- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Not a huge fan of general denials because you run the risk of accidentally making absurd assertions like denying your own name or that you are an attorney.
Steve Quest (p/k/a Montagraph) vs. Nicholas Robert Rekieta & Rekieta Law, LLC (2023)
- Thread starter Useful_Mistake
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
Which he did say he was. But in this particular case it would have been far more constructive to just scribble "I deny everything, including my own name" on construction paper with a highlighter pen and submitted that then showing up 2 weeks late and gay with a lazy request for extension. or even better, filed for an extension BEFORE the time elapsed the same way. Maybe a bit more professionally with a Sharpi marker for writing instead.
Especially since like an idiot he talked about his case on his channel and said "he was retaining counsel". That gives the Plaintiffs attorney the perfect excuse for when the judge asks why he never responded to Rekieta's emails.
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2022
Nick just posted this to his Locals chat. It appears he has been granted an extension to answer the complaint until January 31st.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Nick scored a W, and his request was granted
Honka Honka Burning Love
In Clown World, the only god is the one who Honks.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
Nicky Rakkets finally got a Win, after losing 100 times.
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2019
What costs could the plaintiff have related to the extension?
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
At most whatever the Plaintiff spent on his motion for default
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2019
280000 dollars.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Where is the number from?
Also, that is in no way reasonable for a single horribly done motion
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
I dunno, he's being forced to pay Montagraph some money. If that's a W, it's a lower case w.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
Can confirm. J Shawn wrote the motion.
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2023
It's not going to be much money, but the fact that he now owes Montagraph any amount of money that he could have so easily avoided has me chuckling.
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2015
The filing fee for the motion for default was $75. I suppose they could claim that, but it's not really a direct cost.
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2019
Sir, I cannot think of a more direct cost.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
This isn't surprising and was more or less expected. Even having to file such a motion is embarrassing, though.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
As we have seen, there is no limit to how embarrassing Racket's behavior can be. I have no doubt it will get worse. Much worse.
Twitter Is Cancer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
TJBirish
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 21, 2019
This seems like a REALLY stupid thing to admit to in a defamation suit (from @TheSpectreRep)
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2019
It wouldn't be a LOLsuit without fatal defects in the pleadings.