Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

  • šŸ• I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Thanks @A1 Steak Sauce for wading through Tony's tweets about state bills 🫔. Far too boring and tedious for me, for precisely this reason:
Surely this is an accurate interpretation guys? Surely Tony and Alex aren’t spreading lies again?

But then he tweeted something dumb about intersex conditions and the bat-signal turned on in my house.
ErinInTheMorn-1613703072546537473.pnglibsoftiktok-1613611840231071744.png
(twitter.com, archive.ph)

Tony said:
Chaya Raichik over at Libs of TikTok, like so many of her colleagues, seems to entirely believe intersex people do not exist. This is the what we are up against. She wants doctors to deny intersex people exist at all.

Which gives me an excuse to roll out one of Zach Elliot's great videos:
 
"Legislative Researcher" is a made up occuptation that only exists in the troon community.

Seriously, how is Tony even remotely qualified for his made up occupation? He has never set foot in a law school or a paralegal program. He has zero training on statutory interpretation, statutory construction, or concepts like RFRA, rational basis, intermedite scrutiny, or strict scrutiny. His only legal experience is as a convicted felon, a shitty parent, and a shitty spouse.

People keep citing this imbecile and having him on news shows as if he even has the foggiest idea what he is talking about. Never mind his very loose relationship with the truth.
My theory is that it’s plausible deniability. If you’re a reporter trying to push an agenda and you outright spout falsehoods, your career is over. At the very least, your reputation takes a hit.

But if you get someone who you ā€œhave reason to believeā€ is an expert, they spout those same falsehoods and they get exposed, you can throw your hands and declare yourself shocked and appalled.
 
My theory is that it’s plausible deniability. If you’re a reporter trying to push an agenda and you outright spout falsehoods, your career is over. At the very least, your reputation takes a hit.
Edit: Spoilered my post because it's really OT sperging.
Personally I don't even think it's that cynical. News organisations subconsciously select for people who believe the "right things", and the claims of people or organised campaigns who say things that broadly align with those beliefs will attract little scrutiny, because it seems to be the "natural" position. If those people or groups subsequently blow up, there's a lot of hand-wringing and wailing and gnashing of teeth but the cycle then repeats.

Here the "right thing" at issue is liberal identity politics, but it's not hard to find other topics where those who dissent from the dominant middle-class (not meant in the American sense) belief are treated as lunatics or bigots.

Foreign policy is an area where it's easy to see this in action. For instance, at the height of the Syrian civil war, the discussion in the liberal press in Britain (Graun, Independent, BBC) was all about the government needing to "do more to help Syrians" when anyone with half a brain and a memory longer than that of a goldfish could tell that the UK government was acting to make the conflict worse. But if you said that, no matter how much evidence you had, you were branded a conspiracy theorist and an apologist for Assad.

Same dynamic at play with transgenderism: society's "intellectuals" broadly just see it as an extension of gay rights, "be kind to people", etc etc. Disagree and you're a genocidal transphobe.
 
Have they even bothered examining their so-called "Gender Dysphoria" as a symptom of Schizophrenia? It's enough to look up cases of schizophrenic self-mutilation to see that a large portion of that is matching exactly what the so called "reassignment surgeries" are doing. You take a "gender dysphoric" patient, give him a 6 month course of nootropics such as racetams or non-racetam anti-neurodegenerative drugs, coupled with behavior therapy (i.e. boot camp with regimented daily activity) and you may get a very promising outcome. Nobody even bothers with that either, because no government will issue research grants on actually curing bullshit "diseases" because it hurts their electorate's feelings.

Someone did think of that. It worked.

Outcome: There was an excellent response to pimozide 2 mg daily, with a cessation of both cross-dressing and the wish for sex reassignment. When, after 1 year, the dose was reduced to 1 mg daily, there was a rapid return of the cross-dressing and the wish for sex reassignment. An increase in the dose again led to a remission which has been maintained since then.
Conclusion: Pharmacotherapy with pimozide should be considered in cases of doubtful gender dysphoria.
 
The paper is about just one person, though. I honestly don't think that "gender dysphoria" has much validity as a diagnosis, rather I think that it is a symptom of (many!) other underlying conditions.

