Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Poop Shoot]

In the Elissa clips video Drex says Nick has “assless chaps”?

Aren’t….aren’t all chaps assless?

 

[Balldo]

Just don't have randbot on, and don't react defiantly to people like me telling you that. He is dead fucking weight and killed the stream the other night stone dead.

Agreed. I liked the parts where Claire talked, but Rand is cancer. (note-at least Rand tried, the other two guys were narcolepsy cures) Just because Rand shits on awful people doesn't mean he isn't bottom barrel himself. He could make up for it by being funny, but he isn't. It's one of the most baffling things in the sektur: how many "personalities" there are who are discussed as if they were relevant when they bring zero to the table on air.

While Ralph, Dick, etc. are gross and mostly boring (Rackets is heading that way), you can at least see why people see them as entertaining and have at least enjoyed SOME of their content unironically. But Rand? Big Tech? Clodfelter? Beardson? Michael Alberto? Sartor? Cog? Vicious Vickers? Gator? Pegmenco? These aren't people who should be anywhere near a microphone, even at their local "open mic night".

Who the fuck watches this shit?

 

[Captain Manning]

https://kiwifarms.net/attachments/2023-01-17_00-31-png.4284790/ Wait, isn't Montegraph suing Nick because Nick called him a pedophile? Are these people incapable of seeing the similarities?

Yes. Yes they are.

And their excuse is that they don't watch or like Nick's earlier content. It's called willful ignorance, and it's also why they blindly believe he hasn't changed how he presents himself.

Also of note is that Nick has defended @FROG (with good reason) on his show with respect to being sued by @PocketJacks. I won't go into the full thing here (read the thread if you want), but at the heart of that one is pedo accusation as well. There was even a "wall" statement by Nick directed towards Preston's business partner that drew some very sussybaka lolicon artwork. Somebody here probably knows where that clip is if they wanna fish it out.

Art is just a dumb soyrage filled cuck who is there so his wife can share her lewds. I find him hilarious.

Art reminds me of one of Tonka Saw's audience members, the real johnka.

Come to think of it the wine moms were a Part of the Tonka Saw audience too. Tonka Law?

Were they? I didn't notice.

There were roughly two eras to Tonka's content. The genuinely enjoyable "Kumite Era" and the lame AF "post-Kumite era." I was too busy laughing at retards screaming at each other during the Kumite Era to notice chat much, and everything after that was insufferable to the point I didn't even bother to tune in. *dead air*

Hell, I don't even know what Tonka is up to these days. I'm not surprised he didn't respond to @chudbere though. He got so savagely beaten by everybody and the second cousin back in 2018 his Native American ancestors probably got bruises from it. I think even if he came out to shit on Nick, people would still remind him what a fag he was. There's no way he could get a redemption arc from this.

 

[Not Who You Think]

"Listen, Nick hasn't changed."
*Proceeds to justify how he's changed*
"People are just mad because they had some incorrect vision of him in their head that doesn't fit into the box they want"
*Proceeds to justify why he's had a shift in content and presentation of himself*

Listen, Nick and crew. The shit you're all catching is mostly because you faggots are trying to hold two positions at once. You're trying to say he hasn't changed while defending why it's ok that he did. Just admit that he's changed and say he's allowed to change and if people don't like it then he appreciates them being around for the ride so far but they can hop off now. It honestly is THAT simple. But they have this idea that "changing" is bad and thus they can't admit to it or....something bad will happen? Their egos will be damaged? You guys make yourselves look way more retarded by trying to pull off this double-speak.

Also, Legal Mindset talking about Internet fwendship at the end there is emblematic of an issue that is sure to turn out hilarious.

Drexel provides a hint as to why they can't admit to this change in the video:

The comparison of being a hypocrite caught out for degeneracy invites the comparison with Jack Murphy. Drexel even goes so far as to describe the Jack Murphy scenario in a way that ironically parallels the criticism of Nick. The difference in Drexel's mind seems to be that Jack Murphy projected his persona, while Nick never projected a persona and is just "one of the real ones". Funny stuff.

Drexel references how Nick called out the manosphere as frauds, which he did in late December (link to elissa here):

Note that he says all purveyors of the manosphere are grifters and its all pretend. When asked about Drexel directly, Nick points out Drexel's relationship as an indictment that proves his point. Nick also says he loves Drex and wishes him well (a social tax for pointing out his friend's hypocrisy).

