Megathread SRS and GRS surgeons and associated horrors - the medical community of experimental surgeons, the secret community of home butchers

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
It's a terrible day to have working eyes. u/raceinbk1980
Link | Archive
This guy is non-binary, 52 and loves to post his pre-op dick on r/castrations and r/eunuchs. it also seems he was supposed to get the chop in April but was moved up.
They're slicing and dicing all over the place, cutting up urethras and ballsacks and constructing all kinds of weird shit. I know these "surgeries" will always create disgusting abominations, but once, just ONCE I am begging surgeons to create two labia minora that go all the way down, with the hole between them. BETWEEN THEM, YOU ABSOLUTE MADMEN. Wtf am I even looking at here??? Not underneath like the number 8, not totally outside the entire fiasco like a second asshole, PUT IT BETWEEN
 
Is this even possible? You can't just carve out the Amhole where you want.
It's not a matter of carving the amhole elsewhere, it's a matter of constructing a couple of phony flaps! Like some basic ballsack pussylip construction. Actual for real plastic surgery. I'm fuckin dying looking at that figure-8 lmao
 
It's not a matter of carving the amhole elsewhere, it's a matter of constructing a couple of phony flaps! Like some basic ballsack pussylip construction. Actual for real plastic surgery. I'm fuckin dying looking at that figure-8 lmao
They'd need extra skin for that, so they'd need either a graft or more likely a tissue expander. Of course we can't expect TIMs to endure disfiguring scars or waiting.
 
Dumb TiF finds out some basic facts about her procedure after her dick install.
Screenshot 2022-12-22 121900.pngScreenshot 2022-12-22 121913.png
Link | Archive

Kind of freaking out after stage 2 education appointment.

Hi, so I just had a virtual education appointment regarding my stage 2 surgery, which is supposed to be on March 1st. A little background info: I just had stage 1 RFF with Dr. Rachel Bluebond-Langner on November 16th. It was phallus creation only - no urethral lengthening yet and my natal genitalia was left relatively untouched. I was under the impression that the second stage would include vaginectomy, scrotoplasty, glansplasty, UL, and burial.

Well, when I had my education appointment today, I had some questions about burial because I honestly didn't get much info from them about it yet. I assumed that burial would be in the phallus shaft and that it would include nerve hookup so I would have erotic sensation and the nerves would "branch out" as they grew into my phallus. To my surprise, she told me that burial would be in the scrotum, and that it wouldn't be included in stage 2?? I asked when it would be done, then, and she said "somewhere between stage 2 and stage 3." At this point, I was kind of freaked out because firstly, I wanted the burial to be at the base of my dick so my dick would feel like an extension of my natal genitalia. Secondly, nobody told me that burial wouldn't be in the second stage. If it was supposed to happen between stage 2 and stage 3, then wouldn't that make it stage 3? It makes no sense to me, and I'm bewildered that it wasn't brought up to me until now. Maybe it's my fault for assuming, but I feel like this is not normally the way things are staged with RFF.

On top of that, I asked how nerve hookup would work/what erotic sensation would entail, and she said that there wasn't any hookup to my natal genitalia. This was also a surprise to me, and it made me start freaking out even more because how the hell am I supposed to have erotic sensation in my dick if there's no hookup to my natal genitalia? Am I missing something here? I feel like after I told them in my consultation that sensation is my biggest priority, they should have told me this. The lady I was having my appointment with said that she would set up an appointment with the surgeon and urologist so that I can clear things up more with them, but I do not feel confident right now. If I can't get burial in the second stage, and if there is no nerve hookup, then I made a huge mistake here.

Has anyone else had similar staging who can give some insight as to how everything will end up? I'm seriously upset because now that I've started this with RBL, I'm basically stuck with her as my surgeon for the next two stages (or more, since apparently she doesn't do burial in stage 2). Has anyone gone to a different surgeon for their second stage? I feel like even if I could find a surgeon who would agree to work with me and give me what I actually want, I would have to wait a ridiculously long time for it. I just don't know what to do.