Just think about all the people we see regularly in this thread: Tony trooned out because of his admitted sexual fetish (autogynephilia), Zac because (it seems) he's a self-hating gay man, Dylan because of autism. No point focusing on only treating the symptom of gender dysphoria.
 
The paper is about just one person, though. I honestly don't think that "gender dysphoria" has much validity as a diagnosis, rather I think that it is a symptom of (many!) other underlying conditions.

Just think about all the people we see regularly in this thread: Tony trooned out because of his admitted sexual fetish (autogynephilia), Zac because (it seems) he's a self-hating gay man, Dylan because of autism. No point focusing on only treating the symptom of gender dysphoria.

Yeah, but it could still be worth a try for some of them. But because we live in a backwards world any doctor who did that before fucking them up with hormones and chopping off body parts would be considered a monster.
 
Yeah, but it could still be worth a try for some of them. But because we live in a backwards world any doctor who did that before fucking them up with hormones and chopping off body parts would be considered a monster.
Oh yeah, I fully agree, just that those are likely to be the schizophrenics. But of course everything is now a gender problem.
 
View attachment 4253631
Surely this is an accurate interpretation guys? Surely Tony and Alex aren’t spreading lies again?
View attachment 4253635
I’m bored.
View attachment 4253636
Timothy Burke lives at 5914 N Tampa St Tampa, FL 33604 with Lynn Hurtak. That house is worth about $430k based on estimates. He can be contacted by email using the following:
bubbaprog@mchsi.com
tburke@online.emich.edu
oakley@mocksession.com
bubbaprog@yahoo.com
bubbaprog@mocksession.com
or by phone with the following:
(352) 222-2706 - Wireless
(740) 408-7423 - Wireless
(740) 452-4468 - Landline
(419) 592-8258 - Landline
(734) 482-7399 - Landline
(904) 329-4945 - Landline
(813) 597-8258 - Wireless
Timmy here was born on September 17, 1978. Journo dox over.

View attachment 4253655
Sure, Tony. Because enforcement isn’t a prt of the justice system after all (even if the law says this). Tbh they should do that with this movie and just replace it with the original.
(A)
View attachment 4253664View attachment 4253674
I swear Tony has selective reading. The 21 years old part is only with alcohol. Is that practically always true? Yeah, but details matter. Also, Tony needs to chill with how much he wants minors to see drag. I’m not sure how this even criminalizes troons outside of entertainment.
View attachment 4253666
The broad language is to likely prevent loopholes because they don’t give a shit about troons.
(A)
View attachment 4253667
BROKE PHI BROKE, HE AIN’T GOT IT. Seriously Tony, this is your job now and your going to the trans classic of e begging? Fucking pathetic, no wonder you got caught dealing.
(A)
View attachment 4253695
What are sex chromosomes then? (Note: I am not a scientist, feel free to correct me)
View attachment 4253698
So why does this matter?
(A)
View attachment 4253726View attachment 4253723
ā€œsevrealā€ ā€œonsā€ ā€œcoolsā€
View attachment 4253731View attachment 4253767
This bill sucks for sure. Blatant free speech violation that uses education and the culture war as an excuse for that overstep. This should fail just off of the principles of the Constitution.
(A)
There are several legit websites that track every bill being put forth. Yes, it requires time and effort to actually read the bills in order to stay on top of them, but I guess that's expecting too much for a 'legislative researcher'. Erin REEEd is so goddamn lazy. What is he being hired to do if he cannot keep track of and analyze bills without receiving tips first? He's getting paid to retweet shit at this point lol
 
What is he being hired to do if he cannot keep track of and analyze bills without receiving tips first?
I am curious about Tony’s sources of income, it’s all a bit nebulous at the moment. He’s been doing (allegedly) this work for the Transformations Project for a while, but presumably that’s voluntary. He’s said, without details, that he’s done talks to corporate employee resource groups, but I imagine that’s not on the minutiae of state bills. Most relevantly, Substack marks his newsletter as having hundreds of paid subscribers, which could be anything from $5,000 to $50,000 a year (before Substack’s cut). Presumably he’s not notable enough to have received one of Substack’s $250,000 advances.

Thing is, he uses Legiscan, which has a paid plan. Why wouldn’t you include and budget for that as a business expense when you were planning your new vocation as a trans freedom fighter?

