Lolcow Todd Daugherty / N9OGL / Fox Smith / Doc Dot - Domestic terrorist, ham radio sperg, self-described hikikomori, confirmed pedophile

[Dirty Harry]

Yes, they described it as child pornography. So you lied when you said it was lolicon. The child porn was in open sight on searching your files on the computer (that you forfeited by not asking for it back properly).

This is what is going to happen.

1. Expert witnesses will say it is child porn
2. The judge and jury will believe them and not you when it goes to trial
3. You will be found guilty

That is exactly how your public defender is going to present it to you. That's why you are going to take a plea deal if offered.

And I love how bad your mental illiness and delusions have gotten. He thinks he's smarter than lawyer

And the court believed the expert witness, not you as this proves.

10/13/2022

SA; PDS W/ D IN CUST OF CCJ; ISP INVEST DORWART SWORN AND TESTIFIES; CT FINDS PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE FELONY; D WAIVES FORMAL ARRAIGNMENT; PNG; JURY DEMAND; ON D'S MOTION PT ONLY 11/22/22 AT 11AM.

 

[N9OGL]

Yes, they described it as child pornography. So you lied when you said it was lolicon. The child porn was in open sight on searching your files on the computer (that you forfeited by not asking for it back properly).

This is what is going to happen.

1. Expert witnesses will say it is child porn
2. The judge and jury will believe them and not you when it goes to trial
3. You will be found guilty

That is exactly how your public defender is going to present it to you. That's why you are going to take a plea deal if offered.

And I love how bad your mental illiness and delusions have gotten. He thinks he's smarter than lawyer

View attachment 4165890

There were over 1,000 images on it. only ONE was according to the state child porn, again that is what the state is claiming. Secondly no it was in plain view as you claim. how the fuck you know? The state police testified that the FBI gave up searching for the threat because they couldn't find anything, so they went beyond warrant (which IS illegal) and began looking for other "contraband"

I will also have computer forensic expert who will help me.

and I will appeal on the two issues I have with this case.

Nowhere have I stated I smarter than the lawyer, I merely stated I could pass the bar exam with opening a book. You're the one that thinks I'm an idiot, and I'm not.

No, he was the state trooper who arrested me.
Judici.com doesn't tell you everything that goes on or what is said.

CORRECTION: no it was NOT in plain view as you claimed.

 

[Monkey Shoulder]

How was your Christmas Todd?

 

[N9OGL]

To me, it's just another day

 

[Dirty Harry]

I will also have computer forensic expert who will help me.

You can't afford one and your Public Defender doesn't have the budget to hire one for a "witch hunt" and more then likely won't apply for funding for one. More then likely, she will tell you that a computer foresnic expert will testify to the same thing, that it's child porn. If every client demanded "experts" in public defender office, it would go bankrupt within days.

You're the one that thinks I'm an idiot, and I'm not.

I can assure you 100% that I am not the only one who thinks that.

and I will appeal on the two issues I have with this case.

While you are in State Prison and appeals can take a long, long time. That's why you are going to plead out if offered. Just like the 2 other times you ran your mouth and ended up taking guilty plea deals (in 2010 and 2012).

Again, this is what is going to happen.

1. Expert witnesses from the state and FBI will testify that it is child porn
2. A jury or judge will believe them and not you
3. You will be found guilty

As I said Toad, you can only harm your case by running your mouth about it, none of this childish ranting and anything you say on a forum can be used against you in the court case, and certainly used by the judge when it comes to sentencing. No lawyer in the world would want their client discussing their case in any manner on the internet. It's almost certain that your public defender doesn't know you are doing this.

But you know everything, don't you?

I made a typo

none of this childish ranting and anything you say on a forum can be used against you in the court case,

I meant.... None of this childish ranting and anything you can on a forum CAN NOT HELP YOU, it can only hurt your court case.

If you want to play Perry Mason against the advise of any legal council, go ahead.

 

[N9OGL]

Nope, apparently you have no understanding of what's going on. YOU can't hide what you're planning to do in court. Unlike television and movies where you hide what you are planning to do in court, that isn't how it is done in reality. The only way a person can hurt themselves when talking is if they admit it online or something ALL I have said here and on my own forum is what I plan to challenge in court in regard to this case and will appeal if need be.

I plan to challenge the warrants in regard to them being quashed in 2018 if they weren't quashed then they went beyond the scope of the warrant and that is it. either way the evidence is going to be suppressed and the charges dismissed.

 

[Spergichu]

To me, it's just another day

No wonder. I can't imagine someone facing Possession of CP charges being on Santa's nice list.

 

[N9OGL]

"You can't afford one and your Public Defender doesn't have the budget to hire one for a "witch hunt" and more then likely won't apply for funding for one. More then likely, she will tell you that a computer foresnic expert will testify to the same thing, that it's child porn. If every client demanded "experts" in public defender office, it would go bankrupt within days."

