Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Pomniman]

Nick regualrly only welcomes certain females in the chat, nothing weird to see. I've seen it before, don't know if I captured it before though, so here you go.

That one bitch posting her pawprinted up ass and unwashed asscrack... just grimy. This is getting into scat fetishist-tier degeneracy.

 

[Twitter Is Cancer]

I read the case filing and a local news story about it, and I'm kind of with the judge on this one. This woman ruined a whole family's life, along with putting their employees out of work, due to her thievery, which was around $500,000 in crane bucks. While I like the tactic of her pleading guilty to a few counts so that she can stay out of prison and work to pay back the restitution, this chick has already proven that she knows how to cook the books -- she would always claim that she can't pay anything back while walking fancy free. With this in mind, I completely understand the judge throwing the book at this hambeast for ruining multiple lives. Nick did what he could, but she had it coming, and the judge was pissed about the destruction left behind.

I probably wouldn't recommend Nick giving the judge a piece of his mind, but he saw it as backing his client up, and he thinks he's the smartest person in any room, so that's the kind of outburst that is very on-brand for him. I'm sure his magic starfish puckered up nice and tight when he saw her name as the judge on this lawsuit, though.

I would question why mister ethical Rekieta would represent such a person in the first place. He doesn't have a law practice worth a damn so it's not like people queue up in his office waiting to be seen and everything's desperately urgent. He has basically no clients ever so why her and why then? Some big libertarian reason? Rubbish.

An examination of the why and the how of his representation of this scumbag would be appropriate before trusting anything Balldo Jew says about it.

 

[Potatoherder]

There is a slight difference between "a joke" and using it with three rings to fuck someone. It was a joke because it was retarded and whoever would use one would be retarded and sad.

So he is saying his sex life is a joke and it's worth mockery? I just find it gross but it's also a bit of a joke that 42 year old man needs to wear a cuck cage and talk about it on the internet.

 

[Kopasea]

That one bitch posting her pawprinted up ass and unwashed asscrack... just grimy. This is getting into scat fetishist-tier degeneracy.

That's EgalitarianBitch. Art's wife.

But he's totally not a cuck guys

 

[sum ting wong]

View attachment 4278931

This nigga actually did the "that's not happening and if it did it's good" meme

View attachment 4278936View attachment 4278937

Because joking about cartoon dicks is the same as doing a legitimate review for a rubber prison for your balls that you shove inside your wife.

View attachment 4279125

Which of the 7 dwarves is this?

View attachment 4279127View attachment 4279131

My theory for icancook is that it's actually some horny pajeet man, no normal person types like that.

View attachment 4279152

Grandma hands

View attachment 4279163

RIP ApexAutist, you will be missed

View attachment 4279166

Metal mouth

View attachment 4279184

Simp harder CGoody

View attachment 4278909

A new character appears

View attachment 4278923

Please ramp things up, this is getting exciting

View attachment 4278964

Fair enough

I thought things were calming down for a bit but looks like we're just getting started. Excited for the future

 

[ColinQuinnsStent]

My theory for icancook is that it's actually some horny pajeet man, no normal person types like that.

She talks like one of those lolsorandom holds up spork Invader Zim obsessed kind of girls from the mid-2000s who refuses to let it go.

 

[Irrational Exuberance]

Leave the meme filks to the professionals, sir...

Here, start with this and refine your work - if it matters to you.

You're retarded, Mr. Nick.
You're really quite a tool!
You're a drunkard and perverted - and you're rather slothful too, Mr. Niii-ick!

 

[sneedem&feedem]

See that makes FAR more sense which makes me wonder if the farms is getting its wires crossed or Nick is being obtuse on purpose making "factual" statements, but the context leads you to think something different. Fucking lawyers.

The only person who has lost the plot is Nick himself.

 

[Twitter Is Cancer]

"

The only person who has lost the plot is Nick himself.

habitual liar or serial idiot?

