Megathread TERFs / Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists / Gender Critical Feminists - ft. r/GenderCritical & related reddits, Mancheeze, Cathy Brennan, GCDad, RadFHarva, Jamie Shupe, etc; "Gender Critical Feminism is Homophobic" - Cathy Brennan, 2019.

Soycucks and beta males exists, your point is invalid.

Doesn't mean that their goal of emasculating men isn't going to backfire on them.

Women can't change anything and are never going to take power. Now they've just got a new patriarchy ruled by troons and porn-addicted soyboys.

Emasculated men are even more dangerous towards women and girls, ironically.
 
Doesn't mean that their goal of emasculating men isn't going to backfire on them.

Emasculated men are even more dangerous towards women and girls, ironically.
It already has backfired. Never forget, everytime you see a radfem complain about trannies and coomers, they're complaining about the society that they created.

They wanted a society of unlimited permissiveness free from obligation and responsibility that put women on a pedestal.

They denied the biological reality of men and women being different being the reason why rights and privilidges weren't evenly distributed, called it oppression and demanded the whole thing be abolished and reshaped, and what we got is the modern west.

There's a reason trannies and coomers exist only on feminist countries, but they will never acknowledge it because it would show everyone how much lthe two ideologies (TRAs and TERFs) are alike.

They'll blame the patriarchy for trannies until the cows come home despite the fact that in actually patriarchal countries trannies are borderline nonexistent.
 
terf1.png

terf2.jpg
 
Feminists in general flatten everything they don't like down to one term, just like they call everything they are displeased with misogyny.

By the way, a reminder to our fellow illiterate femoid kiwis, Misogyny means hatred of women, in real world there are more misogynistic women than there are misogynistic straight men.
 
Feminists in general flatten everything they don't like down to one term, just like they call everything they are displeased with misogyny.

By the way, a reminder to our fellow illiterate femoid kiwis, Misogyny means hatred of women, in real world there are more misogynistic women than there are misogynistic straight men.
When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Some of them will look at a female bullying victim who got punished for reacting and be like "THIS HAPPENED BECAUSE SHE'S A GIRL" and not the standard of punishing whoever complained to the teacher because they can't be assed to do their job.
 
Feminists in general flatten everything they don't like down to one term, just like they call everything they are displeased with misogyny.

By the way, a reminder to our fellow illiterate femoid kiwis, Misogyny means hatred of women, in real world there are more misogynistic women than there are misogynistic straight men.
I'd say that generally one of women's biggest flaws is not being able to own culpability and radfems show this 100%.
If something bad happens it's because of men.
If men really can't have been the whole cause then it's because of handmaiden women.
If these handmaidens aren't sufficient enough then the culpability shifts to all straight women.
If that's again not enough the fault lies with the bisluts as well.
If they smell guilt in the lesbian group, it's because some of them are not lesbianing well enough or aren't really lesbian and thus they are guilty (of treason at least).
At the end then you get to the 'core' of really morally perfect poor model lesbians whose only fault was to be born in this shithole world together with all the shitty men and hets.

The moral of the story, to the radfem the guilt is always someone else's.
 
Feminism is fascist and genocidal, at least according to Elisa von Joeden-Forgey of The Lemkin Institute:

GCforGenocide.jpg

"The Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention voices its concern over the growing number of laws introduced in the United States that target transgender individuals and the transgender community. Anti-trans hostility in the US has become a staple of the Republican Party’s election strategy and is clearly being used to stoke voters’ fears of a changing world by raising the specter of a malevolent polluting force tied to liberalism, cosmopolitanism, and democracy. The Lemkin Institute believes that the so-called 'gender critical movement' that is behind these laws is a fascist movement furthering a specifically genocidal ideology that seeks the complete eradication of trans identity from the world."


A judge and and an equality watchgroup have both stated that GC views are a protected belief:



So apparently the person behind this Lemkin Institute is one "Elisa von Joeden-Forgey, Co-Founder and Co-President of the Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention, endowed Chair in Holocaust and Genocide Studies, Keene State College, USA"

https://twitter.com/vonjoedenforgey
https://twitter.com/LemkinInstitute
https://www.linkedin.com/in/elisa-von-joeden-forgey
https://keene.academia.edu/ElisaVonJoedenForgey

This is the woman throwing all other women under the bus for the sake of her activist careerism:



And if you really want to know why Elisa's throwing her fellow women under the bus:

We would love to be able to do this, but we are an all volunteer organization with no budget. However, we are in many conversations with Ethiopians about how we can best be helpful in this terrible and complex context. We stand in solidarity.

As you can see Elisa really desperately wants those gurldiq bux.
She must've noticed where the real NGO money is, and it's obviously not in Ethiopia.
 
View attachment 4143135

The delusions of grandeur really are something. Terfs and troons are two peas in a pod.

The only difference is, Kellie-Jay Keen actually faces legal repercussions for the things she's saying, and doesn't enjoy the same level of institutional support as even the worst kind of troons. I guess they're not the only differences, there's the fact she's right too, that womanhood is not a feeling inside mens heads.

I've never had the police knock on my door to question me for something I said on the Internet, but I can imagine you could get pretty pissed off and righteous after something like that happens.
 
It already has backfired. Never forget, everytime you see a radfem complain about trannies and coomers, they're complaining about the society that they created.

