Business Elon Musk throws out Twitter's political advertising ban in a quest for revenue to save his floundering social media company - So now twitter is a 'floundering social media company'


Elon Musk throws out Twitter's political advertising ban in a quest for revenue to save his floundering social media company​

Kali Hays
Tue, January 3, 2023 at 8:38 p.m. AST·2 min read

  • Elon Musk is lifting Twitter's ban on political ads.
  • This ban was first put in place by Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey.
  • Twitter is struggling financially, Musk has said. Billions are spent on political ads each year.
Political advertising is returning to Twitter after a three-year hiatus.

Twitter will be "expanding" the amount of political advertising allowed on the platform and "relaxing" current rules around all "cause-based" advertising, the site's safety department said on Tuesday. Political ads in their entirety have been prohibited on Twitter since 2019.

"Moving forward, we will align our advertising policy with that of TV and other media outlets," Twitter Safety wrote on its Twitter account. TV advertising falls under the oversight of the Federal Communications Commission, which does not fact check any form of advertising, political or otherwise.

Previous Twitter CEO and co-founder Jack Dorsey took a hard line to banning political ads, saying a "political message reach should be earned, not bought" and that the rise of political advertising online and the practice of microtargeting was creating "significant ramifications that today's democratic infrastructure may not be prepared to handle." These policies, which he put in place, are still available on its business website.

As a result of Dorsey's policies, cause-based ads, like those promoting a specific action toward a predetermined outcome, have been limited on Twitter. Targeting an audience based on zip code, for instance, is currently not allowed, and groups that want to run cause-based ads need to commit to certain criteria.

Since Elon Musk took over Twitter at the end of October, the company's finances have deteriorated as brands and advertisers fled. Its business is based almost entirely on advertising, but under Musk's chaotic reign, he let go 70% of Twitter's staff, including most of the people responsible for monitoring the kind of user content ads appeared next to.

Musk has also continued to make controversial and political statements, leaving advertisers in no hurry to return. Now, the billionaire is looking for any way he can to cut costs and drive revenue. He's compared the company to "a plane headed towards the ground."

Political advertisers spend many billions of dollars a year. In 2022, digital advertising for all political campaigns in the U.S. exceeded $3 billion in the U.S., according to Insider Intelligence. More than $1.5 billion was spent in 2020, a presidential election year, mostly on digital ads and TV.

Are you a Twitter employee or someone else with insight to share? Contact Kali Hays at khays@insider.com, on secure messaging app Signal at 949-280-0267, or through Twitter DM at @hayskali. Reach out using a non-work device.

Read the original article on Business Insider
 
Hm, a media platform I dislike is failing and losing money. Many such cases. Very sad. And… a very repetitive attack? Many such cases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kiwisee
You know, I find it really strange how before Musk bought Twitter you never really saw articles talking about how it was a bot and pedo infested platform and how their finances weren't doing all that great however now that Musk owns it all you heard about is how Twitter is a cesspool of hate and disinformation that is causing the company billions and that now all the brave and selfless journalists are having to flee the site because evil dictator Elon "The Rocket man" Musk is in charge of their "bastion of free speech".
Really strange you know.
 
Elon's not really driving it into the ground though, it's the former controllers / money people / media butthurt they aren't in control anymore. Notice how all the bad press ratcheted up the minute it switched hands.
Little do they know they're playing into our hands. Now at last we have become the jews.
 
A very prudent move on Musk's part, political ads are a multimillion dollar enterprise, Twitter will flourish with money if he does it. The only reason I could see for Twitter not doing it before is putting on an apolitical front while they hypocritically take FBI money under the table. Seems to defeat its own purpose, unless appearances were the only purpose, which is something the FBI were overtly concerned about.
 
Previous Twitter CEO and co-founder Jack Dorsey took a hard line to banning political ads, saying a "political message reach should be earned, not bought" and that the rise of political advertising online and the practice of microtargeting was creating "significant ramifications that today's democratic infrastructure may not be prepared to handle."
That's a lot of words to say "We don't allow anyone right of Mao to post or advertise shit."
 
Why is no one in the media asking the most important question: how in the FUCK did twitter stay afloat for a decade hemorrhaging tens of millions of dollars in worthless do-nothing staff, overpriced rental agreements, and by limiting advertisers? Where was the money coming from to pay their bills?
 
Why is no one in the media asking the most important question: how in the FUCK did twitter stay afloat for a decade hemorrhaging tens of millions of dollars in worthless do-nothing staff, overpriced rental agreements, and by limiting advertisers? Where was the money coming from to pay their bills?
Dumb Boomer venture capitalists who threw money into whatever ongoing dumpster fire Wired told them to from approximately 2008-2018.
Also, according to a few insiders, some very lucrative Hollywood promotional contracts in the leadup to Trump's notoriety finally putting them in the black once he was in office.
 
Why is no one in the media asking the most important question: how in the FUCK did twitter stay afloat for a decade hemorrhaging tens of millions of dollars in worthless do-nothing staff, overpriced rental agreements, and by limiting advertisers? Where was the money coming from to pay their bills?
The same reason why The CW lasted for 16 years while not making a single profit since its inception. It’s now culturally acceptable to live off of debt.

It’s clear that progressives and leftists play by different rules and different standards, hence why this article is written this way. Twitter was a failure before Musk came into the picture; they just refuse to acknowledge it despite the evidence and hide behind a computer screen.
 
Previous Twitter CEO and co-founder Jack Dorsey took a hard line to banning political ads, saying a "political message reach should be earned, not bought"
And anyone who did organically earn millions of followers and significant reach was simply banned if they didn't align with Twitter's approved political slant.
 
Don't worry, the next slime on deck for leadership is guaranteed to be a jew - either that cabal one or the one pumping seed into Trump's daughter. So same shit, different year. Clownworld "normalcy" is already returning to the propaganda birdhouse.
 
While visiting my family this Christmas, my sister, father, and mother, none of whom use Twitter, all confidently said that Twitter is dying because of Musk. My sister said that now anyone can impersonate a celebrity, and didn't understand what I was talking about when I tried to explain the difference between the changeable display name and the actual handle and how Twitter verification actually worked. My dad parroted the media line about how racism increased 400% since Elon took over. My mom says she doesn't like Elon but could not elaborate why.
 
Why is no one in the media asking the most important question: how in the FUCK did twitter stay afloat for a decade hemorrhaging tens of millions of dollars in worthless do-nothing staff, overpriced rental agreements, and by limiting advertisers? Where was the money coming from to pay their bills?
Because of the Silicon Valley mentality of users = money.
So investors pump money into it thinking they'll figure out a way to make money out of it eventually.

Now that it's private, new money has stopped coming in and Twitter needs to find a way stand on its own feet.
 
Back