Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 52 16.3%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.4%

  • Total voters
    319
I remember a few years ago that when talking about Drexel, Rekieta use to say how they have approached life very differently in terms of relationships and sexual activities, with the obvious inference being that Drexel was a swinger/degenerate and that Rekieta was the loving husband who was "normal" in his sexual proclivities.

Now he tries to suggest he has always been a degenerate, so is he lying now or was he lying a few years ago?
 
He is getting very close to it now with popping in youtube comments and fighting with commenters. He clearly doesn't like the clips involving him. He even went super gay and said that they were private streams and lacked context.

Will he come out and say not to do it? no. But he is clearly taking steps to make the clipping and discussion of his locals harder in his mind. Yet another hypocrisy of his. He is fine when clip channels are roasting others but he can't take even the tiniest bit of criticism.
Does he like it? No. Will he tell people to stop? No. He still has lolbertarian takes underneath the libertine presentation that have not been undermined so far.

He's argued with chat, DISCORD, and clip channels before (well documented in this thread). There is nothing new.

Him making the LOCALS chat harder to access is easily justified as a economic measure to keep his wine mom Karens from being too scared to engage in the degeneracy that they all thrive in. Being a lolbert does NOT mean he has to make it easy for Farmers to mock him. What is the barrier anyway? 5 USD per month? Yes, he is making it SO hard to mock and discuss.

EDIT: He has to say something, otherwise the narrative is up to anyone to write (e.g. the Vic PR disaster of saying nothing for years), but I do not think even he is coom-addled enough to think he will convince most people. It is damage control; not propaganda or offensive PR. Whoever will keep sucking him off will keep doing it, and those comments will serve as proof enough for them.
 
And now they realize he is one of them and was just pretending all along. Because really, he doesn't disagree with a large section of them on anything, it turns out.
Nah, you know those types never forget everytime they were fatshamed by some "Alt-Right, CHUD lawyer" in a fly-over state and were terribly shaken over it. The unforgivable sin, next to being called "groomers that belong on a wall".
 
He is getting very close to it now with popping in youtube comments and fighting with commenters.
Dudes always fought with his comments. It’s just rare to see now because he is way bigger.
He clearly doesn't like the clips involving him.
No. He dislikes clips taking him out of context. Which he always has.
He even went super gay and said that they were private streams and lacked context.
That’s very much true though.

And dude has always had a problem with people taking him out of context to make him look like something he thinks he isn’t.

He’s got mad many times when people do this. It’s where his whole ‘on the wall’ issue came from, for the biggist and recent example.
But he is clearly taking steps to make the clipping and discussion of his locals harder in his mind. Yet another hypocrisy of his.
Or he just wants to grift money. To get that stuff you have to pay him.
He is fine when clip channels are roasting others but he can't take even the tiniest bit of criticism.
Dudes taken sheds loads of criticism. Dude does not like taking it for stuff that’s wrong or out of context.

He’s been on so many rants on this issue I could probably but together a Nose Length Stream of nothing but.
 
Now he tries to suggest he has always been a degenerate, so is he lying now or was he lying a few years ago?
He was telling the truth at the time, but his mid-life crisis has shifted his priorities in life and the only way to justify it to himself is to pretend this is how it always was.
 
You've heard of the cock cage
Now try the Ball Bastille
ezgif-2-06909b853c.gif
ezgif-2-b17cc44bc9.jpg
 
The Hedonism II shit was impossible to spin, so his only reaction has been a bizarre doubling down on this behavior and shredding any remaining impression his show is "conservative" or "trad" in favor of balldos and washed up thots.
Nick is 100% conservative. Conservatives love based gays, late middle aged women who dress scantily to titillate their son's friends, being cucked by blacks, and Lady MAGA.

Obviously he isn't 'traditional' or 'moral' in any way. Those things are the antithesis of Ammurrican conservatism.
 
He was telling the truth at the time, but his mid-life crisis has shifted his priorities in life and the only way to justify it to himself is to pretend this is how it always was.
Him repeatedly drunkenly raving about how great a movie American Beauty is should've probably been the clearest warning sign.
 
Now he tries to suggest he has always been a degenerate, so is he lying now or was he lying a few years ago?
I think you are getting a bit confused.

Compared to Drex, Nick is very, very normal.

Still a degrn. But boringly normal in that regard.

I think people took it to be he wasn’t a degen period. That was the incorrect reading on that.
 
What Nick needs to do is go back to Bible Study, tradcath that he is.

Matthew 5:27-30, “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
If your right eye causes you to stumble, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell. And if your right hand causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell.


In other words, THOU SHALT NOT BE A SWINGER/CUCKOLD.
 