Lets see
  • finds out she's not getting UL and nerve hookup
  • think the nerves will branch out and cover her entire phallus
  • burial in scrotum instead of phallus
Meek girl assumes the surgeon knows exactly what she wants. Doctor doesn't bother outlining the surgeries cause she doesn't ask and he isn't required to.

To my knowledge, clitoral burial inside the phallus seems to not be real or at least a misnomer. We see a few people here with this and it seems to be just buried very close to the base but it's not actually in the phallus itself.
 
Dr. Rachel Bluebond-Langner

Comic book villain name, right here.

1671666639245.png
About me

As a plastic surgeon and the Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Associate Professor of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, I aim to minimize the risks of surgery and have a positive, meaningful impact on a person’s quality of life. I was drawn to the field of plastic surgery because it uses creativity and artistry to restore form and function. My goal is to work with each of my patients to achieve a natural aesthetic appearance while ensuring safety.

I discuss with each patient their goals and expectations, explaining all the options available. No two people have the same expectations of surgery. Taking the time to get to know my patients helps me fine tune the procedure to meet their needs. My team and I are easily accessible and readily available to answer any questions patients may have, guiding them through the preoperative decision process, recovery, and postoperative period.

I perform both aesthetic and reconstructive surgery. I also work closely with a team of specialists, including urologists, mental health specialists, and pediatricians, to provide safe, gender-affirming procedures for transgender and nonbinary individuals. We strive to achieve an appearance and anatomy that is congruent with each person’s identity.

Our team is at the forefront of innovation and research in gender-affirming procedures, conducting studies to improve safety, patient outcomes, and patient satisfaction. I value collaborating with transgender-identified professionals in patient care, and centering the transgender and nonbinary community’s voice in surgery research and innovation. My studies specifically compare long-term outcomes of surgical procedures and look for ways to improve them by using advances in biomedical and tissue engineering. Through research and innovation, we aim to improve competent and overall healthcare for transgender and gender nonconforming people.

Fun fact her mother was an anthropologist and Hebrew professor who wrote a book about dying children.

1671666750765.png
 
As the owner of an actual vagina, the 'looks cis to me' comment is offensive as fuck. It looks like someone took a fucking drill to the damn thing.
I happen to watch a bit of porn, and even some disgusting degenerate shit that made me close my browser, and there was one porn that I saw that had a woman stick a huge restaurant whisk in her cooch and it still looked better than the gore that men cut their dicks into.
 
Fun fact her mother was an anthropologist and Hebrew professor who wrote a book about dying children.
Well, color me shocked!

Also RE: the eunuch fetishist, one of the only things that keeps me sane while scrolling this thread is the schadenfreude that comes with knowing that these coombrained men have just permanently destroyed their only source of joy. The men who go as far as getting SRS are porn-rotted beyond any normal farmer's comprehension. The entirety of their life amounts to cooming, and because their brains are completely controlled by their dicks, none of them seem to fucking realize that chopping your dick off means no more orgasms. It just brings me endless, endless joy to imagine them waking up after surgery in excruciating pain, being forced to dilate an open wound forever, while they think to themselves desperately "surely, surely soon I'll have my perfect pornstar pussy that can have 600 orgasms in a row!".

And it's even more pleasing knowing that that desperate, hopeful voice will grow quieter and quieter as they continue their hellish recovery journey. Sure, the AGPs in this thread make me more MATI than anything on this goddamn site, but it sure is nice knowing that every single one of them is on the road to 41% the second they get the chop.
 
u/UselessAltThing. Various demented FTMs and nonbinaries. Assorted porn addicted basement dwellers. Less common than porn addicted men but they do exist.

Is the verdict out yet whether UselessAltThing is a troll or not? The way she talks about her story and keep spamming different subs seem like LARPing, and it just feels too deranged to be true.

