Libertarianism is only one of two things.
I dunno about the Jew thing, but it eats at me every time something gets co-opted by retards and people feel the need to abandon identification with something.
Or what about Nick reminding us how he is a REAL libertarian and Jack Murphy is just a libertine who THINKS he's a libertarian?
Hate to point this out, buddy, but you’re a stranger on the internet and he owes you nothing.
"real" libertarians should read Jefferson. If they agree with him then call themselves Jeffersonians. If they don't agree with him call themselves Laissez-Faire guys.
Don't remember the exact episode number, but it's the one titled 'One of the good ones', I think it involved a libertarian tranny.
Jefferson was a liberal in the vein of John Locke. What we now know as classic liberal.
That, however, isn't why people adopt it. As a rule, Libertarianism is something people cleave to after their authoritarian morality is ripped out from under them and they don't have any sort of rational basis for their life, so they cleave to the notion that they have an inherent right to life, liberty, and property .... and nothing else. They have no ethical standard beyond that nor obligation to anybody. They may make some handwavium about how you can still have your ethics and be Libertarian, but literally no one ever does. They accept the bare minimum they need to get by in society, and never bother to develop any sort of ethos, and so descend into degeneracy ... or they realize that trap, develop an ethos, and cease identifying as a Libertarian.
Hey Ron Paul isn't dead yet.
That sounds like you got your view about what Libertarianism is from Reason Magazine.
Because that worked out so well.
Considering when he said that everyone changed it to ‘against the wall’ which was not what he said he very well could have had a different mraning. And that was his point. The people taking offense at it did not know what he meant and never bothered to ask. They literally made up entirely different context.
Yeah I strongly defended Nick for this incident, even if it wasn't the wisest thing for him to say. IIRC he said "you go on the wall next to all the other pedophiles and groomers", which was wildly exaggerated by Keffals into "you should be put against a wall and shot"
Yeah, it's clear he meant he was referring to executing them via firing squad.
The reference here is at least in part probably to the intellectual father of libertarianism Murray Rothbard along with Ludwig von Mises and certain others. Ayn Rand is also somewhat related. They were absolutely intent on subverting and replacing various forms of liberal and conservative political ideologies that came before them.
Exactly he tried to use Jewish lawyer tricks to weasel out of that one but it didn’t work.
We're adults and well past pretending to be retarded being an actual defense. We all know what he meant, and we know why he tried to weasel out of it. If you want to defend why he was lying about the meaning that is perfectly understandable, but acting like "he could have meant something different" is fucking embarrassing.
Defaulting on it right out of the gate doesn't exactly inspire confidence.
If that happened that's not just weird, it's an ethics violation for an attorney representing a client to contact a represented party directly. MN RPC 4.2. And he is representing a client, even though it's his own LLC.