There are probably many more, but these are the ones I can name without trying.
I'm a basically a nobody amongst the examples you just rattled off, but I'll also note he gave me a rash of shit when I criticized him for associating with Ralph and tried to convince him not to. Afterwards, some hardcore Rekieta fans were less than kind to me.

I have no desire to re-fight that old battle (and Ralph eventually rendered it moot anyways), but I only bring it up to bolster your point that at no point did I think Nick "ordered" anyone to go after me. And if I don't think he did, I don't know why anyone else would. I could be an asshole and try and claim he did, but then I would be grossly dishonest and unfair.

Similarly, CGoody probably isn't getting marching orders from Nick to go after Elissa. He's just doing that on his own in the hope of cummies from Nick and his fellow fans. Nick is probably agnostic towards what he's doing too.

Anyways, there's your "insider baseball," albeit three years stale. Nick's "capos" really aren't because they are self-appointed weirdos seeking parasocial relationships with him.

In fact, I think one of the only people Nick ever charged with anything is Soter to run the Discord. And that is an employee-employer relationship because he was paid.

What this boils down to is Nick has issues he can control, and others he can't. He has limited control over his followers, but total control over his content and demeanor. His biggest problem these days is the radical turn his content and demeanor has taken. The fans drowning in cope are a almost a sideshow to laugh at.

Does he like it? No. Will he tell people to stop? No. He still has lolbertarian takes underneath the libertine presentation that have not been undermined so far.
Yeah, what I'm observing is that he's bitching at Elissa (which is kinda cringe), but he IS stopping well short of telling her to stop.

No. He dislikes clips taking him out of context. Which he always has.
Yeah, but how is Elissa clipping in a way that provides inadequate context?

He's absolutely 100% within his right to make that argument, but does it prevail?

Him repeatedly drunkenly raving about how great a movie American Beauty is should've probably been the clearest warning sign.
I actually liked American Beauty, but I'll be the first to admit absolutely NOBODY should emulate the way Kevin Spacey's character acted in that. I saw the movie as a cautionary tale. It depicts a suburban middle aged man going through an unarrested mid-life crisis, and how it leads to his downfall.

I'm sure that's not the way the hoity toity professional lefty critics saw it, and I'm interpreting it "wrong," but IDGAF.

Movie spoiler:
May Nick's mid-life crisis NOT end with a closeted homosexual Marine Colonel shooting him in the head.
 
I actually liked American Beauty, but I'll be the first to admit absolutely NOBODY should emulate the way Kevin Spacey's character acted in that. I saw the movie as a cautionary tale. It depicts a suburban middle aged man going through an unarrested mid-life crisis, and how it leads to his downfall.

I'm sure is not the way the hoity toity professional lefty critics saw it, and I'm interpreting it "wrong," but IDGAF.

Movie spoiler:
May Nick's mid-life crisis NOT end with a closeted homosexual Marine Colonel shooting him in the head.
I don't really know or care about how the critics saw it and I don't really care about the morality of anything that comes out of hollywood because lol, but it's really telling that the guy who thinks shoving whiskey bottles up his ass and putting his balls in a cage is fun would relate to the Kevin Spacey character from that movie. If his midlife crisis does end in a similar way I hope it's at least on camera.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Not Who You Think
it's really telling that the guy who thinks shoving whiskey bottles up his ass and putting his balls in a cage is fun would relate to the Kevin Spacey character from that movie.
I actually haven't seen his AB rants. If somebody wants to post them here, that might be fun to go over again.

If he saw it as a "how-to guide," and not a warning, yeah. That's not good.

Would a fake Marine Officer like @Spectre_06 count?
I just threw up a little at the thought of Spectre trying to kiss anyone. Regardless of gender. Thanks for that.

Still, it seems oddly appropriate to rate your post Semper Fi. LOL.
 
Last edited:
I actually haven't seen his AB rants. If somebody wants to post them here, that might be fun to go over again.

If he saw it as a "how-to guide," and not a warning, yeah. That's not good.
He basically fetishized the idea of how an "unchained man" like the Spacey character is dangerous to "the system" while coping about how yes he was perving on a teenager but he got cosmically "punished" for it in the movie's logic by being murdered for unrelated reasons anyway or something gay like that so it's totally not glamorizing what he did. Basically he enjoys the idea of being an unfettered degenerate retard but wants to pretend he still has morals.
 
When has that EVER been Nose's style? He does NOT want to be the Nose Pope that everyone else wants him to be. He has said forever that internet groups are gay and full of drama.

