What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

I've always been worried about Alex Jones being a shill conspiracy. Like it's hard to prove but it's not hard to imagine. Everything he's done is an obvious progression anyone in his position would do. But some things are strange. Like he never says jews. Instead he states names of people. Or the amount of people that claim he hijacks events. Or even the claim he's stolen credit for the bohemian grove tapes. It's hard to really believe he's a shill when even in the sandy hook case, he's emails would've shown something. Instead it just revealed that the team against him most likely planted cp on him. Which gives him more credibility. But it doesn't explain everything. So I'm left more confused than anything.
 
the FBI murdered MLK
With some little help of MLK so-called friends like Jesse Jackson. Maybe Steve Cokely was right on target then Jesse Jackson killed MLK.

Btw and on a off-topic sidenote, the guys of ZeroHedge posted a top 10 list of conspiracy theories that'll be validated for 2023.

There has been a lot of talk lately about the “word of the year.”

Some say it is “gaslighting,” which happens to be a personal favorite of mine.

Others say “goblin mode,” a bizarre term linked to Kanye West and Elon Musk that the Left’s semantic gatekeepers have rushed to redefine from a meme that was funny precisely because it had no obvious definition.

In the spirit of New Year’s predictions, I will boldly assert that the same may be true of 2023’s future word of the year, “conspiracy theory.”
 
  • Informative
Reactions: BirdUp
  • The titanic was intentionally sunk to kill opposition to the federal reserve.
  • The jews are extremely tribalistic and have used nepotism and deception to wiggle their way into power.
  • Japan was intentionally provoked into attacking Pearl Harbor.
  • The holocaust never happened.
  • The jews used the holocaust myth to create an apartheid state in Palestine.
  • JFK was assassinated by the CIA.
  • MKUltra is a thing.
  • Petrodollar recycling. The USD is required to be the world reserve currency in order to prevent it from collapsing completely, resulting in the hyper aggressive US foreign policy related to oil.
  • 9/11 was done by the US government in collaboration with the state of Israel and the buildings were demolished using nano-thermite. The motivation was to justify more wars in the Middle East against the state of Israel's enemies and secure the petrodollar. Also to cover up the 2.3 trillion dollars that Donald Rumsfeld announced was unaccounted for on 9/10.
  • Larry Silverstein and other jews related to the WTC were given advanced notice about 9/11, allowing them to not show up the day of, and for Silverstein to take out a massive insurance policy beforehand.
  • The US arms and funds islamic terrorists in order to topple governments that refuse to cater to the US's economic interests (as previously mentioned) and intentionally creates massive civilian collateral damage to radicalize civilians into throwing support behind these terrorists.
  • Neonatal circumcision is done as a form of trauma-based mind control.
  • The elite worship the devil and other demonic entities.
  • Becoming one of the elite requires worshiping the devil and other demonic entities.
  • The elite engage in ritual child sacrifice.
  • Blood libel isn't actually libel because it's true.
  • Jeffrey Epstein didn't kill himself. He's not even dead. He's alive in the state of Israel.
  • The state of Israel is a safe haven for jewish pedophiles escaping prosecution.
  • Releasing the full black book unredacted would implicate the entire government not just in the US, but in Canada and the UK, as well.
  • The British royal family are all in that black book.
  • The on-paper legalization of child molestation will occur by 2030 at the latest, but it will be normalized long before then.
  • 2030 in general is the year that the great reset will be fully implemented.
  • The political left and right have bipartisan agreement on almost everything, and their minor differences are pushed as a psyop for divide and conquer purposes.
  • The government murders anyone who attempts to create a water fuel cell.
  • The government is intentionally overburdening nuclear power with regulations to keep oil and natural gas as the primary source of energy.
  • White genocide is real.
That's just a small number that I can think of off the top of my head.
 