 

[Not Who You Think]

Nick rejects the premise without engaging with the evidence. He seems to be (still) in denial:

Nick's habit of defining things in terms of usefulness is interesting/disappointing. The information may not be flattering, but it would be useful to someone who is not as submissive to their own ego as Nick is.

Again, Nick is somehow able to know evaluate evidence without even seeing it for himself (probably like how he stopped paying attention to his KF thread):

In any case, reality seems to be a matter of convenience to Nick. I look forward to his progress and if/how it can be discerned if he is cognizant of his hypocrisy or if he is an "honest" hypocrite (aka, too dumb/defensive to realize what he is).

 

[AnOminous]

I'm intrigued why anyone actually believes anything Rekieta says, especially when he casts himself in such a heroic selfless role.

Well, the judge literally punished the defendant for taking a plea deal and more or less said so:

“You didn’t even plead guilty to all the things you were accused of. You have not taken full responsibility, but you will,” Fischer said before pronouncing the sentences.

Bookkeeper whose thefts ruined two New London, Minnesota, businesses to serve prison time

A plea from Melanie Daniel, 51, to avoid prison for stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars, was rejected. The court sentenced her to the Commissioner of Corrections for 49 months, with a minimum of 32 2/3 months in prison.

www.wctrib.com

That's some genuinely improper shit and might even constitute reversible error, not that Nick seems to have done anything about it at the time other than spout off.

He also says he uploaded videos to the court's exhibit system. Unfortunately, that is a limited cloud system that only allows access by the filing party and court personnel--neither Rackets nor us can see what was uploaded. Schneider should have served the videos on Rackets, but we don't know if he did.

The sufficiency of the complaint isn't judged on extraneous other documents later filed. Unless this is yet another weird Minnesota thing. Adding claims in a motion for default that should have been in the complaint means the defendant never even had the chance to respond to them.

Monty's lawyer claims to have uploaded video of Nick claiming that Monty "has always been into sucking little boys cocks." If that's true, surely that meets the bar for sufficiently defamatory and specific?

It would seem to, but that isn't in the complaint. Monty will probably be granted leave to amend if Nick doesn't fuck it up so badly that he gets a default judgment against him and the court decides he doesn't get to set it aside for "excusable neglect" or whatever excuse Nick has (or the fact that the motion for default itself was served to the wrong address).

I don't really blame Monty's lawyers for ghosting Nick. This case is about Nick's streaming about Monty.

They're literally violating ethics rules by doing that. The parties are supposed to communicate on these issues, because the court wasn't even involved yet. Refusing to communicate and then instead just filing a default is crackpot bullshit.

Just blowing off the opposing party is highly unethical. Even a rude response would comply with the rules.

Assuming they're aware of that information, I don't blame them for waiting for this to get in front of a judge before discussing anything with a defendant who may or may not be represented by counsel.

That's probably their excuse but if that were the case they should have cleared it up instead of just improperly filing a motion for default while adding new claims that weren't even in the complaint.

Isn't that more or less what the opinion of this thread has become where Nick Rekieta is concerned?

That's a direct cut and paste of an element of the emotional distress torts, so at least they got that part right.

There are like five guys in MN who specialize in representing other lawyers before the Board. They are all low-key grinders who do nothing but save lawyer's butts when they've fucked up.

On the other hand, Randazza does indeed have personal experience with bar discipline processes, albeit not in Minnesota.

 

[zyclonPD]

Literally who? I was a fan for 4 years, point to these people who have been there 3 years and love a 5 hour shit fest of toasts and complaining about kids? I don't see them. I see a bunch of 50 year old slag whore hags with more moles and age marks than sense who jumped on a few months ago as they fanned their stank crotches to Depp. Literally who are these alleged 3 year fans?


How dare people come to the chat that I advertise and pull comments from live to understand why my show has turned to fucking garbage. How dare them want to find the source of the rot.