...But troons are deranged so maybe that's a bad measure.
 
This guy who was trooned out at age eight (at the latest; he has a post that implies the grooming started at age five) didn't believe the lies that he received in response to his post and has made two new posts asking if he has something that looks like an actual vagina. This time he asked on /r/truscum in addition to /r/transgender_surgeries:

View attachment 4120095
View attachment 4120098
Source (Archive)

View attachment 4120191
He wants to know if he can get a revision to turn it into something that looks like an actual vagina:
As expected, they ignored his request for "no hugboxing":
View attachment 4120200
Source (Archive)

His parents should spend the rest of their lives in prison for doing this to their son.

Even the absolute best surgeon alive would not be able to make an amhole that is indistinguishable from a vagina for the simple reason that the region that is supposed to approximate the labia and vaginal opening is just a blown out urethra.
This is one of the things I find most distressing about the field getting behind transgender "medicine". You cannot just slap together a penis or vagina that appears convincingly "cis" if the only materials you have to work with are the natal genitals of the opposite sex. If you could approximate something halfway convincing, you'd still be working within the confines of human anatomy. Anatomical constraints are actually one of the main reasons why no tranny genitals pass. It's why neophalluses look like they're attached way too high on the body and neovaginas have the introitus/fuckhole inserted underneath the "vulva". Because of sex-based (!!) differences in pelvic anatomy, it's not possible to put the neogenitalia in the correct location.

It just doesn't work that way. Even the most talented surgeon in the world, the guy with the most blessed hands, (for real, I know of a surgeon, a fantastically talented and humble man, who has his hands blessed by a priest every morning on the way to work) can't create something from nothing. Let's just say that the coterie of trans butchers are not exactly counted among the "most talented" cohort of surgeons, either. There's no way that they can give these people what they are asking for. Yet, they continue to promise that yeah huh, they totally can, and if it doesn't take the first time, they can just keep chopping - uh, I mean, "revising" endlessly until the result is perfect. This is so incredibly irresponsible to me. Part of any surgeon's job is to manage patient expectations. You need to ensure that your patient has a realistic idea of what the surgery can accomplish. It's extremely unprofessional for any surgeon to promise a result that literally cannot happen. I actually contend that doing so is a violation of the Hippocratic Oath to "do no harm".

Certainly, it raises a philosophical question about the meaning of "informed consent". Is the patient truly consenting to a surgery if he's been promised an impossible result? How many of these people would not consent to a surgery if their surgeon were clinically, coldly straightforward about the actual scope the surgery and its best possible outcome?

Then, the matter is compounded when the troons go online and hear that all the other troons are totes jelly of their results, that "she" looks perfect and so cute, that it looks just like the real "bonus hole" of a True and Honest transman who braved her horrific and life-threatening *~bOttOm dYsPhoRiA*~ to take a look at her vulva for the first time ever and yeah, totally identical, I swear!!!!1

It's liars and charlatans all the way down. Whether in a professional or personal context, I think we should all consider what kind of person does this to another human being. I know it's easy to mock troons, and they are highly deserving of our derision, but it's still horrifying to think about the human toll being exacted here.
 
Is the verdict out yet whether UselessAltThing is a troll or not? The way she talks about her story and keep spamming different subs seem like LARPing, and it just feels too deranged to be true.

...But troons are deranged so maybe that's a bad measure.
No fucking clue. I’ve been watching her since before I joined the forums and that was nearly 2 years ago. Even then I noticed she was doing this shit a suspicious amount.
 
also YES, as some of the reddit comments touch on he's drastically underweight, look at that thigh gap. there's nothing there, to the extent that i'm surprised they operated on him.
thats both a risk for the procedure as well as onwards healing due to malnutrition.
and a total red flag for co-morbid mental health problems/likelihood of any positive outcome regarding satisfaction aside from the increased probable of physical issues..
There are a few full-body photos of him in earlier posts. He doesn't look particularly underweight to me, and he's certainly not so malnourished as to worry about compromised wound healing. There are much redder flags than his weight, and I do agree with you that any halfway competent surgeon would have ruled him out as a surgical candidate. It's actually rather surprising to see a male "early transitioner" who is a healthy weight; I can't recall seeing another who didn't have the eunuch bod. I wonder how tall he is. It's impossible to tell from the photos he's posted.