They have to I don't have the money for it, and if I don't get one then I don't get fair trial, and a lawyer who represent a client can't say "we can't get a computer forensic expert and even if we were to get one, he would say the same thing" that too would prove that it's not a fair trial. I want also to point out that you seem to think it cut and dry but it not. there is a LOT more to it, and a Lot I haven't said.

 

[Dirty Harry]

To me, it's just another day

God, what a horrible, miserable life you must have.

I spent mine with my children, grandchildren and wife.

If evil does exist, you are it.

They have to I don't have the money for it, and if I don't get one then I don't get fair trial,

Incorrect and as I stated above, if every client a public defender has asked for a "expert witness", they would go bankrupt by the 6th of this year. And I bet your public defender will concede it's child porn and also realize that hiring an expert would detemine the same result, so she isn't going to ask for one.

Notice she hasn't filed for funding for one nor applied for you to get access to files under 415c?

Remember she is the lawyer and she is in charge of your defense. She will do what she believes is best for you, regardless if you believe otherwise or ramble on about shit after shit.

No wonder. I can't imagine someone facing Possession of CP charges being on Santa's nice list.

I feel almost sorry for Toad, such a horrible life just like Dr Robert McKim. His family must hate him, the town hates him and the internet hates him.

Meanwhile, my daughter and wife combined to give me one gift, Traeger Pro 575 smoker grill for our cookouts this spring and summer. But the real fun of course is watching the grandkids open their gifts... If you are a parent or grandparent, there is nothing more special then that on Christmas morning.

So Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to the KiwiFarms community.

 

[N9OGL]

God, what a horrible, miserable life you must have.

I spent mine with my children, grandchildren and wife.

If evil does exist, you are it.



Incorrect and as I stated above, if every client a public defender has asked for a "expert witness", they would go bankrupt by the 6th of this year. And I bet your public defender will concede it's child porn and also realize that hiring an expert would detemine the same result, so she isn't going to ask for one.

Notice she hasn't filed for funding for one nor applied for you to get access to files under 415c?

Remember she is the lawyer and she is in charge of your defense. She will do what she believes is best for you, regardless if you believe otherwise or ramble on about shit after shit.

Then it would be a fair trial. Everyone has the right to fair trial. A person accused of a crime has a right to defend themselves, hint the word "accused" a person isn't guilty until it's all said and done.

That's where you are wrong. She is going to ask for an expert. haven't yet because we are still in pre-trial. As for me getting access to files under 415c that was filed and approved by the judge back in November.

if she changes my defense and do what she believes is best for me as you stated, regardless of my believe then she violates a number of canons which lawyers must follow.

 

[Dirty Harry]

Well, well, Mr Daugherty admits they have more than 1,000 documents of evidence against him.

Todd Daugherty wrote:

I saw the folder, there is well over 1,000 documents. so, it will take some time. I'm in hurry I'm going to drag this out as long as I can. It's the retarded TAXPAYERS that are flipping the bill because they hired those MORONS. I mean who hires a state attorney who allows law enforcement

So much it being just a "photo" they found on his computer.

if she changes my defense and do what she believes is best for me as you stated, regardless of my believe then she violates a number of canons which lawyers must follow.

Incorrect. She is bound to do what she feels is the best defense for their client. She is the lawyer, not you.

You are a "know it all client" and will be treated accordingly by her. You are always welcomed to fire her and either hire your own lawyer or be your own lawyer. "Know it all clients" often act out out of fear and low self-esteem, which is why you out act.

She is going to ask for an expert

No she won't if she knows it's child porn, then hiring an expert will have the same conclusion and a waste of money. She is going to defend you as if the photo is child porn (or 100s of other photos they have but are not charging you with, as you said they have over 1,000 documents).

And judge would reject the request for funding if he feels it's child porn beyond question, which he already has stated with the probable cause.

Poor Toad, still banned from Twitter despite multiple attempts to get his lifetime ban lifted for threats.. Which is a violation of his bail agreement prohibiting him from social media accounts.

 

[Trombonista]

@Dirty Harry just because @N9OGL doubleposts doesn't mean you have to as well.

 

[Dirty Harry]

You're right Trombonista and I apologize for that. And I'll leave it at this about Toad as this is the type of client his public defender is dealing with.

3. Know-It-All Client

The Know-It-All client goes hand-in-hand with The Habitual Client. They may question your every decision in their case and try to “take over” your legal process at the first sign of perceived fumbling. Again, it’s important to assert your legal knowledge and course of action is executed with their best interests, effectively letting them know who needs to be in charge. It’s important to note: people deal with stressful situations differently. The Know-It-All client might be expressing extreme fear or lack of control in needing to depend on an attorney at all. This could be the source of their desire to tell you how their case should be handled.