In closing, Drexel would do well to remember that "Honest" Nick Rekieta said the entire manosphere (both people and ideals) was a grift, including Drexel.

Made a quick clip for easy reference (minor sound warning):

 

[Kopasea]

Nick talks about his Montegraph case. Elissa comes in clutch as usual

Montagraph v Rekieta Law: Why Nick’s filing pro se, the problem w/ Monty’s claims, & other things

Original stream https://rekietalaw.locals.com/upost/3370917/monday-night-hot-tub-time@Montagraph

www.youtube.com

 

[talk talk talk]

This is so mindboggling to me (given how dramatically different it is to the UK) that I had to Google it. This was the first case I turned up. Coincidentally, it's also a Minnesota case.

It seems to make the opposite claim to the one that you're making here. Am I misunderstanding something?

Briefly: Pat has an 18 year old girlfriend. Defendant calls him Pat The Paedophile online. Pat loses his job as a cop so sues defendent for calling him Pat the Paedo. Court enters judgement as a matter of law because calling someone a paedo is defamatory per se. and jury awards general damages and special damages. Special damages is overturned on appeal, the rest stands.

This bit in particular stood out to me:

"With this rule in mind, we hold that in almost every circumstance a reasonable listener would believe that calling a person a pedophile imputes serious sexual misconduct or criminal activity to that person. It is, therefore, defamatory per se."

Here: http://injurylawstpaul.com/messages/154.htm
A better, fuller discussion of the case here: https://casetext.com/case/longbehn-v-schoenrock-1
News coverage: https://www.pinejournal.com/news/former-moose-lake-police-officer-wins-retrial-in-defamation-lawsuit

I'd definitely be settling if it was me.

Most of this case is so old that there are no online records of the actual district court filings. The case bounced up and down at least three times to the court of appeals.

It looks like the end result is that Pat the (allegedly) pedophile got an award of $750.00.

Here's the docket sheet

 

[Kars den Karb]

"Listen, Nick hasn't changed."
*Proceeds to justify how he's changed*
"People are just mad because they had some incorrect vision of him in their head that doesn't fit into the box they want"
*Proceeds to justify why he's had a shift in content and presentation of himself*

Listen, Nick and crew. The shit you're all catching is mostly because you faggots are trying to hold two positions at once. You're trying to say he hasn't changed while defending why it's ok that he did. Just admit that he's changed and say he's allowed to change and if people don't like it then he appreciates them being around for the ride so far but they can hop off now. It honestly is THAT simple. But they have this idea that "changing" is bad and thus they can't admit to it or....something bad will happen? Their egos will be damaged? You guys make yourselves look way more retarded by trying to pull off this double-speak.

Also, Legal Mindset talking about Internet fwendship at the end there is emblematic of an issue that is sure to turn out hilarious.

So much of this could have been avoided if Nick just made one sincere effort to understand why people are ragging him.

 

[Annealing Crater]

The last story about balcony(?) or whatever I think originated from a poster on this thread who implied they were an eyewitness, and not a named source such as CRP or Ralph.

IIRC that poster was Had, who was a Dick Show caller/contributor until having a falling out with the diddler about some drama regarding show contributors and artists not being paid what they were promised.

 

[Twitter Is Cancer]

Montagraph v Rekieta Law: Why Nick’s filing pro se, the problem w/ Monty’s claims, & other things

Original stream https://rekietalaw.locals.com/upost/3370917/monday-night-hot-tub-time@Montagraph

www.youtube.com

Elissa clips shares another mikvah video where Rekieta (sans skullcap) lies his way through contradictory statements about his lawsuit. Boiling it down, he is representing himself, he has to behave himself and is raising a lot of spurious arguments himself. He also repeated all his alleged defamation again.

 

[Captain Manning]

IIRC that poster was Had, who was a Dick Show caller/contributor until having a falling out with the diddler about some drama regarding show contributors and artists not being paid what they were promised.

I know nothing about Had or his credibility.

All I'm saying is, when dealing with claims from people like CRP or Ralph, "proceed with caution." It's an intelligent move. Trust me. /Sermon.

Besides, it's almost beside the point, isn't it? CRP was incidentally proven right about Kayla being a "slatternly woman" from other things like the lingerie pics, the Hedonism II trip, the massage parlor story, etc. I think the thread already has them both dead to rights on the degeneracy now.

