Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Pat doesn't feel guilty for planning to murder his daughter and wife:

001.png
 
Putting up the archive of this very choice exchange.
1673934493635.png

L - A
ETA: Justin retweeting the Pig is funny because it takes the wind out of his sails and makes it harder for his fat-yet-small brain to keep up, but also harder to document the full exchange. Anyhow, I'm sure Pat has french fry scented steam coming out of his ears at the moment.
 
He was going to murder his own kid. What a colossal piece of shit.

View attachment 4279298

We're almost five years into the Patposting business. How the fuck did this lay dormant until now?
@Caverlock can you add this to the thread's subtitle, please? I think, everyone should know this. Otherwise, I am fucking speechless, this goes far beyond your typical twitter spergery and retardation.
 
He pleaded no contest because he admitted to the cops that he threatened his ex's new boyfriend's life and denied the ex-wife/newborn baby death threats (Jesus Christ....). He could have walked away from this whole thing, perhaps, by just denying it all.

Pat doesn't feel guilty for planning to murder his daughter and wife:

View attachment 4282518
If none of that was true, then why did Fatty plead no contest to it?

More importantly, why did he surrender all parental rights? He is legally no longer even related to his (genetic) daughter. That's how much of a piece of shit this utter worm is.
 
If Pat is really being swatted all these times, maybe the police aren't idiots responding like this psycho freak actually could commit a massacre. After all, he's threatened to do it in the past. Maybe he's been a person of interest for some time and they correctly think he could snap at any time.
I wish they had tossed a flashbang onto the fart couch and billy-clubbed this fat faggot son of a bitch.

All his fucking grandstanding, and he turns out to be a wannabe child killer. Fuck him with the fury of a thousand suns.
 
If none of that was true, then why did Fatty plead no contest to it?

More importantly, why did he surrender all parental rights? He is legally no longer even related to his (genetic) daughter. That's how much of a piece of shit this utter worm is.
Baby infant tiny child, there was no contest since I had already won, your small stalker mind cannot comprehend that fact.
 
Wrong, baby child, the real question is why isn't a "true crime" podcast working with admitted criminal Patirck S. Tomlinson rather than with alleged unindicted coconspirators not under active investigation but with $30,000 of Patirck S. Tomlinson's debt? Give a solidarity answer, Justin!
 
Even Johnny fucking Rotten could see through it.
He listed Mick Jagger, but that was half-joking. When he gets to Jimmy Savile, he's serious.

And this was 1978.
Don't forget that accusations against Saville went nowhere for reasons.

Like this one.
1673935714066.png


Or this one.
1673935756521.png


Didn't even need to off himself in a psychiatric ward, like Epstein.
 
What the fuck is a "solidarity answer", you fat cunt? Go fuck yourself.

I know you read this thread, Fatrick. And I hope Nikki flees, so that you spend the rest of your days miserable and alone, fighting with aTalkers on Twitter. It's all you have, and it's all you care about, you gay fat sack of shit.
 
Last edited:
More importantly, why did he surrender all parental rights? He is legally no longer even related to his (genetic) daughter. That's how much of a piece of shit this utter worm is.

Not just parental rights, parental obligations as well. That's the state saying "We'd rather spend taxpayer money on taking care of this child if something happens to the mother than letting Pat anywhere near her."
 
I love how every Brit pretended they knew this guy was a pedo the instant he was dead, but nothing up until then.

When John Lydon pointed out he was a disgusting pervert and he wanted to kill him, he was banned off the BBC, in 1978.

I think he was unbanned at some point and then banned again for once again calling Jimmy Savile a pervert, but I can't track that down.

I forget what my point was.

Oh yeah, Patrick S. Tomlinson is fat.
Not just parental rights, parental obligations as well. That's the state saying "We'd rather spend taxpayer money on taking care of this child if something happens to the mother than letting Pat anywhere near her."
Those are paired. Even absolutely monstrous parents are allowed some rights, even if they are completely deprived of custodial rights.

To be completely relieved of parental obligations means you have completely surrendered all rights and all relations to the child. Courts do not generally allow these unless the person involved is an absolutely horrible person.

The state does not generally want to assume the obligation to take over the support of a child at taxpayer expense unless absolutely necessary. It is actually a very unusual event for a man like Patrick S. Tomlinson to be even able to surrender everything resembling parental responsibility or rights to the point the state would take over supporting his child.

Patrick S. Tomlinson is an absolute monster. His child is better off without him. This is what the state decided, and as terrifying as it is for the state ever to have that power, it was entirely correct to exercise it in this case.
 
Back