  • The titanic was intentionally sunk to kill opposition to the federal reserve.
  • The jews are extremely tribalistic and have used nepotism and deception to wiggle their way into power.
  • Japan was intentionally provoked into attacking Pearl Harbor.
  • The holocaust never happened.
  • The jews used the holocaust myth to create an apartheid state in Palestine.
  • JFK was assassinated by the CIA.
  • MKUltra is a thing.
  • Petrodollar recycling. The USD is required to be the world reserve currency in order to prevent it from collapsing completely, resulting in the hyper aggressive US foreign policy related to oil.
  • 9/11 was done by the US government in collaboration with the state of Israel and the buildings were demolished using nano-thermite. The motivation was to justify more wars in the Middle East against the state of Israel's enemies and secure the petrodollar. Also to cover up the 2.3 trillion dollars that Donald Rumsfeld announced was unaccounted for on 9/10.
  • Larry Silverstein and other jews related to the WTC were given advanced notice about 9/11, allowing them to not show up the day of, and for Silverstein to take out a massive insurance policy beforehand.
  • The US arms and funds islamic terrorists in order to topple governments that refuse to cater to the US's economic interests (as previously mentioned) and intentionally creates massive civilian collateral damage to radicalize civilians into throwing support behind these terrorists.
  • Neonatal circumcision is done as a form of trauma-based mind control.
  • The elite worship the devil and other demonic entities.
  • Becoming one of the elite requires worshiping the devil and other demonic entities.
  • The elite engage in ritual child sacrifice.
  • Blood libel isn't actually libel because it's true.
  • Jeffrey Epstein didn't kill himself. He's not even dead. He's alive in the state of Israel.
  • The state of Israel is a safe haven for jewish pedophiles escaping prosecution.
  • Releasing the full black book unredacted would implicate the entire government not just in the US, but in Canada and the UK, as well.
  • The British royal family are all in that black book.
  • The on-paper legalization of child molestation will occur by 2030 at the latest, but it will be normalized long before then.
  • 2030 in general is the year that the great reset will be fully implemented.
  • The political left and right have bipartisan agreement on almost everything, and their minor differences are pushed as a psyop for divide and conquer purposes.
  • The government murders anyone who attempts to create a water fuel cell.
  • The government is intentionally overburdening nuclear power with regulations to keep oil and natural gas as the primary source of energy.
  • White genocide is real.
That's just a small number that I can think of off the top of my head.
You forgot that antipsychotics are a jewish conspiracy to keep people from seeing the truth.
 
I've always been worried about Alex Jones being a shill conspiracy. Like it's hard to prove but it's not hard to imagine. Everything he's done is an obvious progression anyone in his position would do. But some things are strange. Like he never says jews. Instead he states names of people. Or the amount of people that claim he hijacks events. Or even the claim he's stolen credit for the bohemian grove tapes. It's hard to really believe he's a shill when even in the sandy hook case, he's emails would've shown something. Instead it just revealed that the team against him most likely planted cp on him. Which gives him more credibility. But it doesn't explain everything. So I'm left more confused than anything.
Do you know that episode in Futurama, iirc the Roswell one, where there's some military dudes investigating the crash landing, and among them there's a conspiracy theorist?

That's Alex Jones to me, a paid governor shill that comes up with the craziest theories and puts in a little bit of truth in there, so that people can discredit the whackiest ideas as lunatic ramblings.
 
Do you know that episode in Futurama, iirc the Roswell one, where there's some military dudes investigating the crash landing, and among them there's a conspiracy theorist?

That's Alex Jones to me, a paid governor shill that comes up with the craziest theories and puts in a little bit of truth in there, so that people can discredit the whackiest ideas as lunatic ramblings.
I'm old enough to remember a time when his web traffic was going through Stratfor infrastructure. Judas goats abound in the modern world.
 
One I saw recently and I think might be true- the adult "age gap" discourse (e.g shaming 30 year old men for dating 20 year old women, the Leonardo DiCaprio stuff) is a psyop by older single women to shame men into dating older (ideally them).

Elder millennials are incredibly intimidated by 20-25 year women. And there's definitely a link between the rise in loneliness/sexual dissatisfaction and the policing of other people's sex lives.

I don't know where it fits into "conspiracy theory" but it's definitely a promoted narratives.

Women as they age out of child baring ages hate the fact that men aren't also aging out of it. So the whole dynamic of attraction shifts. Media is used to promote various "Social goods" or whatever you want to call it.

Also worth noting how the media also likes to have TV shows and films about 50 year old women who can get an endless supply of ripped 23 year old dudes because they're such great sexual partners. That's clear propaganda to try and convince young dudes to bang old ladies.

While some women as they get older may develop a strategy to get laid by basically just offering sex to younger guys. It has limits and only really works on guys who struggle to get laid. Which isn't the ripped Chads depicted.

This makes a lot of sense once you see it through the lenses of eliminating dating competition. It’s a tactic that goes back centuries when you think about how much it was women who engaged in the most “slut shaming”.


The big conspiracy I believe in is that every western political party has been infiltrated by pedophiles who are trying to get their vices normalized.

