Harry Potter books stripped of J.K. Rowling's name are then resold by 'bookbinder artist' - 'Book artist' takes used books, removes Rowling's name — a project 'spurred by her transphobia,' [s]he claims

By Maureen Mackey | Fox News
Published January 11, 2023 4:43pm EST

A 23-year-old individual in Toronto, Canada, has been hard at work "removing" J.K. Rowling's name from used "Harry Potter" books and replacing not just the book covers with his own custom covers — but removing her name from the copyright pages and titles pages as well, according to SWNS reporting.

The individual has completed at least 30 newly "re-bound books" — offering them for sale in their newly bound form.

Artist Laur Flom, who runs a website in Canada, apparently started the project to "help out" any "Harry Potter" fans who find they have ethical issues with the author while reading her bestselling books.

Flom began the work a year ago, saying his motivation was the allegations of transphobia that were made against the British author, according to SWNS.

Rowling faced backlash a few years ago for comments that were considered by some to be controversial about the transgender community.

1673544747987.png
"Harry Potter" author J.K. Rowling. "Growing up when I did," said a 23-year-old "book artist" based in Toronto, "it was a given that you would read ‘Harry Potter.’" The "artist" removes Rowling's name from her books — and then resells them in newly bound form. (Dia Dipasupil)

Laur Flom told SWNS, "The project is spurred by her transphobia … I was [a fan]. Growing up when I did, it was a given that you would read ‘Harry Potter.’"

Flom added, however, that "after J.K Rowling's views on people like me came out, it left a bad taste in my mouth."

1673544838199.png
A bookbinder named Laur Flom in Toronto is shown removing pages from a J.K. Rowling "Harry Potter" book — so that Rowling's name is stripped out completely from the book, both inside and out. He then re-binds and resells the books to interested buyers. (SWNS)

He added, "It raised questions about the ethics of consuming her work."

‘Creating a safe space’​

Flom said that "the purpose of this project is to create a safe space for fans to find comfort in the books and critically engage with J.K Rowling's work."

In order to "recreate" the books, Flom — who also reportedly works as a bartender — seeks out secondhand copies of the "Harry Potter" books.

"Just the fact that people have been interested makes me think that it's been successful."​


Flom then removes the covers and the copyright pages of the books — and replaces them with his own uniquely created versions, SWNS reported.

1673544938980.png
Laur Flom lives in Toronto, Canada, and said his "the project" was "spurred" by Rowling's "transphobia," as Flom termed it. (SWNS)

Each book apparently takes around 12 hours for Flom to re-bind — not including the time it takes for him to package the books and send them off to buyers.

Flom reportedly sells each newly bound book for about $170. For a set of seven, he charges roughly $1,200.

A portion of each sale is donated to charities that serve the transgender community, according to SWNS.

1673545036442.png
Laur Flom began a project involving J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter" books in January 2022, SWNS reported. (SWNS)

The book work has not occurred without controversy.

Flom told SWNS, "[The reactions are] mostly good. The majority of my comments are positive — my last video reached a strange part of TikTok and reactions were mixed, but mostly good."

Flom added, "I would hope that the impact of my project is just to bring light to [Rowling's] transphobia and to make people aware of the things she has said … I get so many comments just asking what she had done."

1673545114331.png
Bookbinder Laur Flom has posted videos on TikTok about his "Harry Potter" bookbinding project. He describes himself as a "printmaker, book artist and Taylor Swift fan based in Toronto, Ontario." (SWNS)

He also said, "Just the fact that people have been interested makes me think that it's been successful."

Fox News Digital reached out to Flom for comment.

On his website, Flom describes himself as "a printmaker, book artist and Taylor Swift fan based in Toronto, Ontario."

"My practice is largely conceptual."​


He also says, "My practice is largely conceptual, exploring themes surrounding identity, memory and trans masculinity. I also occasionally rebind Harry Potter books."
He says on the site as well, "Send in your personal copies to be rebound, restored and de-Rowlinged."

Scholastic published Rowling's very first "Harry Potter" book in the U.S. in September 1998. That book was "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone." (In the U.K., that book was published as "Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone.")

The publisher, on its website, says that more than 500 million copies of the "Harry Potter" book series have been sold worldwide to date.

More than 180 million copies have been sold in the U.S. alone, it also says.

Adds Scholastic, "If all the ‘Harry Potter’ books ever sold were placed end to end, they would go around the equator over 16 times."

Maureen Mackey is managing editor of lifestyle for Fox News Digital.

Source (Archive)

SWNS video:
 
"Hi there could you rebind HP and the Chamber of Secrets for me?"
"Title needs to be Harry Potter : Klein aber schon durchgerammelt"
"by the author Jens Kurt Rohling"

"Oh hey, I checked out that cool looking book on your shelf, Harry Potter and the something or another. I couldn't find the author, so I googled it. That J.K. Rowling sure sounds based, I should check out other things she's done."
Rebinding well known books is the stupidest waste of time there is especially if they keep the freaking title.

Btw even with a different book binding "you'll never be a real book, your binding is false no matter how much you remove of yourself you'll still be written by the Queen of TERFs"
 
A fun thing to do is take a quote from Mein Kampf and attribute it to somebody else.