The rabbit hole eh? Yeah those sad saps who liked legal topics just needs dads because of my mental gymnastics. No its not the people who donate $20 for a toast for their dead hamster because they have no friends to talk to. No the parasocial relationship can't be coming from inside the house, it has to be coming from outside. Bro look at your own audience you have right now and what they post? Who is the desperate parasocial weirdos? I've never had to post genitals to strangers on the Internet for validation but the people you currently court do. How that for a rabbit hole retard?

You already said you are bored of covering cases because apparently the audience you built doing that who funded you there and got you 500k sub's just weren't good enough anymore. You don't want to "keep" them happy, you want them to eat the slop you call a show now and not rock the boat by saying the show is shit.

How do you even know the "pull up" line or that its in reference to a plane crashing if you didn't watch it. I thought lawyers were better liars Nick?

 

[AnOminous]

You don't want to "keep" them happy, you want them to eat the slop you call a show now and not rock the boat by saying the show is shit.

Eat the bugs, bigot.

 

[talk talk talk]

The sufficiency of the complaint isn't judged on extraneous other documents later filed. Unless this is yet another weird Minnesota thing. Adding claims in a motion for default that should have been in the complaint means the defendant never even had the chance to respond to them.

It should be a normal Rule 12 analysis of the four corners of the complaint.

I pulled a couple district court defamation cases today and they all tend to be this bad. And they also tend to have the plaintiff's lawyer trying to get extra stuff before the court in affidavits. Reading them, I was thinking, "WTF? Didn't you read a single modern MN defamation case so you know what NOT to do?"

 

[Potatoherder]

Seems the drop on youtube continues. I will however note he has been gaining on rumble as i last recall him being at 105k and he's now on 108k.

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

How do you even know the "pull up" line or that its in reference to a plane crashing if you didn't watch it. I thought lawyers were better liars Nick?

Honestly, Nick is just a bad liar. Like when the Keffals thing happened and he was stretching to make an argument that "on the wall" didn't connote "putting up against the wall and executing." Those arguments were cringe and everyone knew they were practically dumb, regardless of their legal efficacy. This is obviously another lie. Maybe he didn't watch the full stream, but obviously he watched the relevant part. It's not like Null is an unknown quantity to Nick or a minor reply guy trying to get views. I would believe not watching Clairebere's videos. I absolutely do not believe he didn't watch at least the clip Null's stream (which that Elissa woman clipped on her channel).

 

[AnOminous]

It should be a normal Rule 12 analysis of the four corners of the complaint.

I pulled a couple district court defamation cases today and they all tend to be this bad. And they also tend to have the plaintiff's lawyer trying to get extra stuff before the court in affidavits. Reading them, I was thinking, "WTF? Didn't you read a single modern MN defamation case so you know what NOT to do?"

You even see that shit in federal court, where the defense lawyer throws shit into affidavits and inadvertently converts their Rule 12 motion into a Rule 56 motion.

Those arguments were cringe and everyone knew they were practically dumb, regardless of their legal efficacy.

Remember when Bill Clinton got the judge to approve a self-serving definition of "sexual relations" just so he could say "I did not have sexual relations with that woman?" Same deal. Maybe you dodge the perjury rap but you look like a giant piece of shit.

 

[chudbere]

Literally who are these alleged 3 year fans?

They are talking about me in this convo and the streams I have done about this lately. I think Cynthia is trying to defend me and Nick is saying he doesn't care what me or anyone else think

 

[Darkholme's Dungeon]

They are talking about me in this convo and the streams I have done about this lately. I think Cynthia is trying to defend me and Nick is saying he doesn't care what me or anyone else think

He cares enough to respond about it.

 

[Car Won't Crank]

The only person who has lost the plot is Nick himself.

So do we have two detractor channels now? Elissa clips and now Pepsi man? I recall some Pepsi named user being a frequent paying superchatter on the older streams.