Why do people insist on making him into a YT Mafia boss and propounding unproveable claims that 'if he had said something, of course they would listen'. If he had with LB it would have been the EXACT thing that she did to get people mad at her--trying to gatekeep and police other streamers' behaviour.

Let's see some examples:

He stuck by the Gunt (much longer than most would say is prudent) and never told any of his various streamer buddies not to mock or shame him. There were many people who did so.

He always said that EVS the FROG was his friend and was nothing but nice to him. Never told any of his buddies to stop messing with him or anything to do with Warcampaign faggotry. If anything, he told people not to do dumb shit that was illegal--that's it. He never told any anti-CG people to stop messing with him.

Same for Douggy Tenapples and Mike Miller, but from the other side.

Hell, he hangs out with Destiny and has streamed with him, and God knows he has an army of haters.

Then let's bring up Sargon... beautiful Soygon... with his legion of haters stretching back a decade.

There are probably many more, but these are the ones I can name without trying.


The 'well he did not say anything, so he must be A-OK with it' is such a basic bitch self-confirmation bias. Instead of asking why he didn't help LB, maybe look at the literal nil count of times he has ever told anyone to stop clipping or covering something.

See Manning's take below:
I don't think I am making my point clear so I will try again to explain myself before giving up

A: Nick hates drama
B: Nick hates the appearance of being involved in drama since that could be damaging

A ≠ B

In all of those cases you mention shutting the fuck up both publicly and privately is consistent with both A and B, which is different than when your close personal friend for decades goes scorched earth on somebody explicitly to defend your honor.

In that case if you really wanted to avoid drama you would probably privately ask your close personal friend for decades to knock it off.

You seem to think I'm saying Nick should or could or did or does order around his fanbase which is not what I'm saying, I do think he would and could have asked Drex to lay off LB if he wanted to for instance
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Captain Manning
In that case if you really wanted to avoid drama you would probably privately ask your close personal friend for decades to knock it off.
I get what you're saying here, but didn't we achieve consensus a long time ago that his shiny new "I hate drama" claim is complete fucking horseshit? He LOVES drama. His channel wouldn't exist without it. Legal drama is still drama.

The only reason why he's going with the "I hate drama" crap now is because he's now at the center of it in a way that's derisive towards HIM.

I do think he would and could have asked Drex to lay off LB if he wanted to for instance
Sure, technically he could have. If he actually had an I hate drama position when the LB shit was going on, maybe he would have. But again, that position is freshly minted, and not coincidentally so.

EDIT: Typo.
 
Last edited:
I don't think I am making my point clear so I will try again to explain myself before giving up

A: Nick hates drama
B: Nick hates the appearance of being involved in drama since that could be damaging

A ≠ B

In all of those cases you mention shutting the fuck up both publicly and privately is consistent with both A and B, which is different than when your close personal friend for decades goes scorched earth on somebody explicitly to defend your honor.

In that case if you really wanted to avoid drama you would probably privately ask your close personal friend for decades to knock it off.

You seem to think I'm saying Nick should or could or did or does order around his fanbase which is not what I'm saying, I do think he would and could have asked Drex to lay off LB if he wanted to for instance
You brought up 'fans', then said 'streamers' like Andrew, now it is 'Drex'. If you had him in mind, then make it clear and stop shifting the goalposts of the argument.

What do you say about how he handled the Drex and fat lip Q(anon) drama? He had Drex on to say what he had to say about it while actively disclaiming any personal issue himself. If you want to spin that into a 'he was there to make a tissue paper denial but really wanted it' that is stretching things thin without evidence of past consistent behaviour with this speculation.

There is all time Drex picked Twitter fights with people ragging on Nick.

Drex also ranted hard about NIck detractors on his show.

Why is Nick Drex's keeper? Is Drex not allowed to speak his mind if it involves Nick?

EDIT: To clarify, Nick hates being caught with drama mud sticking to him. He is not averse to it for its own sake, but he has managed to stay clear of most of the mud other people wallowed in.
 
He obviously wanted Null to start countersignalling to his herd of cats that Rackets is not in fact acting like a complete retard spiraling into degeneracy and doing stupid shit like buying a Mustang GT 500 in Minnesota during the winter and immediately crashing it.

Motherfucker knows that his shit is all fucked up and he wants the Avian Agriculture Agora to stop noticing.
Wait, he DID that? Shows how close I watch this thread. That's fucking hilarious. Nick, it comes with summer tires, you wacko. Shit'll lose it on dry pavement in Minnesota winter temps.

But more importantly if I didn't know that means it probably wasn't featured. Which it would be for any cow. In other words, Nick, you had the Farms Pass. And now you've quite literally fucked it.
 
Back