"Those who want to live, let them fight, and those who do not want to fight in this world of eternal struggle do not deserve to live." - Malcolm X
That reminds me of a guy who trolled an Antifa rally (with his friend who was filming) by reading Hitler quotes in a open mic and the crowd, oblivious to who said the quotes, mindlessly cheered him. Too bad the video has likely been scrubbed from YouTube.
 
Whenever some faggot tries and talk about "being civil", "being the bigger person", "showing a little compassion" or similar to try and get you to take the complaints from these people seriously or worse apologize to them, always bring up J.K. Rowling.

Literal peak woke woman, billions in charity and help, complete adherence to the orthodoxy for 20 years. And a single slight disagreement was all it took for her to be reduced to being the exact same as all those literal Hitlers that she helped them fight.
 
This is low and pitiful.... even for troons/faggots/letter people! Which is saying something!

Is this even legal?

But holy shit either way... still giving the woman money... as usual they haven't thought this through very well or at all! LOL

Here's hoping the person gets sick from the glue/ink.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elim Garak
removing the author's name from the cover doesn't remove the author from the book itself, just like how taking hormones and putting on a dress will never make you a woman

funny how somebody thought this was worth writing up given that he's only sold 30 copies? smells like bait
 
Q: Where are you obtaining these books?

A: I'm purchasing them from the bookstore.

Q: So Rowling is still receiving royalties?

View attachment 4248928
They actually do have an answer for that, IE that phase two is to "find a way to fuck over Rowlings so she never gets a single dime off the Harry Potter franchise ever again". By way of demanding Discovery find a way to steal the entire Harry Potter franchise away from Rowlings in a way where she gets raped with no lube or financial compensation for her work being taken from her and permanently owned by the left's corporate overlords.

It's why these assholes desperately want a Harry Potter reboot where Rowlings is 100% locked out of the creative process and where Discovery will fuck her over so that they keep every single dime the reboot mades/Rowlings gets nothing. And for the original Potter films to be pulled from stream/circulation as physical discs, so that they become lost media and the reboot the only version you can watch/buy so that Rowlings further gets raped financially.
 
They actually do have an answer for that, IE that phase two is to "find a way to fuck over Rowlings so she never gets a single dime off the Harry Potter franchise ever again". By way of demanding Discovery find a way to steal the entire Harry Potter franchise away from Rowlings in a way where she gets raped with no lube or financial compensation for her work being taken from her and permanently owned by the left's corporate overlords.

Thanks to the Mouse, it's going to be incredibly hard for them to do that until well after they've joined the 41%.

I sincerely doubt her lawyers/agent/etc. will go quietly into the night. Yeah, they can create derivative works or shit like Rings of Power, but doing a recreation of the core HP franchise is gonna be next to impossible, barring Rowling going 1000% shitlord.

It's why these assholes desperately want a Harry Potter reboot where Rowlings is 100% locked out of the creative process and where Discovery will fuck her over so that they keep every single dime the reboot mades/Rowlings gets nothing. And for the original Potter films to be pulled from stream/circulation as physical discs, so that they become lost media and the reboot the only version you can watch/buy so that Rowlings further gets raped financially.

George Lucas' 'Han shot first!' legacy lives on with hatchet-wound survivors. But, like Lucas, she owns the rights. WB is simply licensing them out.

Unsurprisingly, the idiots who don't understand basic biology don't understand basic copyright. Cope, seethe, etc.
 
I love how much control Harry Potter, and subsequently JK Rowling have over these freaks' lives.

Even if they hate her so much they have to try to physically scrub her name from existence, they still have to consume her works. There's living rent-free in people's heads, and then there's whatever this is.
Remember when a bunch of people tried to rename Quidditch (the sport where people run around with a broom between their legs) because she said something mildly controversial on Twitter? As far as I know, the name change hasn't caught on. The fact that Rowling created the sport makes them angry, and the fact that the general public will still remember it as Quidditch officially and credits her as the creator (without caring about the Twitter drama at all) makes them even angrier.
 
Re: the time/cost per book being 12 hours / 170 230 canuck bucks.

This isn't news, but the early books are shorter than the late books. That applies to these derivatives too, there's no gradeschool/Hermione style fuckery of playing with font sizes to normalize the page count.

Untitled-1+copy.jpg

Well maybe some fuckery. Do the books really get smaller after book 5?

Whatever the case, the big books are like 3x the size of the small books. And yet there is allegedly a flat rate per volume, the big book doesn't take 3x as long or cost 3x as much?

My suspicion that the binding is glue intensive grows. Surely if it were a fancy hand stitching deal, the time cost would scale linearly to the page count and there would be a range of costs (based on the book size) listed.

Also I find it odd that there's a picture on the spine of the collection. That's the kind of thing I would expect from a box set, not an assortment of secondhand editions from potentially different printings. If a second set is made, and a different version of a middle book is used, won't that fuck up the image? Does that mean the hypothetical person buying the set book by book is going to get a graphic that doesn't line up perfectly?
 
Last edited:
This isn't news, but the early books are shorter than the late books. That applies to these derivatives too, there's no gradeschool/Hermione style fuckery of playing with font sizes to normalize the page count.

Well maybe some fuckery. Do the books really get smaller after book 5?
I'm not autistic enough to count lines of text but yes, the books do get smaller; it looks like the same formatting in books 6/7 as in 5, with 5 having the most pages (870 for book 5, 652 for book 6, 759 for book 7). I guess it also depends on what formats/editions of the books you compare to a degree.
 
Back