You know that Groucho Marx quotation about not wanting to join a club that would have you as a member? This is one of those situations. Anyone who would do a major elective cosmetic surgery on someone like this guy is not a person who you would want anywhere near your crotch with a scalpel.
 
It's a terrible day to have working eyes. u/raceinbk1980
Link | Archive
This guy is non-binary, 52 and loves to post his pre-op dick on r/castrations and r/eunuchs. it also seems he was supposed to get the chop in April but was moved up.
God Damn. That abomination looks like Conrad from Berserk.
Ironically, Conrad is the member who's power include "Transmutation"
 
Even the decadent LGBTQ-friendly Romans thought the priests of Cybele were degenerates. I hear trans people mention the Galli priests when bringing up that transgenderism has existed before modern times and…yeah they’re right but sharing something in common with makeup-caked, screaming delusional castrated men who claimed to be women isn’t really the virtue they think it is.

That's what I've thought, too, when those eunuch priests get brought up. Isn't the obvious response, "why, yes, there is an ancient precedent in human history of genital mutilation inspired by strange metaphysical ideas. And those who don't learn from the past are doomed to repeat it."

The Skoptsy, a relatively modern Russian cult:

Skoptsy_man_and_woman.jpg

All of them are against female circumcision (or at least they were at one point, maybe that's a racist opinion now), so they should at least object to phalloplasty.

Well, trans activists oppose laws against female genital mutilation:


And try to censor victims of female genital mutilation like Jana Cornel and Hibo Wardere who insist on the Female part of the term and concept:


I want to make a longer post in the Social Media thread about this eventually.

What you're describing goes back before the early days of the Internet.
In 1953, Edward D. Wood Jr., made a film called Glen or Glenda? which made a clear distinction between transvestites, homosexuals, and transgender people. Also, the transgender case was medically confirmed to be intersex.
If some guy has a compulsion to dress up like a woman, well, I can't relate but I guess that's much healthier than surgicaal procedures that are somehow still considered experimental many decades after they were first performed.

I never saw the actual Glen or Glenda but a film like Tim Burton's Ed Wood (1994) could never be made today as the title character (Johnny Depp) proudly identifies himself as a heterosexual male transvestite with an "angora fetish." The producer of Glen or Glenda complains to Wood that the latter's script changes the movie's focus from a HSTS type to an AGP like Wood or, in the producer's words, "some schmuck who likes angora sweaters." "I don't think he's a schmuck." This is all played for laughs and presented as part of what makes Wood a silly, silly man. Burton's film is also sympathetic to his loyal girlfriend (Sarah Jessica Parker) who's repulsed by his fetishes after he springs the news of them on her and eventually snaps and leaves him after informing him his movies are shit.

Meanwhile, Bunny Breckinridge (Bill Murray), the guy who plays the head alien in Plan 9 From Outer Space, is a wannabe HSTS who makes a failed attempt at getting sex change surgery in Mexico from a doctor who turns out to be a fraud. The closing text informs us he is still alive and still possesses his original genitalia. This is also presented comically.

It turned out that future events such as these affected us in the future. (:_(
 
It's a terrible day to have working eyes. u/raceinbk1980
Link | Archive
This guy is non-binary, 52 and loves to post his pre-op dick on r/castrations and r/eunuchs. it also seems he was supposed to get the chop in April but was moved up.
“Weird” doesn’t begin to describe that. This is like asking a mentally deficient man who has only heard that women have different parts to draw what it might look like. I cannot figure out how, in Allah’s name, this is supposed to be even a bad approximation.