 

[Diesel Dawg]

Toad can practice his music.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWWgN7837Tk

 

[N9OGL]

There is a lot more too it then oh it's child porn. again, there is the two issues with the warrants, the time (the fact it took 4 years) and under Illinois the accused must have been aware that the person in the image is under the age of 18. Like I said here, and on my site, I don't know the person and I don't know where the image came from. In Illinois it's a lot more to it then we it's child porn and they are guilty.

If they don't give me access to an expert then my right to a fair trial is violated; because everyone has the right to defend themselves in court, that includes allowing experts to testify on your behalf. If they don't allow me to have an expert, then I will ask for mistrial because I'm not being allowed to defend myself and I'm not going to get a fair trial.
As for the bail issue, judge can't ban someone from social media or the internet (Packingham v North Caroline US Supreme Court 2017) especially someone who has only been accused of a crime. just because you've been accused of a crime doesn't mean you lose your rights.

(720 ILCS 5/11-20.1) (from Ch. 38, par. 11-20.1)

Sec. 11-20.1. Child pornography.

(a) A person commits child pornography who: (1) films, videotapes, photographs, or otherwise depicts or portrays by means of any similar visual medium or reproduction or depicts by computer any child whom he or she knows or reasonably should know to be under the age of 18 or any person with a severe or profound intellectual disability

 

[Fwiffo]

There is a lot more too it then oh it's child porn. again, there is the two issues with the warrants, the time (the fact it took 4 years) and under Illinois the accused must have been aware that the person in the image is under the age of 18. Like I said here, and on my site, I don't know the person and I don't know where the image came from. In Illinois it's a lot more to it then we it's child porn and they are guilty.

If they don't give me access to an expert then my right to a fair trial is violated; because everyone has the right to defend themselves in court, that includes allowing experts to testify on your behalf. If they don't allow me to have an expert, then I will ask for mistrial because I'm not being allowed to defend myself and I'm not going to get a fair trial.
As for the bail issue, judge can't ban someone from social media or the internet (Packingham v North Caroline US Supreme Court 2017) especially someone who has only been accused of a crime. just because you've been accused of a crime doesn't mean you lose your rights.

Social media is a service, not a right. You will not be deprived of life or liberty by getting banned from Twitter. Social media are businesses, and like any business they can refuse service to anyone, for any (non-discriminatory) reason.

You might have a case if you claim that Twitter banned you because of your mental retardation diagnosis, though.

 

[Dirty Harry]

under Illinois the accused must have been aware that the person in the image is under the age of 18.

any child whom he or she knows or reasonably should know to be under the age of 18

That's two different statements. So which is it? The "I didn't know she was underaged" excuse never, ever works... And your lawyer won't allow it. Remember she is the lawyer, not you, and she and only she will determine your defense strategy unless you fire her and act as your own attorney.

Now an argument that Todd Daugherty, who was branded retarded in grade school and finished high school a year late in Special Education (SWEP), is incapable to tell the difference between child porn and regular porn.

And again, for someone who claims the police planted the image while he was in jail and never has seen it seems to know every single detail of the photo and I'm sure with 1,000 documents of evidence, they got a lot more they will present in trial then just "one photo". Isn't that amazing?

And you can argue for a mistrial or an appeal all you want from inside a prison cell.... which can take years...

 

[N9OGL]

I just put this here... the first images were the 2018 arrest. note the ticket date as March 16th, 2018. The second is the child porn one and the ticket date is March 21st, 2018, the same day the warrant for the computers regarding the threat was issued. make you kind of think. Was the threat against the school created by the police to give them probably cause to get access to my computer?

 

[Diesel Dawg]

I just put this here... the first images were the 2018 arrest. note the ticket date as March 16th, 2018. The second is the child porn one and the ticket date is March 21st, 2018, the same day the warrant for the computers regarding the threat was issued. make you kind of think. Was the threat against the school created by the police to give them probably cause to get access to my computer?

You're going to prison.

 

[N9OGL]

You're going to prison.

I don't see how. They are basically saying they found the material the same day the warrant was issued by the judge to search the computer. meaning the warrant which was limited to “Peer to peer file trading software; any and all information pertaining to dates and times of access to computer; any and all information pertaining to Internet searches pertaining to posts regarding threats of violence directed toward schools or public official; records and other items which evidence ownership or use of computer equipment found in the above residence; including but not limited to sales receipts, bills for Internet access and handwritten notes, records evidencing occupancy or ownership of then premises described above including but not limited to utility and telephone bills, mail envelopes or address correspondence" didn't mean squat and they were going to rummage through it anyway (Which BTW is ILLEGAL). I also want to state again this also raises the question was it the local police that made that threat against a school? So, they arrested me on fake charges so they could have access to my computer? After all Dorwart (Illinois State Trooper) stated the police were trying to go after me for years over the anime stuff. (YES I said anime stuff because in some parts of Illinois the police are too stupid to know the difference between real child porn and anime - like some people on here)