They wanted a society of unlimited permissiveness free from obligation and responsibility that put women on a pedestal.

They denied the biological reality of men and women being different being the reason why rights and privilidges weren't evenly distributed, called it oppression and demanded the whole thing be abolished and reshaped, and what we got is the modern west.

There's a reason trannies and coomers exist only on feminist countries, but they will never acknowledge it because it would show everyone how much lthe two ideologies (TRAs and TERFs) are alike.

They'll blame the patriarchy for trannies until the cows come home despite the fact that in actually patriarchal countries trannies are borderline nonexistent.

sorry you don’t get to marry your eight year old niece in the west anymore, bro. sucks to be a genetically inferior male these days. :story:
 
View attachment 4143135

The delusions of grandeur really are something. Terfs and troons are two peas in a pod.
Daily Reminder that the feminist icon Boudica showed up to battle with 230.000 celts vs 10.000 romans, she lost the battle, 80.000 men, her own life and britain as a whole, while the romans lost only 400 soldiers, crushed the rebellion and secured rule over britain.

The reason celtic loses were so catastrophic is because boudica was so smuggly asured of victory she blocked the celtic escape route with carts holding the soldier's families so they could watch her win, so when they started getting their asses handed to them they couldn't retreat.

This woman is considered a feminist icon btw

Its actually really weird and I don't know why, but feminists pick the worst women in history to claim as icons for some reason.

Another really common one is the woman pirate king, Zheng Yi Sao, she inherited a fleet of 400 ships and 50.000 men in 1807, and by 1810 it was reduced to 24 ships and 1.400 men and she was forced to surrender to the authorities.

Wikipedia calls her the most succesful female pirate and one of the most succesful pirates in history and I'm just sitting here, thinking "She literally lost 95% of the ships she inherited from her husband in the span of 3 years, how is that succesful?"

Both women inherited positions of power from their husbands, crashed and burned losing them spectacularily, and modern feminists view them as aspirational figures. There's a metaphor in there somewhere for modern feminism.
 
It already has backfired. Never forget, everytime you see a radfem complain about trannies and coomers, they're complaining about the society that they created.
I think this is fairly unfair, a lot of the current TERFs were not radfems when the groundwork for the current shitshow that is our society was laid.

Any woman today that doesn't want children groomed or see dicks in their changing rooms doesn't really have anyone other than TERFs to turn to, unless they want to go the even more retarded tradcath route.
 
I think this is fairly unfair, a lot of the current TERFs were not radfems when the groundwork for the current shitshow that is our society was laid.

Any woman today that doesn't want children groomed or see dicks in their changing rooms doesn't really have anyone other than TERFs to turn to, unless they want to go the even more retarded tradcath route.
Turning to terfs to rid society of troonism is like eating raw salt to quench your thrist.

Sexual/Gender liberation is what led to troons existing in the first place, you're not gonna fix a problem that is the result of abolition of traditional values by turning to a cult founded on dismantling traditional values.
 
Turning to terfs to rid society of troonism is like eating raw salt to quench your thrist.
I don't think wamen see it that way.

Sexual/Gender liberation is what led to troons existing in the first place, you're not gonna fix a problem that is the result of abolition of traditional values by turning to a cult founded on dismantling traditional values.
Yes, that's what I wrote in my comment.

The problem is the ones pushing "traditional values" now are fucking retarded sexpests, soyboys and speds that think chanting "RAPE RAPE RAPE" when they encounter a woman is funny and clever.
 
I don't think wamen see it that way.


Yes, that's what I wrote in my comment.

The problem is the ones pushing "traditional values" now are fucking retarded sexpests, soyboys and speds that think chanting "RAPE RAPE RAPE" when they encounter a woman is funny and clever.
You're making it sound like the only options are "Terf" or "Nick Fuentes". Traditionalism, conservatism and religiocity predates the catboy ranch.
 
You're making it sound like the only options are "Terf" or "Nick Fuentes". Traditionalism, conservatism and religiocity predates the catboy ranch.
It's not just Nick Fuentes, he is just the most obvious example. The others e. g. push soy shit like "the proper way to handle your emotions is to cry in public", or get caught doing weird degenerate shit, and most are focused on men. Or just complete retardation like the monarchists.
I just didn't want to list up every single issue with the current right wing, I think they should be mostly self-explanatory.

Just to clarify: I think I agree with your analysis of the problem and solution, I just don't the current rightoids have good solutions (and most of all have huge image problems).

edit: I think dear feeder explained it better than me: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/jerem...unsleeved-media-midwestly.48959/post-11954041
 
Last edited:
Turning to terfs to rid society of troonism is like eating raw salt to quench your thrist.

Sexual/Gender liberation is what led to troons existing in the first place, you're not gonna fix a problem that is the result of abolition of traditional values by turning to a cult founded on dismantling traditional values.
Sexual liberation and gender liberation(abolition) are not the same thing. Sexual liberation was heavily critiziced by radical feminists (I think Andrea Dworkin tackles the topic in her book Right wing women) as was as porn and prostitution that coomers and liberal feminists love so much.

i do agree that there are a lot of points to be critiqued in radical feminism ideals though, and that they are not the solution to troonism
...still better than TRAs though
 
Back