This is a true “front hole.” God and nature have abandoned this man.
 
Dumb TiF finds out some basic facts about her procedure after her dick install.
View attachment 4127355View attachment 4127352
Link | Archive

Kind of freaking out after stage 2 education appointment.

Hi, so I just had a virtual education appointment regarding my stage 2 surgery, which is supposed to be on March 1st. A little background info: I just had stage 1 RFF with Dr. Rachel Bluebond-Langner on November 16th. It was phallus creation only - no urethral lengthening yet and my natal genitalia was left relatively untouched. I was under the impression that the second stage would include vaginectomy, scrotoplasty, glansplasty, UL, and burial.

Well, when I had my education appointment today, I had some questions about burial because I honestly didn't get much info from them about it yet. I assumed that burial would be in the phallus shaft and that it would include nerve hookup so I would have erotic sensation and the nerves would "branch out" as they grew into my phallus. To my surprise, she told me that burial would be in the scrotum, and that it wouldn't be included in stage 2?? I asked when it would be done, then, and she said "somewhere between stage 2 and stage 3." At this point, I was kind of freaked out because firstly, I wanted the burial to be at the base of my dick so my dick would feel like an extension of my natal genitalia. Secondly, nobody told me that burial wouldn't be in the second stage. If it was supposed to happen between stage 2 and stage 3, then wouldn't that make it stage 3? It makes no sense to me, and I'm bewildered that it wasn't brought up to me until now. Maybe it's my fault for assuming, but I feel like this is not normally the way things are staged with RFF.

On top of that, I asked how nerve hookup would work/what erotic sensation would entail, and she said that there wasn't any hookup to my natal genitalia. This was also a surprise to me, and it made me start freaking out even more because how the hell am I supposed to have erotic sensation in my dick if there's no hookup to my natal genitalia? Am I missing something here? I feel like after I told them in my consultation that sensation is my biggest priority, they should have told me this. The lady I was having my appointment with said that she would set up an appointment with the surgeon and urologist so that I can clear things up more with them, but I do not feel confident right now. If I can't get burial in the second stage, and if there is no nerve hookup, then I made a huge mistake here.

Has anyone else had similar staging who can give some insight as to how everything will end up? I'm seriously upset because now that I've started this with RBL, I'm basically stuck with her as my surgeon for the next two stages (or more, since apparently she doesn't do burial in stage 2). Has anyone gone to a different surgeon for their second stage? I feel like even if I could find a surgeon who would agree to work with me and give me what I actually want, I would have to wait a ridiculously long time for it. I just don't know what to do.

Lets see
  • finds out she's not getting UL and nerve hookup
  • think the nerves will branch out and cover her entire phallus
  • burial in scrotum instead of phallus
Meek girl assumes the surgeon knows exactly what she wants. Doctor doesn't bother outlining the surgeries cause she doesn't ask and he isn't required to.

To my knowledge, clitoral burial inside the phallus seems to not be real or at least a misnomer. We see a few people here with this and it seems to be just buried very close to the base but it's not actually in the phallus itself.
Omfg!!!!!!!!!! The clits not even in the rotdog???? She better cancel that fucking surgery
 
They're slicing and dicing all over the place, cutting up urethras and ballsacks and constructing all kinds of weird shit. I know these "surgeries" will always create disgusting abominations, but once, just ONCE I am begging surgeons to create two labia minora that go all the way down, with the hole between them. BETWEEN THEM, YOU ABSOLUTE MADMEN. Wtf am I even looking at here??? Not underneath like the number 8, not totally outside the entire fiasco like a second asshole, PUT IT BETWEEN
but even if they put it in the right spot it would still look off because it's always ballsack skin or something and not mucosa and pink and moist.
 
Back