shooting them.“ nonsense.
 
You keep reciting outomded 70's feminazi rhetoric. The truth is you're the one who doesn't think women are people. You don't think a porn actress has free will to say no, you don't think she has the ability to determine whether she is a victim or not or whether or not she is a human being because she's doing things you don't like or approve of. You're basically Anita Sarkeesian.

If the internet scares you so much, old man, you can go spend time in the park or the library. No one is making you look at the evil vagina photos. And if you're a parent, you can stop being a lazy white nigger and watch your kid's phone internet access. Much better outcome then giving the feds the ability to put this site to death for offending someone else's precious sensibilities because you think expression you don't personally agree with isn't worth defending.
Everyone against restricting pornography is as gay and retarded as you, which on its own is sufficient reason to ban it.


If it weren’t for illegal immigration being profitable with underpaid labor, we would shoot every coyote that even thought about sneaking across the border. This includes the cartels. Sure, they bribed their way into their current position, but any State gov’t supported by a POTUS that has a pair can tear them out of where they are.

Cartels are foreign criminal actors, they are instantly shootable by the feds. The reason we don’t is because media optics and this whole “We’re civilized, so let the murderers and rapists falsely claim to be victims to get in, then deport them for a week when they commit an atrocity instead of just shooting them.“ nonsense.

If birthright citizenship for illegal aliens' children were handing the Republicans victories in California, we would have landmines on the border.
 
A conflict has arisen apparently between two what could technically be seen as "prominent" American Populists/Trumpists due to their positions in Congress:

Marjorie Taylor Greene attacks Lauren Boebert, calls her childish and mocks her struggle to get re-elected​

Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene attacked fellow MAGA Republican Rep. Lauren Boebert on Monday, accusing her of engaging in petty feuding, while also taking a swipe at her narrow margin of re-election.

Greene's ire was stoked by a video showing Boebert with Turning Point founder Charlie Kirk at its "AmericaFest" event.

Kirk asked Boebert and Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz, also listed as a speaker at the event, what they thought of Greene's endorsement of Rep. Kevin McCarthy to be the next House speaker.

Neither Gaetz nor Boebert were fans of the idea. While Gaetz politely disagreed, Boebert was more personal.

"Well you know, I've been aligned with Marjorie and accused of believing a lot of the things that she believes in," said Boebert. "I don't believe in this, just like I don't believe in Russian space lasers, Jewish space lasers and all of this."

The remark was a reference to a since-deleted 2018 Facebook post in which Greene speculated that that year's wildfires in California were caused by lasers controlled by politicians and Jewish bankers.

Greene took exception, and responded to Boebert by tweeting the clip while noting that the congresswoman "just barely came through by 500 votes" in the 2022 midterms despite support from Greene, former President Donald Trump, and McCarthy.

Boebert survived an extraordinarily tight race for Colorado's Third Congressional District in the midterms.

The contest was close enough to prompt a legally-required recount, which confirmed that she won by 546 votes.

In her thread, Greene complained that Boebert didn't endorse Trump or McCarthy even after she "gladly takes our $$$" in getting re-elected.

"And she childishly threw me under the bus for a cheap sound bite," Greene added, in a likely reference to Boebert's "space lasers" quip.

"Americans expect conservative fighters like us to work together to Save America and that is the only mission I'm 100% devoted to, not high school drama and media sound bites," Greene said in a third tweet.

Boebert did not immediately respond to Insider's request for comment.

Boebert, Greene and Gaetz — who all sit to the far right of the Republican Party — have long been grouped together, but reports emerged in April of a rift between Greene and Boebert.
Politico reported that the pair got into a heated debate over Greene's attendance, in February, of a white nationalist-organized event. According to the outlet, Boebert dislikes being associated with Greene.

Article Link

Archive
 
No, there is no logically consistent reason under the First Amendment to ban child porn and allow adult porn. Banning either type of porn is an infringement upon free speech. The child porn laws are on incredibly weak ground constitutionally and Congress was warned about this when they created those laws and again in the dissent in the court case that upheld them.

Under your logic, all we need to do is ban adult porn is to declare that creating porn is abuse and make it a crime to film, distribute, or watch it. We’d just be protecting victims, not infringing on speech.

Also, since children cannot consent to work, any movie with child actors should also be illegal, if that was actually the standard and not just an excuse to ban something abhorrent.

I’m not defending child porn, but under a strict reading of the constitution it would have to be legal to distribute and watch it, though you could charge the creators for the crimes they committed on video. Under a less strict reading of the First Amendment, there is no reason why adult porn must be legal. The only reason why adult porn would stay legal if a law was passed to ban it is because most modern judges have zero logical reasoning ability and because porn is popular (Hmm…I wonder why the press is trying to normalize pedophilia…)

Any sexual activity with a minor is illegal, ergo any recording of said activity is also illegal. Why? Because it is clearly pornographic and it is a means of extending the abuse from the original incident as much as humanly possible. It is also clearly meant to stimulate sexual impulses in the viewer, as if they were committing the act themselves. It is the reason why child actors are kosher, but child porn is not. It is literally the nature of the material. Kid in a comedy movie? Fine. Pedoshit? Napalm.

The lack of constitutionality makes zero sense when you take into account that the federal law is in line with all 50 state laws regarding minors and sex, in spirit, if not in letter. That fact, in and of itself, means that it is very constitutional. All 50 states have agreed that this shit is illegal, for obvious reasons. The federal gov’t going “And my axe!” is a rare moment where it did its job, and reinforced state laws with federal action.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back