I've always been worried about Alex Jones being a shill conspiracy. Like it's hard to prove but it's not hard to imagine. Everything he's done is an obvious progression anyone in his position would do. But some things are strange. Like he never says jews. Instead he states names of people. Or the amount of people that claim he hijacks events. Or even the claim he's stolen credit for the bohemian grove tapes. It's hard to really believe he's a shill when even in the sandy hook case, he's emails would've shown something. Instead it just revealed that the team against him most likely planted cp on him. Which gives him more credibility. But it doesn't explain everything. So I'm left more confused than anything.
I'm convinced of it.
The moment I was convinced was when he interviewed a witness to the comet ping pong shooting. The witness went on a bunch of programs, including infowars.
He kept saying that comet ping pong was just a normal pizza place with great pizza. The pizza was so good. Imagine being in his shoes. You go and get pizza. There is an armed gunman that shows up and forces to be let inside. He fires shots at a computer somewhere inside. You go on a number of radio and podcast programs. And you talk about how good the pizza was. What?
There are three reasons that made that interview weird.
His claims were
A. He had never been there before
B. He had heard about the growing pizzagate allegations
C. He took his kids there to get pizza on the fateful day
When he was asked if he heard about it before he says yes, but he realizes it's a mistake, because it's kinda odd to try out a pizza place with your children amidst such a situation. He even rolls his eyes just as he says it, as if saying "d'oh!"
So the three weird things are:
1. He's very belligerent against Alex Jones, and uncharacteristically, Alex Jones responds like a puppy to the guest
2. Claiming he had never been there before, had heard about the allegations and then taking his kids there for pizza
3. He keeps talking about how great the pizza was.
Alex Jones was uncharacteristically low energy. Soon after he kept talking about how we should stop talking about it and how it was an intentionally created distraction. And it obviously wasn't because years after it cooled down, Alefantis of comet ping pong was still repairing things with puff piece interviews.
Thinking about it, he was the first big youtube banning. And if I had a lot of power, I'd see the value of doing it that way. If you do it with someone that's controlled, you know they won't fight a winning legal case and change youtube as anticensorship permanently; rather infowars serves as an object lesson for others.
And you create a good test case to see how platform loyal people are without them letting them get out of your message wheelhouse, because the craziest schizo's and most hardline theorists will go exactly to the guy who's banned. It also allowrd them to delete some videos like the one I mentioned before without arousing suspicion.