 

[chudbere]

I think even if he came out to shit on Nick

Oh I wasn't going to ask Donga about Nick, I was going to have some hardcore wrestling fans on to watch a replay of Ralphamania and do commentary lol. I thought Tonka making fun of Ralph's little wish-fulfillment party would have been funny.

 

[Yandex Captcha Solver]

Nick did another hottub stream last night as mentioned right before me. Here is him talking about drama.

• He talks about Null
• Grazes over his criticism
• Our wifes dragging him through the degen arc.. Which was discussed yesterday or the day before
• How he listens to some opinions if he knows the other person (just not Null)
• He doesn't listen to opinion/drama videos because they take things out of context

Spoiler: Chat logs

Here is a view of his tattoo

 

[Potatoherder]

The normie viewers are starting to notice the signs. Nick needs to start an ADL equivalent to shut it down.


She still says she watches the content and his drama and coping is making the experience worse for her.

 

[TexOffender]

This video from a year ago with hardly any views or subscribers hit one of my feeds. Gets interesting at the 7 minute mark.

 

[Captain Manning]

Nick did another hottub stream last night as mentioned right before me. Here is him talking about drama.

• He talks about Null
• Grazes over his criticism
• Our wifes dragging him through the degen arc.. Which was discussed yesterday or the day before
• How he listens to some opinions if he knows the other person (just not Null)
• He doesn't listen to opinion/drama videos because they take things out of context

View attachment 4285967

Grazes over the criticism is right. I'd like to hear @Null's take on the above 2 minute video clip, if he's willing. Specifically WRT the conversation Nick said they had.

I'm gonna take a wild ass guess that Null offered a much better explanation to Nick than vaguely disapproving of how "[Nick] interacts with [his] Locals community." The Null I read on this site here isn't vague like that. He hasn't been on his MATI videos either. The impression I've always gotten is if he doesn't like something or somebody, he'll tell you why.

My point is Nick is going out of his way to ignore the substantive points that are being raised by so many people now. Much to his continued determent. It feels like he's even had to call in all the capos to help perform damage control (see Drex and LM clips above).

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

This video from a year ago with hardly any views or subscribers hit one of my feeds. Gets interesting at the 7 minute mark.

Literally fuck all who is this? Former Jack Murphy supporter turned Nick detractor? Had I seen this a year ago I would have called him autistic and wrong, but I guess now I'll just call him autistic.

Is he our Nosetradamus? Predicting Nick's downfall well before it started? Or is Nick just falling down the same tired mountain path of every other internet famous lolcow and he picked up on the pattern early.

Are his other videos worth anything or is this all he has to offer?

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Nick did another hottub stream last night as mentioned right before me. Here is him talking about drama.

• He talks about Null
• Grazes over his criticism
• Our wifes dragging him through the degen arc.. Which was discussed yesterday or the day before
• How he listens to some opinions if he knows the other person (just not Null)
• He doesn't listen to opinion/drama videos because they take things out of context

View attachment 4285967

Spoiler: Chat logs

View attachment 4285978View attachment 4285981View attachment 4285982View attachment 4285985View attachment 4285986View attachment 4285989View attachment 4285991View attachment 4285992View attachment 4285994View attachment 4285997View attachment 4285999View attachment 4286002View attachment 4286006View attachment 4286008View attachment 4286011

Here is a view of his tattoo
View attachment 4286027

"I don't know if anymore if I'm a liar, I'm a degenerate, I'm a hypocrite, or I interact with my Locals community in a way other people don't like".

"And", Nick, Not "or".

This video from a year ago with hardly any views or subscribers hit one of my feeds. Gets interesting at the 7 minute mark.

A wild detractor appears!

Truly a prescient video.

 

[Skint]

View attachment 4285967

Love that nervous laugh. He's really trying.
So it basically boils down to - 'I will listen to advice unless it's coming from a detractor'? Solid argument. Dig in those heels, Nick. Dig them in and never let go.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

A wild detractor appears!

He has exactly 777 subscribers. It's a sign. He is Our Nosetradamus.

 

[2lolis1cup]

Do you have any more information as to bullet point (1)? Even a hint as to any video to check out?

I found his PLLC with respect to point 2, but nothing that would suggest an urgent need to shut up shop quickly.

Sorry, but not any specific time stamps. It seems d'Adesky has paywalled all of his recent streams.


I had found it before, but never kept a record. Now I will look for it again. I also don't think he was trying to leave quickly it just likely happened with the circumstances.