It’s part of the reason why the whole “sex work is real work” feels like a psy-op to normalize sex trafficking to the point of ensuring that no one cares about it anymore.
I just want to add that I've seen situations where mostly braindead feminists of both genders will call a relationship where both people are consenting adults but there's an older man age gap "pedophilia". As an example, I saw a youtube short once where some airhead was calling Johnny Depp a pedophile because he was an adult in 2001 and Amber Heard was 15. Never mind that Johnny wouldn't have known about her much less met her.

I think you'll end up seeing heckin wholesome kiddy diddlers get the MAP label and be a normalized part of the lgbbq, while "pedophile" gets redefined to an older man dating a early-mid 20s woman at peak fertility instead of either dating some older bpd woman with floor to ceiling Arby's curtains or joining the lgbbq.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kiwisee
I'm not a flat earther or anything, but I do believe that NASA is a huge money laundering operation and they dont fuck around in space nearly as much as they would like you to believe.

I'm having trouble finding it, but theres this video that's supposed to be a livestream of the outside of a space station where a fucking rat walks across the screen, supposedly in the vacuum of space.
 
Twitter / Archive

1672716995637.png


NSIA non-surgical machine interface technology to input multiple channels of information into neural tissue *currently in final testing/transition to implementation phase*
1672717065939.png

5 G niggas got a point


1672717100717.png


if you think it's bullshit here it is

 

Attachments

  • 1672717029225.png
    1672717029225.png
    324.2 KB · Views: 54
I've always been worried about Alex Jones being a shill conspiracy. Like it's hard to prove but it's not hard to imagine. Everything he's done is an obvious progression anyone in his position would do. But some things are strange. Like he never says jews. Instead he states names of people. Or the amount of people that claim he hijacks events. Or even the claim he's stolen credit for the bohemian grove tapes. It's hard to really believe he's a shill when even in the sandy hook case, he's emails would've shown something. Instead it just revealed that the team against him most likely planted cp on him. Which gives him more credibility. But it doesn't explain everything. So I'm left more confused than anything.
Naming The is Jew isn't healthy and Alex no matter how much of shill he may or not is fully aware of the price to paid to if he did. The lawsuit would be the least of his issues
 
I think you'll end up seeing heckin wholesome kiddy diddlers get the MAP label and be a normalized part of the lgbbq, while "pedophile" gets redefined to an older man dating a early-mid 20s woman at peak fertility instead of either dating some older bpd woman with floor to ceiling Arby's curtains or joining the lgbbq.

There already is a slip of terms. Pedo refers to being attracted to children. Pre-pubescent. There's different terms for attracted to infants, people early in puberty, those who are almost through it, at the end and so forth. Not that I remember them, because they are never regularly used.

A 6 year old is very different to a 16 year old and yet the same label gets attached. Of course in the current climate, just pointing this out gets you accused of condoning sexual abuse of 16 year olds. And/or people of all ages below 18.

In polite company, just try and make the case Prince Andrew isn't a dirty Pedo because the girl was 17 and at the legal age of consent where he was and get shouted out of the room. Even though you're not condoning anything that went on in the situation.
 
I've always been worried about Alex Jones being a shill conspiracy. Like it's hard to prove but it's not hard to imagine. Everything he's done is an obvious progression anyone in his position would do. But some things are strange. Like he never says jews. Instead he states names of people. Or the amount of people that claim he hijacks events. Or even the claim he's stolen credit for the bohemian grove tapes. It's hard to really believe he's a shill when even in the sandy hook case, he's emails would've shown something. Instead it just revealed that the team against him most likely planted cp on him. Which gives him more credibility. But it doesn't explain everything. So I'm left more confused than anything.

As Kanye found out, you don't name the Jews. You aren't supposed to know families of Jewish Bankers have ran the worldwide major banks for generations. You can't even bring it up, let alone criticize anything they may do. That said, would things be different if it was Scottish families running the World Banks? I doubt it.
 
As Kanye found out, you don't name the Jews. You aren't supposed to know families of Jewish Bankers have ran the worldwide major banks for generations. You can't even bring it up, let alone criticize anything they may do. That said, would things be different if it was Scottish families running the World Banks? I doubt it.

Probably. Ppl forget that they really think they are God's chosen people. It's almost as if... superior race
 
I personally believe in aspects of false history and very heavily believe in mass medias/social media hypnotic/brainwashing effect.

Also heavily believe in aspects of dead internet/mass AI theories.
 