Anyway, Tony shares a strategy for defeating the bills:
CBA87D14-EC0F-405E-8676-104230768165.jpeg
(source, archive)

ā€œMedical decisions should be left between doctors and families, keep the government outā€ just reminds me of opponents of the US Affordable Care Act talking about ā€œdeath panelsā€.

But if Tony truly believes that, surely he supports the abolition of the FDA and all related legislation back to the 1906 Food and Drug Act?
 
"Medical decisions should be left between doctors and families, keep the government out of it"...unless the person in question is a minor then the government should keep the family out of it.

The equation is simple. If it produces a new troon: good.

You know, I don’t even think Tony particularly wants to screw chemically stunted adult-children. It’s almost worse. He just wants plenty of young people in the background of his Pride selfies.
 
I am curious about Tony’s sources of income, it’s all a bit nebulous at the moment. He’s been doing (allegedly) this work for the Transformations Project for a while, but presumably that’s voluntary. He’s said, without details, that he’s done talks to corporate employee resource groups, but I imagine that’s not on the minutiae of state bills. Most relevantly, Substack marks his newsletter as having hundreds of paid subscribers, which could be anything from $5,000 to $50,000 a year (before Substack’s cut). Presumably he’s not notable enough to have received one of Substack’s $250,000 advances.

Thing is, he uses Legiscan, which has a paid plan. Why wouldn’t you include and budget for that as a business expense when you were planning your new vocation as a trans freedom fighter?

Anyway, Tony shares a strategy for defeating the bills:
View attachment 4256256
(source, archive)

ā€œMedical decisions should be left between doctors and families, keep the government outā€ just reminds me of opponents of the US Affordable Care Act talking about ā€œdeath panelsā€.

But if Tony truly believes that, surely he supports the abolition of the FDA and all related legislation back to the 1906 Food and Drug Act?
ERG gigs are extremely well-paid and EASY. Tone develops one slide deck, accepts a Zoom invitation, trowels on some makeup, turns his head to achieve The Angle, and sibilants through a presentation he's given dozens of times. If he gets two of those a month plus the Substack grifting, he'll have enough money for bad fashions and L'Oreal (and for his poor kiddo...hopefully).
 
The equation is simple. If it produces a new troon: good.

You know, I don’t even think Tony particularly wants to screw chemically stunted adult-children. It’s almost worse. He just wants plenty of young people in the background of his Pride selfies.
Even the non-pedo troons seem to have this obsession with youth. I put it down to arrested development and an inability to relate to the adult world.
 
Wow! Suddeny Tony is against using GoFundMe in child custody disputes after using it to grift his way through his own custody barttle. Way to stay consistent asshonk!

https://twitter.com/erininthemorn/status/1537537987793281026

ERG gigs are extremely well-paid and EASY. Tone develops one slide deck, accepts a Zoom invitation, trowels on some makeup, turns his head to achieve The Angle, and sibilants through a presentation he's given dozens of times. If he gets two of those a month plus the Substack grifting, he'll have enough money for bad fashions and L'Oreal (and for his poor kiddo...hopefully).
I'm not convinced that anyone actually pays for Tony's substack. Notably missing from his page is any pricing information or payment method information.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The math doesn't make a lot of sense. To me, "hundreds of subscribers: = <1,000. 500 subscribers would be a tad over 2 grand a month. How does Tony support himself, a kid, plus the troon out expenses on 2k a month?
Well, yes, hence:
I am curious about Tony’s sources of income, it’s all a bit nebulous at the moment.

A rare troon warns about bad actors in the community who "propagate misinformation" and are "stoking fear". It's one of Dylan Herrada / Eva Herrada's boyfriends, kateisdeflate:
kateisdeflate-1613987031339917312.png
(twitter.com, archive.ph)

What kind of misinformation?
kateisdeflate said:
this can be seen in numerous cases such as the recent controversies over the ā€œsubstation attacksā€, the overblowing of the texas gender marker change list (which doesn’t exist), and stoking fear over legislation which has no chance of passing.
:thinking:

Just three months until kateisdeflate gets his balls removed. Looking, er, very womanly:
mug-tony.jpg

Sorry! Wrong picture.
mug-kateisdeflate.jpg

kateisdeflate-1613972998502875138.pngmedia_FmX74tJWABYp701.jpg
Twitter. No archive as archive.today's being really flaky for me right now.
 
Last edited:
Back