I've always been worried about Alex Jones being a shill conspiracy. Like it's hard to prove but it's not hard to imagine. Everything he's done is an obvious progression anyone in his position would do. But some things are strange. Like he never says jews. Instead he states names of people. Or the amount of people that claim he hijacks events. Or even the claim he's stolen credit for the bohemian grove tapes. It's hard to really believe he's a shill when even in the sandy hook case, he's emails would've shown something. Instead it just revealed that the team against him most likely planted cp on him. Which gives him more credibility. But it doesn't explain everything. So I'm left more confused than anything.
I'm convinced of it.

The moment I was convinced was when he interviewed a witness to the comet ping pong shooting. The witness went on a bunch of programs, including infowars.

He kept saying that comet ping pong was just a normal pizza place with great pizza. The pizza was so good. Imagine being in his shoes. You go and get pizza. There is an armed gunman that shows up and forces to be let inside. He fires shots at a computer somewhere inside. You go on a number of radio and podcast programs. And you talk about how good the pizza was. What?

There are three reasons that made that interview weird.

His claims were
A. He had never been there before
B. He had heard about the growing pizzagate allegations
C. He took his kids there to get pizza on the fateful day

When he was asked if he heard about it before he says yes, but he realizes it's a mistake, because it's kinda odd to try out a pizza place with your children amidst such a situation. He even rolls his eyes just as he says it, as if saying "d'oh!"

So the three weird things are:
1. He's very belligerent against Alex Jones, and uncharacteristically, Alex Jones responds like a puppy to the guest
2. Claiming he had never been there before, had heard about the allegations and then taking his kids there for pizza
3. He keeps talking about how great the pizza was.

Alex Jones was uncharacteristically low energy. Soon after he kept talking about how we should stop talking about it and how it was an intentionally created distraction. And it obviously wasn't because years after it cooled down, Alefantis of comet ping pong was still repairing things with puff piece interviews.

Thinking about it, he was the first big youtube banning. And if I had a lot of power, I'd see the value of doing it that way. If you do it with someone that's controlled, you know they won't fight a winning legal case and change youtube as anticensorship permanently; rather infowars serves as an object lesson for others.

And you create a good test case to see how platform loyal people are without them letting them get out of your message wheelhouse, because the craziest schizo's and most hardline theorists will go exactly to the guy who's banned. It also allowrd them to delete some videos like the one I mentioned before without arousing suspicion.
 
There used to be a conspiracy theory back in the day about how John Wilkes Booth wasn't actually killed at the Garret farmstead, and instead had used his skills as an actor to fake his death and escape justice. I never hear anyone talk about it anymore, which is a shame.
 
There already is a slip of terms. Pedo refers to being attracted to children. Pre-pubescent. There's different terms for attracted to infants, people early in puberty, those who are almost through it, at the end and so forth. Not that I remember them, because they are never regularly used.

A 6 year old is very different to a 16 year old and yet the same label gets attached. Of course in the current climate, just pointing this out gets you accused of condoning sexual abuse of 16 year olds. And/or people of all ages below 18.

In polite company, just try and make the case Prince Andrew isn't a dirty Pedo because the girl was 17 and at the legal age of consent where he was and get shouted out of the room. Even though you're not condoning anything that went on in the situation.
Just think about the ages of romeo an julliet. Think about it.

Or the common calculation of half man's age +7 as the acceptable dating range. When that equation was first formulated it wasn't the socially acceptable limit, but the recommended ideal age difference.

I think it's good this changed, though.
 
Just think about the ages of romeo an julliet. Think about it.

Or the common calculation of half man's age +7 as the acceptable dating range. When that equation was first formulated it wasn't the socially acceptable limit, but the recommended ideal age difference.

I think it's good this changed, though.
Marrying young is something you do when your family's long term survival relies on having as many babies as possible, especially when there's a high infant mortality rate. I think the mean age of death during back then was about forty? Also, the younger girls start to bear children, the easier the birth process is in the future. This is of course, assuming that she isn't so young when she has her first child that she is permanently physically damaged by the process.

With the old calculation, it basically assumes that the man will spend the extra years in frugal bachelorhood, saving for a property and assets. Then, when he is fiscally stable, he finds a sprightly wife with plenty of childbearing years left to go, and installs her in the house he acquired before he married her. This is also back when men were expected to take care of their wives. The wives didn't have much say in their lives, but socially the emphasis was on husbands making certain that their wives were happy and were provided with the necessary resources to raise a shitton of kids while the husbands were out earning the money.

Sometimes this approach worked well. A lot of the time, it did not.
 
Back